Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 97, January 2017, Pages 104-111
World Neurosurgery

Technical Note
Using Intraoperative Ultrasonography for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.097Get rights and content

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of modern intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) in the resection of a wide variety of spinal intradural pathologic entities.

Methods

We evaluated patients with spinal cord disease treated between January 2006 and September 2015. Intraoperative standard B-mode images were acquired using a 3.5-MHz to 12-MHz ultrasonographic probes (linear and curvilinear) on various ultrasound machines. The benefits and disadvantages of iUS were assessed for each case.

Results

A total number of 158 intradural spinal lesions were operated on using iUS. Of these, 107 lesions (68%) were intradural extramedullary and 51 (32%) were intramedullary. All lesions were clearly visible using the ultrasound probe. The high-frequency linear probes (10–12 MHz) provided a better image quality compared with lower-frequency probes. Color and power-angiography modes were helpful in assessing the vascularization of the tumors and location of the major vessels in the vascular lesions.

Discussion

We document how iUS was used to facilitate safe and efficient spinal tumor resection at each stage of the operation. iUS was beneficial in confirmation of tumor location and extension, planning myelotomy, and estimation of degree of resection of the intramedullary tumors. It was particularly helpful in guiding the approach in redo surgeries for recurrent spinal cord tumors.

Conclusions

iUS has a fast learning curve and offers additional intraoperative information that can help improve surgical accuracy and therefore may reduce procedure-related morbidity.

Introduction

Intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) in neurosurgery was pioneered in the early 1980s by Chandler and Knake,1 Dohrmann and Rubin,2 and Masuzawa et al.3 By the early 1990s, Epstein et al.4 were consistently using it for all intramedullary tumor resections, concluding that intraoperative sonography had “permitted a more complete and better-guided radical resection of spinal cord neoplasms, with improved postoperative neurologic function.” These investigators acknowledged that resection was possible only with improved tumor localization, tumor and cyst characterization, placement of myelotomy, and tumor resection monitoring, all of which were performed under iUS visualization.

It is increasingly important to be able to identify tumor location intraoperatively as the case mix has evolved from large tumors causing neurologic deficit to small tumors identified early or even incidentally by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In these cases, the tumor may not be visible macroscopically on the surface of the cord.

Doppler techniques are useful in visualizing feeding arteries in tumors or vascular lesions as well as neighboring vessels. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is helpful in the assessment of the flow dynamics as well as in defining the border between tumor and healthy neural tissue and in detecting residual tumor. Coupling contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with virtual navigation permits one to localize these vessels in the three-dimensional frame within the surgical field. The value of these techniques has been well described in brain surgery5, 6, 7, 8 and we postulate that they can be applied with the similar success to spinal cord surgery. Similarly, it was previously shown that most brain tumors are very visible intraoperatively using B-mode ultrasonography9, 10, 11 and we hypothesize that the same applies to visualization of spinal cord tumors.

As a consequence of technologic progress, iUS is now a requisite in many operations that involve the spinal cord. iUS allows the surgeon to easily detect and assess lesions within the spinal cord, dural sac, and along the ventral aspect of the spinal cord during surgery. Intramedullary and extramedullary tumors, hematomas, abscesses, cysts, syrinxes, discs, bone, and bullet fragments can be easily located and operated on under ultrasonic guidance.12, 13, 14, 15, 16

We report our experience with iUS as an integral aid for locating and determining the resection of intradural spinal disease. We analyze the strengths and limitations of this technique as well as some unique features that other intraoperative imaging techniques cannot provide.

Section snippets

Methods

Between January 2006 and October 2015, 158 patients with intradural spinal pathologic entities underwent surgery performed by the first and last author (2006–2008) and subsequently by the first author in another hospital (2008–2015). In all cases, iUS was used for intraoperative orientation.

Intraoperative standard B-mode images were acquired using a 3.5-MHz to 12-MHz ultrasound probe (linear and curvilinear) on various ultrasound machines (Philips 3500, Philips 4000 [Amsterdam, Netherlands],

Case Mix

There were 76 males (48%) and 82 females (52%) with a mean age of 46 years, ranging from 19 months to 81 years. Of 158 lesions, 68% (107) were intradural extramedullary and 32% (51) intramedullary (Table 1). Five of the intramedullary lesions also had an extramedullary exophytic component. In 1 case, the patient underwent ultrasound-guided surgical biopsy on the basis of a positive MRI finding, but the histopathologic examination showed an inflammatory lesion.

iUS

Lesions were visible on sonographic

Discussion

We discuss the usefulness and limitations of iUS for spinal tumor surgery in a structure guided by the surgical technique itself.

Conclusions

iUS is one of the most underused imaging techniques in general neurosurgery, because of the advent of neuronavigation systems and intraoperative MRI/computed tomography. At the same time it remains the most accessible option.

In our series, we found it particularly helpful in tailoring the dural exposure and extent of myelotomy, estimation of intramedullary tumor debulking, accurate location of small intramedullary lesions, and assessment of lesional and perilesional vascularity and also in

References (22)

  • R. Mair et al.

    A practical grading system of ultrasonographic visibility for intracerebral lesions

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (2013)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Systematic Review: Applications of Intraoperative Ultrasonography in Spinal Surgery

      2022, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kimura et al.35 discovered iUS adequately localized nerve tissue advantageously without dissection of dura. Ivanov et al.50 identified tumors and vasculature along with nervous tissue and reported a fast learning curve for iUS with improved surgical accuracy and decreased procedure-related morbidity. The task of avoiding chronic morbidity, pain, and loss of function caused by iatrogenic nerve damage is challenging during open and even more so in minimal access procedures, with the limited visual field of a smaller incision.82

    • Surgical and Radiologic Prognostic Factors in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lesions

      2021, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Intraoperative ultrasonography is helpful for adequate dural opening, tumor localization, and degree of resection.42,46 It allows the transitional zones between the tumor and the surrounding structures to be identified, defining the cleavage plane.42,46 Based on all these findings, whether a GTR is possible remains mainly an intraoperative decision.

    • Common man's intraoperative ultrasound: Basic Sonosite™ probe doubling as real time neuronavigator

      2020, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Its use in neurosurgery was first described by Reid in 1978. Over the years a lot of neurosurgical procedures have been reported to be guided by IOUS, i.e lesion localization in the brain [10–12] and spine [13,14], guidance of surgical resection in tumors, catheter placement, aspiration of abscess and in spinal surgery. Brain parenchyma has specific viscoelastic features that permit exceptional ultrasound propagation, also aided by the fact that the ultrasound beam is not attenuated by interposed tissue like skin or subcutaneous tissue [11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text