A simulation based study of subliminal control for air traffic management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.03.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Under the so called Subliminal Control concept, an automated system, commanding minor speed adjustments imperceptible by the Air Traffic Controller (ATC), tries to keep the Air Traffic Controller’s risk perception low, emulating a “lucky traffic”. In this paper we outline such a concept and investigate several implementation considerations of subliminal control. A proposed subliminal controller is tested against several encounter geometries for level flights in simulations using a stochastic environment that comprises wind forecast uncertainties. The results demonstrate that subliminal control has the potential to reduce the workload of the ATC in several cases.

Introduction

The current Air Traffic Management (ATM) system is to a large extent based on a rigidly structured airspace and a mostly human-operated system architecture, see for example Tomlin, 1998, Nolan, 1998. For the separation assurance between aircraft, Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) have to make decisions in this highly uncertain and complex environment. To do so, they have to estimate the future positions of aircraft and intervene whenever they perceive a high risk of loss of separation. It is obvious that the traffic increase, predicted by European Commission, 2001, Eurocontrol Air Traffic Statistics and Forecast Service, 2004, demands an increase in the number of aircraft per sector. This will result in more stress on the ATC. To alleviate some of this workload, several alternative concepts of operation have been proposed, mostly centered around Conflict Detection and Resolution (CD&R) algorithms. For a thorough overview and classification of the literature on CD&R methods, the reader is referred to Kuchar and Yang (2000).

Subliminal control is one such concept, proposed in Villiers (2004). The premise is that minor speed adjustments, commanded by an automated system running in parallel with the ATC and using a dedicated ground-air datalink, can convert a potentially conflicting situation into a “lucky traffic” for the ATC, in the sense that most trajectories turn out to ensure safe separation at an early stage, thus reducing his monitoring workload. The speed adjustments have to be as small as possible in order to remain imperceptible by the ATC. In this approach the human is kept in the loop, and automation is introduced in a user-friendly way which reduces uncertainty without changing the work environment. Let us emphasize that the only effect of subliminal control from the ATC point of view is that traffic “behaves” better. From a control theory perspective, subliminal control can be viewed as an “inner-loop” controller, providing small scale adjustments in the system, improving the performance of the “outer-loop” of the system, the ATC, who performs coarser adjustments in the system. The hope is that well-behaved traffic can have higher density without straining the ATC capacity. The present paper is part of an on-going effort to investigate the potential of this approach.

The subliminal control concept was further developed under the project “En Route Air Traffic Soft Management Ultimate System” (ERASMUS) funded by European Commission (2006). As part of this effort, Crück and Lygeros (2007a) presented a mathematical framework for subliminal control. It relies on a model of the way ATC perceive the risk of loss of separation between aircraft as a function of the current traffic situation. The subliminal control problem is then modeled as a hybrid dynamical game in which the control has to minimize a cost representing the risk perceived by the ATC despite the uncertainty of trajectory prediction. The model of ATC’s risk perception is discussed in more details in Crück and Lygeros (2007b). Building on this work, the present paper develops a unified theoretical framework for quantitatively describing subliminal control concepts, so that their performance can be evaluated against different traffic scenarios. The evaluation is performed using Monte Carlo simulations running on the air traffic simulation platform presented in Lymperopoulos et al. (2007).

We present early results of our evaluations in two different sets of ATM scenarios: the current situation and the one envisioned by the SESAR initiative (see Ky and Miaillier, 2006). We consider two main differences between the current and future ATM system. The first is that in the SESAR framework, aircraft trajectories are highly constrained in time (4D trajectories), which reduces the margin of manoeuvre for speed variations for subliminal control. The second difference is that in the current framework, subliminal control speed variations have to be approved by the pilots onboard the aircraft, which yields a stochastic delay in execution; we assume that this delay is reduced in the SESAR framework thanks to better air-ground integration.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces and discusses the subliminal control concept and our modeling framework. Section 3 describes in more details the modeling of ATC risk perception, a crucial parameter for the implementation and evaluation of subliminal control concepts. Section 4 presents the other aspects of the model we have used for the simulation results and for the concept validation. Section 5 briefly describes the simulation setup and presents the results of this study. Finally, Section 6 states the conclusions of this work.

Section snippets

Subliminal control concept

The main idea of subliminal control is to turn the uncertainty of the ATC about traffic evolution into an advantage. It has been shown that small adjustments of speeds commanded early enough can prevent a large percentage of conflicts (Alliot et al., 2001). Subliminal control considers speed adjustments small enough to be within the uncertainty margin of the ATC and hence, in principle, imperceptible. Results from human in the loop experiments of the European project ERASMUS (European

Risk model

The risk perception model we use is along the lines of the one proposed in Crück and Lygeros (2007b). The risk function for a given traffic situation is defined as:RATC,n:X1×X2××Xn[0,7],where Xi denotes the state of aircraft i and n is the total number of aircraft in the traffic situation. The range of values [0, 7] has been set in reference to the experimental setting in Averty et al. (2006) which is, to the best of our knowledge, the only available study attempting to quantify ATC risk

Aircraft/flight environment model

The risk perception model of Section 1 and its implications for subliminal control decision making were evaluated by simulations. The model developed in Lymperopoulos et al. (2007) was used for this purpose. This model allows one to capture multiple flights taking place at the same time. Each flight has an associated flight plan, aircraft dynamics and a Flight Management System (FMS). The evolution of flights is affected by the wind speed, which is uncertain, making the model stochastic.

