Short Communication
Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria associated with porcine respiratory disease in Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.03.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The porcine respiratory disease complex greatly affects the health and production of pigs. While antimicrobial agents are used to treat the respiratory infections caused by bacterial pathogens, there is no current information on antimicrobial resistance in Australian pig respiratory bacterial isolates. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profiles, by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of nine antimicrobial agents for 71 Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, 51 Pasteurella multocida and 18 Bordetella bronchiseptica cultured from Australian pigs. The majority of A. pleuropneumoniae isolates were resistant to erythromycin (89%) and tetracycline (75%). Resistance to ampicillin (8.5%), penicillin (8.5%) and tilmicosin (25%) was also identified. The P. multocida isolates exhibited resistance to co-trimoxazole (2%), florfenicol (2%), ampicillin (4%), penicillin (4%), erythromycin (14%) and tetracycline (28%). While all the B. bronchiseptica isolates showed resistance to beta-lactams (ampicillin, ceftiofur and penicillin), some were resistant to erythromycin (94%), florfenicol (6%), tilmicosin (22%) and tetracycline (39%). The incidence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) varied across the species – in B. bronchiseptica, 27.8% of resistant isolates showed MDR, while 9.1% of the resistant isolates in A. pleuropneumoniae, and 4.8% in P. multocida showed MDR. This study illustrated that Australian pig strains of bacterial respiratory pathogens exhibited low levels of resistance to antimicrobial agents commonly used in the pig industry.

Introduction

The porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), one of the most significant problems affecting health and production in the pig industry worldwide, is described as a multifactorial pneumonic state resulting from the interaction of bacteria, viruses and stresses caused by management, environment and genetic conditions (Opriessnig et al., 2011). A range of bacterial pathogens is associated with the initiation and progress of PRDC, with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis, Pasteurella multocida and Bordetella bronchiseptica having significant roles (Fablet et al., 2011, Opriessnig et al., 2011).

The use of antimicrobial agents, beta-lactams (ampicillin, penicillin and cephalosporins) (except for B. bronchiseptica), co-trimoxazole (sulfonamide and trimethoprim combination), florfenicol, macrolides (erythromycin, tilmicosin and tulathromycin) and tetracyclines remains the best treatment option to control PRDC (Karriker et al., 2013). The usage of antimicrobial agents has the potential to select for antimicrobial resistance (Barton et al., 2003). Resistance to antimicrobials commonly used to treat PRDC have been detected previously in porcine respiratory disease pathogens from many countries (Vicca et al., 2004, de la Fuente et al., 2007, San Millan et al., 2009, Tang et al., 2009, Chander et al., 2011, Kucerova et al., 2011, Nedbalcová and Kucerova, 2013).

In the past, antimicrobial resistance in Australia was reported in A. pleuropneumoniae (Eaves et al., 1989) and P. multocida (Stephens et al., 1995). However, no information exists for B. bronchiseptica. Thus, this study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. pleuropneumoniae, P. multocida and B. bronchiseptica Australian isolates against antimicrobial agents used for bacterial respiratory pathogens.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The bacterial isolates tested were obtained from Australian pigs in diagnostic disease investigations and then submitted to the Microbiology Research Group, EcoSciences Precinct, Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), Queensland, Australia for confirmatory identification and/or serotyping. A total of 71 A. pleuropneumoniae, 51 P. multocida and 18 B. bronchiseptica isolates collected between the years 2002 and 2013 were selected from the culture collection of the Microbiology

Results and discussion

The MIC distribution of 71 A. pleuropneumoniae, 51 P. multocida and 18 B. bronchiseptica isolates, the percentage of resistance in each antimicrobial as well as the MIC50 and MIC90 are shown in Table 1.The MICs of the reference strains in each test run were within the CLSI acceptable quality control ranges. All A. pleuropneumoniae were susceptible to ceftiofur, co-trimoxazole, florfenicol and tulathromycin. Overall, 66 of 71 (93%) of the A. pleuropneumoniae isolates were resistant to one or

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support provided by the Australian Pork Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) project 2A-107 1213 for the operating expenses to complete this work which was part of a PhD degree undertaken by D. Dayao. The PhD study was supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) project AH/2009/022 John Allwright Fellowship.

References (24)

  • T. Gram et al.

    Improved diagnostic PCR assay for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae based on the nucleotide sequence of an outer membrane lipoprotein

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1998)
  • K. Kadlec et al.

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bordetella bronchiseptica isolates from porcine respiratory tract infections

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Antimicrobial resistance of Pasteurella multocida isolated from diseased food-producing animals and pets

      2019, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Australia, a more recent study on 51 P. multocida isolated from swine reported very low levels of resistance, except for tetracycline (28%) (Dayao et al., 2014). Two studies in swine, one in China on 233 isolates and the other on 454 isolates collected in South Korea also identified high levels of tetracycline resistance (58.0% and 66.5% respectively) (Tang et al., 2009; Oh et al., 2018), higher than those reported in Europe (El Garch et al., 2016), North America (Sweeney, 2017), Australia (Dayao et al., 2014) and in our study (6.7%). Similarly, resistance to florfenicol reached 18.5% in South Korea, whereas it appeared to be very limited in Europe.

    • 3Antimicrobial resistance of Pasteurella multocida isolates recovered from swine pneumonia in Spain throughout 2017 and 2018

      2019, Veterinary and Animal Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similar results were obtained for 36 isolated previously (Sellyei et al., 2009; Tang et al., 2009). Other safer phenicol, florfenicol, that is used exclusively in veterinary patients for the therapy of pneumonia caused by P. multocida (Kehrenberg, Wallmann, & Schwarz, 2008), was equally highly effective against clinical isolates (Dayao et al., 2014; de Jong et al., 2014). Nevertheless, resistance to florfenicol in two German isolates, being associated to plasmid pCCK381 and florR gene, was described ten years ago (Kehrenberg et al., 2008).

    • Characterization of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from human infections

      2019, Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text