Full length articleExpanding roles for the Swedish waste management sector in inter-organizational resource management
Introduction
Many economies around the world have historically based their growth on inexpensive and plentiful natural resources. In the context of abundance, applying a linear ‘take, make, waste’ approach to fulfilling society’s needs and wants has been practical to a degree. However, it is evident that this approach to the use of resources in our economies is not sustainable in the long term (Dobbs et al., 2013, EC Environment, 2011, Lacy and Rutqvist, 2015). Global trends such as increasing world population, growing consumer affluence, resource scarcity, and environmental pressures have public and private actors calling for a transformation away from traditional linear economies (Allwood et al., 2010, EC Environment, 2011, Genovese et al., 2015, McKinsey Global Institute, 2011, OECD, 2011).
In addition to such drivers, benefits to economies and individual organizations can be realized through increased inter-organizational resource efficiency. Societal benefits such as increased resource security, improved macro economies, and increased employment are among highlighted benefits (Chertow and Lombardi, 2005, European Commission, 2011, Lombardi and Laybourn, 2006, Wijkman and Skånberg, 2015, Zhu et al., 2007). A recent Club of Rome report estimates that taking political and industrial action supporting material efficiency could raise the Swedish GDP by more than 2% and create an additional 50,000 jobs in the country (Wijkman and Skånberg, 2015). Potential benefits for companies working with resource efficiency include reduced resource costs, reduced supply risks, improved goodwill, increased competitiveness, and perhaps access to new market segments (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2012, Lacy and Rutqvist, 2015, Roy and Cheruvu, 2010). While seen as a major player in enabling a resource transformation on a macro scale, the waste management (WM) sector stands to gain new business opportunities through radically developing their approach to resource management.
As defined by the EU, the WM sector performs “the collection, transport, recovery and disposal of waste, including the supervision of such operations and the after-care of disposal sites, including actions taken as a dealer or broker”(European Commission, 2008). Acting as such, this sector has for many decades been an important partner to our production and consumption systems, actively working toward the safe and effective treatment and use of waste resources from society. The sector has evolved through the years, expanding from regulation driven end-of-pipe solutions such as landfilling and sanitation to include other high value operations such as material recycling, and energy recovery (Singh et al., 2014). Today, many see the WM sector as a key player in realizing the pressing societal drive for more resource efficient and circular regions (Accenture, 2014, EEA, 2014, Lacy and Rutqvist, 2015).
Most organizations in the WM sector are structured to solve ‘the waste problem’, giving inadequate attention to the wider systems and value chains within which they are embedded (Singh et al., 2014). In some cases, WM companies can be seen as hindrances to innovative inter-organizational resource efficiency measures. Some of their traditional ‘low value’ activities such as landfilling, mixed recovery, and energy recovery can be considered as ‘lock-ins’ to lower stages of the waste hierarchy, where ineffective pathways for materials are kept despite potential for realizing more value through innovative alternative value chains (Corvellec et al., 2013). However, recently in Europe and elsewhere, actors in the WM sector have been rethinking and restructuring their traditional business approaches toward that of innovative systems developers and broader value chain managers. This can be seen in the sector’s adoption of the concepts of the circular economy (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2012), cradle-to-cradle (McDonough and Braungart, 2010), and industrial symbiosis (Chertow, 2000). The sector faces demanding challenges in developing approaches to realize these aspirations as a portfolio of valuable business offerings. These challenges range from developing new business models that are less dependent on material mass flows to identifying what role a WM organization can play as a core inter-organizational manager.
To become more resource efficient, our economies will require new, non-linear and high value, approaches to resource management. This article seeks to identify and evaluate novel value creation approaches for WM organizations aspiring to actively assist in innovative inter-organizational resource management.
Toward this aim, this article addresses the following questions:
- 1)
How can WM organizations assist in overcoming obstacles to innovative inter-organizational resource management?
- 2)
What are the risks and opportunities of developing these activities for WM organizations?
- 3)
How are Swedish WM organizations strategically and practically working toward progressive resource management visions?
Section snippets
Literature review
Industrial Symbiosis has been chosen as a representative proxy for innovative inter-organizational resource management in this article’s survey of obstacles. Industrial symbiosis was chosen given its array of activities around inter-organizational resource management, as well as its relatively large canon of literature regarding the obstacles to the facilitation and implementation of industrial symbiosis. The expanded background section of this article builds upon a literature review performed
Background
Before entering the results of the expert interviews, this section outlines some of the underpinning and contextual information for the specific study. To begin, background information regarding the sector of focus (WM in Sweden) is given. This is followed by a short introduction to the concept of industrial symbiosis and a summary of the barriers to industrial symbiosis identified via literature review.
Results
In this section the results of the interviews with executives from public and private WM organizations in Sweden are presented. These results show that leaders in the Swedish WM industry see many potentials for the sector to overcome identified barriers to industrial symbiosis. Their views on risks and opportunities of performing such activities are presented along with current initiatives of their respective organizations.