Simulation results

In this section we examine several two aircraft encounters to determine the minimum time Thorizon for a subliminal control scheme to keep the risk perception of the ATC low for each encounter. We consider two aircraft flying level at the same altitude, in straight lines, at constant airspeeds (see Fig. 7). In the absence of uncertainty, the minimum distance that the two aircraft approach each other is denoted δmin and the time this event occurs tmin (time to minimum separation).

We construct

Conclusions and future work

We have investigated the potential of the use of subliminal control to alleviate ATC workload involved in monitoring some potentially dangerous encounters. For simple two-aircraft situations, the results clearly indicate that, subliminal control can reduce the workload of the ATCs monitoring situations. The efficiency of subliminal control depends of course on the nominal minimal separation between the aircraft and on the time available to solve the situation before it is perceived as a medium

Acknowledgment

This research is supported by the European Commission under the project ERASMUS, FP6-TREN-518276.

References (21)

  • Alliot, J.-M., Durand, N., Granger, G., 2001. A statistical analysis of the influence of vertical and ground speed...
  • Averty, P., Guittet, K., Lezaud, P., July 2006. Perception of Risks of Conflict by Air Traffic Controllers: The CREED...
  • G. Chaloulos et al.

    Effect of wind correlation on aircraft conflict probability

    AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics

    (2007)
  • Cole, R., Richard, C., Kim, S., Bailey, D., July 1998. An assessment of the 60km rapid update cycle (RUC) with near...
  • Crück, E., Lygeros, J., August 2007a. A mathematical framework for subliminal air traffic control. In: AIAA Guidance,...
  • Crück, E., Lygeros, J., July 2007b. Hybrid modeling for the evaluation of risk perception by air-traffic controllers....
  • Eurocontrol Air Traffic Statistics and Forecast Service, February 2004. Forecast of Annual Number of IFR Flights...
  • Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, 2004. User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA)....
  • European Commission, 2001. European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide....
  • European Commission, 2006. ERASMUS – En Route Air Traffic Soft Management Ultimate System....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Applications of stochastic modeling in air traffic management: Methods, challenges and opportunities for solving air traffic problems under uncertainty

    2021, European Journal of Operational Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, the modeling of wind conditions is often underpinned by Gaussian processes, although it is important to take correlation structure into account in such models. A typical approach, as used in Chaloulos, Cruck, and Lygeros (2010), is to model wind velocity as the sum of a deterministic (nominal) component and a stochastic component, where the stochastic component has the form of a Gaussian random field. This type of model can ensure wind correlation in time and space; in other words, the wind conditions experienced by an aircraft at a particular time are correlated with those of other aircraft at the same time, and also with the wind conditions at earlier times.

  • Learning aircraft operational factors to improve aircraft climb prediction: A large scale multi-airport study

    2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
    Citation Excerpt :

    As an example, in Prats et al. (2010) an iterative quasi-Newton method is used to find trajectories for departing aircraft, minimizing the noise annoyance. Another example is Chaloulos et al. (2010) where Monte Carlo simulations are used to estimate the risk of conflict between trajectories, in a stochastic environment. Some of the automated tools currently being developed for ATC/ATM can detect and solve conflicts between trajectories, using Genetic Algorithms (Durand et al., 19961), or Differential Evolution or Particle Swarm Optimization (Vanaret et al., 2012).

  • Adaptive prediction of flight time uncertainty for ground-based 4D trajectory management

    2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
    Citation Excerpt :

    It was mentioned that the position uncertainty also depends on the meteorological conditions (Bakker et al., 2000), and a “dynamic spacing” concept was presented in which position uncertainty prediction based on meteorological conditions could improve both the safety and efficiency of air traffic management. Despite the existence of this concept, the static modeling of trajectory uncertainty has been widely applied in studies in the air traffic management field (Chaloulos and Crück, 2010; Lymperopoulos and Lygeros, 2010; Margellos and Lygeros, 2013; Weitz, 2013). Regarding trajectory uncertainty prediction based on meteorological conditions, the modeling of wind uncertainty correlation between aircraft pairs (Hu et al., 2005; Chaloulos and Lygeros, 2007) and its application for conflict resolution (Matsuno et al., 2015) has been discussed.

  • A dynamic air traffic model for analyzing relationship patterns of traffic flow parameters in terminal airspace

    2016, Aerospace Science and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    From separation maintaining point of view, mostly centered around are the conflict detection and resolution models. A thorough overview and classification of these models was presented by Kuchar and Yang [23], while more recently, the reader is referred to [5,47,40]. With the improvement in simulation techniques, air traffic models were proposed and modified with respect to specific scenarios and constraints.

  • Operating cost sensitivity to required time of arrival commands to ensure separation in optimal aircraft 4D trajectories

    2015, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another example is the project Environmentally Responsible Air Transport (ERAT), which developed methods and systems to reduce environmental impact using continuous arrival and departure procedures inside high density TMAs in Europe (ERAT Consortium, 2012). Alternatively, Chaloulos et al. (2010) propose imperceptible speed adjustments to minimise the risk of potential conflicts and lessen the workload of ATCo, impacting positively into airspace capacity. The current paradigm for air traffic management involves strict air traffic control (ATC) procedures and lacks advanced automation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text