Review
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances exposure and its influence on the intestinal barrier: An overview on the advances

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158362Get rights and content

Highlights

  • PFAS entering the gastrointestinal tract can disrupt the intestinal barrier system.

  • Some PFAS alternatives showed certain intestinal toxicity in animal experiments.

  • Effects of PFAS on the intestinal barrier need more human studies to consolidate.

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of artificially synthetic organic compounds that are hardly degraded in the natural environment. PFAS have been widely used for many decades, and the persistence and potential toxicity of PFAS are an emerging concern in the world. PFAS exposed via diet can be readily absorbed by the intestine and enter the circulatory system or accumulate directly at intestinal sites, which could interact with the intestine and cause the destruction of intestinal barrier. This review summarizes current relationships between PFAS exposure and intestinal barrier damage with a focus on more recent toxicological studies. Exposure to PFAS could cause inflammation in the gut, destruction of the gut epithelium and tight junction structure, reduction of the mucus layer, and induction of the toxicity of immune cells. PFAS accumulation could also induce microbial disorders and metabolic products changes. In addition, there are limited studies currently, and most available studies converge on the health risk of PFAS exposure for human intestinal disease. Therefore, more efforts are deserved to further understand potential associations between PFAS exposure and intestinal dysfunction and enable better assessment of exposomic toxicology and health risks for humans in the future.

Introduction

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) refer to a class of synthesized compounds that contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom. Commonly described as “forever chemicals” for their extreme resistance to biodegradation, PFAS have been widely used as water, grease, and stain repellents and surfactants in fire-fighting foam (Glüge et al., 2020). Now that PFAS have been detected in various environmental media, human exposure to PFAS can occur through multiple routes including dietary intake, drinking water, skin absorption and inhalation of household dust (Ragnarsdóttir et al., 2022; Sunderland et al., 2019). It has been reported that ingested PFAS are readily absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract of mammals and humans (Lupton et al., 2012). Consequently, they can be transmitted to the blood and other bodily tissues (e.g., gut, liver, and kidney) and induce subsequent adverse health effects (Costello et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2020b). In addition, given the long half-life of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (nearly 5 years in humans), the health risks of exposure to PFAS will persist in the long term (Olsen et al., 2007).

The role of intestinal homeostasis in metabolic health and disease has been an active area of study. The intestine represents the largest interface between the human and the environment and performs a variety of homeostatic functions (Gustafsson et al., 2021; Mukherjee and Hooper, 2015). In addition to ensuring the absorption of nutrients, the intestine forms a practical internal barrier to protect the host from harmful substances and microorganisms in the intestinal lumen. The intestinal barrier contains epithelial cells, mucus layer, microbial components and immune cells located in the lamina propria and can be generally divided into four categories, namely physical, chemical, microbiological, and immune barriers (Cui et al., 2019; Hao et al., 2021). However, the integrity of these barriers can be modulated by several exogenous factors, e.g., antibiotics, low-fiber diets, and environmental pollutants, and could further trigger the development of autoimmune, metabolic and aging-related diseases (Albillos et al., 2020).

An increasing number of studies have paid attention to the impacts of PFAS on gut health in recent years. It has been found that PFAS can accumulate in the intestine and cause damage to the intestinal barrier, such as the disruption of tight junctions and increased permeability between epithelial cells, as well as microecosystem disruption (Lai et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020a). In addition, PFAS exposure may also be associated with intestinal and extra-intestinal disorders. Nevertheless, although some reviews were found focusing on the degradation of PFAS by microbial (Lim, 2021; Wackett, 2021; Zhang et al., 2021), few studies have reviewed the toxic effects of PFAS on the intestinal barrier function as well as the intestinal microenvironment in animals and humans. Under these circumstances, it is necessary to review the knowledge about the adverse effects of PFAS exposure on the intestinal barrier system, and to dissect the causes and coping strategies of these adverse effects.

