Elsevier

Research Policy

Volume 38, Issue 6, July 2009, Pages 1032-1043
Research Policy

New forms of organisation and R&D internationalisation among the world's 100 largest food and beverages multinationals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.024Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper explores the strategic internationalisation of Research and Development (R&D) activities of the world's 100 largest food and beverages (F&B) multinationals (MNEs) in 1996 and 2000 with a sample of nearly 8000 affiliates for each period. We develop a global innovation strategy (GIS) structure where we analyse the R&D internationalisation process of F&B MNEs. We argue that in a fully developed GIS model the sourcing of creative inputs does not come exclusively from a ‘central’ R&D laboratory, but other overseas R&D laboratories or technological affiliates can also undertake genuine knowledge creation activity from capitalising on the scientific heterogeneity fostered in individual host countries as well as distinctive demand conditions. Our results indicate the increasing importance of overseas technological affiliates in the application of a GIS in the leading F&B MNEs, which determine the degree of their technological internationalisation. Two variants of technological affiliates reflect two broad knowledge-related activities, i.e. adaptation and genuine forms of knowledge creation.

Introduction

Innovation and technology are of particular importance to the development agenda of countries (UNCTAD, 2005) and a relevant contributing factor, perhaps the most important, to the creation of competitive advantage for firms (Porter, 1998). Learning processes provide the foundations for establishing technological competencies or organisational capabilities that contribute to the firm's competitive advantage (Cantwell and Kosmopoulou, 2001, Cohen and Levinthal, 1989, Kuemmerle, 1997, Kuemmerle, 1999, Pearce, 1999). Research and Development (R&D) is thus a major determinant of good performance in global corporate competition for Multinational Enterprises (hereafter, MNEs) (Franko, 1989).

Given these developments, the internationalisation of R&D has attracted the interest of both academics and practitioners, as such strategies enable the firm to tap into knowledge externalities in world centres for scientific and technological excellence, and facilitate agreements with institutions which are at the forefront of research.

However, there are still few empirical analyses on MNEs’ new transversal structures. While general aspects of the internationalisation of R&D have now been thoroughly explored, our knowledge of these relatively recent R&D superstructures is still insufficient. There is a need to complement the traditional analyses based on patent data or foreign R&D expenditures with studies of these new forms of R&D organisation in MNEs, in order to understand better the internationalisation of these companies’ innovative activities.

This paper analyses the global organisation of R&D in the leading firms of the food and beverages (F&B) industry, and the motives that lead to these firms concentrating their most relevant innovative resources in new centres, often located abroad. In doing so we analyse a sample of around 8000 affiliates of the world's 100 largest food and beverage multinationals (hereafter, F&B MNEs). We approach the internationalisation process using a typology developed and elaborated in earlier studies (Pearce, 1999, Pearce and Papanastassiou, 1999) and investigate the role of the R&D-oriented subsidiaries of MNEs according to the internal resources of the company and the mandate of the subsidiary.

We thus develop a global innovation strategy (GIS) model where we identify the evolution of technological strategies and the critical role of overseas R&D laboratories or technological affiliates in MNEs, which in turn we apply to F&B MNEs. Therefore, our study contributes to the aim of shedding more light on innovation in the so-called low-tech industries, as proposed by recent analyses (von Tunzelmann and Acha, 2005). Second, the majority of previous studies of these forms of global R&D organisation are case studies of small groups of companies. These analyses, in our view, should be complemented with statistical analyses of large samples of similar companies. Third, although the food and beverages (F&B) sector is classified as a low R&D intensity sector (UNCTAD, 2005), F&B MNEs internationalise their R&D activities, according to patent analyses, more than MNEs in most other sectors (Alfranca et al., 2005, Cantwell and Hodson, 1991). Furthermore, F&B MNEs can be considered as precursor to other MNEs because they are, on average, older and more internationally experienced and more internationalised (Stopford and Dunning, 1983). Their analysis, therefore, could help towards a better understanding of the rationale for the new patterns of R&D internationalisation in other MNEs within a GIS model.

The rest of the paper is organised as follows. The next section provides the theoretical foundations and the literature review; Section 3 presents the data and sample description; while Section 4 discusses our empirical methodology and variables. The empirical results and their interpretation are discussed in Section 5. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper by offering future research questions.

Section snippets

Theoretical background and literature review

One of the key changes during the refocusing of the competitive organisation of the MNE over perhaps the last 40 years has been the decentralization of innovation and R&D. In the years immediately after the second world war, as modelled by Vernon (1966) in the original product cycle model, United States MNEs (in particular) created sources of competitive advantage in their home country and used processes of technology transfer to apply these advantages as the basis of internationalisation.

