Cultural factors of sustainable energy development: A case study of geothermal energy in Iceland and Japan
Introduction
Energy is one of most critical components of sustainable socio-economic development. National and international government bodies face significant challenges in energy policy-making and transformations to sustainable energy use. Transformations to sustainability require a shift in the organization of society so that existing social patterns are re-evaluated and reconfigured -this will only be achieved by generating useful knowledge and experiences that can be applied in local settings. Therefore, a critical challenge in designing and implementing transformations to sustainable energy systems is to assemble and evaluate cases in different regions, taking into account such factors as geographical location, levels of technology, economic conditions, and cultural influences. While previous studies have examined economic, technical, and geographical factors there have been few studies examining how cultural characteristics influence transformations to sustainable energy systems [57].
Cultural characteristics can be defined as socially constructed phenomena resulting in collective meanings in a shared social environment. Common cultural characteristics within a nation, including perception of identity, values, and history can be defined as embodying a national culture [9], [16]. Cultural factors are deeply rooted in a society, are slow to change, and determine the behaviour of individuals and groups towards risk, conflict resolution, and the social and institutional capacity for sustainable transformations [11], [42]43,[54], [17]. A deep understanding of a nation's cultural characteristics can strengthen the overall understanding of the underlying dynamics shaping a country's policies, governance systems, and transformation strategies for sustainable energy systems. The determination of the cultural suitability of these policies in other regional contexts may help other countries to overcome their own similar challenges.
Geothermal energy is regarded as an important component of transformations for sustainable energy systems in tectonically active countries such as Japan and Iceland; both countries have geothermal resources and many years of experience of geothermal development. Energy security is a global concern in these days of dwindling fossil reserves and growing energy demand [22]. In this avenue, geothermal energy has been identified by the international community as playing an important part in the transformation to sustainable energy systems. As well as having relatively low carbon emissions [7], it is an indigenous resource and hence can contribute to a nation's energy security. It is even more attractive when its low levelized cost [29], high capacity factor, reliability [51] and flexibility [30] are taken into account. Research suggests that by 2050, geothermal electricity generation could supply around 3.5% of global electricity production, thus avoiding almost 800 megatonnes (Mt) of CO2 emissions per year. Furthermore, geothermal sources could contribute up to 3.9% of energy for heat by 2050 [21]. Japan and Iceland are among the top producers of geothermal energy for heat and electricity in the world. In 2015, the USA had the highest installed capacity for geothermal electricity generation with 3450 MW, with Iceland in 7th place with 665 MW and Japan in 9th place with 519 MW [4].
Culture, commonly seen as part of the social dimension, one of the three pillars advanced in the sustainability discourse, or even a pillar in its own right [52] has received less attention in the literature and has been less clearly defined [10], [35]. Despite its evasiveness, culture is critical in understanding the development and consumption of energy resources, especially where events do not clearly fall in line with classical economic or efficient resource usage models [55]. Furthermore, sustainability assessments of energy technologies often fail to account for social or cultural impacts and the long-term repercussions of energy systems development. While economic and ecological sustainability assessments of energy systems are common, little social research has been carried out on the topic [6]. Whilst such aspects may be difficult to define, it does not mean that they are less important, or should not be measured [8].
This paper focuses on the cultural dimensions of transformations to sustainability. Specifically, based on semi-structured interviews, examination of policy reports, and a comprehensive literature review this paper examines geothermal energy developments in Japan and Iceland through the lens of Hofstede's cultural framework. Towards this end, this paper attempts to first determine the main challenges faced by policy-makers with regard to the sustainable development of geothermal energy resources and second examine the extent to which national culture or other factors shape geothermal energy policy in Japan and Iceland. This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces Hofstede's cultural framework. Section 3 provides the background of geothermal energy development in Japan and Iceland. Section 4 describes the methods used to identify challenges to sustainable geothermal energy development in both countries. Section 5 elaborates on the identified challenges and provides a discussion of cultural and other factors influencing the policy approaches to these challenges as well as recommendations. A conclusion follows in Section 6.
Section snippets
Hofstede's cultural framework
Cultural context is taken into account in Hofstede et al.'s [16] cultural dimensions theory as a basis for comparison and understanding. Hofstede's framework uses six dimensions to compare cultures, by assigning scores for each dimension. These dimensions consist of power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation and indulgence [16]. This theory, using a structure derived from factor analysis, helps to describe or predict the effects of a society's
Country backgrounds: culture and geothermal energy
Japan and Iceland are island nations, in many ways vastly different, but sharing several common characteristics. Both are prosperous nations possessing abundant geothermal resources, many of which are within or adjacent to important national parks that draw many tourists. Japan's current energy policy centres around providing reliable, secure, local energy which must also be environmentally friendly, cost effective and where possible, renewable. Since the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, the
Data collection methods
This research has been informed by a comprehensive literature review and key informant interviews with researchers, industry practitioners, and policy makers in geothermal energy development in Iceland and Japan. The collected data was then triangulated, whenever possible, for purposes of validity [44]. The literature review included industry reports, technology assessment documents, governmental publications, and academic publications relevant to geothermal energy. The literature review was
Influence of cultural characteristics on geothermal energy development
Challenges to sustainable energy transformations centre on providing access, particularly in least developed countries, increasing energy efficiency, environmental impact, social acceptability, and security. The extent and particulars of these challenges will depend on the unique socio-economic, environmental, and mix of energy sources of a country. Specific to Japan and Iceland, the development of geothermal energy has increasingly been viewed with strategic interest by policy makers.
Conclusion
By understanding the cultural dimension of a nation or region, researchers and policy makers can better situate challenges of risk, planning, innovation, and stakeholder engagement in decision making. While the cultural dimension is only one aspect of sustainability and on its own cannot be used to explain current approaches to geothermal energy development, it is nonetheless a critical perspective and has many overlaps with the other dimensions. The cultural perspective is critical when
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their sincerest gratitude to the Watanabe Trust Fund at the University of Iceland for providing the scholarship that made this research possible. Many thanks are also due to the Icelandic Embassy in Tokyo for their help in sourcing interviews. We would also like to thank all of the participants who agreed to be interviewed in both countries.
References (65)
- et al.
Culture, income, and CO2 emission
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2016) Sustainable steam production in the Matsukawa geothermal field, Japan
Geothermics
(2003)- et al.
How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: a comparative analysis using Hofstede's cultural dimensions
Public Relat Rev
(2008) - et al.
Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs
Energy Policy
(2013) - et al.
A cross-cultural comparison of the network capability development of entrepreneurial firms
Ind Mark Manag
(2014) Uncertainty avoidance and facework: a test of the Hofstede model
Int J Intercult Relat
(2006)- et al.
Renewability of geothermal resources
Geothermics
(2010) The development of the Japanese legal system for public participation in land use and environmental matters
Land Use Policy
(2016)- et al.
Measuring countries׳ environmental sustainability performance – a review and case study of Iceland
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2014) - et al.
Agent-based modeling of consumer decision making process based on power distance and personality
Knowl-Based Syst
(2011)
Onsen (hot springs) in Japan—transforming terrain into healing landscapes
Health Place
Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability
Geoforum
The role of traffic law enforcements in the relationship between cultural variables and traffic fatality rates across some countries of the world
Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav
Differing cultures of energy security: an international comparison of public perceptions
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Socio-cultural dimension of innovation
Procedia - Social Behav Sci
Environment and energy in Iceland: a comparative analysis of values and impacts
Environ Impact Assess Rev
“Scenophobia”, geography and the aesthetic politics of landscape
Geogr Ann Ser B: Hum Geogr
Cultural determinants of infection control behaviour: understanding drivers and implementing effective change
J Hosp Infect
Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: results of a survey among European energy experts
Energy Policy
Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability
Ecol Indic
The role of national culture in shaping public policy: a review of the literature
HC Coombs policy forum discussion paper
Model simulations of the Hengill Area, Southwestern Iceland
Transp Porous Media
Toward sustainable management of national parks in Japan: securing local community and stakeholder participation
Environ Manag
Cultures and organizations: software of the mind (Revised an)
Culture and ecology: a cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability
Manag Int Rev
Cited by (54)
Opportunities and challenges of geothermal energy in Turkiye
2024, Energy for Sustainable DevelopmentThe meaning of energy islands: Towards a theoretical framework
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsThe role of national culture in renewable energy consumption: Global evidence
2023, Energy Reports