Research articleDrivers and barriers for the adoption of use-oriented product-service systems: A study with young consumers in medium and small cities
Introduction
Increased environmental concerns related to growing world population have encouraged institutions and governments around the world to pursue more sustainable economic models (Gnoni et al., 2017). Although improving the efficiency of products and processes makes sense from an environmental perspective, it is still not enough to address the scale of current problems, requiring further changes and attention to population consumption levels and patterns (Joshi and Rahman, 2017).
One possible solution to avoid unnecessary use of resources and excessive waste is to reduce new purchases and promote new socioeconomic patterns of consumption, such as circular economy (Kristensen and Remmen, 2019, Mashhadi et al., 2019). Unlike the linear production model, circular economy encompasses resource and product reuse, repair and upcycling (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013), as well as models aimed at sharing of products (Piscicelli et al., 2015). It also includes practices of extending a products life such as resale of second hand items, access-based consumption such as renting, hiring and leasing products (also known as product-service systems) (Bardhi and Eckhardt, 2012), and collaborative consumption such as sharing platforms (Edbring et al., 2016).
Given that in circular economy reuse is more desirable than recycling (Park and Chertow, 2014), one of the alternatives for such transition would be the adoption of new business models that are based on usability/performance and no longer based on product ownership (Bressanelli et al., 2017). In this scenario, a promising way to achieve sustainability goals are product-service systems (PSS) (Zhang et al., 2015, Catulli et al., 2017).
Conceptually, PSS can be defined as a special case of servitization (Baines et al., 2007, Ziout and Azab, 2015, Kjaer et al., 2018), based on the functional thinking that people (consumers) do not necessarily look for a material product, rather they seek its utility, function, value or service (Mont, 2004, Qu et al., 2016, Kanda and Matschewsky, 2018). PSS can also be defined as a potential advanced scenario for more sustainable production and consumption systems (Santoso and Erdaka, 2015), since one of the objectives of PSS is to extend product life cycle and to provide customers with a more satisfactory experience (Annarelli et al., 2016).
Researchers divide PSS into three categories (Gaiardelli et al., 2014, Santoso and Erdaka, 2015, Catulli et al., 2017): (i) product-oriented PSS; (ii) use-oriented PSS; and (iii) result-oriented PSS. In (i) product-oriented PSS, product ownership is held by the customer, but additional services such as maintenance and warranty remain provided by the manufacturer, to ensure product performance over a given period. In (ii) use-oriented PSS, the service provider, which may or may not have been the original manufacturer, holds the product ownership and the customer purchases the use of the product and its functions over a given period of time (examples include sharing/pooling, renting and leasing). (iii) Result-oriented PSS focuses on the service that replaces the product in contrast to use-oriented PSS (for example, instead of renting a washing machine, households access a laundry service or launderettes).
Kristensen and Remmen (2019) point out that different studies have highlighted environmental sustainability as an important driver or result of PSSs. However, the authors draw attention to the gap in studies regarding the social dimension and the value created from PSSs. Therefore, we will focus our study on use-oriented PSS, whose subcategories are rental and product sharing (Tukker, 2004). Specifically, we identify the main drivers and barriers affecting the adoption of use-oriented PSS by young consumers residing in medium and small cities. According to Akbar and Hoffmann (2018), academic research is required in order to provide a framework that helps understand the behaviors associated with use-oriented PSS adoption. Furthermore, Mashhadi et al. (2019) state that there is a lack of elements by public and private managers related to understanding the drivers that contribute to use-oriented PSS adoption. Moreover, research indicates that use-oriented PSS adoption is disappointingly low, with consumer acceptance being a significant barrier (Piscicelli et al., 2015, Catulli et al., 2017).
Section snippets
Literature review: what we already know about drivers and barriers for use-oriented PSS?
This section presents the results of a narrative bibliographic research that was conducted in the Scopus database, focused on use-oriented PSS. Specifically, we seek to identify, from prior research activities, the drivers and barriers for consumer adoption of use-oriented PSS.
