Elsevier

Seminars in Immunology

Volume 24, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages 393-398
Seminars in Immunology

Review
Systemic and cellular consequences of macrophage control of iron metabolism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2013.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Iron is necessary for both mammalian cells and microorganisms, which fiercely compete for this essential nutrient. Accordingly, macrophages exploit the denial of iron from microbial pathogens as an important strategy to accomplish their key role in innate immunity and host defense. Macrophages employ multiple mechanisms to accumulate iron and thus contain microbial infections, but this may come at a price. In particular, at the systemic level iron sequestration in the reticuloendothelial cells can lead to the development of anemia of chronic disease. At the local level, iron sequestration in macrophages, which is targeted to extracellular invaders, can in turn favor intracellular pathogens. Moreover, iron accumulation can per se promote pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages and consequently contribute to maintain the process of inflammation, without resolution. Finally, the peculiar iron trafficking that characterizes alternatively polarized macrophages can influence neighboring cells in the microenvironment and impact on the resolution phase of inflammation. In this review, we describe the role of macrophages in iron metabolism in the context of host defense and iron balance.

Highlights

► Iron retention in pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages has a bacteriostatic effect. ► Macrophage iron sequestration may lead to iron deficiency and anemia of chronic disease. ► Iron accumulation can result in pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages. ► Iron release from alternative M2 macrophages may impact on cells in the microenvironment.

Introduction

Most life forms have exploited the useful chemical characteristics of iron for evolving enzymes and proteins involved in fundamental biologic functions, such as oxygen transport, DNA synthesis, energy production. Indeed, iron is an essential nutrient for both higher organisms and microorganisms, the latter having evolved various sophisticated mechanisms for scavenging iron from the environment. On the other side of the battlefield over iron, macrophages, which are key cells of the innate immunity response, are important players in the control of this strategic resource, the so-called nutritional immunity. The key role of iron in host–pathogen interactions is underscored by the evidence that both iron levels and infection–inflammation control hepcidin, “the iron hormone” (see Section 2).

In this review we will cover the major aspects of the connection between iron and macrophages. Recent evidence suggests that iron handling is profoundly different in macrophages depending upon their activation profile [1], [2]. This can range from classical (or M1) activation, typically observed in inflammatory conditions and in response to pathogen challenge, to alternative (or M2) activation, which is driven by immune signals including IL-4/IL-13, TGFβ and glucocorticoids and characterizes the resolution phase of inflammation. Finally, although this review is focused on macrophages, it should be remembered that lymphocytes also require iron for proliferation, as shown by upregulation of TfR1 levels in activated lymphocytes.

Section snippets

Systemic iron metabolism

Body iron homeostasis is finely regulated to ensure sufficient iron availability for the numerous essential functions in which iron is involved, but avoiding iron excess, which is known to promote the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress-mediated tissue damage.

Dietary iron availability is very low, so that humans and all the vertebrates have evolved systems to strictly conserve and recycle iron. Under normal circumstances, duodenal enterocytes absorb only about 1–2 mg

Pathogens

As outlined above, resistance to infection is in part dependent on the successful outcome of a competition for iron between the host and the invading bacteria. Since iron is an essential growth factor for most bacteria and parasites, these microorganisms have evolved multiple sophisticated mechanisms for acquiring iron in environments where free iron is scarce. These devices include the secretion of siderophores, organic molecules that bind iron with very high affinity, and their reuptake

Macrophages and iron in the inflammatory microenvironment

The battle for iron takes place also in the infection microenvironment where pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages use an array of proteins to restrict microbial access to iron and hence contain infections. On the other hand, alternative types of macrophages (M2) may play a very different role in other environments, such as in tumors, or in different phases of the inflammatory response.

Consequences of increased intracellular macrophage iron content

The strategy of sequestering iron in macrophages to starve microorganisms may have a number of consequences. The first is that this iron redistribution, while being an effective defense against extracellular bacteria that could cause a severe condition like septicemia, may favor intracellular bacteria. Moreover, recent evidence indicated that iron in macrophages appears also to be key for mounting an appropriate immune response.

Conclusions

We reviewed macrophage iron metabolism trying to emphasize the dual role that this essential nutrient has in different situations and environments, and the struggle to maintain iron balance (Fig. 1). At the systemic level, hyposideremia starves microbes but contributes toward causing the common condition of ACD; at the local level, iron retention in inflammatory macrophages prevents iron access to extracellular pathogens but favors those that have been able to adapt to intramacrophage life. In

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from MIUR (PRIN project) to G.C., M.L. and S.R. and the TIMER project from EC to M.L.

References (67)

  • N. Lounis et al.

    Iron and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

    Journal of Clinical Virology

    (2001)
  • F. Yang et al.

    Regulation of reticuloendothelial iron transporter MTP1 (Slc11a3) by inflammation

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2002)
  • C. Peyssonnaux et al.

    TLR4-dependent hepcidin expression by myeloid cells in response to bacterial pathogens

    Blood

    (2006)
  • C.N. Roy et al.

    Hepcidin antimicrobial peptide transgenic mice exhibit features of the anemia of inflammation

    Blood

    (2007)
  • S. Recalcati et al.

    Nitric oxide-mediated induction of ferritin synthesis in J774 macrophages by inflammatory cytokines: role of selective iron regulatory protein-2 downregulation

    Blood

    (1998)
  • A. Pietrangelo

    Hereditary hemochromatosis

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta

    (2006)
  • F.A. Khan et al.

    Association of hemochromatosis with infectious diseases: expanding spectrum

    International Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (2007)
  • G. Cairo et al.

    Inappropriately high iron regulatory protein activity in monocytes of patients with genetic hemochromatosis

    Blood

    (1997)
  • S. Recalcati et al.

    Response of monocyte iron regulatory protein activity to inflammation: abnormal behavior in genetic hemochromatosis

    Blood

    (1998)
  • I. Kasvosve

    Effect of ferroportin polymorphism on iron homeostasis and infection

    Clin Chim Acta.

    (2013)
  • M. Bacci et al.

    Macrophages are alternatively activated in patients with endometriosis and required for growth and vascularization of lesions in a mouse model of disease

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2009)
  • S. Recalcati et al.

    Differential regulation of iron homeostasis during human macrophage polarized activation

    European Journal of Immunology

    (2010)
  • E. Nemeth et al.

    The role of hepcidin in iron metabolism

    Acta Haematologica

    (2009)
  • J.L. Babitt et al.

    Bone morphogenetic protein signaling by hemojuvelin regulates hepcidin expression

    Nature Genetics

    (2006)
  • G. Papanikolaou et al.

    Mutations in HFE2 cause iron overload in chromosome 1q-linked juvenile hemochromatosis

    Nature Genetics

    (2004)
  • B. Andriopoulos et al.

    BMP6 is a key endogenous regulator of hepcidin expression and iron metabolism

    Nature Genetics

    (2009)
  • D. Meynard et al.

    Lack of the bone morphogenetic protein BMP6 induces massive iron overload

    Nature Genetics

    (2009)
  • C. Camaschella et al.

    Iron and erythropoiesis: a dual relationship

    International Journal of Hematology

    (2011)
  • E. Nemeth et al.

    IL-6 mediates hypoferremia of inflammation by inducing the synthesis of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin

    Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (2004)
  • U.E. Schaible et al.

    Iron and microbial infection

    Nature Reviews Microbiology

    (2004)
  • E.P. Skaar et al.

    Iron-source preference of Staphylococcus aureus infections

    Science

    (2004)
  • R.A. Bonnah et al.

    Expression of epithelial cell iron-related genes upon infection by Neisseria meningitidis

    Cellular Microbiology

    (2004)
  • Q. de Mast et al.

    Mild increases in serum hepcidin and interleukin-6 concentrations impair iron incorporation in haemoglobin during an experimental human malaria infection

    British Journal of Haematology

    (2009)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Xyloglucan and Concanavalin A based dressings in the topical treatment of mice wound healing process

      2021, Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Decrease plasma levels of transferrin lead to the iron excess in the extracellular matrix, which has a deleterious effect on tissue repair (Crichton & Charloteaux‐Wauters, 1987; Recalcati et al., 2019). To preventing this, activated M1-macrophages, during the inflammatory phase of the wound healing, plays an important role in the iron metabolism (Recalcati, Locati, & Cairo, 2012). Iron sequestration by M1-macrophages is an efficient bacteriostatic effect in host defense (Ganz & Nemeth, 2015).

    • Metabolic regulation of suppressive myeloid cells in cancer

      2017, Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      M1 macrophages upregulate molecules needed for intracellular iron import and storage (i.e. ferritin, ceruloplasmin, natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1, divalent metal transporter-1), whereas M2 macrophages express molecules mediating iron recycling and release (i.e. CD163, CD94, transferrin receptor, hemeoxygenase-1, ferroportin) [91]. Therefore M1 macrophages have an “iron sequestering” phenotype that limits extracellular bacteria growth and enhances inflammation, while M2 macrophages have an “iron releasing” phenotype that supports cell proliferation, wound healing but also tumor growth [92,93]. In different in vitro models the release of iron emerged as a crucial pro-tumoral activities of M2-polarized macrophages [91,94] and addition of a cell impermeable iron chelator abrogated the capacity of M2 macrophages conditioned medium to enhance cancer cells proliferation [91,94].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text