Dewatering of 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropan-1-ol by hydrophilic pervaporation with poly(vinyl alcohol) based Pervap™ membranes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pervaporation of water-tetrafluoropropanol (TFP) mixtures was studied.

  • Effect of different process conditions on separation efficiency was evaluated.

  • Efficient dewatering of TFP using Pervap™ hydrophilic membranes was proven.

  • Batch mode pervaporation with Pervap™ 2200 and 2216 membranes was suggested.

Abstract

Pervap™ 2200, 2201, 2216, 2255, and 2510 hydrophilic, PVA membranes were investigated in pervaporation of water-tetrafluoropropanol mixtures. Physicochemical properties of membranes were characterized by determining the contact angle (CA) of water and glycerol and the surface free energy (SFE). The separation and transport properties of membranes were determined during vacuum pervaporation in contact with water-TFP mixtures containing up to 22 wt.% water.

It was found that all membranes were hydrophilic (CA < 90°) and the polar component of SFE was much higher than the dispersive one. The apparent activation energy for water transport was very high (Eapp = 81.3 kJ/mol), indicated that water transport is activated thermally. Pervap™ membranes were very selective during the dehydration process of TFP. In contact with the Pervap™ 2200, 2201, and 2216 permeate contained practically pure water, regardless the feed composition. The process separation index (PSI) for Pervap™ 2200 and 2216 was close to 5000 kg m−2 h−1, suggesting that both membranes can be efficiently applied in the batch pervaporation process for TFP dehydration.

Introduction

Tetrafluoropropanol (TFP) can be obtained in a telomerization reaction (Eq. (1)) of tetrafluoroethylen with methanol [1], [2]. Synthesis proceeds at 120–122 °C, and leads eventually to the product with n = 1 and the yield of ca. 80% [1], [2].nC2F4+CH3OHH(CF2CF2)nCH2OH

Dry tetrafluoropropanol is widely used as cleaning agent in dry cleaning, as a dye solvent in an electronic industry during CD-R(W) and DVD manufacturing, and as an ingredient of the fabric finishing agents [3], [4], [5]. Pure TFP and/or its water azeotrope mixture are also used as a new type of working fluids in an organic Rankine’s Cycle, which is a promising process for the conversion of low temperature heat into electricity [6], [7].

Tetrafluoropropanol is an organic solvent classified by REACH regulation as a hazardous substance. The most important physicochemical properties of TFP are gathered in Table 1. Taking into consideration that TFP is bio-accumulative and harmful to organisms, it is very important to remove and/or recover TFP from wastewaters. Nowadays, various processes such as Fenton, O3/H2O2, O3/UV defluoridation and/or sorption on activated carbon are used for treating TFP wastewaters [4], [8], [9], [10].

The application of TFP at the industrial scale has yet some limitations. One of the basic requirements for a wider application of TFP is a must of low water content in the solvent, which depends on the final application of TFP [3], [5], [6], [7]. Binary mixture of TFP and water forms an azeotrope at TFP/water composition of 72.5/27.5 (m/m) – Table 1. For that reason, the simple distillation as a method for TFP dewatering is not effective. The promising solution of this limitation would be application of hydrophilic pervaporation [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

Pervaporation (PV) is a separation process where a binary or multicomponent liquid mixture is separated by a partial vaporization through a membrane [19], [21]. Basics of pervaporation process are described in detail elsewhere [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Compared with the traditional separation method for liquid mixtures, PV has many outstanding advantages, such as high selectivity, low energy consumption and flexible operation condition. This process is particularly appropriate for solvents dehydration [3], [11], [13], [15], [17], [26], [27], separation of organic–organic mixtures [28], [29], [30], [31], and organic recovery or removal from dilute aqueous solution [23], [24], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. However, pervaporation performance is often limited due to membrane fouling and aging, concentration polarization, and the presence of non-volatile solutes and electrolytes in feed mixture [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53].

Over the last decade only few papers were published focusing on application of pervaporation process for the dehydration of TFP [3], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58].

Huang et al. [3] presented research on the preparation of two types of thin-film polyamide composite membranes: Type A (pristine composite membrane) and Type B (annealed composite membrane). Authors found that Type B membrane shows better transport and separation properties than Type A membrane; in contact with 70 wt.% TFP solution separation factor for Type B membrane was equal to 75 [3].

Wang et al. [54] underlined that the membranes used for the dehydration of aqueous TFP solutions should be resistant to that aggressive organic solvent. Moreover, it was suggested that the hollow fiber configuration can show higher performance in practical applications of pervaporation. Authors reported pervaporation properties of novel PBI/P84 dual layer hollow fiber membranes applied to the TFP dehydration. PBI and P84 are both aromatic polymeric materials known for their robustness in the aggressive chemical environment, as well as mechanical strength and thermal stability [54]. Authors reported also that during pervaporation of 85 wt.% TFP solution, the novel PBI/P84 membrane displays the permeate flux of 0.33 kg m−2 h−1 and the separation factor equal to 1990 [54].

Lo et al. [55] presented results on the plasma deposition of tetraethoxysilane on polycarbonate membrane and subsequent utilization of SiOxCyHz/PC membranes in the dehydration of TFP aqueous mixtures. The SiOxCyHz/PC membrane prepared using the deposition time of 30 min and applied power of 150 W showed the best properties. In contact with 80 wt.% TFP and operating at 25 °C, the total pervaporation permeate flux was equal to 0.35 kg m−2 h−1 with the separation factor of 570 [55].

Tu et al. [56] and Lin et al. [57] reported on the preparation of the hydrophilic surface grafted on poly(tetrafluoroethylene) membranes. Authors obtained membranes grafted with polyacrylamide (denoted as PTFE-g-PAAm membrane) and polystyrene sulfonic acid (denoted as PTFE-g-PSSA membrane) [56]. Subsequently a Chistosan-5/PTFE composite membrane was created by casting a chitosan solution on the surface of PTFE-g-PSSA membrane. Authors reported that for 90% solution of TFP in water, the both PTFE-g-PSSA and Chistosan-5/PTFE membranes showed practically identical transport properties, with permeate fluxes of 0.317–0.319 kg m−2 h−1. It was also found that the permeate contains practically pure water [56], [57].

Chen et al. [58] reported on the pervaporation performances of various commercially available PVA/PAN based membranes, denoted as S1, B1, B2, and B3, nevertheless the commercial names nor membrane manufacturers were not disclosed. The preliminary screening test of the pervaporation properties of these membranes in contact with water-TFP mixture containing 72.5–99 wt.% TFP allowed authors to choose the S1 membrane as the best one. Authors reported that the water flux was linearly decreasing with the decreasing water content in feed mixture. The flux was also strongly dependent of the operating temperature. In the examined experimental conditions of feed compositions (72.5–99.0 wt.% TFP) and feed temperatures (40–70 °C), the separation factor changed in the range 4–370, whereas permeate fluxes of water changed within the range 0.13–4.73 kg m−2 h−1. Authors observed also a typical trade-off between separation factor and permeate flux [11], [25], [50], [58].

The aim of this research was to assess the efficiency of several hydrophilic Pervap™ membranes based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in the separation of water-TFP mixtures. The influence of the feed composition and process parameters on separation performances of membranes was investigated. The obtained results allowed to suggest the batch pervaporation dehydration process. Moreover, the obtained results were compared with the available literature data [3], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58].

Section snippets

Experimental protocol

Experiments were performed using the laboratory pervaporation rig presented schematically in Fig. 1. The detailed description of the setup and its operation is given elsewhere [19], [37], [38].

During the experiments, two pervaporation modules with membrane areas of 24 cm2 or 170 cm2 were used. All measurements were made in a batch mode. System reached the steady-state conditions after ca. 1 h. The following characteristics were determined in the course of measurements: total permeate flux (Jtot),

Hydrophilicity of the PVA based Pervap™ membranes

In Fig. 2 the average values of water contact angle for investigated membrane are presented. It can be noticed that the contact angle for water was lower than 90°, what proves the hydrophilic character of PVA based Pervap™ membranes. Interestingly, the contact angle for Pervap™ 2216 is noticeably higher (69 ± 2°) than for other PVA based membranes (54–58 ± 2°). This can result from the different crosslinking procedure of the PVA skin layer.

The obtained values of contact angle for PVA membranes are

Conclusions

Research presented the properties of Pervap™ PVA based membranes applied for the dehydration of tetrafluoropropanol. The performance of membranes is controlled by the following parameters: the thickness of the separation PVA layer and its chemical structure, i.e. the degree of crosslinking and the nature of the utilized crosslinking agent. All membranes were highly selective toward water. The contact angle for water was lower than 90°, indicating the hydrophilic character of the membranes.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the statutory funds of Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika w Toruniu (Faculty of Chemistry, T-109).

The technical assistance of MSc Radosław Kopeć in the experimental part of this research is kindly acknowledged.

References (97)

  • E.J. Cavanagh et al.

    Optimization of environmental impact reduction and economic feasibility of solvent waste recovery using a new software tool

    Chem. Eng. Res. Des.

    (2014)
  • J.G. Wijmans et al.

    The solution-diffusion model: a review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1995)
  • P. Schaetzel et al.

    Mass transfer in pervaporation: the key component approximation for the solution-diffusion model

    Desalination

    (2010)
  • J. Kujawa et al.

    Removal of hazardous volatile organic compounds from water by vacuum pervaporation with hydrophobic ceramic membranes

    J Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • J.G. Crespo et al.

    1 - Fundamentals of pervaporation

  • A. Jonquières et al.

    Industrial state-of-the-art of pervaporation and vapour permeation in the western countries

    J Membr. Sci

    (2002)
  • Z. Huang et al.