The drivers for the adoption of use-oriented PSS vary widely among different products. According to Botsman and Rogers (2011), lower value-added goods whose purchase decision processes require low to medium engagement
Method
In light of this study’s objective, we opted to perform a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. Descriptive studies are recommended when researchers aim to report characteristics or behavioral trends of targetpopulations (Malhotra, 2009). The quantitative approach allows greater assurance in the development of study conclusions (Hair Jr. et al., 2005).
As for the research population sample, we focused our study on the economically active young residents of southern Brazil. We
Data analysis
This section describes the results obtained in our field research, by initially highlighting in Section 4.1 the use-oriented PSS adoption drivers and barriers, followed by the intention to use analysis in Section 4.2
Discussion
Our results confirm the importance given by consumers to environmental aspects. Analyzing the data from the theory of evaluation criteria (Blackwell et al., 2005), it can be stated that drivers associated with hedonistic/experiential needs (such as self-fulfillment, self-esteem, and sense of belonging) tend to positively incentivize the adoption of use-oriented PSS. However, the utilitarian needs (as performance and comfort), tend to hinder such adoption.
Additionally, we found that knowledge
Final considerations
Theoretically, our research furthers the understanding of use-oriented PSS adoption drivers and barriers . We also believe that this study may contribute to public policymaking in support of promoting use-oriented PSS in medium and small cities.
However, this study presents some limitations. We recognize the use of non-probabilistic sampling makes it difficult to generalize the results obtained. We also recognize that in this study we approach the use-oriented PSS in general, i.e., we do not
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Research Coordination of the Brazilian Ministry of Education (CAPES) and the University of Passo Fundo Foundation (FUPF), Brazil for the financial support received to conduct this research.
Andressa D’Agostin ( [email protected]) holds a degree in Environmental and Sanitary Engineering by Federal University of Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. She is currently a master’s student of the Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences (PPGCiAmb) at University of Passo Fundo, researching communication towards pro-environmental behavior, more specifically emotions related to the consumption of single-use plastic, also being a member of the research project on “Innovation Management of
References (73)
- et al.
Under which circumstances do consumers choose a product service system (PSS)? Consumer benefits and costs of sharing in PSS
J. Clean. Prod.
(2018) - et al.
Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review
J. Clean. Prod.
(2016) - et al.
Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland
J. Clean. Prod.
(2015) - et al.
Understanding collaborative consumption: test of a theoretical model
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2017) - et al.
Sustainable product service systems – from concept creation to the detailing of a business model for a bicycle sharing system in berlin
Procedia CIRP
(2016) - et al.
Reshaping the washing machine industry through circular economy and product-service system business models
Procedia CIRP
(2017) - et al.
Consuming use orientated product service systems: A consumer culture theory perspective
J. Clean. Prod.
(2017) Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-service systems: insights from innovation studies and companies’ experiences
J. Clean. Prod.
(2013)- et al.
Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing?
J. Cleaner Prod.
(2016) - et al.
A cost-engineering method for product-service systems based on stochastic process modelling: Bergamo’s bike-sharing PSS
Procedia CIRP
(2017)
What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm
Ecol. Econ.
A classification model for product-service offerings
J. Clean. Prod.
Supporting circular economy through use-based business models: The washing machines Case
Procedia CIRP
Sustainability is a nice bonus the role of sustainability in carsharing from a consumer perspective
J. Clean. Prod.
Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour
Sustain. Prod. Consum.
An exploratory expansion of the concept of product-service systems beyond products and services
Procedia CIRP
Guidelines for evaluating the environmental performance of Product/Service-Systems through Life Cycle Assessment
J. Clean. Prod.
Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging - Rational and emotional approaches
J. Environ. Psychol.
A framework for sustainable value propositions in product-service systems
J. Clean. Prod.
Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior
J. Environ. Psychol.
Dynamic and multidimensional measurement of product-service system (PSS) sustainability: a triple bottom line (TBL)-based system dynamics approach
J. Clean. Prod.
Application of prospect theory on Car sharing product service system
Procedia CIRP
Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil
J. Clean. Prod.
Clarifying the concept of product–service system
J. Clean. Prod.
Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use
Ecol. Econ.
