Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 625, 1 June 2018, Pages 1301-1308
Science of The Total Environment

The hotspots of life cycle assessment for bioenergy: A review by social network analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Certain characteristics of LCA for biomass were visualized.

  • Provide a review on the evolution of LCA for bioenergy.

  • The implication of LCA for bioethanol has showed a descending trend.

  • Biogas could be the direction of LCA for bioenergy.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an up-to-date bibliometric view about the current life cycle assessment (LCA) for bioenergy. The social network analysis (SNA) method was applied to study total 2367 publications in this field. The results showed the high frequency keywords related with the “LCA” for bioenergy included three categories: (1) Bioenergy production, such as “Biodiesel”, “Bioethanol”, “Biogas” and “Biorefinery”; (2) Environmental problems, such as “Greenhouse gas” (GHG), “Environmental impact”, “Climate change”; (3) Environmental target: “Sustainability”. This means that LCA methods have been widely used in assessing the environmental impact from various types of bioenergy production process. Specially, the “GHG” attracted more attention in this research area. According to the temporal trend of the high frequency keywords, “bioethanol” is the most significant hotspot keyword of implication LCA. However, it has become colder since 2011. The environmental performance of “biogas” and “land use” began to receive attention since 2015.The evolutionary co-words network showed that the boundary of hotspots became overlapped. We also found four clusters were identified from keywords networks, i.e. the biggest cluster Cluster (I) (central cluster node linkage was “Bioethanol-GHG”), followed by Cluster (II) (central cluster node linkage was “Biodiesel-Algae”), Cluster (III) (central cluster node linkage was “Biorefinery-Sustainability”) and Cluster (IV) (central cluster node linkage was “Biogas-Anaerobic digestion”). This cluster analysis also showed that the implication of LCA for the relationship between “bioethanol” and “GHG” is the most important hotspot research field. Although “biogas” is the smallest cluster now, it could be the next important hotspot of implication LCA for bioenergy. This study provides an effective approach to obtain a general knowledge of the LCA for bioenergy and supports a deeper understanding of research directions in the future.

Graphical abstract

The co- occur weight between the high frequency keywords and LCA.

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (147KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Climate change mitigation requires a shift from fossil energy resources to renewables, and bioenergy is considered one of the major potential resources (Bentsen and Møller, 2017). From global perspectives, a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80% of current coal reserves should be reduced from 2010 to 2050 in order to meet the target of keeping global warming below 2 °C (Mcglade and Ekins, 2015). What's more, fossil-fuel power generation is a major contributor to worldwide carbon emissions, making up more than 24% of total GHG emissions (Odeh and Cockerill, 2008). Given the unsustainable nature of fossil fuels, in recent years, the importance of the production and use of biomass to generate power, heat, and fuels is increasing on a global scale (Dressler et al., 2012). Renewable bioenergy is viewed as one of the ways to alleviate the current global warming crisis. Moreover, the recent IPCC and Global Energy Assessment reported on and provided the more stringent mitigation scenarios heavily rely on a large scale deployment of bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage called BECCS technology (Creutzig et al., 2015).

At the present stage, the deployment of bioenergy provides great potential to mitigate climate change, but it also poses considerable risks. The production of bioenergy requires fossil fuel input and causes environmental impacts. There is uncertainty about the impacts of the growth of bioenergy crops on ecosystem services (Dagmar and Pete, 2017). Without a complete accounting of net GHG fluxes, development and evaluating mitigation strategies are not possible. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an analytical tool widely used today in evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of bioenergy. Further, LCA can help to set environmental and climate performance criteria and standards for bioenergy and biofuels (Bright et al., 2012). Fig. 1 is the LCA technology framework. It follows the IOS14001 system standard. LCA is widely used in evaluating various products or projects related to environment. For example, Zuo and Zhao (2014) and Zuo et al. (2017) analyzed green building from a life-cycle perspective; Wang and Teah (2017) conducted a life cycle analysis about a small-scale horizontal axis wind turbines; Qi et al. (2017) carried out a case study on the life cycle assessment of recycling industrial mercury-containing waste.

There are lots of literatures investigating on the bioenergy, too. Mao et al., 2015a, Mao et al., 2015b characterizes the body of knowledge on biomass energy from 1998 to 2013 by employing bibliometric techniques based on the Science Citation Index (SCI)databases; Valdez-Vazquez et al (2017) proposed a sustainability evaluation framework for bioenergy production systems; Zhao et al., 2011, Zhao et al., 2016 established a “Five Forces” model as the analytical framework to investigate the competitiveness of the biomass power industry. Bentsen and Møller (2017) studied solar energy conserved in biomass. Most researches focused on the specific topic of raw materials, environmental impacts, production technologies, and economic benefits, respectively. However, few studies have reported on the overall hotspots and development trends of the research of LCA for bioenergy by bibliometrics.

Bibliometric methods are now firmly established as scientific specialties and are an integral part of research evaluation methodology especially within the scientific and applied fields (Ellegaard and Wallin, 2015). Through statistical analysis of a large number of data, the research hotspots and key points can be obtained. Bibliometric shows the current research characteristics in the form of knowledge map. The social network analysis (SNA) is an excellent bibliometric method. It can be applied to study sets of nodes (keywords) and links (co-word relationships). The analysis of co-word network can better show visual representation of a citation network, helping readers identify significant movements in research fronts and emerging research fields (Choi et al., 2011).

The objective of this study is to present the comprehensive publication status and hotspots about LCA for bioenergy by the SNA method. These results will not only provide a better understanding of global hotspots in the specific research related to the LCA for bioenergy, but may also provide useful information to broaden research area of bioenergy.

Section snippets

Data resource

The data was retrieved from the web of science core collection database, in which Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Conference proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH) were applied. These four databases generally were recognized as influential database, whose large amount of data can meet the requirements of study and research. We retrieved publication data from titles,

The hotpots research field applied LCA

To reveal the hot sections applied by LCA in bioenergy field, this paper compared the top 8 co-occurrence weight keywords with LCA (Fig. 2). According to the significance of these high frequency keywords, they could be grouped into three categories as below. This means that LCA methods have been widely used in assessing the environmental impact of various bioenergy productions. We separated the 8 keywords to three categories.

Conclusion

This article discussed the key problems based on previous reviews of papers and publications concerning LCA for bioenergy. It concerns the keywords from 2367 publications about LCA for bioenergy during 2000–2017, providing a review on the evolution of research topics of LCA for bioenergy based on the SNA. We summarized several main innovative findings:

  • (1)

    The top 8 co-occurrence weight keywords with LCA could be classified into three categories: 1) the bioenergy production, including biodiesel,

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2014 BAC 26B05) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41571522 and No. 71673198).

References (37)

Cited by (36)

  • 9.17 - Life Cycle Analysis of Renewable Energy

    2022, Comprehensive Renewable Energy, Second Edition: Volume 1-9
  • Life cycle approach for the sustainability assessment of intensified biorefineries

    2022, Biofuels and Biorefining: Volume 2: Intensification Processes and Biorefineries
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text