Review article
“Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy”

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2020.100569Get rights and content

Highlights

  • CAV still represents one of the main cause of death in heart recipients.

  • CAV is a fibroproliferative concentric circumferential intimal thickening of coronary tree.

  • IVUS presents higher sensibility compared with coronary angiography in early detection of CAV.

  • Plaque composition and vulnerability on VH/IVUS or OCT seem to relate to adverse clinical events.

  • PCI seems to have only a palliative meaning and should be considered in focal CAV disease.

Abstract

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a unique form of accelerated atherosclerosis that represents the main late cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting almost half patients at ten years after heart transplantation (HTx). Unless the pathogenesis of CAV is still not completely understood, it seems to be the result of a complex interplay between immunological and non-immunological factors that induce endothelial injury. Histologically epicardial and intramural vessels present a concentric circumferential intimal thickening caused by smooth muscle cell proliferation, inflammatory cells, and lipid deposition. Coronary angiography is still considered the gold-standard diagnostic tool for CAV detection but has reduced sensibility due to its inability to visualize beyond the arterial lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) allows detecting early intimal thickening with high sensitivity. Plaque composition and vulnerability, detectable with virtual histology (VH/IVUS), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) seem to relate to adverse clinical events. Treatment approaches continue to evolve, but prevention and early detection remain the focus. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors can significantly delay the development and the progression of CAV, but their optimal use remains to be established. New encouraging results come from monoclonal autoantibodies. At present percutaneous revascularization procedures seem to have only a palliative meaning, with no clear evidence of survival advantage over medical therapy and should be considered in case of a focal disease. Drug-eluting stents have proven to reduce in-stent restenosis, with a potential role of imaging-guided intervention in this setting. Heart re-transplantation is the only resolutive therapy and is considered in the case of CAV associated with graft dysfunction.

Introduction

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) still represents a complex challenge after heart transplantation (HTx). Its prevalence at 1, 5, 10 years is estimated to be 8, 29, 47%, respectively, accounting for 10% of all cause-specific deaths in heart recipients, between the first and the fifteenth year after HTx [1].

Section snippets

Pathophysiology

CAV is a unique form of arteriosclerosis. This accelerated inflammatory fibroproliferative disease affects epicardial coronary arteries as well as the microcirculation of transplanted heart, determining diffuse stenosis due to concentric intimal expansion and inadequate compensatory (outward) remodeling, causing tissue altered perfusion, ischemic injury, and graft loss [2]. Diffuse intimal thickening is due to smooth muscle cells (SMc) proliferation, inflammatory cell infiltration, and in the

Diagnosis and suirveillance

Diagnosis of CAV can be difficult, as the disease is often clinically silent due to denervation of the transplanted heart. Indeed, patients are often asymptomatic for typical angina, and they may present with heart failure, arrhythmia, or sudden death when graft dysfunction has already occurred [16]. Thus routine surveillance is essential to achieve early diagnosis. A summary protocol for the diagnosis and surveillance of HTx patients is proposed in Fig. 1.

Statins

Evidence of benefits of early statins initiation on HTx outcomes and reduction of CAV are well known as confirmed by a recent metanalysis by Vallakati et al. [49] with a significant reduction of CAV among patients taking statins (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16–0.68; P = .003). Possible reasons for this effect were found in the NK-cells inhibition promoted by statins and the reduction of lipoprotein levels, which results in a higher concentration of unbound fraction of immunosuppressive drugs like

Revascularization

The ischemic status following the diffuse narrowing of coronary arteries represents a strong predictor of a negative outcome [61]. However, due to the lack of evidence-based data, the role of revascularization (both percutaneous and surgical) is not clearly established.

Redo heart transplantation

Despite the fact that CAV represents the main indication to redo-HTx in the United States, the significant perioperative mortality and the ethical issues related to the shortage of organs make this option controversial, preventing widespread adoption. In this context, a recent specific sub-analysis of the  ISHLT registry on 4595 patients has found no benefits in terms of outcomes in patients who underwent redo-HTx versus those who were medically managed, with a more favourable advantage in those

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (75)

  • O. Wever-Pinzon et al.

    Coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a meta-analysis of prospective trials

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2014)
  • S. Chih et al.

    Perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as a rule-out test for cardiac allograft vasculopathy

    Am J Transplant

    (2016)
  • L. Martínez-Dolz et al.

    Follow-up study on the utility of von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2008)
  • H.J. Torres et al.

    Prevalence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy assessed with coronary angiography versus coronary vascular ultrasound and virtual histology

    Transplant Proc

    (2011)
  • E.M. Tuzcu et al.

    Intravascular ultrasound evidence of angiographically silent progression in coronary atherosclerosis predicts long-term morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • J.A. Kobashigawa et al.

    Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • L. Potena et al.

    Interplay of coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in predicting long-term outcomes after heart transplantation

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2015)
  • E. Raichlin et al.

    Inflammatory burden of cardiac allograft coronary atherosclerotic plaque is associated with early recurrent cellular rejection and predicts a higher risk of vasculopathy progression

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2009)
  • F. Ribichini et al.

    Virtual histology findings in rapid cardiac allograft vasculopathy progression and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

    Int J Cardiol

    (2014)
  • H. Kitahara et al.

    Association of periarterial neovascularization with progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and long-term clinical outcomes in heart transplant recipients

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2016)
  • J. Hou et al.

    OCT assessment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients

    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2012)
  • T.S. Clemmensen et al.

    Layered fibrotic plaques are the predominant component in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

    Systematic Findings and Risk Stratification by OCT JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2017)
  • K.H. Park et al.

    Relationship between markers of plaque vulnerability in optical coherence tomography and atherosclerotic progression in adult patients with heart transplantation

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2017)
  • F. Tomai et al.

    Optical coherence tomography for characterization of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in late survivors of pediatric heart transplantation

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2016)
  • W.F. Fearon et al.

    Discordant changes in epicardial and microvascular coronary physiology after cardiac transplantation: physiologic investigation for transplant Arteriopathy II (PITA II) study

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2006)
  • W.F. Fearon et al.

    Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition early after heart transplantation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2017)
  • J.C. Fang et al.

    Effect of vitamins C and E on progression of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis: a randomised trial

    Lancet.

    (2002)
  • M. Masetti et al.

    Differential effect of everolimus on progression of early and late cardiac allograft vasculopathy in current clinical practice

    Am J Transplant

    (2013)
  • I. Kaczmarek et al.

    Preventing cardiac allograft vasculopathy: long-term beneficial effects of mycophenolate mofetil

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2006)
  • L.H. Lund et al.

    The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirtieth official adult heart transplant report--2013; focus theme: age

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (2013)
  • J.A. Kobashigawa et al.

    Cardiac allograft vasculopathy by intravascular ultrasound in heart transplant patients

    substudy from the Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil randomized, multicenter trial JACC Heart Fail

    (2013)
  • S. Chih et al.

    Canadian cardiovascular society/Canadian cardiac transplant network position statement on heart transplantation: patient eligibility, selection, and post-transplantation care

    Can J Cardiol

    (2020)
  • M.S. Lee et al.

    Role of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

    Am J Cardiol

    (2018)
  • M.S. Lee et al.

    Long-term outcomes of heart transplantation recipients with transplant coronary artery disease who develop in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention

    Am J Cardiol

    (2012)
  • J.A. Ormiston et al.

    A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial

    Lancet.

    (2008)
  • B.D. Gogas et al.

    JACC Cardiovasc Interv

    (2016)
  • F. Ribichini et al.

    Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a new therapeutic option

    Am J Med

    (2013)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: Pathophysiology, detection approaches, prevention, and treatment management

      2022, Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Donor brain death is critical to the graft's success [4,8]. It has the potential to induce severe cardiac damage as a consequence of increased catecholamine production, endocrine, and hemodynamic abnormalities, culminating in organ hypoperfusion and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion damage after transplant [4]. Additionally, the mechanism of donor brain death has a substantial effect on heart transplantation results, with traumatic brain death linked with decreased mortality, rejection, and allograft vasculopathy [4].

    • Rubidium-82 PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging

      2022, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Volume 1-4
    • Pathology of cardiac transplantation

      2022, Cardiovascular Pathology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text