A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing
J. Clean. Prod.
The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior
J. Environ. Psychol.
The norm activation model: an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour
J. Econ. Psychol.
Environmentally friendly consumer choices: cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt
J. Environ. Psychol.
Establishing and testing the reuse potential indicator for managing wastes as resources
J. Environ. Manag.
The role of values in collaborative consumption: insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK
J. Clean. Prod.
Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study
Appl. Energy
State-of-the-art of design, evaluation, and operation methodologies in product service systems
Comput. Ind.
Customer loyalty in collaborative consumption model: Empirical study of CRM for product-service system-based e-commerce in Indonesia
Procedia Comput. Sci.
Interview study: How can product-service systems increase customer acceptance of innovations?
CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol.
Decision support for environmental-friendly vehicle relocations in free- floating car sharing systems: The case of car2go
Procedia CIRP
Cited by (42)
Change agents’ cognitive maps of circular supply chain transition – An investigation of barriers, actions, and outcomes
2024, Journal of Purchasing and Supply ManagementResistance to the sharing economy: Why some consumers and providers do not participate in P2P sharing
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionMobile apps against food waste: Are consumers willing to use them? A survey research on Italian consumers
2023, Resources, Conservation and Recycling AdvancesInvestigating the circular supply chain implementation challenges using Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP approach
2023, Materials Today: ProceedingsRole of consumer mindsets, behaviour, and influencing factors in circular consumption systems: A systematic review
2022, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionCitation Excerpt :Wang and Hazen et al. (2016) find that environmental awareness regarding remanufactured products is positively related to the perceived value of remanufactured products and acquisition intention; however, in Asia, environmentally conscious consumers do not show a high appreciation for the green concept of remanufactured products (Wang and Kuah, 2018). Environmental awareness and concern have also been found in other research contexts, such as participation in take-back systems (Abuabara et al., 2019; Botelho et al., 2016; Nowakowski, 2019), adoption of product-service systems (D'Agostin et al., 2020; Kuah and Wang, 2020; Patti, 2017), daily sustainable behaviour (Clark et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2017), and packaging (Testa et al., 2020). Machado et al. (2019) establish that consuming second-hand clothing purchased in thrift stores enhances consumers' environmental awareness and, consequently, their engagement with other circular behaviours.
Andressa D’Agostin ( [email protected]) holds a degree in Environmental and Sanitary Engineering by Federal University of Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. She is currently a master’s student of the Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences (PPGCiAmb) at University of Passo Fundo, researching communication towards pro-environmental behavior, more specifically emotions related to the consumption of single-use plastic, also being a member of the research project on “Innovation Management of Environmentally Sustainable Products”.
Janine Fleith de Medeiros ( [email protected]) is a Full Professor of the Graduate Program on Business Administration and of the Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences at University of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil. She coordinates the research project on “Innovation Management of Environmentally Sustainable Products”. Janine is currently a postdoctoral researcher on Industrial Engineering from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul where she also received her doctorate degree in Industrial Engineering.
Gabriel Vidor ( [email protected]) Gabriel Vidor holds a PhD (2014) and a Master’s degree (2010) in Industrial Engineering from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and an undergraduate in Production Engineering from the University of Caxias do Sul (2007). He is currently a Professor at the University of Caxias do Sul. He has experience in planning, design and control of production systems. His main research areas involve the use of production methods to solve capacity and planning problems in industrial and service organizations.
Maikielli Zulpo ( [email protected]) holds a degree in Environmental Engineering and a Graduate Degree in Occupational Safety and Health by University of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil. She is currently a master’s student of the Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences (PPGCiAmb) at University of Passo Fundo, researching the contribution of the efficient microorganisms involved in cattle manure composting, as well as the characterization of this material.
Cleide Fátima Moretto ( [email protected]) is a Full Professor of the Graduate Program on Human Aging and of the Graduate Program on Environmental Sciences at University of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil. She holds a doctorate degree in Economic Theory by University of São Paulo (USP) and is currently a researcher on the areas of socioeconomic development, labor and human resources economy, approaching subjects such as sustainable development, labor market and worker’s health.