Elsevier

Scientia Horticulturae

Volume 120, Issue 4, 19 May 2009, Pages 532-537
Scientia Horticulturae

Modeling individual leaf area of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) using leaf length and width

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.037Get rights and content

Abstract

Leaf area estimation is an important biometrical observation one has to do for comparing plant growth in field and pot experiments. In this study, a leaf area estimation model was developed for ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe), using linear measurements of leaf length (L) and maximum width (W). Leaves from five ginger varieties (Varada, Rejatha, Mahima, Maran and Himachal) were used to develop the model in 2006–2007. The actual leaf area (LA) was measured with a leaf area meter (LI-3100, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and taken as reference LA. The linear measurements were used to build linear (LA = a + b × L × W) and power models (LA = α × (L × W)β) for each variety, as the modeling among variety were not different from each other, data for all five varieties have been pooled and compared with earlier models by graphical procedures and statistical criteria such as Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Chi-square (χ2). The selected model was validated during 2007–2008. The validation data set was used to produce a validation model for each variety by re-estimating the model parameters to develop the estimation model and the models were compared for consistency. The predicted LA (PLA) was compared with observed LA (OLA) by graphical procedures and lack of agreement was evaluated by calculating the relative bias, estimated by the mean of differences (d) and the standard deviation (SD) of the differences. Normality test was carried out by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) and residuals were normally distributed. Finally, the proposed model for leaf area estimation of ginger is LA = −0.0146 + 0.6621 × L × W, R2 = 0.997. This model can be reliably used for estimating leaf area of ginger non-destructively. The same equation can be extrapolated to all varieties and land races of ginger as it is vegetatively propagated crop with narrow genetic variability.

Introduction

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe), a monocotyledon belonging to family Zingiberaceae and in the natural order Scitamineae, is herbaceous perennial, usually grown as annually for its pungent rhizome. It is native of South East Asia and one of the earliest oriental spices known to Europe (Kandiannan et al., 1996, Parthasarathy et al., 2003, Ravindran and Nirmal Babu, 2005). Commercially more than 25 countries in the tropics and subtropics are producing it, however, India is the largest producer, and it is an export oriented crop (Singh and Tamil Selvan, 2003).

Leaves are important organs of the plant. Leaf area (LA) is a key variable for most agronomic and physiological studies involving plant growth, light interception, photosynthetic efficiency, evaporation, and responses to fertilizers and irrigation (Blanco and Folegatti, 2005). Therefore, LA strongly influences growth and productivity; estimating LA is a fundamental component of crop growth models (Lizaso et al., 2003). However, the measurement of the surface area of a large number of leaves is often costly, time consuming and destructive. The total LA of the plant can be obtained by either direct or indirect methods. The direct method consists of removing and measuring all leaves in plant. This method is destructive and requires expensive equipment. Indirect, non-destructive methods are user-friendly, less expensive, and can provide accurate LA estimates (Norman and Campbell, 1989) and help in in situ LA estimation. A modeling approach is rapid, reliable and involves linear relationships between LA and one or more dimension of the leaf (L – leaf length and W – maximum width) and it is an alternative for accurately measuring LA (Kandiannan et al., 2002, Williams and Martinson, 2003, Lu et al., 2004, Cho et al., 2007, Peksen, 2007, Antunes et al., 2008).

