Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 54, Issue 4, February 2002, Pages 493-504
Social Science & Medicine

Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00045-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify factors associated with satisfaction among inpatients receiving medical and surgical care for cardiovascular, respiratory, urinary and locomotor system diseases.

Two weeks after discharge, 533 patients completed a Patient Judgments Hospital Quality questionnaire covering seven dimensions of satisfaction (admission, nursing and daily care, medical care, information, hospital environment and ancillary staff, overall quality of care and services, recommendations/intentions). Patient satisfaction and complaints were treated as dependent variables in multivariate ordinal polychotomous and dichotomous logistic stepwise regressions, respectively. Patient sociodemographic, health and stay characteristics as well as organization/activity of service were used as independent variables.

The two strongest predictors of satisfaction for all dimensions were older age and better self-perceived health status at admission. Men tended to be more satisfied than women. Other predictors specific for certain dimensions of satisfaction were: married, Karnofsky index more than 70, critical/serious self-reported condition at admission, emergency admission, choice of hospital by her/himself, stay in a medical service, stay in a private room, length of stay less than one week, stay in a service with a mean length of stay longer than one week.

The factors associated with inpatient satisfaction elucidated in this study may be helpful in interpreting patient satisfaction scores when comparing hospitals, services or time periods, in targeting patient groups at risk of worse experiences and in focusing care quality programs.

Introduction

Respect for patients’ needs and wishes is central to any humane health care system. Providers wishing to meet those needs more effectively have shown growing interest in the use of patient evaluations and reports as a complement to other methods of quality assessment and assurance (Cleary et al., 1991). Increasing attention has been paid to the assessment of patient satisfaction with care. Furthermore, the patients’ own evaluations of their experiences in the hospital have been used to improve the quality of care in English-speaking countries (Calnan et al., 1994; Epstein, Laine, Farber, Nelson, & Davidoff, 1996; Hays & Ware, 1986; Williams, 1994). Indeed, patient satisfaction is widely considered as an integral part of the quality of care. Pascoe (1983) has defined it as a health care recipient's reaction to salient aspects of his or her experience of a service. In his formulation, satisfaction is assumed to consist of a cognitive evaluation and an emotional reaction to the structure, process and outcome of services. For Donabedian (1980), client satisfaction is a fundamentally important measure of the quality of care because it offers information on the provider's success at meeting those expectations of most relevance to the client. Measures of satisfaction are, therefore, important tools for research, administration and planning. Patient satisfaction can also be used to evaluate the process of care (Carey & Seibert, 1993; Etter, Perneger, & Rougemont, 1996; Fitzpatrick (1991a), Fitzpatrick (1991b); Guadagnoli & Cleary, 1995; Kane, Maciejewski, & Finch, 1997; Lasek, Barkley, Harper, & Rosenthal, 1997; Linn et al., 1995; Ross, Steward, & Sinacore, 1995; Williams, 1994) as greater satisfaction may be associated with superior compliance, improved attendance at return visits and better outcomes (Cleary, Keroy, Karapanos, & McMullen, 1989).

Previous studies have tended to report very high levels of overall satisfaction during hospitalization, often reaching 90% or more (Williams, 1994; Victorian public hospitals, 1995). Factors associated with satisfaction are thought to include the structure, process and outcome of care as well as patient sociodemographic, physical and psychological status, and attitudes and expectations concerning medical care (Cleary & McNeil, 1988; Minnick, Roberts, Young, Kleinpell, & Marcantonio, 1997; Williams, 1994). Results, however, are inconsistent and sometimes contradictory, other than the finding that older patients consistently tend to report higher levels of satisfaction than do younger ones (Calnan et al., 1994; Cleary & McNeil, 1988; Cleary et al., 1989; Ware & Berwick, 1990). Although numerous hospitals have developed ongoing programs for the routine assessment of patient perceptions of the quality of care, and many inpatient satisfaction surveys have been published (Rubin, 1990), none in France has been devoted to factors that may affect level of satisfaction, especially in a single, prospective study.

The objective of the present study was to identify factors associated with satisfaction among inpatients receiving medical or surgical care for cardiovascular, respiratory, urinary and locomotor system diseases.

Some factors such as those related to hospital stay (e.g. amenities in the patient's room or in the service) or those related to the organization and provision of services (e.g. number of inpatients, index of care load per physician or per nurse) are alterable by health providers/managers who wish to intervene and monitor programs aimed at improving the quality of care.

Some other factors such as patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex) are not alterable. However, their role might be important to investigate for two reasons. One is the need to adjust for these factors for benchmarking when comparing hospitals, services and specialties. The second concerns making it possible for providers to target patients at risk for worse experiences.

