Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 33, Issue 49, 8 December 2015, Pages 7008-7014
Vaccine

Genetic stability of live attenuated vaccines against potentially pandemic influenza viruses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.050Get rights and content

Highlights

  • H5N2, H7N3, H2N2 potentially pandemic LAIV viruses were detected in vaccines.

  • We studied genetic stability of potentially pandemic LAIVs clinical isolates.

  • All LAIVs tested displayed high genetic stability of attenuating mutations.

  • No viral RNA was found in any of the placebo recipients after vaccination.

Abstract

Background

Ensuring genetic stability is a prerequisite for live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). This study describes the results of virus shedding and clinical isolates’ testing of Phase I clinical trials of Russian LAIVs against potentially pandemic influenza viruses in healthy adults.

Methods

Three live attenuated vaccines against potentially pandemic influenza viruses, H2N2 LAIV, H5N2 LAIV and H7N3 LAIV, generated by classical reassortment in eggs, were studied. For each vaccine tested, subjects were randomly distributed into two groups to receive two doses of either LAIV or placebo at a 3:1 vaccine/placebo ratio. Nasal swabs were examined for vaccine virus shedding by culturing in eggs and by PCR. Vaccine isolates were tested for temperature sensitivity and cold-adaptation (ts/ca phenotypes) and for nucleotide sequence.

Results

The majority of nasal wash positive specimens were detected on the first day following vaccination. PCR method demonstrated higher sensitivity than routine virus isolation in eggs. None of the placebo recipients had detectable vaccine virus replication.

All viruses isolated from the immunized subjects retained the ts/ca phenotypic characteristics of the master donor virus (MDV) and were shown to preserve all attenuating mutations described for the MDV. These data suggest high level of vaccine virus genetic stability after replication in humans.

During manufacture process, no additional mutations occurred in the genome of H2N2 LAIV. In contrast, one amino acid change in the HA of H7N3 LAIV and two additional mutations in the HA of H5N2 LAIV manufactured vaccine lot were detected, however, they did not affect their ts/ca phenotypes.

Conclusions

Our clinical trials revealed phenotypic and genetic stability of the LAIV viruses recovered from the immunized volunteers. In addition, no vaccine virus was detected in the placebo groups indicating the lack of person-to-person transmission.

LAIV TRIAL REGISTRATION at ClinicalTrials.gov: H7N3-NCT01511419; H5N2-NCT01719783; H2N2-NCT01982331.

Introduction

Pigs and some avian species are the main reservoir of newly emerging pandemic influenza viruses [1], [2], [3]. Global circulation of all influenza A virus subtypes in avian species pose a constant threat to human public health. As of January 6, 2015, 694 cases of H5N1 influenza virus were reported by World Health Organization (WHO), 402 (58%) of which were fatal [4]. A total of 450 laboratory-confirmed cases of human infection with avian influenza H7N9 virus, including 165 (37%) deaths, have been reported to WHO on June 27, 2014 [5]. Influenza H2N2 viruses are also considered as a probable subtype to cause future pandemic because these viruses have not circulated in the human population since 1968. Therefore, people born after the H2N2 pandemic in 1968 more likely have no immunity to these viruses and may be more vulnerable if the H2N2 subtype returns to circulation [6], [7].

Vaccination remains the principal strategy against both seasonal and pandemic influenza. Over the last years, the interest in the live cold-adapted reassortment influenza vaccine (LAIV) has increased considerably. To a certain degree, it is because WHO recognized the advantages of LAIV in comparison with inactivated vaccine in the event of pandemic situation. These advantages include needle-free administration, higher vaccine virus yield, easier down-stream processing, cross-reactivity of immune responses and the induction of herd immunity [8].

Two types of LAIVs are now available commercially. The first, licensed in 1987 for the prevention of influenza in persons 3 years and older as Ultravac (Microgen, Russia), is based on cold-adapted MDVs, A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2N2) and B/USSR/60/69 [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Pre-master seed vaccine viruses for LAIV production are developing by IEM (Institute of Experimental Medicine, St Petersburg, Russia).

The second, licensed as FluMist in 2003 (MedImmune, Inc, USA), is based on cold-adapted MDVs, A/Ann Arbor/6/60ca (H2N2) and B/Ann Arbor/1/66ca and uses for the prevention of influenza in persons younger than 49 and older than 2 years of age [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].

Seasonal influenza vaccination does not appear to protect against pandemic or H5N1 influenza viruses [20], [21], [22]. Therefore, in the face of pandemic development of appropriate potentially pandemic LAIVs is of primary strategic importance. A number of potentially pandemic LAIVs already generated by MedImmune [23], [24], [25], [26] and IEM [14], [27], [28], [29]. IEM is preparing a National collection of vaccine strains against potentially pandemic influenza viruses, which may cause serious and fatal disease.

Stability of genotype and phenotype, together with the absence of transmission potency are the main properties of live attenuated vaccines, which ensure their safety profile [30]. Confirmation of genetic and phenotypic stability of an LAIV is especially important in a pandemic situation to guarantee its safety during large-scale immunization campaigns. The lack of person-to-person transmission of Russian live attenuated vaccine was demonstrated in several clinical trials [27], [28], [31]. To our knowledge, there was only a single documented case of an LAIV virus transmission to an unvaccinated child during clinical trials of seasonal LAIVs prepared by MedImmune [32].

