Microplastics contamination of groundwater: Current evidence and future perspectives. A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153851Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Current studies on microplastics (MPs) in groundwater are scarce.

  • Structured and standardized approaches to MPs in groundwater are needed.

  • The Hydrogeoplastic conceptual Model for aquifers contaminated by MPs is proposed.

  • The proposed approach can be a reference for future hydrogeologist research.

Abstract

Groundwater is a primary water source which supplies more than 2 billion people. The increasing population and urbanization of rural areas stresses and depletes the groundwater systems, reducing the groundwater quality. Among the emerging contaminants, microplastics (MPs) are becoming an important issue due to their persistency in the environment. Seepage through the pores and fractures as well as the interaction with colloidal aggregates can partially affect the MPs dynamics in the subsoil, making the detection of the MPs in the groundwater systems challenging. Based on literature, a critical analysis of MPs in groundwater is presented from a hydrogeological point of view. In addition, a review of the MPs data potentially affecting the groundwater systems are included. MPs in groundwater may have several sources, including the atmosphere, the interaction with surface water bodies, urban infrastructures, or agricultural soils. The characterization of both the groundwater dynamics and the heterogeneity of MPs is suggested, proposing a new framework named “Hydrogeoplastic Model”. MPs detection methods aimed at characterizing the smaller fragments are necessary to clarify the fate of these contaminants in the aquifers. This review also aims to support future research on MP contamination in groundwater, pointing out the current knowledge and the future risks which could affect groundwater resources worldwide.

Introduction

Groundwater is the world's most important source of freshwater, supplying more than 2 billion people access to safe water for domestic drinking, as well as agricultural and industrial purposes (Wada, 2016). Increasing population and incremented human activities affect the urbanized plains and valleys with a significant pressure on aquifers. In the last decades, a deterioration of the groundwater resources quality has been observed due to increasing anthropic activities (Famiglietti, 2014), that also lead to widespread emerging contaminants (Lapworth et al., 2012). Among them, the role of Microplastics (MPs) in groundwater is relatively less explored (Re, 2019). MPs are defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm (Arthur et al., 2009), prone to be disaggregated in finer fragments (Mintenig et al., 2018). This emerging contaminant is rapidly gaining attention because of its ubiquitous nature, high resistance, and dispersion in the environment (Enfrin et al., 2019). MPs are intentionally manufactured or derived from the fragmentation of larger plastic debris subjected to external forces such as high temperature, friction, and UV exposure (Hale et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021a). The continuous production and consumption of plastic objects generates an accumulation of MPs in the environment that can contaminate the subsoil (Duan et al., 2021).

Besides their intrinsic toxicity (Zhang et al., 2022), MPs can anyway play the role of source, carriers, and accumulators of other contaminants, and consequently, also have the potential to be used as environmental indicators (Ma et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021b), providing information about groundwater quality. Thanks to their strong hydrophobicity, absorption capacity, and large specific area, MPs are in turn drivers for other contaminants (Ren et al., 2021a) during the seepage processes. In addition to their own toxic additives (Bradney et al., 2019), MPs tend to adsorb and transport a wide range of organic and inorganic hazardous substances like heavy metals, pesticides, bisphenols, and antibiotics (Li et al., 2019; Godoy et al., 2019; Selvam et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2019; Li et al., 2018).

Despite large scientific interest, publications focusing on MPs occurrence and fate in freshwater resources, and more specifically in groundwater, are only a minor percentage of the total research conducted (Yao et al., 2020). Indeed, it is more difficult to carry out hydrogeological investigations as direct measurements are possible only via water springs, piezometers, and water-wells. In addition, physical and chemical processes occurring in the soil can attenuate the contaminant in space and time (Ruimin et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2020).

From a theoretical point of view, the suspended solid transport processes can be used as a reference to describe MPs dynamics in groundwater (Keller et al., 2020). According to laboratory studies, several factors (e.g., particle size, type, shape, density) seem to influence the transport of MPs in subsoil (Ren et al., 2021a). Among them, in the frame of hydrogeological assessments at catchment scale, the comparison between the size of the plastic fragments and the pore-throat size of the geological media is a crucial aspect to consider.

The hydraulic parameters of the geological media favor or impede the groundwater flow (Fetter et al., 2018). In fact, during the seepage processes, the subsoil has the capacity to block suspended solids larger than the soil pore-throats and the bottlenecks of the bedrock fractures. Due to the challenging relationship between MPs and groundwater characteristics, and to contribute to this emerging field of investigation, a critical literature review is performed to: i) describe the MPs occurrence in different aquifer types in relationship with the performed detection methods; ii) summarize the possible sources of MPS contamination of groundwater resulting from the interaction with the other ecological spheres; iii) provide an integrated overview of the MPs in the groundwater cycle.

