Elsevier

Transplantation Proceedings

Volume 45, Issue 1, January–February 2013, Pages 10-12
Transplantation Proceedings

Organ donation, recovery and ischemia-reperfusion injury
Communication and Consent: Discussion and Organ Donation Decisions for Self and Family

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Organ transplantation is a significant medical advancement. However, number of individuals registering as donors and next-of-kin's refusal to grant consent are notable limitations on the availability of organs for transplantation. Therefore, investigation into factors that influence willingness to donate and consent decisions is warranted. We examined the relationship between attitudes and family communication in relation to consent decisions for self and family member organ donation (OD). Data were collected from students at an Australian university and individuals from the wider community (N = 267).

Method

Participants completed an on-line survey composed of questions relating to demographic information, questionnaires from previous research, and several single items relating to family communication and consent created specifically for the study. The main outcome measure was participants' willingness to consent to OD for themselves or for a family member.

Results

Attitudes and prior discussion of OD were predictive of registration and willingness to consent. Positive attitudes were also related to previous conversations regarding OD. A more open level of communication within families was associated with an increased tendency to discuss OD, but was not directly related to consent decisions.

Conclusion

Findings reiterate the importance of promoting positive attitudes within the community and specific, informed discussion within families. The positive influence these factors exert on next-of-kin decisions may be vital to maximize donation rates in opt-in systems (such as Australia).

Section snippets

Participants

After obtaining ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee at Macquarie University (reference 5201000661), valid data were obtained from 267 (of 271) respondents; 200 participants from the community volunteered through social networks of the researchers and 67 university students participated in exchange for course credit.

Materials

An on-line survey was administered through Qualtrics and comprised: demographic items; registration as a donor, a single question with yes, no, and uncertain

Results

The sample was predominantly female (74.5%), younger, educated, and Christian. A reliability of .84 (Cronbach's alpha) was found for the modified ODAS.

Discussion

Consistent with predictions, significant associations were observed between attitudes and registration as a donor and willingness to consent for self or family. These findings replicate results reported in the literature1, 4, 7 indicating that more positive attitudes help to predict greater willingness to consent for both individuals and family members. The positive relationship found between attitudes and prior family discussion of OD suggests that affirmative attitudes may also play a

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Ms Jessica Sloey in the preparation of this article.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • Attitudes of Nurses Toward Organ Donation in Serbia

    2020, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    The process of communication includes the multilayered, complex, and dynamic exchange of information, which requires an adjustment of the interpersonal relationship between patients and nurses in providing medical care [14]. Essential elements of professional attitude in communication are also empathy, support, and providing adequate information [15]. The empathic attitude of the participants in our study to the family of potential donors is the result of a professional attitude.

  • Organ donation within the intensive care unit: A retrospective audit

    2020, Australian Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    Family conflict or inability of family members to reach a mutually agreed consensus can similarly lead to declining organ donation.28–32 Transparency and open communication within the family unit has been associated with greater engagement in discussions and family agreement to organ donation.33 Current DonateLife campaigns encourage families to engage in conversations about organ donation.10

  • Knowledge and Opinions of Deceased Organ Donation among Middle and High School Students in Korea

    2015, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    The current law in Korea allows family members to veto consent for deceased organ donation, such that familial consent is essential with respect to harvesting organs from the deceased. It is well documented that family communication and knowing the intentions of the deceased regarding organ donation are positively correlated with familial consent for deceased organ donation [15,18–20]. In this regard, promoting family discussion about organ donation will be essential to increase deceased organ donation in Korea.

  • Emotional paths of professional experiences in transplant coordinators

    2020, Nefrologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another controversial aspect related to the difficult emotional experiences is emotional expression. In our study, the debate was organised around the meaning of a "good" professional: the women advocate the benefits of expressing emotion, important when seeking balance between negative and positive emotions,8 for overcoming difficult situations and strengthening empathy and trust with the families.27,33 The men mostly associate expressing emotions with a loss of a professional image,34 although some identify the costs of this emotional camouflage, in the same vein as the risk to psychological health, it brings to mind the metaphor of "hiding behind a mask" expressed by some Australian professionals6 (p. 705).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Dr Claire Wakefield is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID510421) and the Cancer Institute NSW.

View full text