Review ArticleSex differences in immune responses: Hormonal effects, antagonistic selection, and evolutionary consequences
Introduction
In vertebrates, the highly developed immune system provides protection from pathogens and parasites, but also from pathologies that are caused by the organism itself, e.g. tissue damage induced by oxidative stress or uncontrolled growth of tumors (Abbas et al., 2014, Murphy and Weaver, 2016). However, immune responses are costly, e.g., in terms of energy, nutrients, and immunopathology, and investments in immunity must therefore be traded off against investments in other important traits and activities (Hasselquist and Nilsson, 2012, Roff, 1992, Sheldon and Verhulst, 1996, Stearns, 1992, Zuk and Stoehr, 2002). Immune costs play out differently depending on reproductive and life history strategies across species, and such differences exist also within species or populations, for example between sex and age groups (Hasselquist, 2007, Klein, 2000, Sheldon and Verhulst, 1996, Zuk and Stoehr, 2002). In terms of sex, many empirical studies have found that males and females differ in parasite burden (Klein, 2004, Schmid-Hempel, 2011, Zuk and McKean, 1996) and that there can be sex differences in immune responsiveness (Klein and Roberts, 2010, Schuurs and Verheul, 1990). Moreover, it has been known for over 30 years that sex hormones can affect immune responses (e.g., Ansar Ahmed et al., 1985, Grossman, 1985).
Folstad and Karter (1992) connected the findings on parasite burden, immune responsiveness, and sex hormones, and argued that higher parasite burdens and lower immune responses in males compared to females was a result of immunosuppressive effects of the androgen hormone testosterone in males. They named their idea the ‘immunocompetence handicap hypothesis’ (ICHH) and proposed that this mechanism could explain why secondary sexual traits in males could be honest signals of male quality (Folstad and Karter, 1992). Specifically, Folstad and Karter suggested that androgen-dependent secondary sexual signals in males are adjusted according to a trade-off between the potential cost of infection and the benefits of higher reproductive success achieved by increased mating success (Folstad and Karter, 1992). Males with stronger secondary sexual signals (for example larger secondary sexual ornaments) suffer a reduction in immunocompetence (due to suppressed immune responses) as an effect of increased testosterone levels, and these males therefore run an increased risk of infection which ensures that only high quality males with ‘good genes for disease resistance’ can afford the most elaborate secondary sexual characters (Folstad and Karter, 1992).
Previous studies have suggested that sex hormones and mating behavior may interact to affect selection patterns on immune function (Hasselquist, 2007, Rolff, 2002, Zuk, 1990, Zuk and McKean, 1996). The selective advantage of high testosterone levels in males should be determined by the strength of sexual selection, and this is often affected by the social mating system of the species/population (Hasselquist, 2007, Zuk, 1990). For example, if males may increase their mating success considerably by having high expression of testosterone-dependent traits, it will impose a selection on males for increased testosterone levels, despite the risk of having strongly suppressed immune responses. Under such conditions the difference in the strength of immune responses between the sexes may be particularly large. Variation in mating behaviors (or social mating systems) have been predicted to affect immune responses according to the following general trends (Hasselquist, 2007, Zuk, 1990):
- (1)
Larger sex differences in immune responses in species with socially polygynous mating systems.
- (2)
Larger sex differences in immune responses in species where males are more involved in fighting and thus generally have higher testosterone levels, e.g., species where intra-sexual selection is strong.
- (3)
Larger sex differences in immune responses in species with a higher degree of inter-sexual selection (but smaller sex difference than in intra-sexual selection species).
- (4)
No or only small differences in immune responses between the sexes in species with socially monogamous mating system and low degree of sexual selection.
Social mating systems and sexual selection may also emphasize specific aspects of immunity, for example related to wound healing in species with strong intra-sexual selection (Zuk and Johnsen, 1998), or to stress-induced risk of immunopathology (e.g. autoimmunity, Raberg et al., 1998). The latter could differ between the sexes if there are differences in the amount of parental care that is provided by the male and the female parent (cf. Raberg et al., 2000). Furthermore, in species with large size dimorphism between the sexes (as is often characteristic of species with strong intra-sexual selection), the larger sex may suffer increased risk of contracting infections with food-transmitted parasites and pathogens, because of the increased food intake needed to maintain a larger body (Folstad and Karter, 1992).
