The hotspots of life cycle assessment for bioenergy: A review by social network analysis
Graphical abstract
The co- occur weight between the high frequency keywords and LCA.
Introduction
Climate change mitigation requires a shift from fossil energy resources to renewables, and bioenergy is considered one of the major potential resources (Bentsen and Møller, 2017). From global perspectives, a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80% of current coal reserves should be reduced from 2010 to 2050 in order to meet the target of keeping global warming below 2 °C (Mcglade and Ekins, 2015). What's more, fossil-fuel power generation is a major contributor to worldwide carbon emissions, making up more than 24% of total GHG emissions (Odeh and Cockerill, 2008). Given the unsustainable nature of fossil fuels, in recent years, the importance of the production and use of biomass to generate power, heat, and fuels is increasing on a global scale (Dressler et al., 2012). Renewable bioenergy is viewed as one of the ways to alleviate the current global warming crisis. Moreover, the recent IPCC and Global Energy Assessment reported on and provided the more stringent mitigation scenarios heavily rely on a large scale deployment of bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage called BECCS technology (Creutzig et al., 2015).
At the present stage, the deployment of bioenergy provides great potential to mitigate climate change, but it also poses considerable risks. The production of bioenergy requires fossil fuel input and causes environmental impacts. There is uncertainty about the impacts of the growth of bioenergy crops on ecosystem services (Dagmar and Pete, 2017). Without a complete accounting of net GHG fluxes, development and evaluating mitigation strategies are not possible. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an analytical tool widely used today in evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of bioenergy. Further, LCA can help to set environmental and climate performance criteria and standards for bioenergy and biofuels (Bright et al., 2012). Fig. 1 is the LCA technology framework. It follows the IOS14001 system standard. LCA is widely used in evaluating various products or projects related to environment. For example, Zuo and Zhao (2014) and Zuo et al. (2017) analyzed green building from a life-cycle perspective; Wang and Teah (2017) conducted a life cycle analysis about a small-scale horizontal axis wind turbines; Qi et al. (2017) carried out a case study on the life cycle assessment of recycling industrial mercury-containing waste.
There are lots of literatures investigating on the bioenergy, too. Mao et al., 2015a, Mao et al., 2015b characterizes the body of knowledge on biomass energy from 1998 to 2013 by employing bibliometric techniques based on the Science Citation Index (SCI)databases; Valdez-Vazquez et al (2017) proposed a sustainability evaluation framework for bioenergy production systems; Zhao et al., 2011, Zhao et al., 2016 established a “Five Forces” model as the analytical framework to investigate the competitiveness of the biomass power industry. Bentsen and Møller (2017) studied solar energy conserved in biomass. Most researches focused on the specific topic of raw materials, environmental impacts, production technologies, and economic benefits, respectively. However, few studies have reported on the overall hotspots and development trends of the research of LCA for bioenergy by bibliometrics.
Bibliometric methods are now firmly established as scientific specialties and are an integral part of research evaluation methodology especially within the scientific and applied fields (Ellegaard and Wallin, 2015). Through statistical analysis of a large number of data, the research hotspots and key points can be obtained. Bibliometric shows the current research characteristics in the form of knowledge map. The social network analysis (SNA) is an excellent bibliometric method. It can be applied to study sets of nodes (keywords) and links (co-word relationships). The analysis of co-word network can better show visual representation of a citation network, helping readers identify significant movements in research fronts and emerging research fields (Choi et al., 2011).
The objective of this study is to present the comprehensive publication status and hotspots about LCA for bioenergy by the SNA method. These results will not only provide a better understanding of global hotspots in the specific research related to the LCA for bioenergy, but may also provide useful information to broaden research area of bioenergy.
Section snippets
Data resource
The data was retrieved from the web of science core collection database, in which Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Conference proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH) were applied. These four databases generally were recognized as influential database, whose large amount of data can meet the requirements of study and research. We retrieved publication data from titles,
The hotpots research field applied LCA
To reveal the hot sections applied by LCA in bioenergy field, this paper compared the top 8 co-occurrence weight keywords with LCA (Fig. 2). According to the significance of these high frequency keywords, they could be grouped into three categories as below. This means that LCA methods have been widely used in assessing the environmental impact of various bioenergy productions. We separated the 8 keywords to three categories.
Conclusion
This article discussed the key problems based on previous reviews of papers and publications concerning LCA for bioenergy. It concerns the keywords from 2367 publications about LCA for bioenergy during 2000–2017, providing a review on the evolution of research topics of LCA for bioenergy based on the SNA. We summarized several main innovative findings:
- (1)
The top 8 co-occurrence weight keywords with LCA could be classified into three categories: 1) the bioenergy production, including biodiesel,
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2014 BAC 26B05) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41571522 and No. 71673198).
References (37)
- et al.
Solar energy conserved in biomass: sustainable bioenergy use and reduction of land use change
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2017) Climate impacts of bioenergy: inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2012)Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution
Inf. Manag.
(2011)Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis
Inf. Process. Manag.
(2001)LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario
Biomass Bioenergy
(2009)Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean, jatropha and microalgae in China conditions
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2011)Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant
Appl. Energy
(2015)A critical review on the research topic system of soil heavy metal pollution bioremediation based on dynamic co-words network measures
Geoderma
(2017)Way forward for alternative energy research: a bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2015)Past, current and future of biomass energy research: a bibliometric analysis
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2015)
Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: environmental impacts and energy balance
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage
Energy Policy
Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Ppart II: Llife cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways
J. Clean. Prod
A case study on the life cycle assessment of recycling industrial mercury-containing waste
J. Clean. Prod.
Proposal for a sustainability evaluation framework for bioenergy production systems using the MESMIS methodology
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev
Life cycle assessment of small-scale horizontal axis wind turbines in Taiwan
J. Clean. Prod.
Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization
Comput. Chem. Eng.
Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: a bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Cited by (36)
Promoting sustainable development: A study of China's bicycle sharing industry policies based on text analysis
2024, Research in Transportation Business and ManagementA critical review for the impact of anaerobic digestion on the sustainable development goals
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementBox-Behnken design and life cycle assessment for nickel oxide nanoparticles application in biomethane production
2023, Chemical Engineering Journal9.17 - Life Cycle Analysis of Renewable Energy
2022, Comprehensive Renewable Energy, Second Edition: Volume 1-9Life cycle approach for the sustainability assessment of intensified biorefineries
2022, Biofuels and Biorefining: Volume 2: Intensification Processes and Biorefineries