Section snippets

Subsoil characterization

The characterization of pore-throats and fracture aperture is a useful analysis to infer the MPs size range can travel throughout the sediments (Fig. 1a). Soil pores form continuous channels from the centimeter to the nanometer scale with size depending on the lithology. The pore size distribution is an in-situ parameter difficult to characterize. In the case of multi-layer aquifers, analysis is more complicated as alternated strata have different properties. However, laboratory tests and

Potential contamination sources

Results of the above-mentioned articles demonstrate that MPs can travel over long distances throughout the aquifers, but research application using spectroscopy methods detect only a few fragments per Liter. It is likely that the discrepancies in MPs concentrations are mainly related to different pollution levels combined with the intrinsic subsoil characteristics. However, quantification of MPs may suffer because of the detection limit of the chosen analytical approach. To better understand if

Hydrogeoplastic model

Literature detects MPs in the atmosphere, surface water and soils (Petersen and Hubbart, 2021) making the contamination sources potentially ubiquitous throughout the land surface. The transport in the atmosphere or on the surface sorts the MPs fragments favoring or impeding the aquifer contamination. The often-underestimated relationship between aquifers and contamination sources is discussed in detail and synthetized via a conceptual model presented in Fig. 2.

The “Hydrogeoplastic Model” is

Conclusions and future perspectives

Despite the increasing interest in assessing MPs occurrence in the natural environment, only a few studies currently present field data about groundwater. Results are not comparable due to the lack of common analytical procedure and to the absence of hydrogeological information which can deeply affect the groundwater dynamics. Results of the critical review suggest that future studies supporting the characterization of the subsoil are necessary for a comprehensive assessment of MPs occurrence

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Stefano Viaroli: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft. Michele Lancia: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization. Viviana Re: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. R. Petrini and Prof. V. Castelvetro of Pisa University and Prof. M. Galluzzi of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences for the proficient discussion and inspiring advice. We thank the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments and Prof. M. Jellick of Southern University of Science and Technology for the language revision.

References (76)

  • R.R. Hurley et al.

    Fate and occurrence of micro(nano)plastics in soils: knowledge gaps and possible risks

    Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health

    (2018)
  • A. Kelessidis et al.

    Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in european countries

    Waste Manag.

    (2012)
  • S.K. Kim et al.

    Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in soils with different agricultural practices: importance of sources with internal origin and environmental fate

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • M. Klein et al.

    Microplastic abundance in atmospheric deposition within the metropolitan area of Hamburg, Germany

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • A.A. Koelmans et al.

    Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: critical review and assessment of data quality

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • D.J. Lapworth et al.

    Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2012)
  • J. Li et al.

    Adsorption of antibiotics on microplastics

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • X. Li et al.

    Enhancement in adsorption potential of microplastics in sewage sludge for metal pollutants after the wastewater treatment process

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • M. Li et al.

    Transport and deposition of microplastic particles in saturated porous media: co-effects of clay particles and natural organic matter

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2021)
  • M. Li et al.

    Transport and deposition of plastic particles in porous media during seawater intrusion and groundwater-seawater displacement processes

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • K. Liu et al.

    Source and potential risk assessment of suspended atmospheric microplastics in Shanghai

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • H. Ma et al.

    Microplastics in aquatic environments: toxicity to trigger ecological consequences

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • S.M. Mintenig et al.

    Low numbers of microplastics detected in drinking water from ground water sources

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • D. O'Connor et al.

    Microplastics undergo accelerated vertical migration in sand soil due to small size and wet-dry cycles

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2019)
  • F. Petersen et al.

    The occurrence and transport of microplastics: the state of the science

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • S. Raju et al.

    Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant

    Water Res.

    (2020)
  • Z. Ren et al.

    Microplastics in the soil-groundwater environment: aging, migration, and co-transport of contaminants – a critical review

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • Z. Ren et al.

    Chemical and photo-initiated aging enhances transport risk of microplastics in saturated soils: key factors, mechanisms, and modeling

    Water Res.

    (2021)
  • S. Samandra et al.

    Microplastic contamination of an unconfined groundwater aquifer in Victoria, Australia

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2022)
  • S. Selvam et al.

    Hazardous microplastic characteristics and its role as a vector of heavy metal in groundwater and surface water of coastal South India

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • M. Simon et al.

    Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying focal plane Array (FPA)-based fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging

    Water Res.

    (2018)
  • H.B. Wakode et al.

    Impact of urbanization on groundwater recharge and urban water balance for the city of Hyderabad, India

    Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res.

    (2018)
  • Y. Wan et al.

    Effects of plastic contamination on water evaporation and desiccation cracking in soil

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: current status and future perspectives

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Environmental source, fate, and toxicity of microplastics

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • P. Wu et al.

    Adsorption mechanisms of five bisphenol analogues on PVC microplastics

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Microplastics in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs): occurrence and removal

    Chemoshpere

    (2019)
  • L. Yao et al.

    Freshwater microplastics pollution: detecting and visualizing emerging trends based on citespace II

    Chemosphere

    (2020)
  • Cited by (90)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text