Factors affecting Internet diffusion in China: A multivariate time series analysis
Introduction
China first embraced the Internet in 1993, when a Chinese academic institute leased a satellite link to the U.S. Subsequently, China Telecom, China’s telecommunications industry monopoly,1 connected to the U.S. in 1994 and provided Internet access to the general public in limited areas. In the meantime, China Telecom initiated the construction of a nationwide Internet network called “ChinaNet”, preparing for large-scale commercial service throughout the country. In January 1996, subsequent to the completion of the ChinaNet backbone, China Telecom began to offer nationwide Internet service (Loo, 2004). This represents the official beginning of China’s Internet era.
The Chinese government has long hoped to take full advantage of the economic benefits of Internet development while remaining wary of the threat it poses to the regime (Kalathil and Boas, 2003). Due to these double motives, the Chinese government encourages the industrial use of the Internet on the one hand, while strictly monitoring private Internet use on the other (Foster and Goodman, 2000). Despite Internet controls, China’s Internet population has been booming. Since June 2008, China has possessed the world’s largest number of Internet users, a total of 649 million who account for 47.9% of China’s total population as of January 2015. Nevertheless, the contributing factors to China’s rapid Internet development have been understudied, although the factors affecting Internet diffusion in other regions have been extensively examined in the literature. Nonetheless, most studies use variables at the individual or organizational level [for a review, see Dewan and Riggins, 2005, Fichman, 1992, Kumar et al., 2007], relying on Rogers’ (1983) theory of the diffusion of innovations, Rubin’s (1994) theory of use and gratification [e.g., Ebersole, 2000], the model of the adoption of technology in households (MATH) [see Venkatesh and Brown, 2001, Brown and Venkatesh, 2005], the decomposed theory of planned behavior (Taylor and Todd, 1995a, Taylor and Todd, 1995b), Dutton et al.’s (1987) chain process model [e.g., Zhu and He, 2002], and Davis’ (1989) technology acceptance model to investigate factors affecting people’s intentions or behavior in adopting certain technologies, either at the workplace or in households (for a review, see Vishwanath and Chen, 2011, in addition to chapters 2 through 4 in the same work). Despite the importance of individual-level factors, they missed the variance driven by those effects due to the country-level factors and passage of time.
Relying on country-level data, the present study aims to discover the dynamics of China’s Internet population, explicate what and how it has driven the Internet to diffuse, and determine why it has such a diffusion pattern by proposing a new integrative theoretical framework. Before formally introducing this framework, relevant studies (see Table 1 for a summary) are reviewed in the following section.
Section snippets
Rogers’ diffusion model
In the diffusion literature [for a review, see Meade and Islam, 2006], the diffusion of innovation has been defined as the process by which that innovation “is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system” (Rogers, 1983, p. 5). Understandably, each innovation has unique characteristics, while mass media and interpersonal communication may facilitate the process. Rogers (1983) further classifies innovation adopters according to the timing of their
Theoretical framework
The literature review revealed that previous studies lacked a cohesive theoretical framework. Considering the findings and problems of these prior studies, the author proposes a framework called EPIC (Economy-Policy-Infrastructure-Content), hypothesizing that the growth of Internet penetration is mainly driven by economic variables, telecom infrastructure, governmental policy, and the development of Internet content.
The hypothesized relationships among the variables are shown in Fig. 2. All of
Data
Most data in this study (see Table 2) come from the bi-annual survey conducted by CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center), the quasi-governmental agency responsible for domain name registration and Internet statistics in China (CNNIC, 2003), since 1997. In addition to the CNNIC data, the World Bank has statistics on China’s Internet users dating back to 1993. The data from the two sources were hence merged. In addition, because the statistics for GDP per capita were annual data and
Descriptive analysis concerning Internet development in China
Corresponding to the first research question, a series of descriptive analyses were performed.
Concluding remarks
The present paper is the first study to ever empirically examine the factors affecting China’s Internet diffusion using time series modeling. The proposed EPIC model examined the joint effects of economy, policy, infrastructure, and content on China’s Internet diffusion in a longitudinal way, although all of these factors have been examined separately in other regions by previous studies. Only with the multivariate time series analysis are we able to determine the actual effects of the four
Acknowledgement
This study was funded in part by the grant of Joint Project of the 12nd “Five-year Plan in the Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guangdong Province” (Grant No. GD14XXW02). The author would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.
References (76)
- et al.
An exploratory model of inter-country internet diffusion
Telecommun. Policy
(2003) - et al.
Tracing the route of China’s Internet censorship: an empirical study
Telematics Inf.
(2013) - et al.
Developing the internet: entrepreneurship and public policy in Ireland, Singapore, Argentina, and Spain
Telecommun. Policy
(2001) - et al.
Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals
Econ. Lett.
(1980) - et al.
Cross-country diffusion of the internet
Inf. Econ. Policy
(2002) The diffusion of the internet: trend and causes
Soc. Sci. Res.
(2011)- et al.
Post-industrial transformations and cyber-space: a cross-national analysis of internet development
Soc. Sci. Res.
(2002) - et al.
Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation – a 25-year review
Int. J. Forecast.
(2006) - et al.
Internet diffusion in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-country analysis
Telecommun. Policy
(2005) - et al.
Digital divide: determinants and policies with special reference to Asia
J. Asian Econ.
(2003)
Internet subscription in Africa: policy for a dual digital divide
Telecommun. Policy
Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions
Int. J. Res. Mark.
Capital investment, international trade and economic growth in China: evidence in the 1980–1990s
China Econ. Rev.
Internet metrics: using host and domain counts to map the internet
Telecommun. Policy
Mathematical models of the diffusion process
A new product growth model for product diffusion
Manage. Sci.
Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle
MIS Quart.
Finite-sample sizes of Johansen’s likelihood ratio tests for cointegration
Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat.
The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration
Oxford Econ. Papers
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
MIS Quart.
The digital divide: current and future research directions
J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
Across the digital divide: a cross-country multi-technology analysis of the determinants of it penetration
J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root
Econometrica
Diffusion and social impacts of personal computers
Commun. Res.
Uses and gratifications of the web among students
J. Comp.-Mediated Commun.
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing
Econometrica
The Diffusion of the Internet in China
Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice
Measures of concentration
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
Cited by (13)
Internet adoption and financial development in sub-Saharan Africa
2020, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeCitation Excerpt :Theoretical literature abounds on the role of the internet in financial activity at the country level (Kenney, 1995). There has been an exponential growth in its use in business activities over the past two decades, and this has had an effect on financial development (credit access) in furtherance of the theoretical suggestions (Pradhan et al., 2014, 2016; Feng, 2015). Financial development could be defined as the ease of firms accessing finance at a low cost with the confidence of making an adequate return (Rajan and Zingales, 2003).
Rainbow over the Internet: How Internet use curtails homophobia in China
2020, Technology in SocietyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, according to the theory of negativity bias, the preferences of online media and netizens on homosexual events or news could ultimately affect the public's homosexuality tolerance. Although China began to introduce Internet technology in the 1990s, the Internet has a blowout in China [87]. In recent years, the Chinese government has successively implemented a series of the informatization development strategies, such as the “Internet+.”
Do income distribution and socio-economic inequality affect ICT affordability? Evidence from Australian household panel data
2019, Economic Analysis and PolicyCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, several studies indicate that diffusion of ICT is dependent on the affordability of ICT services. A high level of affordability denotes high diffusion of ICT (Choudrie and Dwivedi, 2006; Feng, 2015; Flamm and Chaudhuri, 2007; Kiiski and Pohjola, 2002). These results suggest that ICT affordability can potentially play a mediating role in translating the impact of income inequality on ICT diffusion.
Chinese folk music: Study and dissemination through online learning courses
2022, Education and Information Technologies