Determination of N-species in soil extracts using microplate techniques
Introduction
The 96-well microplate, developed principally for use as a disposable bioreactor, offers the possibility of N-analysis (NO2−, NO3−, NH4+ and total dissolved N) of soil extracts by adaptation of existing chemistries previously carried out at larger scales, resulting in savings in the amounts of reagents and wastes. Of particular importance among existing methods are those for the determination NO2− and NO3− involving azo dye formation [1] and those for NH4+ involving the Berthelot (or indophenol) reaction [2]. The determination of NO3− by azo dye formation requires prior reduction of NO3− to NO2− and this has often been achieved in flow analysis systems with copperised Cd. The use of copperised Cd in microplates poses constraints because the microplate system involves vertically transmitted light for absorbance measurements. Hydrazine can reduce NO3− to NO2− and solutions of hydrazine sulphate containing Cu2+ as catalyst have been used in automated air-segmented flow systems [3], [4]. A disadvantage of hydrazine in such analysis is that it may partially decompose NO2− so that simple subtraction of analytical data with and without hydrazine cannot easily be applied to determine NO3− in the presence of NO2−. However, using an air-segmented flow system under specific conditions of reagent concentration, pH, temperature and time, it is possible to have quantitative recovery of NO2− and quantitative conversion of NO3− to NO2−. Kamphake et al. [3] used hydrazine sulphate at a concentration of 190 mg L−1 at 38 °C for approximately 10 min, whereas, Downes [4] used the same concentration of hydrazine sulphate at 33 °C for 7.5 min.
The procedure for the determination of NH4+ in soil extracts using the Berthelot reaction is well suited to adaptation in microplates as the method involves the addition of only two solutions to the sample. However, the reaction is prone to interferences from organic-N compounds and from divalent cations which may exist in soil extracts or natural waters [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. These interferences can be overcome by separation of the NH4+ by diffusion in the form of NH3 [10] but microplate methods for this have not been reported. Several methods for the separation of N by diffusion of NH3 for isotopic analysis exist, such as those involving suspended paper discs soaked in acid [11] and acid traps wrapped in polytetrafluoroethylene membranes [12].
Microplate based methods for the determination of NO2−, NO3− and NH4+ in soil extracts and water using the Berthelot reaction have been reported but involve reduction of the oxidised forms to NH4+ with Devarda's alloy, transfer of the reduced solution to a fresh well and the use of sulphamic acid to decompose NO2− [13]. The performance of a number of substituted phenols as alternative to phenol or salicylate in the determination of NH4+ has been studied; 2-phenylphenol proved to be the most promising with regard to freedom from interferences and a method using this reagent has been described for the determination of NH4+ in KCl extracts of soil [8].
A knowledge of the total dissolved N (TDN) in soil extracts and waters is important not only in its own right but also because the difference between TDN and the sum of the inorganic N components (NO2−-N, NO3−-N and NH4+-N) allows estimation of the amount of organic N. The quantitation of TDN (simultaneously with total dissolved P) in soil extracts has been achieved by oxidation of the extract with S2O82− in closed tubes heated in an autoclave followed by determination of the NO3− produced but on-plate oxidation techniques have not been reported [14]. Microplate methods for the direct determination of urea in soil extracts have been reported [15], [16]. Other reported microplate procedures for the determination of N in environmental samples are the determination of NO3− in waters using brucine [17] and the determination of NO2− or NO3− in waters by fluorimetry [18], [19]. Assessments of the capability of microplate methods for the analysis of NO3−, NO2− and NH4+ in seawater have been made [20], [21] and used for monitoring NO2−, NO3− and NH4+ in seawater from aquaculture facilities, although, the determination of NO3− involved off-plate Cd reduction of NO3− to NO2− [22].
Our aims were to: (1) optimise conditions for the determination of NO3− by azo dye formation employing hydrazine sulphate solution as the reducing agent; (2) devise an NH3 diffusion method for the separation and determination of NH4+ using microplates; (3) devise an oxidation procedure for the determination of TDN in water extracts of soil by a technique compatible with microplate procedures; (4) establish the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for NO2−, NO3− and NH4+; (5) to test the procedures on water extracts from a range of nutrient-poor Scottish soils.
Section snippets
Microplate spectrophotometer
Colourimetric measurements were made using a SPECTRAmax® 190-microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, California) with a scanning monochromator. The spectrophotometer was controlled using SOFTmax® PRO (Molecular Devices Corporation). Absorbance measurements were made using flat-bottomed, 96 μL × 350 μL well microplates (Thermo Life Sciences, Hampshire, UK).
Dispensing of solutions
An EDP-Plus™ micropipette (Rainin Instruments, Oakland, CA, USA) with a 25, 250 or 1000 μL liquid end was used to
Reduction of N03− and N02− by hydrazine
The effect of changing the incubation time, temperature and hydrazine concentration in the reagent on the determination of NO3− and NO2− is shown in Fig. 2. For the reduction of NO3−, increasing the concentration of hydrazine increased the initial response followed by a plateau region or decline, whereas, for NO2− there was a short plateau followed by a general decline. We did not find ideal conditions, where there was no reduction of NO2− and quantitative conversion of NO3− to NO2−. Nitrite is
Conclusion
We have developed 96-well microplate procedures for the colourimetric analysis of NH4+ and NO3− in small volumes of water extracts of nutrient poor soils. To remove substances which may interfere with the colourimetric assay of NH4+ we also developed a microplate NH3 diffusion technique. The determination of total N in soil extracts was achieved by S2O82− oxidation at 110 °C in a closed, 96-well, PTFE microplate followed by NO3− analysis. The limits of determination for NO3− and NH4+ are
Acknowledgements
The Scottish Executive, Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD) funded the work. We thank Dr. Renate Wendler for her contribution to the development of the diffusion method and Ms. Miriam Young for technical support.
References (35)
- et al.
Water Res.
(1967) Water Res.
(1978)- et al.
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2005) - et al.
Anal. Chim. Acta
(1991) - et al.
Talanta
(2007) - et al.
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.
(1991) Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.
(1996)- et al.
Water Res.
(1983) Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.
(1994)Analyst
(1984)