Elsevier

Advances in Clinical Radiology

Volume 2, September 2020, Pages 113-125
Advances in Clinical Radiology

Contemporary Techniques and Applications of Radioembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Y90 from Palliative to Curative

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yacr.2020.04.005Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Radioembolization (Y90) has been proven safe and effective in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

  • Over the past 20 years, Y90 practice has grown and evolved to include different treatment approaches and paradigms, such as radiation segmentectomy, radiation lobectomy, modified radiation lobectomy, and same-day Y90.

  • Y90 is effective in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, with outcomes comparable to other curative surgical treatments in select patients with

Planning and treatment

Once patients are deemed Y90 candidates per multidisciplinary tumor board and interventional oncology clinic evaluation, they are scheduled to undergo treatment planning procedure (angiography plus Tc 99m macroaggregated albumin [MAA] scan), which is followed by Y90 treatment 1 to 2 weeks later.

Current and evolving Y90 techniques

Radioembolization was initially performed via lobar (right or left) hepatic arteries. Modern practice allows more selective treatments, sparing non–tumor-bearing hepatic parenchyma. This flexibility has allowed new treatment strategies.

Posttreatment follow-up

Radioembolization is an outpatient procedure. Follow-up protocols vary between institutions, but typically include phone call assessments for any fatigue, pain, and other adverse events over the course of 1 month posttreatment, clinical visits in the interventional oncology clinic, and contrast enhanced MRI or CT follow-up scans at 1, 3, and 6 months post-Y90 [46,47]. It is ideal to have 2 follow-up scans within the first 6 months post-Y90 to identify tumor response to treatment [[48], [49],

Applications and outcomes

Y90 has been shown to be effective across the BCLC staging paradigm, with outcomes and prognoses varying significantly based on tumor burden and hepatic function [47,56,57].

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0/A

According to the BCLC treatment guidelines, BCLC A patients should receive resection, ablation, or transplant. Other therapies, such as radioembolization, are typically reserved for those patients not considered adequate candidates for one of these curative intent options [23,58]. Many reasons contribute to patients not being good candidates for ablation, surgical resection candidate, or liver transplant. These reasons include advanced age, medical comorbidities, hypercoagulable states, portal

Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B

BCLC B patients are characterized by multifocal disease that is limited to the liver without vascular invasion or performance status deterioration. BCLC B patients used to be the main target population whom LRTs were intended to treat, because these patients do not often have surgical options [61].

BCLB B patients represent a diverse group of patients; the approach to radioembolization in these patients depends on the tumor burden and distribution [22]. Sequential lobar Y90 (rather than

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (86)

  • A. Gabr et al.

    Technical aspects and practical approach toward same-day Y90 radioembolization in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2019)
  • M.D. Li et al.

    Same-Day Yttrium-90 radioembolization: feasibility with resin microspheres

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2019)
  • B.B. Toskich

    Beta on demand: the adoption of same-day yttrium-90 radioembolization

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2019)
  • A. Riaz et al.

    Radiation segmentectomy: a novel approach to increase safety and efficacy of radioembolization

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2011)
  • S.A. Padia et al.

    Segmental Yttrium-90 radioembolization versus segmental chemoembolization for localized hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched study

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2017)
  • M. Vouche et al.

    Radiation lobectomy: Time-dependent analysis of future liver remnant volume in unresectable liver cancer as a bridge to resection

    J Hepatol

    (2013)
  • A. Gabr et al.

    Neoadjuvant radiation lobectomy as an alternative to portal vein embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Semin Nucl Med

    (2019)
  • A. Gabr et al.

    Outcomes of Surgical Resection after Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2018)
  • M. Iñarrairaegui et al.

    Response to radioembolization with yttrium-90 resin microspheres may allow surgical treatment with curative intent and prolonged survival in previously unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (2012)
  • M.J. Wallace et al.

    Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: applications in the interventional suite

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2009)
  • R. Salem et al.

    Research reporting standards for radioembolization of hepatic malignancies

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2011)
  • F.E. Boas et al.

    Optimal imaging surveillance schedules after liver-directed therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2015)
  • A. Riaz et al.

    Role of the EASL, RECIST, and WHO response guidelines alone or in combination for hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation

    J Hepatol

    (2011)
  • R. Hickey et al.

    Independent analysis of albumin-bilirubin grade in a 765-patient cohort treated with transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2016)
  • R. Salem et al.

    Y90 radioembolization significantly prolongs time to progression compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2016)
  • A. Gabr et al.

    03:54 PM Abstract No. 331 Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients within Milan criteria: bridging and beyond

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2019)
  • R.J. Lewandowski et al.

    A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization

    Am J Transplant

    (2009)
  • S.A. Padia et al.

    Superselective yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma yields high response rates with minimal toxicity

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2014)
  • K.T. Brown

    Superselective Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk cases: another tool in the toolbox

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2014)
  • K. Memon et al.

    Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: Impact of liver function on systemic treatment options at disease progression

    J Hepatol

    (2013)
  • J.Y. Young et al.

    Radiation dose limits and liver toxicities resulting from multiple yttrium-90 radioembolization treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2007)
  • C. Spreafico et al.

    Development of a prognostic score to predict response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • J. Bruix et al.

    Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Lancet

    (2017)
  • M. Kudo et al.

    Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial

    Lancet

    (2018)
  • T. Yau et al.

    Nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib-experienced Asian cohort analysis

    J Hepatol

    (2019)
  • V. Vilgrain et al.

    Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2017)
  • J. Ricke et al.

    The impact of combining Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) with Sorafenib on overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The Soramic trial palliative cohort

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • R. Lencioni et al.

    Objective response by mRECIST as a predictor and potential surrogate end-point of overall survival in advanced HCC

    J Hepatol

    (2017)
  • C. Zhan et al.

    Safety of Combined Yttrium-90 Radioembolization and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2020)
  • A. Gabr et al.

    4: 03 PM Abstract No. 268 Role of Y90 radioembolization in BCLC D patients

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2018)
  • T. Akinyemiju et al.

    The burden of primary liver cancer and underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the global, regional, and national level: results from the global burden of disease study 2015

    JAMA Oncol

    (2017)
  • H. Tsukuma et al.

    Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • J.D. Chen et al.

    Carriers of inactive hepatitis B virus are still at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death

    Gastroenterology

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text