Technical NoteUltrasound for the Clinical Management of Vascular Access Cannulation and Needle Position in Hemodialysis Patients
Introduction
Hemodialysis (HD) is the most frequent dialytic modality, being chosen by 70% of patients with end-stage renal disease. Adequate treatment requires a well-functioning vascular access. A native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) represents the vascular access of choice for HD patients owing to the lower incidence of complications and longer survival compared with grafts and central venous catheters (Gibson et al. 2001; NKF-K/DOQI 2001).
Optimal cannulation of AVFs is very important for the survival of the vascular access. Cannulation of the vessel causes a microtrauma that can result in hyperplasia of the intima and lead to vasal stenosis (Hsiao et al. 2010). Over time, repeated punctures in the same area result in a weakened vessel wall that results in the formation of aneurysms (Lee et al. 2006). Moreover, the insertion of the needle inside the wall causes hematomas (a complication present in 35% of cannulations) and clots, which are associated with an increased risk of fistula thrombosis and loss of access (Lee et al. 2006). It is generally recommended that the needle be placed on the venous access in the same direction as the blood flow (co-current). This reduces the formation of hematomas and the development of pseudoaneurysms during removal of the needle (Ball 2005) and minimizes bleeding because closure of the vessel flap facilitates hemostasis at the endothelial wall. The needle at the arterial access can be positioned in both co-current and counter-current directions. Recent studies, however, have found that retrograde positioning counter-current improves blood flow dynamics (Fulker et al. 2013), although the risk of bleeding is increased owing to the failure of vessel wall tissue to close the wall. Some authors recommend directing the needle tip anteriorly to prevent infiltration at the level of the anterior vessel wall, avoiding rotation of the needle inside the vessel, which can lead to trauma (Fulker et al. 2013). In clinical practice, different choices are adopted by different centers, and methods based on personal experience are used with no unambiguous recommendations for the practice of vascular access puncture.
Intimal hyperplasia and shear stress of the wall are two other important aspects of vascular access function and are the primary causes of stenosis of the AVF. After formation and maturation of an AVF, the consequent hemodynamic alterations in the vessel wall are correlated with new changes in parietal tension, shear stress, that are not correctly perceived by the endothelium. These changes may, in fact, result in reductions (Meyerson et al. 2001), oscillations (Keynton et al. 2001) or excessive increases in wall shear stress (Fry 1968), inducing mechanical alterations of the vascular endothelial layer and local activation of inflammation, finally leading to cellular and tissue alterations and intimate hyperplasia.
In addition to the turbulent flow present within the AVF, the use of extracorporeal circulation determines a further perturbation in blood flow caused by the impact of needle flow at the arterial and venous levels. Blood flow generated by the needles during the extracorporeal circulation has a direct effect on endothelial function. This flow may, in fact, induce changes in the blood flow or disturbance of AVF flow, resulting in the appearance of turbulent components at the vessel wall. This phenomenon changes the shear stress to which endothelial cells are subjected. This alteration is also heightened when the direction of venous needle flow is not perfectly co-current with respect to the natural flow of the AVF, but is oriented toward the vessel wall. The same alteration can be observed if the venous needle induces turbulence in the blood flow owing to incorrect positioning.
The diameter of the needle and the direction of vessel cannulation entail alterations in the dynamics of flow inside the vessel that can affect the damage induced by the general hemodynamic alterations in the fistula. Studies have reported that the needle alters blood flow dynamics after insertion, modifying wall stress and flow turbulence (Huynh et al. 2007). Furthermore, Fulker et al. (2017) recently reported that positioning of the needle tip at the level of the posterior wall of the vessel causes a large increase in wall shear stress, while significant secondary flows are generated if the needle is positioned at the level of the anterior wall. On the basis of this evidence, it is easy to deduce how positioning of the needle tip away from the vessel wall can minimize vessel damage, greatly limiting shear stress and turbulent secondary flow.
The use of ultrasound in evaluating both the arterial and venous sides of the AVF has improved survival of patients with AVFs, because acute and chronic complications are rapidly detected and corrected, and useful information is obtained for follow-up (Zamboli et al. 2012).