    Pervaporation study of aqueous ethanol solution through zeolite-incorporated multilayer poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes: effect of zeolites

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • B. Smitha et al.

    Separation of organic–organic mixtures by pervaporation—a review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M. Zhou et al.

    Electrochemical preparation of polypyrrole membranes and their application in ethanol-cyclohexane separation by pervaporation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1995)
  • R. Kopeć et al.

    Polyamide-6 based pervaporation membranes for organic–organic separation

    Sep. Pur. Technol.

    (2013)
  • E. Drioli et al.

    Recovery of pyridine from aqueous solution by membrane pervaporation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1993)
  • G. Liu et al.

    Pervaporation performance of PDMS/ceramic composite membrane in acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) fermentation–PV coupled process

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • P. Sampranpiboon et al.

    Pervaporation separation of ethyl butyrate and isopropanol with polyether block amide (PEBA) membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • A. Rozicka et al.

    Apparent and intrinsic properties of commercial PDMS based membranes in pervaporative removal of acetone, butanol and ethanol from binary aqueous mixtures

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • J. Kujawski et al.

    Pervaporative removal of acetone, butanol and ethanol from binary and multicomponent aqueous mixtures

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2014)
  • R.W. Baker et al.

    The effect of concentration polarization on the separation of volatile organic compounds from water by pervaporation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1997)
  • E.A. Fouad et al.

    Use of pervaporation to separate butanol from dilute aqueous solutions: effects of operating conditions and concentration polarization

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • P. Gomez et al.

    Modeling of pervaporation processes controlled by concentration polarization

    Comput. Chem. Eng.

    (2007)
  • L.M. Vane et al.

    Reduction of concentration polarization in pervaporation using vibrating membrane module

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1999)
  • L.M. Vane et al.

    Vibrating pervaporation modules: effect of module design on performance

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • M. Weyd et al.

    Bio-alcohol concentration by pervaporation with organophilic zeolite membranes – influence of protective coatings on fouling tendency

    Procedia Eng.

    (2012)
  • A.G. Fadeev et al.

    Fouling of poly[-1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] membranes in pervaporative recovery of butanol from aqueous solutions and ABE fermentation broth

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • F. Liu et al.

    Surface immobilization of polymer brushes onto porous poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane by electron beam to improve the hydrophilicity and fouling resistance

    Polymer

    (2007)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Experimental methods for tracking physical aging of thin glassy polymer films by gas permeation

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M.F.S. Dubreuil et al.

    Study on ageing/fouling phenomena and the effect of upstream nanofiltration on in-situ product recovery of n-butanol through poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] pervaporation membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • M. Zak et al.

    Selective removal of butanol from aqueous solution by pervaporation with a PIM-1 membrane and membrane aging

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2015)
  • W. Kujawski et al.

    Influence of inorganic salt on the effectiveness of liquid mixtures separation by pervaporation

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2007)
  • V. García et al.

    From waste treatment to resource efficiency in the chemical industry: recovery of organic solvents from waters containing electrolytes by pervaporation

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2013)
  • S. Chovau et al.

    Influence of fermentation by-products on the purification of ethanol from water using pervaporation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • K.Y. Wang et al.

    Dehydration of tetrafluoropropanol (TFP) by pervaporation via novel PBI/BTDA-TDI/MDI co-polyimide (P84) dual-layer hollow fiber membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • C.-H. Lo et al.

    Plasma deposition of tetraethoxysilane on polycarbonate membrane for pervaporation of tetrafluoropropanol aqueous solution

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • C.-Y. Tu et al.

    Hydrophilic surface-grafted poly(tetrafluoroethylene) membranes using in pervaporation dehydration processes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • Y.-L. Liu et al.

    Chitosan/poly(tetrafluoroethylene) composite membranes using in pervaporation dehydration processes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • R.W. Baker et al.

    Permeability, permeance and selectivity: a preferred way of reporting pervaporation performance data

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • A. Kujawska et al.

    ABE fermentation products recovery methods - a review

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2015)
  • X. Qiao et al.

    Dehydration of isopropanol and its comparison with dehydration of butanol isomers from thermodynamic and molecular aspects

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • P. Boutikos et al.

    Performance evaluation of silica membrane for water–n-butanol binary mixture

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2014)
  • K. Koch et al.

    Pervaporation of binary and ternary mixtures of acetone, isopropyl alcohol and water using polymeric membranes: Experimental characterisation and modelling

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Water removal in the alkaline electrochemical valorization of glycerol by pervaporation

      2020, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The slight difference in the contact angle might be due to the different amount of the PVA and also the degree of cross-linking in each membrane. Crosslinking changes the polymer structure as well as the physicochemical nature of the membrane, which controls the hydrophilicity of the membrane [45]. The high contact angle for the potassium carbonate solution is due to the salt ions interactions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text