Elsevier

Solar Energy

Volume 109, November 2014, Pages 1-10
Solar Energy

PV technologies performance comparison in temperate climates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.015Get rights and content

Abstract

During the last decade, PV technology has been subject to a quick and remarkable improvement, affecting both the efficiency of modules and the manufacturing costs; during its period of greatest growth, the EU market was characterized by different major types of PV modules, but in many cases, due to the extremely rapid development of the sector, there is a lack of knowledge about the energy performance and behavior of such technologies under actual operating conditions. The aim of this work is thus to carry out a performance comparison of three different and representative PV technologies in temperate climatic conditions; in particular, the influence of climatic parameters on energy production was investigated, with a focus on the thermal and spectral analysis. The experimental results, referred to a monitoring period of one year, show a significant difference between the reference performances, rated under standard test conditions, and the actual daily/seasonal productivity, providing useful information about the different interaction with climate of the technologies tested.

Introduction

The actual performance of PV systems is strongly related to the environmental conditions; in detail, the parameters that most affect energy production are global irradiance, ambient temperature and solar radiation spectrum (Monokroussos et al., 2011, Huld et al., 2010, Strobel et al., 2009, Zinßer et al., 2008). These parameters directly affect the operating conditions of PV modules, with particular reference to cells temperature, which can be identified as one of the major factors affecting electricity production. However, each PV technology reacts differently to the variations of cells operating temperature, according to the temperature coefficient (Makrides et al., 2009): the performance of crystalline silicon modules (c-Si), as is well known, decreases when temperature increases (Radziemska, 2003); on the contrary, modules realized with single or multi-junction amorphous silicon cells (a-Si) are able to improve the electrical performance in high-temperature conditions (Makrides et al., 2012). This effect, which is called thermal annealing, allows to recover part of the nominal power initially lost due to Light Induced Degradation (LID), as a consequence of a prolonged exposure to high temperature (McEvoy et al., 2012). These modules have a strongly site-dependent performance, which is typically difficult to predict in terms of actual energy production.

In such a scenario, it is worth to note that the actual performance of PV modules in outdoor conditions is thus determined by the overlapping of several concurrent effects, which are difficult to differentiate and analyze individually (Fanni et al., 2011, Gottschalg et al., 2003).

The aim of this study is the definition and the performance comparison of three main categories of PV modules, made, respectively, of crystalline silicon cells (c-Si), micromorphous silicon cells (a-Si/μc-Si) and heterojunction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT). The first category is the most common all over the world (European Photovoltaic Industry Association, 2010), with a stable and predictable performance over time; the second is an emerging technology at commercial level, with very competitive manufacturing costs (Stannowski et al., 2013, Chopra et al., 2004, Zweibel, 1999), and the third achieves a very high energy conversion efficiency among the PV products for civil uses actually available on the market (Taguchi et al., 2014, Tsunomura et al., 2009).

The paper provides the experimental monitoring and a critical analysis of different representative commercial PV modules, applied at the experimental test facility of the Politecnico di Milano University from January 1 to December 31, 2013. The experimental analysis was carried out in order to evaluate in detail the actual performance of the chosen technologies in a temperate climate, under real operating conditions.

Section snippets

Experimental setup

This section describes the experimental setup of the PV test facility used to monitor the selected PV technologies. In detail, the test facility is arranged with mounting structures characterized by a variable tilt angle and oriented with an azimuth angle of 0°. The climatic conditions of the reference context are summarized in Table 1

The PV test facility is equipped with sensors aimed at providing measurements of meteorological and operating parameters, in order to determine the energy

Tested technologies

This section describes the average features of the chosen PV technologies adopted for the comparative analysis. In detail, the chosen modules are PV products widely available on the European market, made of crystalline silicon cells (c-Si), micromorphous cells (a-Si/μc-Si) and heterojunction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT) cells, respectively. A description of each technology is provided in the following sub-sections.

Seasonal performance assessment

As previously mentioned, the modules tested were monitored for one year, from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, with an interruption due to a malfunction on the first 14 days of February.

The first step of the analysis is focused on the evaluation of the modules performance in relation to the seasonal variation. The investigation aims at establishing a correlation between performance and climatic conditions. The experimental results are discussed in the following section.

Conclusions

The experimental work presented in this paper provides interesting data, which can be used to assess the performance differences between the three analyzed photovoltaic technologies in operating conditions. The performance ratio parameter was chosen in order to compare the PV modules.

The seasonal analysis provides the performance trend over the year: while the performance of the c-Si and HIT modules is rather stable and predictable, the module with an a-Si layer presents widely variable

References (30)

Cited by (0)

View full text