The safety profile and immunogenicity of Russian H2N2 [28], H5N2 [29] and H7N3 [27] potentially pandemic LAIVs were already well documented and published. In this paper, we presented the results of molecular genetics and virological studies conducted as a part of three clinical trials. The goal of this paper was to evaluate shedding, transmission and genetic stability of H7N3, H5N2 and H2N2 LAIVs against potentially pandemic influenza viruses developed by IEM (Russia) and to compare our results with published data by MedImmune (USA).

Section snippets

Vaccines tested

Three live attenuated vaccine strains against potentially pandemic influenza viruses, A/17/mallard/Netherlands/00/95 (H7N3) [33], A/17/California/66/395 (H2N2) [34] or A/17/turkey/Turkey/2005/133 (H5N2) [35] were generated in Institute of Experimental Medicine (IEM, St. Petersburg, Russia) by classical reassortment in eggs as pre-master seed viruses (pre-MSVs). Cold-adapted A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2N2) virus was used as MDV. H2N2 and H7N3 LAIVs displayed 6:2 genomic composition (six MDV genes

Results and discussion

The safety of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza vaccine is dependent on retention of the ts and ca phenotypes, genetic stability and lack of possible person-to-person transmission. In this study, we examined vaccine viruses shed in nasal secretions from three separate studies of H7N3, H5N2 and H2N2 LAIVs for duration of shedding and to ascertain retention of the appropriate phenotypes and genotypes. The inclusion of placebo controls in the studies, which were conducted as inpatient

Conclusions

Phenotypic (cold adaptation and temperature sensitivity) and genotypic (sequence) analyses conducted on the viruses recovered from the volunteers suggest that the Russian live attenuated vaccine is genetically stable after in vivo passages. All 40 clinical isolates tested retained the ts/ca phenotype of the MDV and were shown to preserve all attenuating mutations described for MDV. These data suggest high level of vaccine virus genetic stability after replication in humans.

Vaccine virus was not

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The clinical part of this work was funded by Program for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH, Seattle, WA, USA). Molecular genetics studies were partially supported by Russian Scientific Fund No.14-15-00034 (RSF, Moscow, Russia).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors would like to thank the study participants and the following collaborators on the study who supported the clinical studies: Vadim Tsvetnitsky (PATH), Maureen Power (PATH), Oleg Kiselev (Institute of Influenza), Marina Stukova (Institute of Influenza) and Marianna Erofeeva (Institute of Influenza) for their expert clinical assistance. We are also very grateful to Nadezhda Konovalova (Institute of Influenza) for collection of specimens and to Larisa Gubareva (CDC) for performing NA

References (44)

  • Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1) reported to WHO. 2014, WHO. Available at:...
  • WHO risk assessment of human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus. 2014, WHO. Available at:...
  • G.J. Nabel et al.

    Vaccinate for the next H2N2 pandemic now

    Nature

    (2011)
  • R. Pyhala

    Antibody status to influenza A/Singapore/1/57(H2N2) in Finland during a period of outbreaks caused by H3N2 and H1N1 subtype viruses

    J Hyg (Lond)

    (1985)
  • WHO global action plan to increase vaccine supply for influenza vaccines. 2006, Geneva, Belgium. WHO/IVB/06.13....
  • L.G. Rudenko et al.

    Efficacy of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in schoolchildren and their unvaccinated contacts in Novgorod, Russia

    J Infect Dis

    (1993)
  • L.G. Rudenko et al.

    Clinical and epidemiological evaluation of a live, cold-adapted influenza vaccine for 3–14-year-olds

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1996)
  • L. Rudenko et al.

    Live attenuated pandemic influenza vaccine: clinical studies on A/17/California/2009/38 (H1N1) and licensing of the Russian-developed technology to WHO for pandemic influenza preparedness in developing countries

    Vaccine

    (2014)
  • L. Rudenko et al.

    Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated influenza reassortant H5 vaccine (phase I–II clinical trials)

    Influenza Respir Viruses

    (2008)
  • C.S. Ambrose et al.

    Current status of live attenuated influenza vaccine in the United States for seasonal and pandemic influenza

    Influenza Respir Viruses

    (2008)
  • T. Vesikari et al.

    Safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of cold-adapted influenza vaccine-trivalent against community-acquired, culture-confirmed influenza in young children attending day care

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • K.M. Zangwill et al.

    Safety and efficacy of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in young children: a summary for the new era of routine vaccination

    Pediatr Infect Dis J

    (2004)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Immunogenicity and efficacy comparison of MDCK cell-based and egg-based live attenuated influenza vaccines of H5 and H7 subtypes in ferrets

      2020, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Extensive use of the Russian A/Leningrad-backbone-based LAIV has proven this vaccine concept to be safe for human use [17]. Reversion to a virulent strain has not been reported and a stable genetic configuration can be attributed to the multiple sites of attenuating mutation in different segments of the viral genome [25]. Furthermore, no serious adverse event associated with the use of the MDCK-based LAIV in a phase 1 clinical trial conducted using a seasonal trivalent LAIV was reported [21] and no adverse effects of the vaccines tested were observed in the studies described here.

    View full text