Elsevier

Surface Science

Volume 605, Issues 13–14, July 2011, Pages 1275-1280
Surface Science

Investigation of hydrogen bonds and temperature effects on the water monolayer adsorption on rutile TiO2 (110) by first-principles molecular dynamics simulations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2011.04.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Density Functional Theory (DFT), based on both static and Born–Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics approaches, has been used to investigate the effect of hydrogen bonds and temperature on the water monolayer adsorption on the rutile TiO2 (110) face. It was demonstrated that the difference between some previous theoretical results and experimental data is due to too slim slab thickness model and/or too small surface area. According to the present static calculations, water monolayer adsorbs molecularly on the five-fold titanium atoms of an optimised five-layer slab thickness, due to the stabilising lateral hydrogen bonds between molecules. From the molecular dynamics simulations, two adsorption mechanisms were described as a function of temperature. Finally, it was pointed out that the dynamics of water adsorption is strongly influenced by the structural model used. When temperature increases, the monolayer dissociates gradually. However, because of the periodic boundary conditions, the 1 × 1 surface unit needs to be extended to at least 2 × 5 to get an accurate representation of the monolayer dissociation ratio. In these conditions, this ratio is around 20%, 25% and 33% at 270, 350 and 425 K, respectively.

Research highlights

Ab initio Molecular Dynamics approach has been used to investigate hydrogen bonds and temperature effects on H2O adsorption on TiO2. ► From static calculations, water monolayer adsorbs molecularly on titanium atoms due to the stabilizing lateral hydrogen bonds. ► Two adsorption mechanisms were described as a function of temperature. ► When temperature increases, the monolayer dissociates gradually. ► The monolyer dissociation ratio is around 20 %, 25 % and 33 % at 270, 350 and 425 K, respectively.

Introduction

Water/metal oxide interfaces take a great place in many industrial applications such as heterogeneous catalysis, photochemistry, electrochemistry and gas sensors [1]. The investigation of water interaction with oxide surface is of high level of interest for the improvement of these technologies. However, if we consider the interface as an area in which water/metal and water/water interactions are in competition, the interpretation of the involved mechanism becomes rather complex [2], [3]. Indeed, water may activate metal surface atom [4], but at the same time hinder the adsorption of ions on the activated site [5]. Consequently, the use of model system can be very helpful to understand such interfaces. The water/TiO2 interface is considered as a probe system in liquid/metal oxide interface science [6], [7], [8]. For this reason, both experimental and theoretical works have investigated adsorption of water molecules on the rutile TiO2 (110) face. However, it remains a subject of controversy between some theoretical studies relative to experimental results. Therefore, both understanding and clarification of these discrepancies should be elucidated.

On one hand, some experimental studies concluded on a molecular adsorption for the first hydration layer at low temperature (~ 120 K), whereas dissociation may occur at lower coverage on a perfect surface, at high temperature and/or on surface oxygen vacancies [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Kurtz et al. [15] showed by ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy that water remained on molecular form up to 160 K, then partly dissociated while the temperature increased. Coupling this result with X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, Hugenschmidt et al. [16] determined a temperature programmed desorption peak at 275 K attributed to the molecularly adsorbed water according to a O(1s) peak position at 532.9 eV and a work function decrease of 1.1 eV, while a tail of this peak which extends to 375 K was attributed to the dissociative form according to ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy results [15]. Henderson [10] completed these investigations and concluded that dissociation should occur at 130 K on defective site.

On the other hand, some theoretical studies (e.g. Hartree Fock [17], semi-empirical [8], static DFT [2], [7], [18], [19], [20], [22] and DFT based on molecular dynamics using three layer slab thickness as surface model [2], [18], [19], [20]) showed dissociation at all coverage on the perfect (110) face, with however a small dissociation ratio. The same behaviour was also found on the rutile TiO2 (011) [6] and (100) faces [8]. On the contrary, Schaub et al. [21] showed that dissociation can only occurr on defect surfaces by coupling DFT calculations with high resolution STM images. From DFT calculations, using a three-layer slab thickness model, Harris et al. [7] found a maximum difference of about 0.17 eV per water molecule in favour of the dissociative adsorption at low coverage. However by increasing the coverage, they showed that the adsorption is preferentially led by a mixed mode with adsorption energies of 1.30 eV per water molecule, against 1.27 and 1.18 eV for the full molecular and dissociative modes, respectively. This stabilisation was explained thanks to the lateral hydrogen bonds (HB) between neighbouring adsorbed water molecules on a titanium row of the (110) surface [2], [18], [19]. However by using a five layer slab, Harris et al. [7] showed that the molecular adsorption overtook the mixed and full dissociative mode by 0.02 and 0.14 eV per water molecule, respectively. This relative stability order change has been explained by Perron et al. DFT calculations [23] which is due to the parity of the slab. In this study, it has been demonstrated that the three-layer slab is too thin to correctly model water interaction. Finally, Lindan et al. [18] indicated, using DFT molecular dynamics, that the usual surface size 2 × 1, which represents the monolayer by two independent water molecules, cannot provide reliable information on the dissociated molecules fraction.

In summary, it appears that previous theoretical DFT results are not consistent. From these previous static studies, it seems that the surface model used to represent the TiO2 surface, in terms of slab thickness and surface area, can have a significant influence on the water monolayer behaviour. Moreover, the temperature should also affect the adsorption process, the repartition between the different adsorption modes and the associated proton transfer dynamic, as well. Therefore, the aim of this work is to clarify the discrepancy of these previous theoretical works by using the DFT in both, static and Born Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics (MD) approaches. In the first part, the limitation of the three-layer slab (S3) will be compared to the five-layer slab (S5) in terms of adsorption energies and temperature behaviour. This part will confirm the choice of S5 as a good surface model. Then, coverage (up to the saturation of the first hydration layer) and temperature effects on the water adsorption modes will be investigated with the optimised S5 model. Finally, some insights of dissociation mechanism in terms of energy profile will be proposed.

Section snippets

Computational background

All calculations were performed using DFT based on plane wave basis sets generated with the Projector Augmented Wave method (PAW) [24] as implemented in the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package code (VASP) [25], [26], [27]. The Generalised Gradient Approximation (GGA) as defined by Perdew and Wang PW91 [28] has been used. Titanium atoms were described with four valence electrons (4s2 3d2) and oxygen ones with six (2s2 2p4). The Kohn–Sham equations were resolved with an optimised plane wave

Slab thickness effect

According to the DFT-static calculations of Perron et al. [23], the S5 model corresponds to an accurate surface model with a surface energy of 0.60 ± 0.02 J/m² (about 0.75 J/m² for the S3 model) relative to 0.50 ± 0.02 J/m² for the unconstrained 12 layers surface used as reference. Adsorption energies were compared with the S3 and S5 models using static calculations, while their behaviours in temperature were studied by MD. The 2 × 3 surface model was used which corresponds, for a full coverage (θ = 1 ML)

Conclusion

Density Functional Theory, in both static and Born Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics approaches, was used to clarify the difference of the theoretical results about the water monolayer adsorption on the rutile TiO2 (110) face. In this work, it has been showed that the choice of the structural model is essential for the representation of water adsorption versus temperature. In agreement with Perron et al. [23], it has been demonstrated that the three layer slab is unable to correctly describe the

Acknowledgements

The CCRT supercomputer within the framework of an EDF–CEA contract has been used. Parts of the calculations have been performed on the IBM BG/L and BG/P EDF R&D supercomputers.

References (40)

  • R. Long et al.

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2010)
  • C.D. Taylor et al.

    Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.

    (2005)
  • T.J. Beck et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • K. Jug et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • M.A. Henderson

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • M.A. Henderson

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (2002)
  • D. Brinkley et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • T. Bezrodna et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2004)
  • R.L. Kurtz et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1989)
  • M.B. Hugenschmidt et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • A. Fahmi et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • P.J.D. Lindan et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1996)
  • J. Goniakowski et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • H. Perron et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2003)
  • C.D. Taylor et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • A. Tilocca et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2004)
  • L.A. Harris et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2004)
  • M.A. Henderson

    Langmuir

    (1996)
  • M. Primet et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1971)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Dynamical and structural properties of adsorbed water molecules at the TiO<inf>2</inf> anatase-(1 0 1) surface: Importance of interfacial hydrogen-bond rearrangements

      2020, Chemical Physics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      To render H2 competitive as a fuel with fossil fuels, the United-States DOE stipulates that its production costs should be lower than $ 4 per kg of H2, and PEC approaches are promising to the end for industrial scale-up if appropriate water-splitting catalysts can be improved substantially in terms of solar-to-hydrogen (STH) performance [3]. The hydrogen-bond (HB) between protons in water molecules and the bridging oxygen atoms at the surface, as well as the variation in bond stretch and bond-angle bending modes in the water molecules are a sensitive probe of the water-TiO2 interfacial interactions [11,12]. These interfacial hydrogen bonds stand out for their critical role in catalytic reactions: for hydrogen-evolution modifiers of TiO2, metal sulphides and selenides can be used as spatially-controlled oxidation and reduction co-catalysts/modifiers on titania surfaces, which serve to modify hydrogen-bonding arrangements [13].

    • Application of density functional theory in studying CO<inf>2</inf> capture with TiO<inf>2</inf>-supported K<inf>2</inf>CO<inf>3</inf> being an example

      2018, Applied Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the adsorption of H2O on pure K2CO3 up to 126.4 kJ·mol−1 [14] is stronger than that at the interface of K2CO3/TiO2 and support of TiO2. In recent studies, it was found that H2O molecules not only remain intact when adsorbed at low temperature at monolayer coverage, but also that a small portion of H2O monomers can dissociate, with the fraction of such dissociated monomers increasing with increased temperature [55,56]. Accordingly, we also investigated the dissociative adsorption of H2O on K2CO3/TiO2.

    • Photoemission studies of water dissociation on rutile TiO <inf>2</inf> (1 1 0): Aspects on experimental procedures and the influence of steps

      2014, Applied Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dissociation on stoichiometric TiO2 (1 1 0) has been a very controversial topic [17,18]. However, the most recent experimental and theoretical efforts are consistent in that the first water layer on a defect-free surface is partially dissociated [19–26]. Specifically, using surface-sensitive O 1s photoelectron spectra in conjunction with DFT calculations and Monte Carlo simulations we have proposed a mechanism for the OH and H2O speciation, which is found to vary with the coverage [22].

    • Competing water dissociation channels on rutile TiO<inf>2</inf>(110)

      2014, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Very recently, it was also shown that the r-TiO2 surface presents oxygen vacancies at steps that are active towards water dissociation [8]. The adsorption state of water on the defect-free stoichiometric TiO2(110) surface (s-TiO2) has been much more controversial [1–4,9–17]. On the perfect surface, dissociation occurs through H2O adsorption on a Ti ion followed by proton donation to a neighboring Obr ion.

    • First-principles molecular dynamics simulations of uranyl ion interaction at the water/rutile TiO <inf>2</inf>(110) interface

      2012, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The surface area was set to 2a √ 2 × 4c = 156.24 Å2 which corresponds to eight elementary surface areas of a √ 2 × c = 19.53 Å2 containing each one fivefold – Ti(5) and one sixfold – Ti(6) coordinated titanium atoms with surface Os and bridging Ob oxygen atoms (Fig. 1a). The bulk parameters were calculated according to a DFT static study of Perron et al. [44] with a = b = 4.65 Å (4.59 Å), c = 2.97 Å (2.95 Å), internal parameter x = 0.30 (0.30) and c/a = 0.64 (0.64) (in parentheses are experimental values from [45–47]). According to a vacuum thickness of 21 Å between slabs, the liquid phase was represented with 111 water molecules with water density close to 1 g.cc− 1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text