Elsevier

Tourism Management

Volume 28, Issue 5, October 2007, Page 1167
Tourism Management

Editorial
New development for the journal

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.04.006Get rights and content

References (0)

Cited by (8)

  • Pro-environmental behaviours in protected areas: A systematic literature review and future research directions

    2022, Tourism Management Perspectives
    Citation Excerpt :

    The results show that there is a prevalence of self-reported survey methods (76.14%) over other research methods i.e. experimental design (11.36%), longitudinal study (3.41%), interviews (6.82%) and content analysis (2.27%). This over-dependency on quantitative methods, especially cross-sectional studies, rather than other types of research methods, such as experimental design and longitudinal studies, or qualitative research methods, is not limited to PEB research; this has been an ongoing issue in tourism research (Juvan & Dolnicar, 2016; Ryan, Page, & Roche, 2007). While the reliability and validity of cross-sectional studies have been criticised in the tourism research literature in relation to measuring an individual's behaviour, qualitative research has also been subject to criticism due to its subjective nature (Rittichainuwat & Rattanaphinanchai, 2015).

  • Applying a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative design in explaining the travel motivation of film tourists in visiting a film-shooting destination

    2015, Tourism Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Tourism research has been criticized regarding the validity and reliability of using only one cross-sectional study to generalize management implications (Ryan, Page, & Roche, 2007), using irrelevant samples such as non-tourists, and undertaking a piece of specific research and cutting it into as many papers as possible (Page, 2005).

  • Exploring tourism labor

    2011, Annals of Tourism Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Certainly, an epistemological enquiry into the nature and structure of tourism labor would give rise to a critical analysis of the research field, with perhaps a focus on different paradigms or discourses offering additional insight. However, unlike the broad field of tourism which arguably shows signs of maturation (Ryan, Page, & Roche, 2007), tourism labor as a distinct subject is perhaps not quite yet developed enough to warrant this critical approach. Instead, an appropriate starting point is to explore tourism labor by broad themes, both mature and emerging, with critical analysis where appropriate.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text