In the study described here, we aimed to assess the role of ultrasound in the optimal clinical assessment of AVF cannulation by evaluating positioning of HD needles during standard HD sessions.
Section snippets
Patients
Forty-five patients were considered for this study (mean age: 64.4 ± 12.6 y, age range: 36–86 y, 36 males and 9 females). Exclusion criteria for the participation to this study were the presence of diabetes, diameter of the vessel at the cannulation site <5 mm, complications related to previous AVF/arteriovenous grafts (AVG) cannulations during the ultrasound vascular access follow-up, known problems with AVF or AVG cannulation caused by difficult access and problems related to the
Results
As outlined in Table 1, of the 45 vascular accesses evaluated, 24 were distal AVFs (53.3%), 11 were proximal AVFs (24.5%), 3 were proximalized AVFs (6.7%) and 7 were grafts (15.5%).
Among the 45 vascular accesses, 12 had already developed a stenosis or fully recovered from a previous episode of thrombosis (26.7%), 12 had aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms (26.7%) and 15 were previously non-functioning vascular accesses (33.3%); of the latter, there were 4 fistulas in 4 patients (9% of the total), 3
Discussion
Via colorDoppler evaluation using a portable device, a randomized control was established to evaluate the positioning of the needles inside the vascular access during HD sessions, without complications at the time of venipuncture and in the absence of previous predictors of access malfunction.
On enrollment in the study, no patient manifested complications of the vascular access at the physical examination, and analysis of hemodynamic parameters during extracorporeal circulation did not reveal
Conclusions
Ultrasonography is the only instrumental examination that allows dynamic evaluation of vascular access during the extracorporeal treatment. It is a non-invasive procedure and can be performed at the patient's bedside and repeated over time, allowing nephrologists to have an anatomic and functional evaluation of the vascular access with a quantitative and qualitative hemodynamic analysis.
Given that the absence of clinical and hemodynamic signs of dysfunction or complications related to the
Conflict of interest disclosure
The authors declare no competing interests.
References (19)
- et al.
Vascular access survival and incidence of revisions: A comparison of prosthetic grafts, simple autogenous fistulas, and venous transposition fistulas from the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study
J Vasc Surg
(2001) - et al.
Vascular changes at the puncture segments of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access
J Vasc Surg
(2010) - et al.
Effects of venous needle turbulence during ex vivo hemodialysis on endothelial morphology and nitric oxide formation
J Biomech
(2007) - et al.
Needle infiltration of arteriovenous fistulae in hemodialysis: Risk factors and consequences
Am J Kidney Dis
(2006) - et al.
The effects of extremely low shear stress on cellular proliferation and neointimal thickening in the failing bypass graft
J Vasc Surg
(2001) Improving arteriovenous fistula cannulation skills
Nephrol Nurs J
(2005)Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients
Circ Res
(1968)- et al.
The flow field near a venous needle in hemodialysis: A computational study
Hemodial Int
(2013) - et al.
Computational model of the arterial and venous needle during hemodialysis
J Biomech Eng
(2017)
Cited by (9)
Sonographic 3-D Power Doppler Imaging Enhances Rapid Assessment of Morphologic and Pathologic Arteriovenous Fistula Variations
2021, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :Conventional 2-D US plays a key role in assessing AVFs and is well established for initially diagnosing access-related insufficiency of hemodialysis. For experienced sonographers, Doppler sonography provides an excellent tool for real-time imaging in routine assessment and in the initial evaluation of access-related failure in adults and children (Dumars et al. 2002; Doelman et al. 2005; Thalhammer et al. 2007; Visciano et al. 2014; Shroff et al. 2019; Nalesso et al. 2020). High-quality AVF sonography calls for a great deal of practice in properly estimating hemodynamic changes.
Nurses' perceptions of point-of-care ultrasound for haemodialysis access assessment and guided cannulation: A qualitative study
2023, Journal of Clinical NursingEvaluation of a Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) workshop for peripheral intravenous cannulation
2023, BMC Medical Education