Section snippets

Sample and procedure

The study population consisted of inpatients discharged from 12 medical and surgical services specializing in cardiovascular, respiratory, urinary and locomotor system diseases at the Nancy University Hospital Center (20.1% of all inpatients). The investigation was conducted between April 1997 and May 1998. Nancy University Hospital is a public hospital located in northeast France. In 1997, it had 2474 beds, with 74% occupancy rate, 76,012 admissions and 608,462 hospitalization days. Some 92%

Characteristics of the sample

The sample comprised respondents with respiratory diseases (31.3%), cardiovascular diseases (22.1%), urinary diseases (15.8%) and locomotor system diseases (30.8%). A total of 77% were admitted to medical services.

Mean age of subjects was 56.2 years, and 63% were male. Forty-seven percent were educated to below high school level, 42% had a high school education and 11% had received college or graduate diplomas. Two-thirds of respondents were not working, and 15% lived alone. About 18% were

Main findings

Seventeen variables describing patient and service characteristics were significant factors in at least one satisfaction dimension equation, and variables that appeared in more than one dimension equation were consistent in their directions of influence. Patient characteristics (demographics, health and patient stay) were the strongest predictors of the level of satisfaction. Satisfaction was not related to specialty ward. The two most consistent factors associated with a higher satisfaction

Conclusions and recommendations

This study demonstrates that information about patient satisfaction with their care may be collected in a way that is acceptable to both patients and health care providers/managers. Using polychotomous logistic regression has proved useful and appropriate for analyzing determinants of satisfaction level. Information of the kind provided here, based on quantitative and qualitative data, reveals the specific areas in which care may be improved or is already very good.

We recommend that health care

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a 1996 PHRC grant (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) from the French Health Ministry. T.P.L. Nguyen was supported by a grant from the French Foreign Office. Approval was given by the Regional Ethics Committee.

The authors would like to thank the research team of Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, the physicians and nurses of the study services, and the administrative staff of CHU Nancy for their help with organization. They would also like to thank all the

References (36)

  • D.A Asch et al.

    Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals

    Journal Clinical Epidemiology

    (1997)
  • P.D Cleary et al.

    Patient assessments of hospital care

    Quarterly Review Bulletin

    (1989)
  • G.C Pascoe

    Patient satisfaction in primary health careA literature review and analysis

    Evaluation and Program Planning

    (1983)
  • B Williams

    Patient satisfactionA valid concept?

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1994)
  • M Calnan et al.

    Major determinants of consumer satisfaction with primary care in different health systems

    Family Practice

    (1994)
  • R.G Carey et al.

    A patient survey system to measure quality improvementQuestionnaire reliability and validity

    Medical Care

    (1993)
  • R.A Carr-Hill

    The measurement of patient satisfaction

    Journal of Public Health Medicine

    (1992)
  • S.K Chang et al.

    The adequacy of the Karnofsky rating and global adjustment to illness scale as outcome measures in cancer rehabilitation and continuing care

    Progress in Clinical and Biological Research

    (1983)
  • P.D Cleary et al.

    Patients evaluate their hospital careA national survey

    Health Affairs

    (1991)
  • P.D Cleary et al.

    Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care

    Inquiry

    (1988)
  • Dixon, W. J. (1992). BMDP statistical software manual, version 7.0, vol. 2 (p. 1145). Berkeley: Los...
  • E.R Doering

    Factors influencing inpatient satisfaction with care

    Quarterly Review Bulletin

    (1983)
  • A Donabedian

    Exploration in quality assessment and monitoringVol. 1. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment

    (1980)
  • K.R Epstein et al.

    Patients perceptions of office medical practiceJudging quality through the patients eyes

    American Journal of Medical Quality

    (1996)
  • J.F Etter et al.

    Does sponsorship matter in patient satisfaction surveys?

    Medical Care

    (1996)
  • R Fitzpatrick

    Surveys of patient satisfactionI. Important general considerations

    British Medical Journal

    (1991)
  • R Fitzpatrick

    Surveys of patient satisfactionII. Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey

    British Medical Journal

    (1991)
  • E Guadagnoli et al.

    How consistent is patient-reported pre-admission health status when collected during and after hospital stay?

    Medical Care

    (1995)
  • Cited by (304)

    • The Impact of Room-Sharing on Length of Stay After Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

      2021, Arthroplasty Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most of the available literature on room-sharing is centered on the patient’s subjective experience and preference. It is widely believed that the facilitation of patient-patient interaction affects the overall satisfaction of their hospital experience [17-19,23]. Our study is one of the few specifically examining the potential impacts of room-sharing on postoperative outcomes, and the first to explore this in the orthopedic population.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text