Zebrafish embryos as an alternative to animal experiments—A commentary on the definition of the onset of protected life stages in animal welfare regulations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.06.121Get rights and content

Abstract

Worldwide, the zebrafish has become a popular model for biomedical research and (eco)toxicology. Particularly the use of embryos is receiving increasing attention, since they are considered as replacement method for animal experiments. Zebrafish embryos allow the analysis of multiple endpoints ranging from acute and developmental toxicity determination to complex functional genetic and physiological analysis. Particularly the more complex endpoints require the use of post-hatched eleutheroembryo stages. According to the new EU Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, the earliest life-stages of animals are not defined as protected and, therefore, do not fall into the regulatory frameworks dealing with animal experimentation. Independent feeding is considered as the stage from which free-living larvae are subject to regulations for animal experimentation. However, despite this seemingly clear definition, large variations exist in the interpretation of this criterion by national and regional authorities. Since some assays require the use of post-hatched stages up to 120 h post fertilization, the literature and available data are reviewed in order to evaluate if this stage could still be considered as non-protected according to the regulatory criterion of independent feeding. Based on our analysis and by including criteria such as yolk consumption, feeding and swimming behavior, we conclude that zebrafish larvae can indeed be regarded as independently feeding from 120 h after fertilization. Experiments with zebrafish should thus be subject to regulations for animal experiments from 120 h after fertilization onwards.

Section snippets

The zebrafish embryo as an alternative to animal experiments

Embryonic stages of fish are increasingly being used as a model in biomedical research and (eco)toxicology. According to the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement of animal experiments, [1]), fish embryos are considered as replacement or refinement methods, since these developmental stages are likely to experience less or no pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm [2]. In particular, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo has achieved high popularity founded on a unique set of properties

The current regulatory situation

Fish show a high variability with respect to their embryonic development and the identification of clear markers of the end of the embryonic period is difficult [38], [39]. In contrast, from a regulatory perspective, precise definitions are needed and various attempts have been made within European regulations. In Great Britain, protection of fish, amphibians and Octopus vulgaris commences from the time at which they become capable of independent feeding. According to the home office's guidance

When does a zebrafish feed freely?

In order to address the onset of independent feeding in the zebrafish, a clear definition of developmental time is required. This is an issue over which there is considerable confusion in the literature. It is difficult to refer to time after hatching, since the time of hatching itself depends on strain, stocking density and temperature, reflecting the fact that fish are poikilothermic animals. Moreover, rather than being a time point, hatching is a process that occurs over a prolonged period.

Regulatory perspectives for the use of zebrafish embryos

The exact onset of feeding in zebrafish is of great practical interest because of its far-ranging implications for animal protection. For mammals, the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) considers the stage of development at which there is a risk of poor welfare to begin with the last third of development within the mother. For fish, it is instead defined as the stage when it is capable of feeding independently rather than being dependent on the food supply deposited by the mother in form of the

Conclusions

The stage of “independently feeding larval forms” can be defined by assessing a couple of criteria, such as development of the digestive tract and swim bladder, incorporation of food, swimming ability and yolk consumption. By 120 hpf, when the yolk is gradually used up, swimming activity increases and the majority of the larvae are able for the first time to actively hunt for food, most of these criteria would be matched. We thus conclude that developing zebrafish should be regarded as protected

Acknowledgements

This study has been created within the scope of EuFishBiomed COST Action BM0804. U. Strähle and R. Geisler are supported by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme (ZF-HEALTH project, EC Grant Agreement HEALTH-F4-2010-242048). Critical comments on the manuscript by colleagues from the UFZ Leipzig (R. Altenburger, W. Busch, T. Luckenbach and others) are gratefully acknowledged.

References (55)

  • E. Lammer et al.

    Development of a flow-through system for the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Toxicol In Vitro

    (2009)
  • H.A. Field et al.

    Formation of the digestive system in zebrafish: II. Pancreas morphogenesis

    Dev Biol

    (2003)
  • H.A. Field et al.

    Formation of the digestive system in zebrafish: I. Liver morphogenesis

    Dev Biol

    (2003)
  • A.N. Ng et al.

    Formation of the digestive system in zebrafish: III. Intestinal epithelium morphogenesis

    Dev Biol

    (2005)
  • S.E. Belanger et al.

    Saltatory ontogeny of fishes and sensitive early life stages for ecotoxicology tests

    Aquat Toxicol

    (2010)
  • W.M.S. Russell et al.

    The principles of humane experimental techniques

    (1959)
  • EFSA

    Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to the aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (EFSA-Q-2004-105)

    EFSA J

    (2005)
  • P. Haffter et al.

    Large scale genetics in a small vertebrate, the zebrafish

    Int J Dev Biol

    (1996)
  • G.J. Lieschke et al.

    Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2007)
  • I. Skromne et al.

    Current perspectives in zebrafish reverse genetics: moving forward

    Dev Dynam

    (2008)
  • C. Nüsslein Volhard et al.

    Zebrafish: a practical approach

    (2002)
  • J.T. Shin et al.

    From zebrafish to human: modular medical models

    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet

    (2002)
  • L.I. Zon et al.

    In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2005)
  • T.E. North et al.

    Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis

    Nature

    (2007)
  • R.T. Peterson et al.

    Chemical suppression of a genetic mutation in a zebrafish model of aortic coarctation

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2004)
  • J. Rihel et al.

    Zebrafish behavioral profiling links drugs to biological targets and rest/wake regulation

    Science

    (2010)
  • S. Scholz et al.

    The zebrafish embryo model in environmental risk assessment – applications beyond acute toxicity testing

    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

    (2008)
  • Cited by (493)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text