Although LA is an important parameter in growth studies, only a few workers from India, China and Australia reported for ginger (Gowda and Melanta, 2000, Xizhen et al., 2001, Ajithkumar et al., 2002, Ajithkumar and Jayachandran, 2003, Smith et al., 2004, Xizhen et al., 2005). Earlier methods, employing leaf dimension for estimating the area of ginger leaf was proposed LA = −1.7362 + 0.7153 × L × W (Jayachandran and Sethumadhavan, 1979) with coefficients estimated using least-square linear regression analysis. Similar equations were also developed later LA = −0.7608 + 0.6695 × L × W (Ancy and Jayachandran, 1994) and LA = −9.358 + 0.8549 × L × W (Reddy and Reddy, 1995). It was also proposed an equation LA = k × L × W, k = 0.666 (Reddy and Reddy, 1995), a coefficient ‘k’ derived as the ratio of LA to the product of L and W. Nwachukwu and Ene (1987) compared different methods of estimating ginger LA from Nigeria and reported that no differences were noted between grid and punch method. Punch method was not recommended because of the time and labour required for its use and other calculation methods based on leaf length and width gave unrealistic results for ginger. The above equations have been selected based only on values obtained for the coefficient of determination (R2) and without assessing their prediction accuracy by validation. They also have used limited number of samples for building equations and from only one variety Rio-de-Janeiro (Jayachandran and Sethumadhavan, 1979, Ancy and Jayachandran, 1994). Hence, no information is available on whether or not such models can be successfully used to other genotypes. Moreover, a graph paper method has been employed to find LA that might significantly underestimate the actual LA. Reddy and Reddy (1995) also used limited number of leaves from five genotypes and they have not validated their equation. In these studies, the adequacy of the model assumptions for estimating LA has not been carefully examined. A simple and effective method for detecting model deficiencies in regression analysis is the examination of residual (Bland and Altman, 1986, Rangaswamy, 1995). Therefore, it is necessary to have a simple and validated accurate model for LA estimation of ginger. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the current models (Jayachandran and Sethumadhavan, 1979, Ancy and Jayachandran, 1994, Reddy and Reddy, 1995), as well as to propose a reliable and accurate model using measurements of L and W for estimating the LA of ginger by non-destructive method.

Section snippets

Data collection

Ginger plants were grown at Indian Institute of Spices Research, Experimental Farm, Peruvannamuzhi, Calicut District, Kerala State, India (geographical coordinates 11°34′N, 75°48′E and 60 m MSL) during 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 crop seasons. The region is located in the Western Ghat area of India encompasses one of the world's richest biodiversity. The site experiences tropical humid climate with mean annual rainfall of 4460 mm received from southwest (June–September) and north east

Results

Ginger plants produce leafy shoot (pseudo-stem) about 50 cm tall. The aerial pseudo-stem bear distichous leaves, usually 5–25 cm long and 1–3 cm wide. The samples drawn for this study from five ginger varieties with their summary statistics are given in Table 2. There was no validated model available for prediction of LA of ginger. The sample data has been used for building estimation and validation models. Models were built separately for five varieties and test for their homogeneity was carried

Discussion

Leaf area is one of the important growth parameters and one must record it for effective monitoring of the growth and development of plant in the experiment. Lack of accurate model is a limitation for calculating LA. Non-destructive method of the estimation of LA has several advantages without compromising on accuracy (Kandiannan et al., 2002, Williams and Martinson, 2003, Lu et al., 2004, Cho et al., 2007, Peksen, 2007, Antunes et al., 2008). An export oriented crop like ginger requires LA

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Dr. B. Chempakam, Head of the Division and Dr. V.A. Parthasarathy, Director, IISR, Calicut for facilities and their help and to Head, Water Management Division, CWRDM, Calicut for providing leaf area meter. Thanks also to Mr. N.A. Madhavan, and Mr. K. Gangadharan, for their help in recording observations. The help of Ms. Martina Canavan, Journal Manager, Editor and unknown referees are gratefully acknowledged for shaping the paper.

References (37)

  • M. Bhatt et al.

    Prediction of leaf area in Phaseolus vulgaris by non-destructive method

    Bulg. J. Plant Physiol.

    (2003)
  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • F.F. Blanco et al.

    Estimation of leaf area for greenhouse cucumber by linear measurements under salinity and grafting

    Sci. Agric.

    (2005)
  • E. Campostrini et al.

    Estimation of papaya leaf area using the central vein length

    Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)

    (2001)
  • H. Demirsoy et al.

    Non-destructive leaf area estimation in peach

    Eur. J. Hort. Sci.

    (2004)
  • H. Gamper

    Non-destructive estimates of leaf area in white clover using predictive formulae: the contribution of genotype identity to trifoliate leaf area

    Crop Sci.

    (2005)
  • F.A. Graybill

    Theory and Application of the Linear Model

    (2000)
  • K.A. Gomez et al.

    Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research

    (1984)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Is there a maximum length of strap-like leaves for submerged angiosperms?

      2020, Aquatic Botany
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, leaf traits play critical roles in various processes and as physiological and environmental indicators (e.g., photosynthetic rate, lifespan, and mass per area), which were emphasized by the leaf economics spectrum (LES) (Wright et al., 2004). As an important indicator of leaf size, leaf length has been the focus of many terrestrial plant studies (Kandiannan et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017). Currently, the palm-tree family (Arecaceae) is known to possess the longest leaves in the world (e.g., >25 m in Raphia regalis).

    • Using models for estimation of leaf area index in Cucurbita pepo L.

      2019, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The LAI, defined as the ratio of the leaf area of a plant population to the ground area it occupies, is an important index of the canopy. It expresses the effect of the emergence and expansion of leaves, and interaction with the input of CO2 and energy flow, and directly affects the interception of solar radiation, photosynthesis, accumulation of biomass, transpiration and gas exchange in the crop canopies (Jonckheere et al., 2004; Kandiannan et al., 2009). LAI is an excellent indicator of crop development and health, and is used as an input variable for crop growth and yield forecasting models.

    • Non-destructive estimation of leaf area of durian (Durio zibethinus) – An artificial neural network approach

      2017, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      But, these methods are time consuming, expensive, complex and suitable only for few specific species of plants. In direct methods, total leaf area of plant can obtain by measuring the area of the all removed leaves in plant (Kandiannan et al., 2009). These direct methods are destructive and needs costly instruments.

    • Leaf area constant model in optimizing foliar area measurement in plants: A case study in apple tree

      2015, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on research, it was found that estimating leaf area from equations using leaf dimensions is an inexpensive, rapid, and non-destructive alternative method for accurately assessing leaf area (Kvet and Marshall, 1971; Lu et al., 2004). Nondestructive models for leaf area determination have been tested for different species such as: cucumber (Robbins and Pharr, 1987), avocado (Uzun and Celik, 1999), maize (Stewart and Dwyer, 1999), pistachio (Ranjbar and Damme, 1999), tomato (Astegiano et al., 2001), lettuce (Guo and Sun, 2001), bean (Bhatt and Chanda, 2003), Cherry (H. Demirsoy and L. Demirsoy, 2003), peach (Demirsoy et al., 2004), taro (Lu et al., 2004), white clover (Gamper, 2005), Chestnut (Serdar and Demirsoy, 2006), sugar beet (Tsialtas and Maslaris, 2005, 2008), sunflower (Kvet and Marshall, 1971; Sepaskhah, 1977; Rouphael et al., 2007), radish (Salerno et al., 2005), zucchini (Rouphael et al., 2006), strawberry (Strik and Proctor, 1985; Demirsoy et al., 2005), grapevines (Manivel and Weaver, 1974; Gutiérrez and Lavín, 2000; Montero et al., 2000 Williams and Martinson 2003), kiwi (Mendoza-de Gyves et al., 2007), chestnut (Serdar and Demirsoy, 2006), hazelnut (Cristofori et al., 2007), eggplant (Rivera et al., 2007), faba bean (Peksen, 2007), stevia (Ramesh et al., 2007), persimmon (Cristofori et al., 2008), medlar (Mendoza-de Gyves et al., 2008), small fruits (Fallovo et al., 2008), euphorbia (Fascella et al., 2009), saffron (Kumar, 2009), ginger (Kandiannan et al., 2009), watermelon (Rouphael et al., 2010b) and roses (Rouphael et al., 2010a; Fascella et al., 2013). Some studies also use petiole length (Manivel and Weaver, 1974) and leaf weight (Sepulveda and Kliewer, 1983; Montero et al., 2000) for area measurement.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text