Sample description

Our sample of F&B MNEs comprises 81 companies taken from the Top 100, with nearly 8000 affiliates. For this study we selected continuing firms included in the Top 100 group both in 1996 and 2000, a method which enabled us to analyse changes taking place during this period. The list of firms comes from the AGRODATA database (IAMM, 1990, Padilla et al., 1983, Rastoin and Tozanli, 1998). The main sources for compiling the AGRODATA database are Moody's Industrial Manual, the Fortune 500 directory,

Statistical methodology and variables

In this paper our main objective is to identify the internal factors which determine the existence of TAs within the structure of a multinational network; the target variable, therefore, is the average number of TAs per firm. Second, we try to discern two variants of TAs, the creative units within the MNE network and those involved in adaptation only. We therefore attempt to identify predictors for each type of TA. The TAs of our sample correspond to a portfolio of IILs, LILs and SLs described

Results and interpretation

In our sample, 43% of the companies own at least one TA. This result suggests that, even in a mature sector, a substantial number of the companies already manage their global R&D through a network of diversified TAs. Though the first to implement these methods of coordination were high-tech companies (Gerybadze and Reger, 1999), our results suggest that this form of R&D organisation has now been adopted by many MNEs which operate in traditional industries.

Conclusions and future research

In this paper we have tested the application of a GIS model in a representative sample of the world's top 100 food and beverage multinationals by bringing forward the existence of TAs and furthermore by discerning between two variants of TAs that reflect two broad knowledge-related activities, i.e. adaptation and genuine forms of knowledge creation.

Our data show that the most important reason determining the presence of a large number of TAs is the country spread of the MNE. In other words,

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Selma Tozanli for her help with the data. Ruth Rama gratefully acknowledges support provided by PRIME (Policies for Research and Innovation in the Move towards the European Research Area), European Commission.

References (70)

  • G. Reger

    Coordinating globally dispersed research centres of excellence: the case of Philips Electronics

    Journal of International Management

    (2004)
  • M. von Zedtwitz et al.

    Organizing global R&D, challenges and dilemmas

    Journal of International Management

    (2004)
  • O. Alfranca et al.

    A patent analysis of global food and beverage firms: the persistence of innovation

    Agribusiness: An International Journal

    (2002)
  • O. Alfranca et al.

    Competitive behaviour, design and technical innovation in food and beverage multinationals

    International Journal of Biotechnology, Special issue

    (2003)
  • O. Alfranca et al.

    Combining different brands of in-house knowledge: technological capabilities in food, biotechnology, chemicals and drugs in agri-food multinationals

    Science and Public Policy

    (2004)
  • O. Alfranca et al.

    Innovation in food and beverage multinationals

  • P. Almeida et al.

    Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building

    Organization Science

    (2002)
  • G. Anastassopoulos et al.

    The performance of multinational agribusinesses: effects of product and geographical diversification

  • Ayadi, N., J.-L. Rastoin, Tozanli, S. et al. (2006). Les Operations de Restructuration des irmes Agroalimentaires...
  • C.A. Bartlett et al.

    Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution

    (1989)
  • C.A. Bartlett et al.

    Managing Innovation in the Transnational Corporation

  • W.B. Bijman et al.

    Internationalisation of Dutch Agribusiness and the Organisation of R&D. Seminar on Globalization of the Food Industry

    (1997)
  • J. Birkinshaw

    Approaching heterarchy: a review of the literature on multinational strategy and structure

    Advances in Comparative Management Research Annual

    (1994)
  • J. Birkinshaw

    How subsidiary mandates are gained and lost

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (1996)
  • L. Breiman et al.

    Classification and Regression Trees

    (1984)
  • J. Cantwell et al.

    Global R&D and UK competitiveness

  • J. Cantwell et al.

    Globalization of innovatory capacity: the structure of competence accumulation in European home and host countries

  • Cantwell, J., Kosmopoulou, E., 2001. Determinants of internationalisation of corporate technology. DRUID Working...
  • J. Chataway

    Novartis: new agribusiness strategy

    AgroBioForum

    (2001)
  • Christensen, J.F., 1998. The dynamics of the diversified corporation and the roles of central management of technology....
  • Christensen, J.L., Rama, R., von Tunzelmann, N., 1996. Study on innovation in the European food products and beverages...
  • W.M. Cohen et al.

    Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D

    Economic Journal

    (1989)
  • J.M. Connor

    North America as a precursor of changes in Western European food-purchasing patterns

    European Review of Agricultural Economics

    (1994)
  • R. Coombs et al.

    Strategic Control of Technology in Diversified Companies with Decentralized R&D

    Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

    (1993)
  • Y.L. Doz

    A commentary on innovation systems in small open economies in light of the Swedish, Israeli, Finnish and Singaporean experiences

  • Cited by (40)

    • R&D internationalization and innovation: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research directions

      2021, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a similar vein, Bartholomew (1997) and Fan (2006), found that the exploitation of foreign technology through the Internationalization of R&D in terms of cross-border R&D alliances whether among firms or between firms and research institutions, also enhance innovative capabilities of organizations. On a different note, Winterhalter, Zeschky, Neumann, and Gassmann (2017) showed that when R&D units of MNEs are located in emerging markets, frugal innovation is enhanced, whereas Zanfei (2000) and Filippaios et al. (2009) found that R&D internationalization enhances the appearance of genuine forms of knowledge creation. Moreover, other scholar found that R&D internationalization positively affects: market novelty in terms of the company's ability in bringing innovations to the market (Hottenrott & Lopes-Bento, 2014; Mihalache et al., 2012), radical innovation (Regnér & Zander, 2014), product innovation (Belderbos et al., 2015; Bertrand & Mol, 2013; Miotti & Sachwald, 2003; Nieto & Rodríguez, 2011; Rodríguez & Nieto, 2016; Zeller, 2004), technological innovation (Kafouros et al., 2008; Lecocq, Leten, Kusters, & Van Looy, 2012; Zeller, 2004), and process innovation (Belderbos et al., 2015; Rodríguez & Nieto, 2016).

    • Adoption of ICT innovations in the agri-food sector: An analysis of French and Spanish industries

      2021, Innovation Strategies in the Food Industry: Tools for Implementation, Second Edition
    • Cross-cultural differences in creativity: A process-based view through a prism of cognition, motivation and attribution

      2019, Thinking Skills and Creativity
      Citation Excerpt :

      The creative process has been one of the key research topics of the past century (Lubart, 2001), and today it continues to intrigue and attract scholars from various fields (Zhou & Shalley, 2003) as a vaguely understood area. While researchers call for an assessment of a multi-step cognitive process involved in individual creativity in general (Shalley et al., 2004), the dynamics associated with geographical expansion of innovative activities among organizations (Filippaios et al., 2009) present an additional level of complexity and magnify the relevance of the topic. Even though cognitive mechanisms of creativity have received increasing attention among cross-cultural researchers, there is still no overarching theoretical framework that describes the psychological mechanisms explaining varying levels of creativity across different cultures (Zhou & Su, 2010).

    • Brokerage and balance: Creating an effective organizational interface for product modularization in multinational R&D

      2018, Research Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dispersion of organizational units is another characteristic of MNCs. Dispersed R&D centers are beneficial regarding local knowledge access and market proximity (Filippaios et al., 2009; Kurokawa et al., 2007). However, geographic boundaries of organizational units of R&D could diminish communication between them and increase coordination costs (Haas and Cummings, 2015).

    • An examination of product innovation in low- and medium-technology industries: Cases from the UK packaged food sector

      2017, Research Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Through DUI activities significant innovation and value is being added at this stage. Our evidence is based on cases from large firms, this reflects the reality in the industry that the largest food and beverage multinationals account for one half of technological activities in the industry worldwide, and influence technological developments throughout the industry, and account for a significant proportion of production (Alfranca et al., 2002; Filippaios et al., 2009). Further, Galizzi and Venturini (2012) suggest that the innovation rate, measured as a comparison of the number of product launches per individual employed, in the food industry is higher within large firms.

    • Gone are the creatures of yesteryear? On the diffusion of technological capabilities in the ‘modern’ MNC

      2017, Journal of World Business
      Citation Excerpt :

      To a certain extent, the clustering of firms along the dimensions of structure and pace of diffusion lends support for the suggestion that modernity of the MNCs produces different pathways in terms of strategic and organizational developments (Contractor, 2012; Zander & Mathews, 2010). Some of these alternative pathways may involve structures, innovation processes, and managerial attitudes that sustain or re-confirm traditional patterns of capability creation and diffusion within the MNC network (Filippaios et al., 2009). There may also be a set of firm-specific and environmental contingencies at play (Ghoshal & Nohria, 1993; Kobrin, 1994).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +44 20 8417 5631; fax: +44 20 8417 5026.

    2

    Tel.: +45 3815 2538; fax: +45 3815 2500.

    View full text