Original article
Population-based analysis of factors associated with survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Despite level 1 evidence demonstrating a survival benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in well-selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the cytokine era, its role in the contemporary period of targeted therapy remains understudied. To help facilitate improved patient selection for CN and clinical trial design in the targeted therapy era, this study sought to identify factors associated with RCC-specific survival in patients diagnosed with mRCC and undergoing CN between 2005 and 2010 using a large population-based cohort.

Materials and methods

Patients diagnosed with mRCC and undergoing CN between 2005 and 2010 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results cancer database. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate disease-specific survival. Stepwise multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with risk of RCC-specific death.

Results

A total of 2,478 patients were identified who were eligible for analysis with a median disease-specific survival of 21 months (95% CI: 19, 22). Factors independently associated with an increased risk of RCC-specific death included age at diagnosis≥60 years, African American race, higher American Joint Committee on Cancer T stage (≥T3), high Fuhrman nuclear grade (3 or 4), primary tumor size≥7 cm, regional lymphadenopathy, both distant lymph node and visceral metastases, and sarcomatoid histology. A higher number of adverse factors correlated with an increased risk of RCC-specific death (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Factors associated with RCC-specific survival identified in this large population-based study can be used to better stratify patients suitable for CN and to help with future clinical trial design and interpretation.

Introduction

Up to 25% of patients continue to present with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) at the time of diagnosis [1]. The introduction of targeted therapy (TT) in 2005 marked a major milestone in the treatment of mRCC. However, even with TT, the prognosis of patients with mRCC remains poor. The central role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) before the advent of TT was based on level 1 evidence demonstrating a survival advantage when CN was performed before treatment with interferon alfa-2b (IFNα) compared with IFNα treatment alone [2], [3], [4]. Unfortunately, such evidence does not exist for CN in the context of TT [5]. Although 2 prospective randomized trials are currently underway to help define the benefit of CN in the present era of TT, the results may be limited based on their selection criteria and thereby not generalizable to all patients diagnosed with mRCC. Furthermore, the results of these trials are not likely to be available for years to come. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use a large population-based database to identify factors associated with RCC-specific survival in patients diagnosed with mRCC and undergoing CN between 2005 and 2010, the period corresponding to the initial use of TT, to better stratify patients suitable for CN and to help with future clinical trial design and interpretation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Data were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. In addition to basic demographic data, SEER records information regarding tumor site and histology, stage and grade of disease, as well as initial treatment(s) administered. The vital status of most cases is known, allowing accurate calculation of survival time [6].

Cases were identified as any person 30 years or older diagnosed with a malignant tumor of the kidney parenchyma (site code 64.9) between 2005 and

Results

A total of 2,478 patients with mRCC at diagnosis were identified that underwent CN and eligible for analysis with a median follow-up of 13 months (interquartile range 5, 27). Characteristics of patients undergoing CN are listed in Table 1. Death occurred in 1,506 (60.8%) patients undergoing CN: 1,360 (90.3%) from RCC and 146 (9.7%) from other causes. Patients undergoing CN demonstrated a median DSS of 21 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19, 22) (Fig. 1). The results from univariable and

Discussion

The introduction of TT in 2005 marked a significant breakthrough in mRCC treatment with multiple studies showing prolonged survival and decreased toxicity with TT compared with immunotherapy [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Although the central role of CN in the management of patients with mRCC in the immunotherapy era was based on 2 randomized prospective trials (Southwest Oncology Group trial 8949 and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 30947) [2],

Conclusions

Despite the inherent limitations of this population-based study, our results provide useful information regarding factors influencing survival of patients undergoing CN in the contemporary era of TT. As opposed to other major series [15], [29] evaluating prognostic factors in the setting of TT, our results are restricted to only those patients undergoing surgery; include race, primary tumor size, grade, and AJCC T and N stages; and are based on a large cohort representing a diverse population

References (29)

  • R.T. Tripathi et al.

    Racial disparity in outcomes of a clinical trial population with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

    Urology

    (2006)
  • E.J. Abel et al.

    Percutaneous biopsy of primary tumor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma to predict high risk pathological features: comparison with nephrectomy assessment

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • R.C. Flanigan et al.

    Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • L.C. Harlan et al.

    The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text