Estimation of methane emission rate changes using age-defined waste in a landfill site
Introduction
The landfilling of biodegradable organic materials, such as kitchen waste, papers and woods causes long term methane gas generation, which can contribute to global warming if not adequately collected by a gas-recovery system. Emissions from landfill sites account for 30% of the total anthropogenic methane emissions in Europe, 34% of those in the US, and 10% of anthropogenic methane emissions worldwide (Perdikea et al., 2008). The EU landfill directive (European Union, 1999) required EU member countries to reduce biodegradable organic waste going to landfill sites and set a goal of reducing the amount of biodegradable waste going to landfills by 65% by 2020 compared to 1995 levels. The evaluation and monitoring of methane emissions from landfill sites is meaningful for preventing global warming.
In general, there are two different approaches to estimate methane emissions from landfill sites: the direct approach, which is based on landfill gas (LFG) emission measurements from the landfill surface, and an indirect calculation based on a straightforward mass balance equation between methane production, recovery and oxidation at the landfill site (Bella et al., 2011).
In the direct approach, methane emissions can be estimated (1) from the soil gas concentration profiles of methane through the landfill cover materials or (2) by using the static and/or dynamic closed flux chamber method, which is applied to a relatively small part of the landfill surface (Bella et al., 2011). However, the direct approaches have limitations, because the measured values are only obtained at discrete points and for a limited short time of the measurement (Spokas et al., 2003). There are spatial and time variations in landfill methane emissions. To reduce the influence of these variations, some larger area measurement assessments, such as a dynamic plume measurement using CO and N2O as tracer gasses was proposed (Scheutz et al., 2011). However, scaling the direct measurement approach to long term methane emissions from landfill sites is difficult because the measurement is based on the limited temporal period of the measurement.
In contrast, for the indirect calculation, several models have been developed with different orders of kinetics, including zero-, first-, and second-order models, as well as some more complex models (Freidrich and Trois, 2011; Meima et al., 2008). Most of the models are based on the first-order decay (FOD) model to predict methane generation as a surrogate for landfill methane emissions, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) model (IPCC, 2006), TNO model (Oonk et al., 1994), GasSim Lite model (Golder Associates, 2010), LandGEM model (US-EPA, 2005), and Afvalzorg model (Scharff, 2010). However, the coefficients introduced in the FOD models typically overestimate LFG production because the coefficients are derived from a calibration procedure in ideal steady-state conditions (e.g., gas production factors, conversion coefficients for organic matter degradation) (Cossu et al., 1996). These ideal steady-state conditions differ significantly from actual landfill site conditions. Amini et al. (2012) evaluated the uncertainty in estimated landfill gas generation rates, including the default coefficients given by the IPCC. The uncertainty in the modeled LFG generation rate varied from ±11% to ±17% while the landfills were open, from ±9% to ±18% at the end of waste placement, and from ±16% to ±203% at 50 years after waste placement ended.
Other than the amount and composition of waste, such as the biodegradable organic fraction, there are a variety of factors influencing methane generation, including climate conditions, such as temperature and precipitation, landfilling methods, such as waste compaction, leachate recirculation, and anaerobic or semi-aerobic landfilling (Freidrich and Trois, 2011, Lou and Nair, 2009). Thus, the coefficients in the FOD model should be determined under more realistic landfill site conditions.
This study attempts to establish a new approach to estimate more accurate methane generation rate coefficients through investigation of a real landfill site that has been operated for over 20 years in a city of Hokkaido, Japan. In the new approach, age-defined wastes are sampled from the real landfill site. The time of year when each waste was landfilled is defined based on working records of the landfill. Furthermore, these wastes have been in the landfill under real circumstances for specific periods of time. Although the new approach requires some assumptions and prerequisites in terms of waste composition, the degradation rate, and sample representativeness, the new approach can be an improved method for estimating the amount of long term methane generation from landfill sites.
Section snippets
Procedure of the new approach
This new approach consists of four steps, as shown in Fig. 1. First, existing information on the history of municipal solid waste management in the study area and working reports of the landfill at the targeted site are investigated to predict the composition of the landfilled waste, the annual amount of landfilled waste, and the distribution of landfilled waste over space and time.
