Original article: surgery
Sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Two-year results from a Swedish multicenter randomized controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.033Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a world-wide epidemic and it is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Few randomized controlled studies have compared the 2 most common surgical procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in the treatment of obese patients with T2D.

Objectives

To compare diabetes remission rates (glycosylated hemoglobin ≤6.0%, without diabetes medications) in obese T2D patients (body mass index, 35–50) undergoing RYGB or SG.

Setting

Three University Hospital clinics and 1 Regional Hospital in Sweden.

Methods

Forty-nine patients with T2D were included. Twenty-five were randomized to RYGB and 24 to SG. There was no difference between groups regarding patient characteristics, duration of T2D, overall usage of antidiabetic medications, or glycosylated hemoglobin levels. All patients (100%) completed 1-year follow-up and 47 (95.9%) 2-year follow-up.

Results

Remission of T2D was not significantly different between the RYGB and SG, reaching 44% and 46% (n = 25 and n = 24, respectively, P = .897, power = .80) at 1 year, and 48% and 55% (n = 25 and n = 22, respectively, P = .654) at 2 years of follow-up. Similarly, mean glycosylated hemoglobin was improved in both groups at 1 and 2 years, with no significant differences between the groups (RYGB baseline versus 1 yr; mean ± standard deviation: 7.9 ± 1.5 versus 5.8 ± .6%, P < .0001; versus 2 yr: 5.9 ± .7%, P < .0001; SG baseline versus 1 yr: 8.2 ± 1.9 versus 5.9 ± .7%, P < .0001; versus 2 yr: 5.9 ± 1.1%, P < .0001). Total weight loss was not different but percentage excess weight loss was higher after RYGB compared with SG both at 1 and 2 years; mean ± standard deviation: 78 ± 22 versus 60 ± 22%, and 76 ± 24 versus 54 ± 21%, respectively (P < .01 for both). Waist circumference also decreased significantly more in the RYGB group.

Conclusions

Despite superior excess weight loss after RYGB, T2D remission rates did not differ significantly between RYGB and SG after 2 years. Long-term follow-up data are needed to define the role of SG in the treatment of patients with obesity and T2D.

Section snippets

Methods

Patients referred for bariatric surgery were considered for participation in the study. Inclusion criteria were T2D requiring antidiabetic medications, BMI between 35 and 50 kg/m2, and age between 18 and 60 years. Patients were excluded if they had uncontrolled psychiatric disorder, alcohol and/or substance abuse, severe nephropathy (chronic kidney disease index >2), retinopathy or neuropathy, had previously undergone surgical weight reducing procedures, or if Barrett’s esophagus was diagnosed

Results

There were no differences at baseline between the groups regarding age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, diabetes duration, and co-morbidities (Table 1). All patients had urine samples examined for proteinuria. There were 8 (32%) patients with microalbuminuria in the RYGB group and 6 (25%) patients in the SG group (P = .592). The average operation time was similar for RYGB and SG, 93.9 ± 37.1 and 91.8 ± 47.7 minutes, respectively (P = .865). One patient (4.2%) in the SG group and 3 patients (12%)

Discussion

In the present study, similar T2D remission rates were found at 2 years after RYGB and SG. Our data corroborate the findings in some other randomized controlled studies comparing the outcomes after RYGB and SG in patients with T2D [[16], [17], [18], [19]]. However, the reported remission rates vary between studies. One year after surgery, the T2D remission rates in the study by Murphy et al. [17] were comparable to our present data showing 52% and 49% remission rates with no medications in RYGB

Conclusions

In this randomized study, T2D remission rates did not differ significantly between RYGB and SG at the 2-year follow-up. However, larger studies with long-term follow-up data are needed to define the role of SG in the treatment of patients with obesity and T2D.

Disclosures

The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References (30)

  • S.N. Karamanakos et al.

    Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study

    Ann Surg

    (2008)
  • R. Peterli et al.

    Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial

    Ann Surg

    (2009)
  • V. Wallenius et al.

    Glycemic control after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Obes Surg

    (2018)
  • E. Osland et al.

    Diabetes improvement and resolution following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    Surg Endosc

    (2017)
  • W.J. Lee et al.

    Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial

    Arch Surg

    (2011)
  • Cited by (23)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    VW reports grants from the Region Västra Götaland in Sweden (grant no. ALFGBG 813871) and grants from Erik and Lily Philipson memorial foundation. AT reports grants from the Erling-Persson Family Foundation (grant no. 140604). AM reports grants from the Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland in Sweden (grant no. VGFOUREG-384231).

    View full text