Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 22, Issue 3, November 2011, Pages 421-427
Epilepsy & Behavior

Review
Heredity in epilepsy: Neurodevelopment, comorbidity, and the neurological trait

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.07.031Get rights and content

Abstract

The genetic bases of common, nonmendelian epilepsy have been difficult to elucidate. In this article, we argue for a new approach to genetic inquiry in epilepsy. In the latter part of the 19th century, epilepsy was universally acknowledged to be part of a wider “neurological trait” that included other neuropsychiatric conditions. In recent years, studies of comorbidity have shown clear links between epilepsy and various neuropsychiatric disorders including psychosis and depression, and genetic studies of copy number variants (CNVs) have shown that in some cases, the same CNV underpins neuropsychiatric illness and epilepsy. Functional annotation analysis of the sets of genes impacted by epilepsy CNVs shows enrichment for genes involved with neural development, with gene ontological (GO) categories including “neurological system process” (P = 0.006), “synaptic transmission” (P = 0.009), and “learning or memory” (P = 0.01). These data support the view that epilepsy and some neuropsychiatric conditions share pathogenic neurodevelopmental pathways, and that epilepsy should be included in the spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet, most current genetic research in epilepsy has restricted samples to specific types of epilepsy categorized according to the clinical classification schemes on the basis of seizure type, anatomical location, or epilepsy syndrome. These schemes are, to an extent, arbitrary and do not necessarily align with biological reality. We propose an alternative approach that makes no phenotypic assumptions beyond including epilepsy in the neurodevelopmental spectrum. A “‘value-free” strategy of reverse phenotyping may be worth exploring, starting with genetic association and looking backward at the phenotype. Finally, it should be noted that there are societal implications to associating epilepsy with other neuropsychiatric disorders, and it is vital to ensure research in this area does not result in increased stigma for patients with epilepsy.

Highlights

► Epilepsy has a strong genetic basis. ► Little is known of the molecular genetic basis of common epilepsies with complex inheritance. ► Historical and modern evidence places epilepsy within the spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders. ► These observations suggest new approaches to genetic inquiry in epilepsy.

Introduction

Published estimates of heritability for epilepsy indicate that epilepsy has a strong genetic basis [1], [2], [3], [4], yet other than a few rare mendelian forms of the disease, we know very little about the molecular genetic contributions to epilepsy. It has been suggested that genetic research efforts in the more common, sporadic forms of epilepsy have failed because of the inadequate statistical power of existing genetic association studies [5] or because the genetic formulation of epilepsy as predominantly a common variant disease is incorrect [6]. In this article we take an alternative perspective on epilepsy genetics that instead focuses on the nature of the epilepsy phenotype itself. The epilepsies referred to in this article are the common, mostly sporadic forms of epilepsy loosely termed idiopathic or cryptogenic, for which no structural or metabolic cause can be demonstrated. Drawing on the historical epilepsy literature, as well as more recent advances in epilepsy epidemiology and molecular genetics, we argue that genetic susceptibility to epilepsy should be studied from the broader perspective of epilepsy being a neurodevelopmental disorder, with shared mechanisms with other neuropsychiatric disorders. We call for a reappraisal of the epilepsy phenotype in genetic research that departs from one based solely on seizure semiology, epilepsy syndrome, or anatomical localization. We suggest that genetic inquiry of epilepsy from this mechanistic point of view may yield novel insights into the etiology of epilepsy.

Before considering the evidence for this position from modern genetics, we first mention some historical aspects of thought on the heredity of epilepsy from the mid-19th century, as the astute clinical observations made then throw an interesting light on this issue.

Section snippets

The neurological trait

By the middle years of the 19th century, there was intense interest in the heredity of epilepsy; see, for instance, the books of Sieveking 1861 [7], Reynolds 1861 [8], and Gowers 1881 [9]. At this time, no physiological, biochemical, or imaging methods were available to identify the cause of epilepsy, except when it was associated with an obvious gross cerebral or systemic disorder. Most cases were considered to be idiopathic and of constitutional origin. Indeed, the term epilepsy itself was

The “comorbidity” of epilepsy

The theories of a neurological trait have a recent parallel in a striking way with the current interest in epilepsy “comorbidities.” The same types of mental disorders, alcoholism and dementia, are found in contemporary statistical surveys of patients with epilepsy as a comorbidity. The most striking associations are with the psychiatric diseases, for instance, major depression, bipolar disease, and schizophrenia. Rates of major depressive episodes are increased in patients with epilepsy and

Shared pathways in neurodevelopmental disorders, copy number variation, epistasis, epigenetics, and the temporal dimension

The term neurodevelopmental disorder typically refers to the range of common neurological and behavioral conditions that includes schizophrenia, autism, and mental retardation/intellectual disability (MR/ID). Very recently, it has become clear that in some cases these neurodevelopmental disorders may share common genetic underpinnings with epilepsy, which we believe prompt a reappraisal of the approach to epilepsy genetic inquiry.

The first feature, and an exciting development in the field, has

Phenotyping and the implications for epilepsy genetic research

A common theme in epilepsy genetic case–control association studies, including genomewide association studies, has been to restrict the epilepsy phenotype in the population of “cases” to a particular type of seizure or epilepsy in an attempt to enrich for genetic variants associated with the restricted phenotype. Although this restricted phenotype approach has been very successful in identifying genes for rare mendelian forms of epilepsy in rare families, the same approach applied to the common

Societal implications

Finally, but importantly, the suggestions described above have societal implications. In the early 20th century, contemporary medical genetics was adopted into the field of social policy—with disastrous results. Eugenics provided pseudoscientific evidence for dividing humans into an advantaged (normal) group and a disadvantaged underclass. Eugenic theory was scientifically flawed and yet it was the justification for the massacre of hundred of thousands of mentally impaired persons and people

Acknowledgments

This work was undertaken at UCLH/UCL and Imperial College/Imperial College Healthcare, both of which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. This article is based partly on the invited Masakazu Seino Memorial Lecture given by one of the authors (S.D.S.) at the 2010 Asian and Oceanian Epilepsy Congress of the International League Against Epilepsy.

References (69)

  • L.L. Miller et al.

    Univariate genetic analyses of epilepsy and seizures in a population-based twin study: the Virginia Twin Registry

    Genet Epidemiol

    (1998)
  • S.F. Berkovic et al.

    Epilepsies in twins: genetics of the major epilepsy syndromes

    Ann Neurol

    (1998)
  • D. Kasperaviciūte et al.

    Common genetic variation and susceptibility to partial epilepsies: a genome-wide association study

    Brain

    (2010)
  • M.R. Johnson

    The genetic contribution to epilepsy: the known and missing heritability

  • E. Sieveking

    Epilepsy and epileptiform seizures: their causes, pathology and treatment

    (1861)
  • J.R. Reynolds

    Epilepsy: its symptoms, treatment and relation to other chronic convulsive diseases

    (1861)
  • W. Gowers

    Epilepsy and other chronic convulsive disorders

    (1881)
  • B.A. Morel

    Traité des dégénérescences physiques, intellectuelles, et morales des l'espèce humaine

    (1857)
  • B.A. Morel

    Traité des maladies mentales

    (1860)
  • C. Féré

    La famille névropathique

    Arch Neurol

    (1884)
  • L.L. Moreau

    La psychologie morbide dans ses rapports avec la philosophie de l'histoire

    (1859)
  • M.G. Echeverria

    On epileptic insanity

    Am J Insanity

    (1873)
  • J.J. Dejerine

    L'hérédite dans les maladies du système nerveux

    (1886)
  • O. Binswanger

    Die Epilepsie

    (1899)
  • W. Spratling

    Epilepsy and its treatment

    (1904)
  • W.A. Turner

    Epilepsy: a study of the idiopathic disease

    (1907)
  • M. Burleigh

    Death and deliverance: ‘euthanasia’ in Germany 1900–1945

    (1994)
  • M. Burleigh

    Ethics and extermination: reflections on Nazi genocide

    (1997)
  • D.C. Hesdorffer et al.

    Major depression is a risk factor for seizures in older adults

    Ann Neurol

    (2000)
  • P. Qin et al.

    Risk for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis among patients with epilepsy: population based cohort study

    Br Med J

    (2005)
  • B. Elliott et al.

    Psychiatric disorders

  • J.K. Austin et al.

    Behavior problems in children before first recognized seizures

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • A.T. Berg et al.

    Special education needs of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (2005)
  • D.C. Hesdorffer et al.

    ADHD as a risk factor for incident unprovoked seizures and epilepsy in children

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Epilepsy and bipolar disorder

      2015, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The observation that relatively large genomic rearrangements are common was a surprise, but this became more than academic when it was identified that these occur more commonly in people with a broad range of neurological and psychiatric phenotypes than they do in control populations. This association has provoked some authors to consider them a risk of a ‘neurological trait’ [78]. They can both cluster as hot spots (such as 15q13.3 or 16p11.2) or can be very rare and produce a phenotype because of haploinsufficiency, or by increasing gene dosage.

    • Parent-rated emotional-behavioral and executive functioning in childhood epilepsy

      2015, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The current findings highlight the prominence of neurobehavioral comorbidities in the presentation of childhood epilepsy and the effectiveness of parent-report measures in identifying such comorbidities. While it is hypothesized that both seizures and neurobehavioral comorbidities manifest in epilepsy due to shared underlying neurobiologic pathogenic mechanisms [6–9], we sought to identify demographic and epilepsy-related variables that may contribute to emotional–behavioral and behavioral functioning. From a clinical perspective, the present study identified easily obtainable variables, notably patient age, family psychiatric history, and epilepsy status, which were significantly associated with each domain of emotional–behavioral and executive functioning in our sample.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text