Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 20, Issue 4, April 2020, Pages 621-628
The Spine Journal

Basic Science
Augmented reality navigation for spinal pedicle screw instrumentation using intraoperative 3D imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.10.012Get rights and content

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Due to recent developments in augmented reality with head-mounted devices, holograms of a surgical plan can be displayed directly in the surgeon's field of view. To the best of our knowledge, three dimensional (3D) intraoperative fluoroscopy has not been explored for the use with holographic navigation by head-mounted devices in spine surgery.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical accuracy of holographic pedicle screw navigation by head-mounted device using 3D intraoperative fluoroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

In this experimental cadaver study, the accuracy of surgical navigation using a head-mounted device was compared with navigation with a state-of-the-art pose-tracking system.

METHODS

Three lumbar cadaver spines were embedded in nontransparent agar gel, leaving only commonly visible anatomy in sight. Intraoperative registration of preoperative planning was achieved by 3D fluoroscopy and fiducial markers attached to lumbar vertebrae. Trackable custom-made drill sleeve guides enabled real-time navigation. In total, 20 K-wires were navigated into lumbar pedicles using AR-navigation, 10 K-wires by the state-of-the-art pose-tracking system. 3D models obtained from postexperimental CT scans were used to measure surgical accuracy. MF is the founder and shareholder of Incremed AG, a Balgrist University Hospital start-up focusing on the development of innovative techniques for surgical executions. The other authors declare no conflict of interest concerning the contents of this study. No external funding was received for this study.

RESULTS

No significant difference in accuracy was measured between AR-navigated drillings and the gold standard with pose-tracking system with mean translational errors between entry points (3D vector distance; p=.85) of 3.4±1.6 mm compared with 3.2±2.0 mm, and mean angular errors between trajectories (3D angle; p=.30) of 4.3°±2.3° compared with 3.5°±1.4°.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, holographic navigation by use of a head-mounted device achieve accuracy comparable to the gold standard of high-end pose-tracking systems.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These promising results could result in a new way of surgical navigation with minimal infrastructural requirements but now have to be confirmed in clinical studies.

Introduction

The proximity of vital and neural structures in spine surgery requires very high accuracy from the surgeons [1]. Recently, there has been increasing interest in augmented reality (AR) and its potential to improve accuracy of orthopedic surgeries [2], [3], [4], [5]. To perform surgical navigation by holographic guidance, a three-dimensional (3D) preoperative plan can be uploaded to the AR head-mounted device (HMD) and registered (superimposed) with the intraoperative anatomy [6]. HMDs enable visualization of a 3D hologram directly into the surgeon's field of view. Compared with current state-of-the-art pose-tracking systems (PTS) working with two-dimensional (2D) monitors, HMDs have the advantage of direct overlay of navigation on anatomy and that the surgeon can stay focused on the operating field without having to turn away.

A systematic review of most recent AR advancements reported a surgical accuracy between 1 and 5 mm and attested improvements in safety and efficacy of surgical procedures [2,6,7]. In a comparison of three different HMDs, Qian et al. presented the HoloLens (Microsoft, Redmond, USA) to be most suitable for supporting surgical interventions [8].

Since the position of the patient's anatomy in surgery is different from the position in the preoperatively acquired computed tomography (CT), the anatomy can be registered intraoperatively in order to align it with the hologram of the 3D preoperative plan [9]. Several registration techniques such as manual or landmark-based surface registration, surface digitalization or intraoperative ultrasound have been employed [[5], [6], [7],9,10]. However, in conventional navigation of spine surgeries, imaging-based registration remains the gold standard to perform the registration task precisely, and 3D fluoroscopy has been shown to be a reliable imaging technique in this regard [11]. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, imaging-based registration has not been investigated for holographic navigation and compared with state-of-the-art real-time PTS.

In this cadaver study, AR-enabled holographic navigation of pedicle screw instrumentation by use of an HMD (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, USA) was compared with gold standard navigation with a state-of-the-art PTS (fusionTrack500, Atracsys LLC, Puidoux, Switzerland). Intraoperative registration by 3D fluoroscopy was used in both methods to ensure identical experimental setups and comparable results.

Section snippets

Material and methods

This experimental cadaver study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee on research involving humans (ID: KEK 2017-00874). Consent to use a person's body for research purposes was given by the person itself or his/her representative. After the experiments, all exogenic material was extracted and cadavers were cremated.

3D evaluation method

Postexperimentally, CT scans with 1 mm slice thickness of the three cadaver specimens were conducted in prone position embedded within agar gel. Vertebrae and K-wires were semiautomatically segmented and registered with the 3D planning, as explained before [6].

With the CASPA software, cylinders of 2 mm diameter were aligned with the 3D models of the K-wires and sphere centers (diameter 2 mm), representing the entry points, were placed where the cylinder passed through the posterior surface of

Results

The AR and PTS groups were navigated with 20 K-wires and 10 K-wires, respectively.

The evaluation of the surgical accuracy resulted in a mean 3D TE in the AR and PTS groups of 3.4±1.6 mm and 3.2±2.0 mm, respectively (Fig. 6a). Mean 3D AE was 4.3°±2.3° in the AR group and 3.5°±1.4° in the PTS group (Fig. 6b). No statistically significant difference between the groups was found for TE (p=.85) or AE (p=.30).

In 2D, the axial TE was 1.8±1.3 mm (AR group) versus 1.6±1.0 mm (PTS group) and the sagittal

Discussion

Although being the gold standard in surgical navigation [11], to our knowledge, image-based registration has not been explored for the use with AR-based HMD and compared with state-of-the-art navigation systems in spine surgery. In the here performed cadaveric pilot study, we found surgical accuracy achieved by AR navigation using HMD with image-based registration to be within the range of commercially available navigation systems.

Various different clinical grading systems have been applied to

Conclusions

In conclusion, navigation for pedicle instrumentation by augmented reality-based head-mounted devices achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art high precision navigation systems when using 3D image-based registration.

Acknowledgments

This work is part of “SURGENT” under the auspices of University Medicine Zurich/Hochschulmedizin Zürich. Imaging was performed with the support of the Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging, SCMI, Balgrist Campus AG, Zurich. We thank Fabio Carrillo and Jonas Walker for their great support throughout the experiments, especially during the design of custom-made guides and markers as well as illustrations.

References (26)

  • JT Gibby et al.

    Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography

    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

    (2019)
  • L Qian et al.

    Comparison of optical see-through head-mounted displays for surgical interventions with object-anchored 2D-display

    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

    (2017)
  • K-M Scheufler et al.

    Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography- based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine

    Neurosurgery

    (2011)
  • Cited by (75)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

    Author disclosures: FM: Nothing to disclose. SR: Nothing to disclose. FL: Nothing to disclose. JMS: Nothing to disclose. PF: Nothing to disclose. MF: Stock Ownership: Incremed AG (amount not disclosed); Consulting: Incremed AG (amount not disclosed); Scientific Advisory Board/Other Office: Incremed AG, Prognosyst AG; Research Support (Investigator Salary, Staff/Materials): Medacta, Depuy Synthes (paid directly to institution); Fellowship Support: Depuy Synthes (paid directly to institution).

    View full text