Herein, we aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding the sources and routes of human exposure to PFAS, and expound the absorption and transportation of PFAS within the gastrointestinal tract. Subsequently, relevant studies on the adverse effects of PFAS exposure on the intestinal barrier system were interpreted in detail. We also sorted out the associations between PFAS and intestinal diseases and extra-intestinal disorders, and discussed potential intervention strategies. Finally, the research prospects achieved and future perspectives are discussed. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of the current knowledge of health effects and directions for future investigation, and bring forward some hints to mitigate the intestinal toxicity problem of PFAS by manipulating the gut microbiota.

Section snippets

Sources of human exposure

As anthropogenic chemicals, environmental PFAS can come from direct and indirect sources. Fluorochemical manufacturing plants, metal plating, textile and paper coating, semiconductor production, and aqueous film-forming foam applications are considered direct sources of PFAS to the environment (Prevedouros et al., 2006). The production or waste disposal processes in such industries could be directly responsible for the release and contamination of PFAS, spreading it throughout the environment.

Absorption and transport of PFAS within the gastrointestinal tract

PFAS are highly efficiently absorbed in animals and humans (Lupton et al., 2012). The vast majority of PFAS entering the body are absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, then passed into the bloodstream, and subsequently conveyed to various tissues. A large percentage of the total PFAS is retained in serum, liver, and kidney, and some can also accumulate in the intestine (Pérez et al., 2013). Ultimately, PFAS leave the body by urine or feces. Therefore, the impacts of PFAS on the intestinal

Destruction of the intestinal barriers by PFAS exposure

The intestine is an innate barrier that maintains the homeostasis of the intestinal environment and prevents the invasion of harmful substances and pathogens into the organism. The intestinal barrier is a multilayered structure consisting of interconnected physical, chemical, immune, and microbiological barriers (Fig. 1A). Because of the difficulty in obtaining human intestinal tissue, most of the current studies are focused on toxicological effects of PFAS on intestinal barriers in animals or

Discussion and future prospects

Considering the risks of human health and ecological environment, some long-chain PFAS like PFOA and PFOS have been phased out of production in many regions in the world over the last 10 to 15 years (UN Stockholm Convention, 2019). Therefore, various kinds of alternatives to conventional PFAS have been produced and used widely, such as short-chain homologs (PFBA, PFBS and PFHxA), functionalized perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs), for example, perfluoroether carboxylic (PFECAs), perfluoroether sulfonic

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiaoyang Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Lei Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Xin Zhang: Writing – review & editing. Peng Liu: Visualization. Zhuoma Deji: Writing – review & editing. Yudong Xing: Writing – review & editing. Yan Zhou: Writing – review & editing. Xia Lin: Validation. Zhenzhen Huang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81903368).

References (165)

  • J.L. Domingo et al.

    Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through drinking water: a review of the recent scientific literature

    Environ. Res.

    (2019)
  • K. English et al.

    Polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardant concentrations in faeces from young children in Queensland, Australia and associations with environmental and behavioural factors

    Environ. Res.

    (2017)
  • C. Gallen et al.

    Australia-wide assessment of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in landfill leachates

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2017)
  • S.A. Gannon et al.

    Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of [1-14C]-perfluorohexanoate ([14C]-PFHx) in rats and mice

    Toxicology

    (2011)
  • J. Garcia-Barrios et al.

    Biomarkers of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sub-Arctic and Arctic communities in Canada

    Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health

    (2021)
  • A. Gaylord et al.

    Persistent organic pollutant exposure and celiac disease: a pilot study

    Environ. Res.

    (2020)
  • A. Glynn et al.

    Are additive effects of dietary surfactants on intestinal tight junction integrity an overlooked human health risk? - a mixture study on Caco-2 monolayers

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (2017)
  • M.I. Gomis et al.

    Comparing the toxic potency in vivo of long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids and fluorinated alternatives

    Environ. Int.

    (2018)
  • H. Hamid et al.

    Review of the fate and transformation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in landfills

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • P.M. Hinderliter et al.

    Age effect on perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) plasma concentration in post-weaning rats following oral gavage with ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO)

    Toxicology

    (2006)
  • L. Hu et al.