Many studies have investigated the links between testosterone and immune function, for example when testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis. In a first meta-analysis to summarize this type of data by Roberts et al. (2004), a link between elevated testosterone and immunosuppression was found, although the effect was not significant when controlled for multiple studies conducted on the same species. In this study, there was no effect of testosterone on direct measures of immune function (white blood cell counts, antibodies, or response to phytohemagglutinin), but testosterone was shown to increase ectoparasite burdens, especially in reptiles (Roberts et al., 2004). Recently, Foo et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis on an extended data set that included both females and males. They investigated the effects of male (testosterone) and female (estrogen) sex hormones on immune function, because previous studies have found that also female sex hormones may affect immune function (Klein, 2004, Schuurs and Verheul, 1990, Zuk and McKean, 1996). Moreover, they also included the effects of sex hormones on more detailed measures of immune responses, such as cell-mediated and humoral immunity (explained below in “The vertebrate immune system”). Foo et al. (2016) found that, in studies where sex hormones were experimentally added, the general pattern was that testosterone had a medium-sized immunosuppressive effect, while estrogen showed no clear overall pattern. The effects of estrogen depended on the immune measure in question; experimentally elevated estrogen increased parasite resistance (i.e., reduced parasite load), suppressed cell-mediated immunity, and tended to enhance humoral immunity (p = 0.07). When considering correlational studies of natural levels of circulating sex hormones, the levels of testosterone in males showed no relationship either with overall immune function or humoral immunity, but there was a significant positive relationship with cell-mediated immunity (p = 0.04). In females, natural levels of estrogen showed a positive relationship with overall immune function (p = 0.01), although it became non-significant when phylogeny was accounted for (p = 0.16). Moreover, there was no significant relationship between circulating levels of estrogen and cell-mediated immunity, though there was a tendency for a positive relationship with humoral immunity (p = 0.08).
The meta-analysis by Foo et al. (2016) (summarized in Table 1) provides evidence that testosterone has a general suppressive effect on immune function, whereas the effects of estrogen depend on the immune measure in question. However, there is a substantial heterogeneity in the results of the meta-analysis, particularly concerning the effects on cell-mediated and humoral immunity, and this encouraged us to examine the effects of sex hormones on immunity in more detail. In the present review, we summarize the knowledge about the effects of sex hormones on different aspects of the vertebrate immune system, discuss possible evolutionary and ecological consequences of such sex differences, and propose a novel hypothesis for how sex hormone-induced differences in immune responses can affect the evolution of immune genes.
Section snippets
The vertebrate immune system
The vertebrate immune system is highly conserved across species and consists of innate immunity, which is a rapid immune response to infection that rely on recognition of conserved features unique to pathogens, and adaptive immunity that provides antigen-specific responses which are up-regulated at infection (Murphy and Weaver, 2016). The high specificity and flexibility of adaptive immune responses is based on specific antigen receptors on T- and B-lymphocytes (Cooper and Alder, 2006). One of
The effects of male sex hormones on the strength and nature of immune responses
We conducted a literature review of the effects of male and female sex hormones on specific components of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and below, we summarize the specific effects and discuss how they may cause immune responses to differ between the sexes. The detailed results from the reviewed studies are summarized in Tables S1–S3. Reviewed studies of sex differences in specific components of the innate and adaptive immune systems are summarized in Table S4. Whether or not a study
The effects of female sex hormones on the strength and nature of immune responses
Foo et al. (2016) found that estrogen tended to have positive effects on humoral immunity, but had a significant dampening effect on cell-mediated immunity (Table 1). When compiling information about the effects of estrogen on specific aspects of adaptive immunity, studies show that it induces the Th2 cytokine IL-4 (Faas et al., 2000) and enhances Th2 differentiation (Table S2; Hepworth et al., 2010). A study in mice found that estrogen also increases Th1 differentiation (Table S2; Karpuzoglu
Sex differences in immune responses
Testosterone has been hypothesized to have an overall immunosuppressive effect (Folstad and Karter, 1992), and Foo et al. (2016) found support for this in a recent meta-analysis. Moreover, the results from Foo et al. (2016) suggested that estrogen may have generally immunoenhancing effects. It thus appears that steroid sex hormones may affect the strength of immune responses in opposite directions and result in a general difference between males and females in the strength of immune responses,
Evolutionary and genetic implications of sex differences in immune function
We would like to propose a new hypothesis that partly explains immune gene diversity. It is based on sexually antagonistic selection arising from hormonally-induced sex differences in immune responses.
