Cultural factors of sustainable energy development: A case study of geothermal energy in Iceland and Japan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Energy is important for sustainable development, yet multidimensional challenges exist for policy makers in transformations to sustainable energy systems. Sustainable development is generally recognised as having a three-lens approach: development must balance impacts in the economic, environmental and cultural dimensions. While cultural themes such as governance, motivation, and social values are widely acknowledged in the literature as critical for transformations to sustainability, however, research on these themes has been scant. Culture influences many aspects of society; hence it is important to consider culture when developing policies for sustainable development. Understanding national cultures can lead to greater understanding of what shapes national policy and strategies for transformations to sustainable energy systems. Understanding cultural influences on policy can help other countries to overcome similar challenges in policy making, planning or local resource management. Comparisons between countries serve to further advance the understanding of approaches to such challenges. This paper examines transformations towards sustainable energy through the lens of culture, through a case study of geothermal development in Iceland and Japan. Using Hoftsede's cultural theory framework, we highlight cultural variables relevant to sustainability transformations, with particular emphasis on the challenges of the management of geothermal energy resources, and the management of related conflicts and public participation. We present our findings garnered from interviews with key players in the energy industry in both countries reinforced by an extensive literature review. We find that culture clearly influences the approach to geothermal energy development in both countries and we identify benefits and disadvantages to approaches on overlapping issues and challenges in both countries.

Introduction

Energy is one of most critical components of sustainable socio-economic development. National and international government bodies face significant challenges in energy policy-making and transformations to sustainable energy use. Transformations to sustainability require a shift in the organization of society so that existing social patterns are re-evaluated and reconfigured -this will only be achieved by generating useful knowledge and experiences that can be applied in local settings. Therefore, a critical challenge in designing and implementing transformations to sustainable energy systems is to assemble and evaluate cases in different regions, taking into account such factors as geographical location, levels of technology, economic conditions, and cultural influences. While previous studies have examined economic, technical, and geographical factors there have been few studies examining how cultural characteristics influence transformations to sustainable energy systems [57].

Cultural characteristics can be defined as socially constructed phenomena resulting in collective meanings in a shared social environment. Common cultural characteristics within a nation, including perception of identity, values, and history can be defined as embodying a national culture [9], [16]. Cultural factors are deeply rooted in a society, are slow to change, and determine the behaviour of individuals and groups towards risk, conflict resolution, and the social and institutional capacity for sustainable transformations [11], [42]43,[54], [17]. A deep understanding of a nation's cultural characteristics can strengthen the overall understanding of the underlying dynamics shaping a country's policies, governance systems, and transformation strategies for sustainable energy systems. The determination of the cultural suitability of these policies in other regional contexts may help other countries to overcome their own similar challenges.

Geothermal energy is regarded as an important component of transformations for sustainable energy systems in tectonically active countries such as Japan and Iceland; both countries have geothermal resources and many years of experience of geothermal development. Energy security is a global concern in these days of dwindling fossil reserves and growing energy demand [22]. In this avenue, geothermal energy has been identified by the international community as playing an important part in the transformation to sustainable energy systems. As well as having relatively low carbon emissions [7], it is an indigenous resource and hence can contribute to a nation's energy security. It is even more attractive when its low levelized cost [29], high capacity factor, reliability [51] and flexibility [30] are taken into account. Research suggests that by 2050, geothermal electricity generation could supply around 3.5% of global electricity production, thus avoiding almost 800 megatonnes (Mt) of CO2 emissions per year. Furthermore, geothermal sources could contribute up to 3.9% of energy for heat by 2050 [21]. Japan and Iceland are among the top producers of geothermal energy for heat and electricity in the world. In 2015, the USA had the highest installed capacity for geothermal electricity generation with 3450 MW, with Iceland in 7th place with 665 MW and Japan in 9th place with 519 MW [4].

Culture, commonly seen as part of the social dimension, one of the three pillars advanced in the sustainability discourse, or even a pillar in its own right [52] has received less attention in the literature and has been less clearly defined [10], [35]. Despite its evasiveness, culture is critical in understanding the development and consumption of energy resources, especially where events do not clearly fall in line with classical economic or efficient resource usage models [55]. Furthermore, sustainability assessments of energy technologies often fail to account for social or cultural impacts and the long-term repercussions of energy systems development. While economic and ecological sustainability assessments of energy systems are common, little social research has been carried out on the topic [6]. Whilst such aspects may be difficult to define, it does not mean that they are less important, or should not be measured [8].

This paper focuses on the cultural dimensions of transformations to sustainability. Specifically, based on semi-structured interviews, examination of policy reports, and a comprehensive literature review this paper examines geothermal energy developments in Japan and Iceland through the lens of Hofstede's cultural framework. Towards this end, this paper attempts to first determine the main challenges faced by policy-makers with regard to the sustainable development of geothermal energy resources and second examine the extent to which national culture or other factors shape geothermal energy policy in Japan and Iceland. This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces Hofstede's cultural framework. Section 3 provides the background of geothermal energy development in Japan and Iceland. Section 4 describes the methods used to identify challenges to sustainable geothermal energy development in both countries. Section 5 elaborates on the identified challenges and provides a discussion of cultural and other factors influencing the policy approaches to these challenges as well as recommendations. A conclusion follows in Section 6.

Section snippets

Hofstede's cultural framework

Cultural context is taken into account in Hofstede et al.'s [16] cultural dimensions theory as a basis for comparison and understanding. Hofstede's framework uses six dimensions to compare cultures, by assigning scores for each dimension. These dimensions consist of power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation and indulgence [16]. This theory, using a structure derived from factor analysis, helps to describe or predict the effects of a society's

Country backgrounds: culture and geothermal energy

Japan and Iceland are island nations, in many ways vastly different, but sharing several common characteristics. Both are prosperous nations possessing abundant geothermal resources, many of which are within or adjacent to important national parks that draw many tourists. Japan's current energy policy centres around providing reliable, secure, local energy which must also be environmentally friendly, cost effective and where possible, renewable. Since the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, the

Data collection methods

This research has been informed by a comprehensive literature review and key informant interviews with researchers, industry practitioners, and policy makers in geothermal energy development in Iceland and Japan. The collected data was then triangulated, whenever possible, for purposes of validity [44]. The literature review included industry reports, technology assessment documents, governmental publications, and academic publications relevant to geothermal energy. The literature review was

Influence of cultural characteristics on geothermal energy development

Challenges to sustainable energy transformations centre on providing access, particularly in least developed countries, increasing energy efficiency, environmental impact, social acceptability, and security. The extent and particulars of these challenges will depend on the unique socio-economic, environmental, and mix of energy sources of a country. Specific to Japan and Iceland, the development of geothermal energy has increasingly been viewed with strategic interest by policy makers.

Conclusion

By understanding the cultural dimension of a nation or region, researchers and policy makers can better situate challenges of risk, planning, innovation, and stakeholder engagement in decision making. While the cultural dimension is only one aspect of sustainability and on its own cannot be used to explain current approaches to geothermal energy development, it is nonetheless a critical perspective and has many overlaps with the other dimensions. The cultural perspective is critical when

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincerest gratitude to the Watanabe Trust Fund at the University of Iceland for providing the scholarship that made this research possible. Many thanks are also due to the Icelandic Embassy in Tokyo for their help in sourcing interviews. We would also like to thank all of the participants who agreed to be interviewed in both countries.

References (65)

  • M. Serbulea et al.

    Onsen (hot springs) in Japan—transforming terrain into healing landscapes

    Health Place

    (2012)
  • K. Soini et al.

    Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability

    Geoforum

    (2014)
  • G. Solmazer et al.

    The role of traffic law enforcements in the relationship between cultural variables and traffic fatality rates across some countries of the world

    Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav

    (2016)
  • B.K. Sovacool

    Differing cultures of energy security: an international comparison of public perceptions

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2016)
  • H. Tekin et al.

    Socio-cultural dimension of innovation

    Procedia - Social Behav Sci

    (2015)
  • T.E. Thórhallsdóttir

    Environment and energy in Iceland: a comparative analysis of values and impacts

    Environ Impact Assess Rev

    (2007)
  • National Energy Authority. Energy statistics in Iceland 2015. Reykjavik;...
  • Axelsson G. Sustainable geothermal utilization. In: Proceedings of the ICG 2013; March...
  • K. Benediktsson

    “Scenophobia”, geography and the aesthetic politics of landscape

    Geogr Ann Ser B: Hum Geogr

    (2007)
  • Bertani R. Geothermal power generation in the world 2010–2014 update report. In: Proceedings of the world geothermal...
  • M.A. Borg

    Cultural determinants of infection control behaviour: understanding drivers and implementing effective change

    J Hosp Infect

    (2014)
  • D.G. Carrera et al.

    Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: results of a survey among European energy experts

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: special report of...
  • A.L. Dahl

    Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability

    Ecol Indic

    (2012)
  • K.A. Daniell

    The role of national culture in shaping public policy: a review of the literature

    HC Coombs policy forum discussion paper

    (2014)
  • Dessein J, Soini K, Fairclough G, Horlings L editors. Culture in, for and as;...
  • G. Gunnarsson et al.

    Model simulations of the Hengill Area, Southwestern Iceland

    Transp Porous Media

    (2011)
  • L. Hiwasaki

    Toward sustainable management of national parks in Japan: securing local community and stakeholder participation

    Environ Manag

    (2005)
  • Hofstede G. Compare countries; 2016. Retrieved November 25, 2016, from...
  • G. Hofstede et al.

    Cultures and organizations: software of the mind (Revised an)

    (2010)
  • B.W. Husted

    Culture and ecology: a cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability

    Manag Int Rev

    (2005)
  • Statistics Iceland. Reykjavik; 2014. Retrieved from...
  • Cited by (54)

    • Opportunities and challenges of geothermal energy in Turkiye

      2024, Energy for Sustainable Development
    • The meaning of energy islands: Towards a theoretical framework

      2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text