    Impact of a hexafluoropropylene oxide trimer acid (HFPO-TA) exposure on impairing the gut microbiota in mice

    Chemosphere

    (2022)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Comparative chronic toxicities of PFOS and its novel alternatives on the immune system associated with intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in adult zebrafish

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • J.-M. Jian et al.

    A short review on human exposure to and tissue distribution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • G.R. Johnson

    PFAS in soil and groundwater following historical land application of biosolids

    Water Res.

    (2022)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of 3 perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in rats

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (2016)
  • N. Kudo et al.

    Sex hormone-regulated renal transport of perfluorooctanoic acid

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2002)
  • Y.M. Lee et al.

    Concentration and distribution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the Asan Lake area of South Korea

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Determinants of serum half-lives for linear and branched perfluoroalkyl substances after long-term high exposure-a study in Ronneby, Sweden

    Environ. Int.

    (2022)
  • C.H. Lindh et al.

    Blood serum concentrations of perfluorinated compounds in men from Greenlandic Inuit and European populations

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • C. Liu et al.

    Induction of oxidative stress and apoptosis by PFOS and PFOA in primary cultured hepatocytes of freshwater tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2007)
  • P. Lochhead et al.

    Plasma concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances and risk of inflammatory bowel diseases in women: a nested case control analysis in the nurses’ health study cohorts

    Environ. Res.

    (2022)
  • Y. Luo et al.

    Exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and allergic outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Environ. Res.

    (2020)
  • L.R. Macheka et al.

    Determination and assessment of human dietary intake of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in retail dairy milk and infant formula from South Africa

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • B.A. Melake et al.

    Distribution of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in water, sediment, and fish tissue, and the potential human health risks due to fish consumption in Lake Hawassa, Ethiopia

    Environ. Res.

    (2022)
  • J. Menzel et al.

    Internal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in vegans and omnivores

    Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health

    (2021)
  • S. Mukherjee et al.

    Antimicrobial defense of the intestine

    Immunity

    (2015)
  • A. Munck

    Cystic fibrosis: evidence for gut inflammation

    Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.

    (2014)
  • J.M.M. Natividad et al.

    Modulation of intestinal barrier by intestinal microbiota: pathological and therapeutic implications

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2013)
  • M. Neagu et al.

    Adverse outcome pathway in immunotoxicity of perfluoroalkyls

    Curr. Opin. Toxicol.

    (2021)
  • H. Nilsson et al.

    Biotransformation of fluorotelomer compound to perfluorocarboxylates in humans

    Environ. Int.

    (2013)
  • A.F. Ojo et al.

    Assessing the human health risks of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: a need for greater focus on their interactions as mixtures

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • Z. Pan et al.

    Subchronic exposure of environmentally relevant concentrations of F-53B in mice resulted in gut barrier dysfunction and colonic inflammation in a sex-independent manner

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2019)
  • F. Pérez et al.

    Accumulation of perfluoroalkyl substances in human tissues

    Environ. Int.

    (2013)
  • D.M. Pizzurro et al.

    Interspecies differences in perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) toxicokinetics and application to health-based criteria

    Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2019)
  • D.Q. Andrews et al.

    Population-wide exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water in the United States

    Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.

    (2020)
  • P. Artursson et al.

    Selective paracellular permeability in two models of intestinal absorption: cultured monolayers of human intestinal epithelial cells and rat intestinal segments

    Pharm. Res.

    (1993)
  • Y.A. Bamai et al.

    Effect of prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on childhood allergies and common infectious diseases in children up to age 7 years: the Hokkaido study on environment and children’s health

    Environ. Int.

    (2020)
  • S.A. Banack et al.

    The cyanobacteria derived toxin Beta-N-methylamino-L-alanine and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Toxins (Basel)

    (2010)
  • L.S. Birnbaum et al.

    Alternatives to PFASs: perspectives on the science

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2015)
  • J.A. Björklund et al.

    Perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs) in indoor dust: concentrations, human exposure estimates, and sources

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (21)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    The authors contribute equally to this work.

    View full text