The studies that we have reviewed here suggest that the opposing effects of sex hormones on immunity cause the strength of the immune responses to differ systematically between males and females (Fig. 2a). The general suppression of immune responses induced by testosterone may have caused males to
How do the observed sex differences in immunity relate to mating behaviors?
Variation in mating behavior may have an impact on selection on immune genes (and their regulation) by either increasing or reducing the sex differences in selection patterns (Hasselquist, 2007, Zuk, 1990). This will in turn affect the strength of the sexual conflict over immune responsiveness. It could also emphasize certain aspects of immunity in one sex, for example exaggerate wound healing in males in species with strong intra-sexual selection (Zuk and Johnsen, 1998). In the introduction,
Conclusions and further directions
The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (Folstad and Karter, 1992) builds on the theory of parasite-mediated sexual selection proposed by Hamilton and Zuk (1982), and it suggests a key role for male sex hormones, arguing that the immunosuppressive effect of testosterone ensures honest signaling in secondary sexual characters. In this article, we have put this idea into the context of observed sex differences in type 1 (mostly cell-mediated) and type 2 (mostly humoral-mediated) immune
Acknowledgements
The authors have been supported by the following grants: Swedish Research Council (grant 621-2013-4357 and 2016-04391 to D.H.; grant 621-2011-3674 and 2015-05149 to H.W.), Kungliga Fysiografiska Sällskapet (to J.R.), the Crafoord Foundation (to D.H.), the Linnaeus excellent research environment CAnMove funded by the Swedish Research Council (349-2007-8690) and Lund University.
References (150)
- et al.
In vitro effects of different steroid hormones on superoxide anion production of human neutrophil granulocytes
Steroids
(2000) - et al.
Intralocus sexual conflict
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2009) - et al.
Estrogen, neutrophils and oxidation
Life Sci.
(2004) - et al.
The evolution of adaptive immune systems
Cell
(2006) - et al.
Persistence of androgenic effects on the production of proinflammatory cytokines by circulating antigen-presenting cells after withdrawal of testosterone treatment in aging type 2 diabetic men with partial androgen deficiency
Fertil. Steril.
(2009) - et al.
The immune response during the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle: a Th2-type response?
Fertil. Steril.
(2000) - et al.
Oestrogen as an inhibitor of human NK cell cytolysis
FEBS Lett.
(1985) - et al.
17β-estradiol inhibits monocyte adhesion via down-regulation of Rac1 GTPase
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
(2006) - et al.
Sex differences in disease genetics: evidence, evolution, and detection
Trends Genet.
(2014) - et al.
Physiological mechanisms mediating costs of immune responses: what can we learn from studies of birds?
Anim. Behav.
(2012)
Progesterone and autoimmune disease
Autoimmun. Rev.
Estrogen enhances immunoglobulin production by human PBMCs
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
IFN-gamma-inducing transcription factor, T-bet is upregulated by estrogen in murine splenocytes: role of IL-27 but not IL-12
Mol. Immunol.
Hormones and mating system affect sex and species differences in immune function among vertebrates
Behav. Process.
Inhibition of oxidative-stress-induced platelet aggregation by androgen at physiological levels via its receptor is associated with the reduction of thromboxane A2 release from platelets
Steroids
Estrogen stimulates arachidonoylethanolamide release from human endothelial cells and platelet activation
Blood
Estradiol reduces basal and cytokine induced monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells
Maturitas
Sex-specific alterations in neutrophil apoptosis: the role of estradiol and progesterone
Blood
Gender differences in autoimmune disease
Front. Neuroendocrinol.
Latitudinal variation of immune defense and sickness behavior in the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys)
Brain Behav. Immun.
Basic immunology: functions and disorders of the immune system
Testosterone increases human platelet thromboxane A2 receptor density and aggregation responses
Circulation
Sex hormones and autoimmunity
Immunol. Lett.
Estrogens inhibit angiotensin II-induced leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in vivo via rapid endothelial nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase activation
Circ. Res.
Sex hormones, immune responses, and autoimmune diseases. Mechanisms of sex hormone action
Am. J. Pathol.
Molecular mimicry in the MHC: hidden clues to autoimmunity?
Immunol. Today
Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by the female sex hormones oestradiol and progesterone
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
The effect of estrogens on superoxide anion generation by human neutrophil granulocytes: possible consequences of the antioxidant defense
Gynecol. Endocrinol.
Progesterone increases csk homologous kinase in HMC-1560 human mast cells and reduces cell proliferation
J. Cell. Biochem.
Progesterone reduces the migration of mast cells toward the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12 with an accompanying decrease in CXCR4 receptors
Am. J. Physiol. - Endocrinol. Metab.
Menopause is associated with a significant increase in blood monocyte number and a relative decrease in the expression of estrogen receptors in human peripheral monocytes
Am. J. Reprod. Immunol.
The pathogen connection
Nature
Sex hormones and the immune response in humans
Hum. Reprod. Update
Progesterone inhibits mature rat dendritic cells in a receptor-mediated fashion
Int. Immunol.
Chronic estradiol administration in vivo promotes the proinflammatory response of macrophages to TLR4 activation: involvement of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway
J. Immunol.
Th17 cells upregulate polymeric Ig receptor and intestinal IgA and contribute to intestinal homeostasis
J. Immunol.
Influence of steroids on oxidant generation in activated human granulocytes and mononuclear leukocytes
Shock
Female sex hormones modulate the function of LPS-treated macrophages
Am. J. Reprod. Immunol.
Estradiol inhibits Th17 cell differentiation through inhibition of RORγT transcription by recruiting the ERα/REA complex to estrogen response elements of the RORγT promoter
J. Immunol.
Genomic organization of the crested ibis MHC provides new insight into ancestral avian MHC structure
Sci. Rep.
Medroxyprogesterone acetate inhibits CD8 + T cell viral-specific effector function and induces herpes simplex virus type 1 reactivation
J. Immunol.
Neutropenia with impaired host defense against microbial infection in mice lacking androgen receptor
J. Exp. Med.
Estradiol enhances leukocyte binding to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-stimulated endothelial cells via an increase in TNF-induced adhesion molecules E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule Type 1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule Type 1
J. Clin. Invest.
Modulation of rat peritoneal mast cell and human basophil histamine release by estrogens
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict
Am. Nat.
Dihydrotestosterone promotes vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in male human endothelial cells via a nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent pathway
Endocrinology
Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at H-2 gene complex
Nature
Studies of the regulatory effects of the sex hormones on antibody formation and stem cell differentiation
J. Exp. Med.
Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap
Am. Nat.
The effects of sex hormones on immune function: a meta-analysis
Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc.
Cited by (202)
Prairie dog responses to vector control and vaccination during an initial Yersinia pestis invasion
2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and WildlifeMale C57BL/6J mice have higher presence and abundance of Borrelia burgdorferi in their ventral skin compared to female mice
2024, Ticks and Tick-borne DiseasesThe interplay between Sars-Cov-2 infection related cardiovascular diseases and depression. Common mechanisms, shared symptoms
2024, American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and PracticeGenetic determinants of complement activation in the general population
2024, Cell ReportsAge at Natural Menopause, Reproductive Lifespan, and the Risk of Late-Onset Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in Women: A Prospective Cohort Study
2024, Journal of Investigative DermatologyGenetic relationship between the immune system and autism
2023, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity - Health
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this article.