Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Original articleRole of surgical approach on lymph node dissection yield and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Introduction
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5% to 10% of all urothelial carcinomas [1]. The gold standard treatment for high-grade lesions or invasive disease is radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Although routinely performed during radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, a formal lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomy is not a universally agreed upon standard [2]. However, several population-based studies and multi-institutional series have demonstrated that LND and lymph node (LN) yield have diagnostic and therapeutic value [3], especially for muscle-invasive disease. As such there is increasing interest in understanding the role of LND during radical nephroureterectomy.
Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly being utilized to perform complex oncologic procedures that were traditionally performed using an open approach, such as open nephroureterectomy (ONU). Presently, the most commonly performed approach for the surgical management of UTUC is a laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). However, several studies have demonstrated increasing utilization of robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) [4], [5]. An associated finding has been the observation of higher rates of LND when a robotic approach to nephroureterectomy is employed [4], [5]. LN yield achieved with RNU, and the attendant effects on oncologic and survival outcomes, however, have not been investigated.
In this study, we examine the relationship between surgical approach and LN yield during nephroureterectomy. We also compare rates of performance of LND between surgical approaches and identify independent predictors of LND. Finally, we evaluate whether LND, LN yield, and approach to nephroureterectomy impact overall survival (OS).
Section snippets
Data source
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a hospital registry-based database compiled from more than 1,500 Commission on Cancer accredited centers, and is sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The NCDB captures more than 70% of newly diagnosed cancers in the United States and represents more than 34 million historical records [6].
Study population
To identify patients with UTUC we first isolated patients with renal pelvis and/or ureteral tumors (ICD-O primary site
Results
A total of 3,116 patients met our inclusion criteria. Clinical covariates stratified by surgical approach are presented in Table 1. Significant differences in sex, income, education level, US region, facility type, tumor-specific characteristics (primary site, laterality, tumor size, tumor grade, and clinical node status), pathologic characteristics (pT stage, pN stage, and surgical margins), and treatment characteristics (performance of a LND, systemic therapy, and treatment year) were found
Discussion
Current literature on the role of LND in the management of UTUC is evolving yet remains controversial. A formal LND for UTUC improves staging, guides the need for adjuvant treatment, and can potentially control micrometastatic disease [3]. A recent meta-analysis found that LND improved cancer-specific survival in patients with muscle-invasive UTUC compared with patients who did not undergo a LND [7]. Although no randomized data exist currently, a prospective study of 90 patients found that LND
Conclusions
RNU does not compromise rates of LND or LN yield compared with an ONU. LNU is associated with the lowest rates of LND and LN yield. When controlling for other variables, increasing LN yield was associated with improved OS in patients with pN0 disease. Despite varying rates of LND and higher LN yield, surgical approach was not associated with OS in our models. Based on this data and others, LND may be considered for patients likely to have pathologically negative LNs at the time of
References (14)
- et al.
The effect of surgical approach on performance of lymphadenectomy and perioperative morbidity for radical nephroureterectomy
Urol Oncol
(2016) - et al.
European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: 2015 update
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
Patterns of lymphatic metastases in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and proposed dissection templates
J Urol
(2015) - et al.
Prediction of true nodal status in patients with pathological lymph node negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma at radical nephroureterectomy
J Urol
(2013) - et al.
Cancer statistics, 2016
CA Cancer J Clin
(2016) - et al.
The role of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Nat Rev Urol
(2011) - et al.
Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
World J Urol
(2016)
Cited by (37)
EDITORIAL COMMENT
2023, UrologyPerioperative and Oncologic Outcomes Associated with Simultaneous Radical Cystectomy and Nephroureterectomy
2023, UrologyCitation Excerpt :Additionally, 5 of 32 (16%) patients who did not undergo RPLND at the time of nephroureterectomy subsequently developed retroperitoneal nodal recurrence. Recent studies demonstrate that RPLND in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UTUC improves CSS, reduces risk of local recurrence, and improves survival even in clinically and pathologically node-negative disease.26-28 Based on these findings, the current EAU guidelines recommend template-based retroperitoneal node dissection for all patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UTUC, and this should be considered in patients meeting criteria for RCNU.29
Benefit of lymph node dissection in cN+ patients in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of NCDB registry
2022, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsNovel nomograms to predict muscle invasion and lymph node metastasis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma
2022, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsCitation Excerpt :An accurate preoperative decision-making tool to help risk stratify patients and predict muscle-invasive disease would be of benefit in guiding clinicians, particularly as more data emerges assessing the efficacy of NAC in UTUC. Despite current European Association of Urology guidelines recommending a template-based LND in patients with presumed muscle-invasive UTUC [14], LND remains underperformed, with retrospective series showing LND being performed in only around 25% to 40% of eligible patients [13,15–16]. This is significant, as LND in UTUC has been shown to improve pathologic staging, and template-based LND has been shown to improve cancer specific survival in patients with muscle-invasive disease and reduce the risk of local recurrence [11–13].
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years
2021, Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :In the multivariate analysis, a radical cystectomy prior to surgery was associated with a 2.7 times higher risk of death from any cause. Lenis et al. also found tumor location, size, positive surgical margins, pT and pN stage to be associated with the OS; and patient age and lymph node yield according to Clements et al. [18,35]. As for the PFS, lymph node metastases had the strongest impact with a hazard ratio of 3.3 for metastasized tumors, but also patient age and prior cystectomy.
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node dissection, and treatment delay in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing partial cystectomy
2021, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsCitation Excerpt :NAC was defined as receipt of multiagent chemotherapy before surgery, determined by a variable defining the sequence of treatment events (“Systemic/Surgery Sequence”). Patients were considered to have undergone LND only if the intent to perform this procedure was coded (variable “Scope of LN Surgery”) and if >0 lymph nodes were reported, as previously described [9]. Lymph node yield was used as a surrogate for adequacy rather than extent of template (information not available in NCDB) based on prior literature demonstrating 10 lymph nodes as an appropriate cutoff [10].
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Loan Repayment Program (L30 CA154326 [Principal Investigator: K.C.]), the STOP Cancer Foundation (Principal Investigator: K.C.), and the H & H Lee Surgical Resident Research Award (Recipient: A.T.L.).