Evaluation of the flaw depth using high-Tc SQUID
Introduction
In last decade, many researchers have made efforts to develop the SQUID-based nondestructive evaluation (NDE), which is a powerful tool for detecting deep flaws [1], [2]. Among many remarkable works [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], the method utilizing the sheet inducer was report to be useful for performing the phase-sensitive flaw detection with SQUIDs. The uniform excitation generated by the sheet inducer is advantageous for analyzing the eddy-current problem, but the spatial resolution is limited to the SQUID-to-sample distance because of the uniform excitation field. In contrast, the method using the differential coil exciter has achieved a better spatial resolution [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. But it is a challenge to use the differential coil exciter for the quantitative flaw evaluation because the anti-symmetric excitation field introduces a complex eddy-current problem. To avoid solving the complex eddy-current problem, we investigated the empirical relation between the defect field, which is the magnetic field due to the eddy current around a flaw, and the depth of the flaw in this work. The differential defect field was proposed to correlate the detected field with the depth and the position of flaws.
Section snippets
Experimental details
The electronics used for the SQUID NDE system was described elsewhere [8], [9]. The SQUID used in the system was a commercialized dc SQUID fabricated by Conductus Inc. The SQUID was mounted at 18 mm above the center of the differential coil exciter, where the excitation field generated by the differential coil exciter was zero. The distance from the sample to the differential coil exciter was 2 mm. To operate the system in the unshielded environment, we utilized a small μ-metal cylinder to
Results and discussion
The vertical component of the excitation field generated by the differential coil exciter was calculated according to the Biot–Savart law as shown in Fig. 1. The excitation current in the coil was 1 A, and the diameter of the coil exciters is D=28 mm. The symbol d shown in Fig. 1 represents the vertical distance measured from the plane of the coil to the SQUID, or to the sample beneath the coil. The excitation field, Bz, is found to be anti-symmetric with the zero amplitude at x=0 for various d
Conclusion
In conclusion, the evaluation of flaw depth was investigated by using the differential coil exciter. The magnitude and the phase of the differential defect field were correlated directly to the defect field. For the crack-like flaw with the width and the height much less than D, the phase of the differential defect field is useful in indicating the flaw depth at least for the flaw depth smaller than D. Using the differential defect field instead of the defect field is beneficial because the
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Science Council of ROC under grant no. NSC89-2112-M-003-040, and NSC89-2112-M-002-071.
References (9)
- et al.
Eddy current nondestructive material evaluation based on HTS SQUIDs
Physica C
(1997) - et al.
Nondestructive evaluation of flaws using SQUIDs
Physica C
(2000) - et al.
High-transition-temperature superconducting quantum interference devices
Rev. Mod. Phys.
(1999) - et al.
Review article: SQUIDs for nondestructive evaluation
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
(1997)
Cited by (12)
Depth-resolved eddy-current detection with GMR magnetometer
2006, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic MaterialsCrack detection for the graphite slab using the high-T<inf>c</inf> SQUID in unshielded environment
2002, Physica C: Superconductivity and its ApplicationsNoise characteristics of high-T<inf>c</inf> YBa<inf>2</inf>Cu<inf>3</inf>O<inf>y</inf> SQUID gradiometers
2002, Physica C: Superconductivity and its ApplicationsDetection of small cracks using high-T<inf>c</inf> SQUIDs in an unshielded environment
2002, Superconductor Science and TechnologyApplication of gmr based probe – for eddy current in flaw testing system
2021, Lecture Notes in Mechanical EngineeringMotion-induced eddy current techniques for non-destructive testing and evaluation
2018, Motion-Induced Eddy Current Techniques for Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation