Basic ScienceAugmented reality navigation for spinal pedicle screw instrumentation using intraoperative 3D imaging
Introduction
The proximity of vital and neural structures in spine surgery requires very high accuracy from the surgeons [1]. Recently, there has been increasing interest in augmented reality (AR) and its potential to improve accuracy of orthopedic surgeries [2], [3], [4], [5]. To perform surgical navigation by holographic guidance, a three-dimensional (3D) preoperative plan can be uploaded to the AR head-mounted device (HMD) and registered (superimposed) with the intraoperative anatomy [6]. HMDs enable visualization of a 3D hologram directly into the surgeon's field of view. Compared with current state-of-the-art pose-tracking systems (PTS) working with two-dimensional (2D) monitors, HMDs have the advantage of direct overlay of navigation on anatomy and that the surgeon can stay focused on the operating field without having to turn away.
A systematic review of most recent AR advancements reported a surgical accuracy between 1 and 5 mm and attested improvements in safety and efficacy of surgical procedures [2,6,7]. In a comparison of three different HMDs, Qian et al. presented the HoloLens (Microsoft, Redmond, USA) to be most suitable for supporting surgical interventions [8].
Since the position of the patient's anatomy in surgery is different from the position in the preoperatively acquired computed tomography (CT), the anatomy can be registered intraoperatively in order to align it with the hologram of the 3D preoperative plan [9]. Several registration techniques such as manual or landmark-based surface registration, surface digitalization or intraoperative ultrasound have been employed [[5], [6], [7],9,10]. However, in conventional navigation of spine surgeries, imaging-based registration remains the gold standard to perform the registration task precisely, and 3D fluoroscopy has been shown to be a reliable imaging technique in this regard [11]. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, imaging-based registration has not been investigated for holographic navigation and compared with state-of-the-art real-time PTS.
In this cadaver study, AR-enabled holographic navigation of pedicle screw instrumentation by use of an HMD (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, USA) was compared with gold standard navigation with a state-of-the-art PTS (fusionTrack500, Atracsys LLC, Puidoux, Switzerland). Intraoperative registration by 3D fluoroscopy was used in both methods to ensure identical experimental setups and comparable results.
Section snippets
Material and methods
This experimental cadaver study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee on research involving humans (ID: KEK 2017-00874). Consent to use a person's body for research purposes was given by the person itself or his/her representative. After the experiments, all exogenic material was extracted and cadavers were cremated.
3D evaluation method
Postexperimentally, CT scans with 1 mm slice thickness of the three cadaver specimens were conducted in prone position embedded within agar gel. Vertebrae and K-wires were semiautomatically segmented and registered with the 3D planning, as explained before [6].
With the CASPA software, cylinders of 2 mm diameter were aligned with the 3D models of the K-wires and sphere centers (diameter 2 mm), representing the entry points, were placed where the cylinder passed through the posterior surface of
Results
The AR and PTS groups were navigated with 20 K-wires and 10 K-wires, respectively.
The evaluation of the surgical accuracy resulted in a mean 3D TE in the AR and PTS groups of 3.4±1.6 mm and 3.2±2.0 mm, respectively (Fig. 6a). Mean 3D AE was 4.3°±2.3° in the AR group and 3.5°±1.4° in the PTS group (Fig. 6b). No statistically significant difference between the groups was found for TE (p=.85) or AE (p=.30).
In 2D, the axial TE was 1.8±1.3 mm (AR group) versus 1.6±1.0 mm (PTS group) and the sagittal
Discussion
Although being the gold standard in surgical navigation [11], to our knowledge, image-based registration has not been explored for the use with AR-based HMD and compared with state-of-the-art navigation systems in spine surgery. In the here performed cadaveric pilot study, we found surgical accuracy achieved by AR navigation using HMD with image-based registration to be within the range of commercially available navigation systems.
Various different clinical grading systems have been applied to
Conclusions
In conclusion, navigation for pedicle instrumentation by augmented reality-based head-mounted devices achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art high precision navigation systems when using 3D image-based registration.
Acknowledgments
This work is part of “SURGENT” under the auspices of University Medicine Zurich/Hochschulmedizin Zürich. Imaging was performed with the support of the Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging, SCMI, Balgrist Campus AG, Zurich. We thank Fabio Carrillo and Jonas Walker for their great support throughout the experiments, especially during the design of custom-made guides and markers as well as illustrations.
References (26)
- et al.
Workflow caveats in augmented reality–assisted pedicle instrumentation: Cadaver Lab
World Neurosurg
(2019) - et al.
Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion among 3 image-guided navigation systems: systematic review and meta-analysis
World Neurosurg
(2018) - et al.
Spinal intraoperative three-dimensional navigation: correlation between clinical and absolute engineering accuracy
Spine J
(2017) - et al.
Pedicle violation and navigational errors in pedicle screw insertion using the intraoperative O-arm: a preliminary report
Int J Spine Surg
(2013) - et al.
Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2001) - et al.
Recent development of augmented reality in surgery: a review
J Healthc Eng
(2017) - et al.
Preclinical usability study of multiple augmented reality concepts for K-wire placement
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
(2016) - et al.
Augmented and virtual reality navigation for interventions in the musculoskeletal system
Curr Radiol Rep
(2018) - et al.
Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
(2017) - et al.
Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
(2019)
Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Comparison of optical see-through head-mounted displays for surgical interventions with object-anchored 2D-display
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography- based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine
Neurosurgery
Cited by (75)
Facial augmented reality based on hierarchical optimization of similarity aspect graph
2024, Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineAutomatic registration with continuous pose updates for marker-less surgical navigation in spine surgery
2024, Medical Image AnalysisVirtual and Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
2023, World NeurosurgeryThe HoloLens in medicine: A systematic review and taxonomy
2023, Medical Image Analysis
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: FM: Nothing to disclose. SR: Nothing to disclose. FL: Nothing to disclose. JMS: Nothing to disclose. PF: Nothing to disclose. MF: Stock Ownership: Incremed AG (amount not disclosed); Consulting: Incremed AG (amount not disclosed); Scientific Advisory Board/Other Office: Incremed AG, Prognosyst AG; Research Support (Investigator Salary, Staff/Materials): Medacta, Depuy Synthes (paid directly to institution); Fellowship Support: Depuy Synthes (paid directly to institution).