Evaluation of a neural network classifier for pancreatic masses based on CT findings

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-6111(97)00006-2Get rights and content

Abstract

We have investigated a neural network classifier based on CT findings extracted by a radiologist for the differential diagnosis between the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and mass-forming pancreatitis, and compared its classification performance with that of Bayesian analysis, Hayashi's quantification method II, and radiologists. The three computerized classification methods were designed to classify categorized CT findings extracted by a radiologist, and were trained and tested on 71 cases. There was comparable performance between the neural the network, the Bayesian analysis, Hayashi's quantification method II, and the radiologists, in classifying pancreatic carcinoma and inflammatory mass.

Reference (39)

  • RedelmeierD.A. et al.

    Assessing predictive accuracy: how to compare Brier scores

    J. Clin. Epidemiol.

    (1991)
  • BergeronB.P. et al.

    Data qualification: Logic analysis applied toward neural network training

    Comput. Biol. Med.

    (1994)
  • NeffC.C. et al.

    Inflammatory pancreatic masses: problems in differentiating focal pancreatitis from carcinoma

    Radiology

    (1984)
  • FreenyP.C. et al.

    Pancreatic ductal carcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • LuetmerP.H. et al.

    Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • DelMaschioA. et al.

    Pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis with CA 19-9 assessment: US, CT, and CT-guided fine-needle biopsy

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • SchulteS.J. et al.

    Root of the superior mesenteric artery in pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma: evaluation with CT

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • MaclinP.S. et al.

    Using an artificial neural network to diagnose hepatic masses

    J. Med. Syst.

    (1992)
  • AsadaN. et al.

    Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • BooneJ.M. et al.

    Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: I. Introduction and illustration

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1990)
  • GrossG.W. et al.

    Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1990)
  • FujitaH. et al.

    Application of artificial neural network to computer-aided diagnosis of coronary artery disease in myocardial SPECT bull's-eye images

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1992)
  • MillerA.S. et al.

    Review of neural network applications in medical imaging and signal processing

    Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.

    (1992)
  • KippenhanJ.S. et al.

    Evaluation of a neural-network classifier for PET scans of normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1992)
  • ScottR.

    Artificial intelligence: its use in medical diagnosis

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1993)
  • TourassiG.D. et al.

    Acute pulmonary embolism: artificial neural network approach for diagnosis

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • ScottJ.A. et al.

    Neural network analysis of ventilation-perfusion lung scans

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • WuY. et al.

    Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • SieblerM. et al.

    Real-time identification of cerebral microemboli with US feature detection by a neural network

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • Cited by (19)

    • The use of intelligent database systems in acute pancreatitis e A systematic review

      2014, Pancreatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Analysis of both amylase and lipase together did not significantly enhance the accuracy at 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79–0.89). Ikeda et al. used radiological findings extracted from a radiology image database to differentiate mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and found ANN to be comparable to experienced radiologists [15]. Severity prediction was better with ANNs than APACHE II [12,19,32], modified Glasgow score (GS) [12,19] and Ranson's criteria [19].

    • Artificial neural networks

      2000, Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      They have demonstrated a superior diagnostic accuracy for the detection and classification of brain lesions49,50 and breast lesions51 on MRI. They also appear capable of evaluating pancreatic lesions on computed tomography52 and chronic liver disease on liver scintigrams.53 Similar to ANNs used for mammographic screening, computer-aided diagnosis of Papanicolaou smears54,55 and other pathological specimens—including breast fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens56,57—has obvious potential advantages.

    • Implementation of the System of the Early Diagnostics of Pancreatic Cancer in Clinical Practice

      2020, Proceedings - 2020 2nd International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2020
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text