Low-drift nozzles vs. standard nozzles for pesticide application in the biological efficacy trials of pesticides in apple pest and disease control
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Pesticide drift is a side effect of chemical crop protection associated with ground and aerial application, and is considered one of the major routes of water, soil and atmosphere pollution with agrochemicals. Due to the way the pesticides are applied by orchard sprayers (radial and upward emission with air assistance, high droplet release, great distance to the target) the risk of environmental contamination is especially high when spraying on three-dimensional crops, such as fruit trees, soft fruit bushes, hop plants or vine crops. Fine, lightweight spray droplets generated by standard hollow-cone nozzles, traditionally used in fruit growing, are very easily carried by air currents which results in relatively high drift. Heavier droplets of coarse spray, produced by air-induction nozzles, are much less prone to drift but at the same time they have also less target coverage potential. This may be compensated by an increased spray volume and therefore reduced pesticide concentration in spray liquid which may result in the reduced efficacy of pest and disease control.
The effect of droplet size and spray volume rate on spray deposit and coverage, that determine the technical performance and biological efficacy of spray applications in fruit crops has always been of concern of the applicators and interest of the researchers. It was long believed that the efficacy of insecticides was inversely proportional to droplet size, i.e. due to better spatial distribution of greater number of small droplets (fine quality spray) they ensured better control of pests compared to the large ones (coarse quality spray) with the same amount of active ingredient. Adams et al. (1990) made a literature review to support this opinion. The data for fungicides cited in the review, although limited (Frick, 1970, Falchieri and Cesari, 1993) led to similar conclusions, while that for herbicides was more complicated (Knoche 1994). Thus, the fine spray hollow cone nozzles, assisted with an air jet, were commonly used as a standard application technique in orchards. However, the fine spray was found very prone to evaporation (Zung 1967) and drift (Walklate, 1992, Reichard et al., 1992), which since the early 1990s has been looked upon as a main diffuse source of environmental contamination by pesticides. Then the spray drift reduction became a hot topic of research and development in the field of plant protection technology. In order to meet the challenge in the mid 1990s, the air induction (venturi) nozzles came on the market. In these nozzles a spray liquid flows through a constricted section of channel resulting in Venturi effect, i.e. creating a negative pressure inside the nozzle body. This makes air be sucked into the nozzle through two holes in the nozzle side, and mixed with the spray liquid before exiting the nozzle. Generated spray contains large droplets filled with air bubbles, and virtually no fine droplets. A mean volumetric diameter of these coarse droplets is at least double that of conventional nozzles (Friessleben, 2004, Heinkel et al., 2000) which makes them less prone to off-target drift (Jaeken et al., 2003, Wenneker et al., 2005, McArtney and Obermiller, 2008). On impact with targets the air-filled droplets tend to explode and fracture into many smaller droplets, increasing the potential for spreading on the leaves, and producing similar (Miller and Lane 1999), or even greater (McArtney and Obermiller 2008) coverage compared to conventional, finer sprays. Also spray deposition in fruit tree canopies, being a quantitative measure expressed by mass of a product per target surface unit, was reported to be at least equal (Świechowski et al. 2014) or significantly greater (Loquet et al. 2009) for applications made with the air induction nozzles compared to those with the conventional nozzles. Heinkel et al. (2000) claimed that because of the drift reducing and coverage favouring properties of the coarse air-filled droplets the air induction nozzles could be successfully used to apply pesticides in fruit growing, especially during unfavourable weather conditions (high wind, low humidity and high temperature) that would result in the suboptimal performance of the standard fine spray nozzles.
Several field evaluations of the biological efficacy of the air induction nozzles in apple orchards have been performed for the last two decades. Heinkel et al. (2000) reported equivalent control of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) and powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha) for treatments made with air induction or conventional hollow cone nozzles. Also Knewitz et al. (2002), based on seven trials in the years 1998–2001, found no principal differences in control efficacy of apple scab and powdery mildew, as well as spider mite (Panonychus ulmi) and rosy apple aphid (Dysaphis plantaginea) between those two types of nozzles. An equal effect of spider mite and rosy apple aphid control obtained by both types of nozzles was also reported by Lešnik et al. (2005). In the same study he observed, however, a worse control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella), green apple aphid (Aphis pomi), and leaf miner (Leucoptera malifoliella) with the air induction nozzles. Friessleben (2003) reported a summary of 8 years of data (130 trials over the years 1995–2002), comparing the efficacy of pesticides applied in apple orchards with air induction nozzles and conventional hollow cone nozzles used under commercial conditions, and he concluded that no definite difference in biological performance was found between the nozzles for any of examined diseases (apple scab and powdery mildew) or pests (mites and aphids).
