X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa are equally able to uptake and internalize exogenous DNA by sperm-mediated gene transfer in swine
Section snippets
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Domenico Ventrella for the critical reading of the manuscript.
This study was supported by grants from: Ateneo Bologna, Research Funding Office 60% EF2012-EF2013 to MLB, MF, AZ, MS. Consorzio Interuniversitario per i Trapianti d'Organo, EF2008 to MF, AZ, MLB.
References (21)
- et al.
Sperm mediated gene transfer treated spermatozoa maintain good quality parameters and in vitro fertilisation ability
Theriogenology
(2009) - et al.
NanoSMGT: transfection of exogenous DNA on sex-sorted bovine sperm using nanopolymer
Theriogenology
(2011) - et al.
Identification of differentially expressed proteins between bull X and Y spermatozoa
J. Proteome
(2012) - et al.
Differential gene expression and immune localization of the orexin system in the major salivary glands of pigs
Regul. Pept.
(2011) - et al.
Viability and DNA fragmentation in differently sorted boar spermatozoa
Theriogenology
(2006) - et al.
Coupling sperm mediated gene transfer and sperm sorting techniques: a new perspective for swine transgenesis
Theriogenology
(2010) Do X and Y spermatozoa differ in proteins?
Theriogenology
(1999)- et al.
The interaction of sperm cells with exogenous DNA: a role of CD4 and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules
Exp. Cell Res.
(1997) - et al.
Developmental competence of pig oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro
Theriogenology
(1989) - et al.
Incapsulation of sex sorted boar semen: sperm membrane status and oocyte penetration parameters
Theriogenology
(2013)
Cited by (2)
Expression of fluorescent reporter protein was not obtained in ovine embryos produced through in vitro fertilization-sperm mediated gene transfer (IVF-SMGT)
2016, Small Ruminant ResearchCitation Excerpt :This was the method of choice for more than 20 years (Kues and Niemann, 2011), and transgenic mice, sheep, pigs, and cattle have been successfully produced using this technique (Garcia-Vazquez et al., 2009), but besides being expensive, this technique is still inefficient when used to generate transgenic farm animals (0.5–4%) (Garcia-Vazquez et al., 2011). More efficient protocols are now available (Kues and Niemann, 2011), including virus-mediated transgenesis, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) (Zaniboni et al., 2016). These methods vary in efficacy and safety.