Second, sampling of age-defined wastes from the landfill site is conducted. The waste composition, moisture,
Prediction of the history of waste composition by the record of landfill
Information on both of the amount and composition of landfilled waste are required in this study. The data on the annual amount of waste landfilled were obtained for each year from 1988 to 2010, as already described in Fig. 2. However, only limited data on the waste composition were available during this time period. In W city, the collection of recyclable paper began in 2001, as mentioned previously. Thus, by assuming that the waste composition did not change over time after 2001, the waste
Conclusion
This study predicted long term methane emissions from the landfill sites using a new approach, which estimated the coefficients in the first-order decay (FOD) model using age-defined waste samples obtained from a real landfill site. The new approach differs significantly from the conventional approaches. Although assumptions and prerequisites are required to apply the new approach to predict long term methane emissions from landfill sites, the new approach can be an improved method to predict
Acknowledgments
Age-defined waste sampling from the landfill site was supported by W city, Hokkaido, Japan. We would like to thank all people involved.
References (17)
- et al.
Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties
Waste Manage.
(2012) - et al.
The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions – a review
Bioresour. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
Sensitivity analysis and literature review of parameters controlling local biodegradation processes in municipal solid waste landfills
Waste Manage.
(2008) - et al.
Study of thin biocovers (TBC) for oxidizing uncaptured methane emissions in bioreactor landfills
Waste Manage.
(2008) - et al.
Quantification of multiple methane emission sources at landfills using a double tracer technique
Waste Manage.
(2011) - et al.
Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analysis
Waste Manage. (Oxford)
(2003) - et al.
Deer track bioreactor experiment: field-scale evaluation of municipal solid waste bioreactor performance
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
(2012) - et al.
Evaluation of methane emissions from Palemo municipal landfill: comparison between field measurements and models
Waste Manage.
(2011)
Cited by (21)
Determination of landfill gas generation potential from lignocellulose biomass contents of municipal solid waste
2021, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :The organic waste fraction has high potential to emit CH4 and CO2 for the longer period (Ishii and Furuichi, 2013). The anthropogenic CH4 emission from European and US landfill sites has contributed to around 10% to global CH4 emission (Ishii and Furuichi, 2013; Perdikea et al., 2008). Several studies reported that in an anaerobic digestion (AD) of biodegradable substrates, the rate of CH4 generation is high due to the presence of lignocellulose biomass comprised of cellulose and hemicellulose.
Biogas Production From Solid Waste Landfill
2020, Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials: Volume 1-5A study on the optimal path of methane emissions reductions in a municipal solid waste landfill treatment based on the IPCC-SD model
2019, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Majdinasab et al. (2017) claimed that IPCC model are extensively used to estimate the amount of methane, and also discussed the specific characteristics of several commonly used models. Ishii and Furuichi Ishii and Furuichi (2013) found that the IPCC model could estimate long-term methane generation more accurately by considering region-specific conditions. Lee Lee et al. (2017) found that the key parameters in the IPCC model have a great impact on the methane production.
Economic study on LFG energy projects in function of the number of generators
2018, Sustainable Cities and SocietyCitation Excerpt :Thus, these must be carefully chosen to guarantee the effectiveness of the model. Climatic aspects as precipitation and temperature are among the factors that influence the methane generation rate (k) in a landfill and have been studied by several authors in different regions (Wangyao et al., 2010; Ishii & Furuichi, 2013). The greater k value, the more warm and humid climates and the lower k value, the more cold and dry climates conditions (CETESB, 2006).
Spatially distributed potential of landfill biogas production and electric power generation in Brazil
2018, Waste ManagementCitation Excerpt :There are several mathematical and computational models to forecast methane generation out of landfills, which are classified as zero-order, first-order, second-order and multiphase (USEPA, 2005a). The first-order model is the most widely applied (Amini et al., 2013; Ishii and Furuichi, 2013; Karanjekar et al., 2015), adopted, for example, in the LandGEM model (USEPA, 2005b), Scholl Canyon (World Bank, 2004) and the Brazilian software Biogas® (CETESB, 2006). This parameter reflects the proportion of collected methane in relation to total methane generated (Lagos et al., 2017).