In most efficacy trials with the air induction nozzles the effects of changes in drop size (variable factor) were investigated at the unchanged spray volume rate (constant factor) in order not to confound the effects of both factors. However, the effect of different combinations of the factors on the efficacy of pest and disease control in apples is an interesting subject to study, and the results of the investigations are of great practical value. The fruit growers are awaiting scientifically supported recommendations on nozzle selection that would ensure satisfactory biological performance. Their attention has recently been turned towards the air induction nozzles since, according to legal regulations in many European countries, they allow the growers to reduce no spray buffer zones for surface water and other sensitive areas, or in some countries/regions they permit pesticide applications in densely populated fruit growing areas.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of pests and diseases control on apples as affected by spray volume rate and spray quality in order to provide evidence that the satisfactory level of plant health status can be ensured with up-to-date plant protection products applied with coarse spray air-induction nozzles having recognised and documented pesticide drift reducing potential and hence posing lower risk of environmental pollution than standard fine spray hollow cone nozzles.
Section snippets
The experimental orchard
The investigation was carried out over the years 2010–2013 in the experimental orchard of the Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland (51°57′36.49″N/20°09′34.16″E). The apple trees of cv. Jonagold/M26 were planted in the year 2000, in single rows with 4 m spacing. The trees were 3.0 m tall and 1.8 m wide resulting in tree row volume (TRV) 13,500 m3 ha− 1. Every three rows of apple trees were separated by 5.5 m tall hedgerow of black alder (Alnus glutinosa) serving as an isolation of
Apple scab
Due to very humid and rainy weather in 2010 there were as many as 14 events of risk of strong infections in critical months of spring (April–June) (Table 3) which resulted in an extremely high infection pressure and intensive production of conidia that initiated secondary infections. Thus, the fungicide applications needed to be continued after the fruitlet abscission during the June drop. In summer (July–August), however, events of several rainy days in a row prevented spray applications from
Discussion
The spray application technique is one of the principal factors having an impact on efficacy of plant protection products, just next to other factors such as choice of the product and its dose, timing and weather conditions at the time of application. Since the product and timing are determined mainly by pests or diseases the application technique, or to be more precise the application parameters need to be adjusted according to weather conditions and target characteristics. The weather
Conclusions
No definite conclusions may be drawn based on the obtained results for the effect of nozzle type on efficacy of control of the harmful organisms was demonstrated to be not clear. However, some findings were noteworthy:
- •
in the years with adverse weather conditions and extremely high infection pressure powdery mildew was better controlled with fine spray nozzles and higher volume rates,
- •
green and rosy apple aphids were better controlled with higher volume rates, though significance of the advantage
Acknowledgements
The described research and the article preparation were made within the statutory research task S 11.5 of the Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland, subordinated to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, and in the mentioned research area financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland.
References (21)
Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage applied herbicides
Crop. Prot.
(1994)- et al.
Comparison of the effectiveness of standard and drift-reducing nozzles for control of some pests of apple
Crop. Prot.
(2005) A simulation study of pesticide drift from an airassisted orchard sprayer
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
(1992)A method for computing the effectiveness of the insecticides
J. Econ. Entomol.
(1925)- et al.
Droplet spectra for some agricultural fan nozzles, with respect to drift and biological efficiency
- et al.
Relationship between deposit characteristics, modes of action of pesticide and efficacy
The effects of volume, drop size and concentration, and their interaction on the control of apple powdery mildew by Dinocap
Br. Crop Prot. Councis Monogram
(1970)Influence of coarse droplet application via injector nozzles on the biological efficacy in apple production
Balancing drift management with biological performance and efficacy
- et al.
The effect of air injector nozzles on crop penetration and biological performance of fruit sprayers
Asp. Appl. Biol.
(2000)
Cited by (38)
Cross-regional scale studies of organochlorine pesticides in air in China: Pollution characteristic, seasonal variation, and gas/particle partitioning
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentMepanipyrim induces cardiotoxicity of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae via promoting AhR-regulated COX expression pathway
2023, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)Use of ultrasound anemometers to study the influence of air currents generated by a sprayer with an electronic control airflow system on foliar coverage. Effect of droplet size
2022, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, variations in airflow rate will directly interact with the spray distribution (Miranda-Fuentes et al., 2018, García-Ramos et al., 2018) and, consequently, to the efficiency of the process. Several authors focused their research on the use of air-induction nozzles to reduce the spray drift (Balsari et al., 2017, McCoy et al., 2022), while ensuring the biological efficacy (Doruchowski et al., 2017). This type of nozzle consists of a pre-orifice chamber, that mix the liquid with air and increase droplet size to reduce spray drift (Ferguson et al., 2015).
Reducing ground and airborne drift losses in young apple orchards with PWM-controlled spray systems
2021, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureCitation Excerpt :There are considerable number of factors manipulating spray drift potentials during pesticide applications (Zhu et al., 1994). Selection of the equipment used for spraying and how the spray equipment is operated significantly affect the creation and severity of spray drift (Salyani et al., 2007; Salyani et al. (2013; Doruchowski et al., 2017; Grella et al., 2017a, b). Among all the components of a sprayer, nozzles play the most significant role in generation of spray drift (Van de Zande et al., 2012; Guler et al, 2007; Nuyttens et al., 2007).