Discussion
By surveying the main barriers to inter-organizational resource management initiatives, based on industrial symbiosis concepts, this study highlights what may seem to be self-evident: the Swedish WM sector can and does perform many of the activities required for realizing more effective inter-organizational resource management. However, a shift is underway regarding the sector’s ambition, and perhaps the future role of the sector in Sweden (See Appendix A). Many Swedish WM organizations have
Conclusions
This article began by summarizing the main barriers to improving inter-organizational resource management through industrial symbiosis. The Swedish WM sector is already supplying services and technologies to ease and in some instances overcome many of these barriers. However, there are certain risks, such as supply and investment risks, in aiming to take a larger role in inter-organizational resource management. At the same time, the opportunities are substantial, such as staying ahead of
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance and insightful information provided by the management interviewees from NSR AB, Stena Recycling Sweden, Tekniska verken i Linköping AB, and Ragn-Sells AB. Many thanks to Matilda Nilsson and Sara Baumgarten for their consultation over the past year in relation to their master’s thesis work (Nilsson and Baumgarten, 2014). Their work was key in setting up the background section on barriers. This report has in part been financed by the Ragnar
References (110)
- et al.
Looplocal – a heuristic visualization tool to support the strategic facilitation of industrial symbiosis
J. Clean. Prod.
(2015) - et al.
Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences
J. Clean. Prod.
(1998) - et al.
Purchasing strategies in the Kraljic matrix—a power and dependence perspective
J. Purch. Supply Manag.
(2005) - et al.
Semantic algorithm for industrial symbiosis network synthesis
Comput. Chem. Eng.
(2015) - et al.
Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: the case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan Area
J. Clean. Prod.
(2013) - et al.
Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development
J. Clean. Prod.
(2007) - et al.
Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons
J. Clean. Prod.
(2004) - et al.
Landfill biogas for heating greenhouses and providing carbon dioxide supplement for plant growth
Biosyst. Eng.
(2003) - et al.
Institutional conditions for Swedish metal production: a comparison of subsidies to metal mining and metal recycling
Resour. Policy
(2014) Co-production of heat and power: an anchor tenant of a regional industrial ecosystem
J. Clean. Prod.
(2001)
Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges
J. Clean. Prod.
Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences
Int. J. Res. Mark.
Econometric analysis of the performance of recycling projects in Japanese Eco-Towns
J. Clean. Prod.
Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context
J. Clean. Prod.
The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development – reflections, practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology
J. Clean. Prod.
Implementing eco-industrial parks in existing clusters. Findings from a historical Italian chemical site
J. Clean. Prod.
Economies of scale for future lithium-ion battery recycling infrastructure
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
Circular Advantage – Innovative Business Models and Technologies to Create Value in a World without Limits to Growth
Waste to resources: moving toward the 2030 sustainable development goals
Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Harnessing catastrophe to promote resource recovery and eco-industrial development
J. Ind. Ecol.
Fostering industrial symbiosis with agent-based simulation and participatory modeling
J. Ind. Ecol.
Shared responsibility at the regional level: the building of sustainable industrial estates
Eur. Environ.
Municipal Waste Management in Europe: European Policy Between Harmonisation and Subsidiarity
Municipalities and industrial ecology: reconsidering municipal environmental management
Sustain. Dev.
Landfill Taxes & Bans [WWW Document]
Optimization of a waste heat utilization network in an eco-industrial park
Appl. Energy
The impact of scale recycling boundary, and type of waste on symbiosis and recycling: an empirical study of Japanese eco-towns
J. Ind. Ecol.
Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy
Annu. Rev. Energy Environ.
The use of fly larvae for organic waste treatment
Waste Manag.
A walk on the human side of industrial ecology
Am. Behav. Sci.
Competence Center Recycling [WWW Document]
The status of industrial ecology in Australia: barriers and enablers
Resources
On the failure of socialist economies to close the loop on industrial by-products: insights from the Austrian critique of planning
Environ. Polit.
Resource Revolution: Tracking Global Commodity Markets Trends Survey 2013
The Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (COM(2011) 571)
EEA Signals 2014 – Well-being and the Environment
European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) [WWW Document]
Ecopal – Ecologie Industrielle Dunkerquoise [WWW Document]
Public Procurement and Innovation (In Swedish with English Summary) Offentlig Upphandling Och Innovation
Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at kalundborg
J. Ind. Ecol.
A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 – communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
Change
Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Finland [WWW Document]
Eurostat: Treatment of Waste by Waste Category, Hazardousness and Waste Operations – Datasets [WWW Document]
Barriers of interorganisational environmental management: two case studies on industrial symbiosis
Prog. Ind. Ecol. Int. J.
Policy instruments towards a sustainable waste management
Sustainability
Cited by (78)
Research progress and frontier of global solid waste management based on bibliometrics
2023, Environmental DevelopmentThe impact of fintech on carbon efficiency: Evidence from Chinese cities
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionConnecting organizational context to environmental sustainability initiatives and industrial symbiosis: Empirical results and case analysis
2023, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionA sustainable approach for an integrated municipal solid waste management
2023, Recent Trends in Solid Waste ManagementMulti-stakeholder synergies for enhancing environmental management of beach recreation in the eastern coast, Thailand
2023, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability