Elsevier

Renewable Energy

Volume 129, Part A, December 2018, Pages 384-408
Renewable Energy

Review
Key issues in modeling and optimization of lignocellulosic biomass fermentative conversion to gaseous biofuels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Efficient production of biofuels requires the implementation of optimization procedures.

  • High hydrolysis ratio is crucial for efficient consumption of monosugars in fermentation.

  • Lignin is responsible for biomass recalcitrance and inhibitory compounds formation.

  • ADM1 is the most advanced and relatively universal model for biogas production.

  • Authors propose a classification of mathematical models for biofuels production.

Abstract

The industrial-scale production of lignocellulosic-based biofuels from biomass is expected to benefit society and the environment. The main pathways of residues processing include advanced hydrolysis and fermentation, pyrolysis, gasification, chemical synthesis and biological processes. The products of such treatment are second generation biofuels. The degree of fermentation of organic substances depends primarily on their composition and chemical structure. Optimization of fermentation conditions leads to better understanding of occurring processes. Therefore, an overview of recent developments in fermentation modeling is necessary to establish process parameters enabling high yields of biofuels production. Among process parameters affecting the yield and rate of biogas and biohydrogen, pH of the pulp, temperature, composition, biomass pre-treatment and digestion time are to be considered. The technology of anaerobic co-digestion has been intensively developed as a valuable solution for the disposal of organic wastes and sewage sludge. Modeling of biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass has been intensively investigated and is well described by adapted ADM1 model. Modeling of fermentative hydrogen production lacks a kinetic model incorporating process parameters with the view of pretreatment and fermentation. This paper presents the state-of-the-art on the problems related to lignocellulosic biomass pre-treatment and discusses the mechanisms of lignocellulosics conversion to gaseous biofuels.

Introduction

Large amounts of the biomass-originating energy come from processing of lignocellulosic biomass. Fuels generated from biomass include liquid and gaseous biofuels. Lignocellulosic materials consist of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and extractives. Cellulose and hemicellulose are a very good carbon source and may be potentially used in different biological processes after the pre-treatment step. This kind of biomass is typically inedible plant material, including crops of wood, grass, and agro-forest residues. Conversion of various types of biomass to useful products i.e. fuels has recently been an important topic both for scientific and industrial research.

The industrial-scale production of lignocellulosic-derived biofuels from plant biomass is expected to benefit society and the environment in numerous ways. The development of technologies for biomass processing focuses mainly on biorafination processes. Biogas and biohydrogen are the most important gaseous biofuels while the most popular liquid biofuels are bioethanol, biomethanol, biodiesel, bio-based methyl or ethyl tert-butyl ether and pure vegetable oil [1]. The main pathways of lignocellulosic biomass and residues processing are advanced hydrolysis and fermentation, pyrolysis, gasification, chemical synthesis and biological processes. The main products are second generation biofuels, as given in Fig. 1.

Biomass conversion through fermentation processes is crucial because it allows for production of various groups of substances under relatively mild conditions. The degree of fermentation of organic substances depends primarily on their composition and chemical structure. Only feedstocks not competing with the food request should be considered for biofuel production. Therefore, agricultural and forestry residues and wastes seem to be the most interesting sources of biomass, as their exploitation leads to energy recovery.

High hydrolysis ratio is needed for efficient utilization of monosugars present in lignocellulosic structures. From a biochemical point of view, organic substances present in the hydrolyzed solution can be divided into several groups of substances: simple and complex carbohydrates, proteins, lipids and heteropolymers. Different microorganisms are able to convert the cellulose and hemicellulose fraction of agricultural residues. Therefore, the potential of biogas and biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass may be enormous. The efficiency of fermentation leading to biofuels, related with the type of pretreatment is widely discussed. The major problems related to biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass lie basically in the conversion ratio of polymeric compounds into fermentable sugars such as hexoses and pentoses. This kind of processing must involve pretreatment steps such as physical, chemical and physicochemical pretreatment, biological or enzymatic treatment, fermentation and purification [2,3]. The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic materials requires pretreatment to facilitate enzymatic action [4]. During the hydrolysis inhibitors i.e. lignin derivatives affecting further conversion processes are formed. To maximize the fermentation of hexoses and pentoses and to minimize the presence of inhibitors during fermentation processes for cellulosic biofuels, application of microbial metabolism in the degradation and saccharification of the plant cell wall is considered [5].

Biohydrogen and biogas can be produced via anaerobic fermentation from hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass. Due to the presence of inhibitory compounds from lignin derivatives, an efficient method for lignin bioconversion without detoxification is not defined. Therefore, it is crucial to consider an influence of the presence of different by-products on the fermentation process. Optimization of fermentation may lead to better understanding of occurring processes. Anaerobic digestion is a multi-step process carried out by highly differentiated microorganisms. The process requires strictly anaerobic conditions enabling the transformation of organic matter into carbon dioxide and methane or biohydrogen. Different types of microbial populations have specific optimal working conditions and are inhibited by various process parameters such as pH, temperature, alkalinity, concentration of free ammonia, hydrogen, sodium ions, potassium ions, volatile fatty acids (VFA) or heavy metals. An overview of recent developments in fermentation modeling is necessary to define process parameters ensuring high yields of biofuels production.

Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass towards biogas production has been well described. The substrate characterization is ultimately the most influential model input on methane yield prediction. The development of methods for feedstock characterization and accurate calculations of kinetic factors to provide the required model inputs are still the supreme challenges. Lignocellulosic biomass may also be used for biogas production, either exclusively or mixed with other organic materials so as to obtain a feedstock with a convenient relation of carbon to nitrogen. Among different process parameters affecting the yield and rate of biogas generation, the pH of the pulp, temperature, substrate composition, biomass pre-treatment method and digestion time seem to be the most important. A kinetic model incorporating important parameters affecting fermentative hydrogen production is required. Modeldescribing a bioprocess should be a sum of biological, chemical and physical processes occurring in the bioreactor. Modeling of hydrogen production from complex organic substrates by dark fermentation requires the knowledge of other bioprocesses i.e. hydrolysis or acidogenesis. However, modeling of conversion towards biohydrogen is still developed.

It is assumed the future energy economy will be based on renewable sources. Biomass-based fermentative technology utilizing microorganisms capable of conversion of waste to valuable acids and alcohols with liberation of biogas or biohydrogen is tested for different types of biomass and process parameters. The possibility of predicting the fermentation process leading to biofuel production may allow saving time and increasing the efficiency of resources utilization, scaling up and the design of the system including appropriate operational factors. Possible problems occurring during biomass conversion stage are pointed in Fig. 2. Probable solutions and conclusions for the purposes of this review have been mentioned.

The industrial application of a given solution for the production of gaseous biofuels requires a comprehensive analysis of its costs. To select the optimal production method, biogas or bio-hydrogen yield and energy requirements, ease of production as well as different production costs including capital costs, operating costs, variable and fixed expenses, and replacement costs should be taken into account [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. Nevertheless, the commercialization of the proposed solution depends on a large extent on the prices of fossil fuels as well as legal rules and policy on biofuels established in a given country [8,9].

In the field of biogas production, technologies are currently successfully implemented. There are many installations producing biogas by anaerobic digestion and the improvement can be done on the basis of experience of existing plants [[10], [11], [12]]. The working installations for anaerobic digestion are usually integrated with heat or energy generation that can be used on-site and surplus can be an additional benefit to the total cost analysis [10,13]. Recently the new inexpensive solutions have been proposed to utilize local waste and integrate waste management with the energy generation [14,15]. Research is also carried out to optimize the key steps of anaerobic digestion process to improve both economic and environmental performance of AD plants [12].

In the case of biohydrogen production from lignocellulose biomass, high cost and low hydrogen yields as well as relatively low operating fermentation broth concentration are still major bottlenecks in the development of its production [7,16]. Even improving above mentioned parameters, it is projected that the cost of bio-hydrogen obtained via dark fermentation will still be too high to be economically viable. Therefore, integrated technologies for bio-hydrogen production are proposed, taking into account the use of added-value products and co-generation of energy [7,8] or combining solid state fermentation and dark fermentation for hydrogen production [17,18]. Because bio-hydrogen technologies are still at a laboratory scale, further and intense research is required to explore the potential, feasibility, and extent of the possible improvements [7].

This review is focused on the description of the key challenges in modeling and optimization of lignocellulosic biomass conversion processes. The main objective is to develop a framework and methodology presenting a holistic influence of a particular stage of the bioconversion process on the overall system performance and efficiency.

Section snippets

Characteristics of lignocellulosic materials

Biofuels are obtained from different types of biomass including plant-derived materials like wood, food crops, grassy and woody plants as well as residues from agriculture and forestry, oil-rich algae and organic components of municipal and industrial wastes [19]. An interesting group of substrates for production of second-generation biofuels is lignocellulosic biomass. The interest is mainly due to the vast abundance of the renewable lignocellulosic substrates, being a non-food feedstock,

Dark fermentation to biogas

Biogas is a biofuel composed mainly of methane (50 ÷ 75%), carbon dioxide (up to 40%) and other minor constituents such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen and nitrogen [1]. The biggest potential for clean energy production in combination with various biodegradable wastes is biogas production through anaerobic digestion (AD) process. The role of AD in the treatment of organic materials differing in the C/N ratio, i.e. agricultural wastes, wastewater sludges, municipall solid wastes or mixed

Pretreatment method selection

Pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass includes physical, chemical, physicochemical and biological methods. Size reduction of biomass by means of fragmentation, grinding, milling or rolling is realized during physical pre-treatment. Decomposition of lignocellulose to simple compounds via various chemical reactions (hydrolysis, oxidation, ozonolysis, and application of solvents) is realized during chemical pre-treatment. Physicochemical methods aim at the decomposition of lignocelluloses by

Recent developments in modeling of fermenation processes

The use of mathematical models can help to explore the phenomena occurring during various processes. The production of biogas and biohydrogen form biomass is realized via biochemical processes accomplished by the combined action of microorganisms, which metabolize the organic substrates into a mixture of both gaseous and liquid compounds. Such processes of microbiological fermentation are complex and require further research to be fully understood. Additionally, the efficiency of fermentation

Concluding remarks

Advanced hydrolysis and fermentation are proposed for processing of lignocellulosic biomass to produce gaseous biofuels like biogas and biohydrogen. Anaerobic digestion leading to biogas formation is a widely used technology utilizing waste biomass such as sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Dark fermentation is applied to biohydrogen production in a laboratory scale, usually from simple sugars. Both processes are still developed to be applied for processing of complex

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Acknowledgements

Funding: This work was carried out within the framework of the project “Studies of alkaline hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and conversion conditions of hydrolyzed products to biogas”, supported financially by the National Science Center through the grant UMO-2014/13/B/ST8/04258.

References (229)

  • R. Oztekin et al.

    Optimization of media composition for hydrogen gas production from hydrolyzed wheat starch by dark fermentation

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2008)
  • X. Chen et al.

    H2O splitting in tubular PACT (plasma and catalyst integrated technologies) reactors

    J. Catal.

    (2001)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2002)
  • C. Ververis et al.

    Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2007)
  • J. Dai et al.

    Influence of organic loading rate and solid retention time on polyhydroxybutyrate production from hybrid poplar hydrolysates using mixed microbial cultures

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • K. Karimi et al.

    Ethanol production from dilute-acid pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with Mucor indicus, Rhizopus oryzae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (2006)
  • K. Karimi et al.

    A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • R.C. Kuhad et al.

    Bioethanol production from Lantana camara (red sage): pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • Y. Zheng et al.

    Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C. Mao et al.

    Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • G. Tian et al.

    Metabolic pathway analysis based on high-throughput sequencing in a batch biogas production process

    Energy

    (2017)
  • S.S. Veeravalli et al.

    Optimizing hydrogen production from a switchgrass steam exploded liquor using a mixed anaerobic culture in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2014)
  • K. Koch et al.

    Biogas from grass silage - measurements and modeling with ADM1

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • K. Uyeda et al.

    Pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase. IV. Studies on the reaction mechanism

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1971)
  • B.B. Buchanan

    6 ferredoxin-linked carboxylation reactions

    Enzymes

    (1972)
  • B.O. Solomon et al.

    Comparison of the energetic efficiencies of hydrogen and oxychemicals formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Clostridium butyricum during anaerobic growth on glycerol

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1995)
  • L. Thomas et al.

    Xylanase and cellulase systems of Clostridium sp.: an insight on molecular approaches for strain improvement

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • A.T.W.M.T.W.M. Hendriks et al.

    Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • H. Li et al.

    Microwave irradiation – a green and efficient way to pretreat biomass

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • N. Azbar et al.

    Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from cheese whey wastewater under thermophilic anaerobic conditions

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2009)
  • F. Talebnia et al.

    Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • S.C. Rabelo et al.

    Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2011)
  • A.A. Elgharbawy et al.

    Ionic liquid pretreatment as emerging approaches for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • V.B. Agbor et al.

    Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward application

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2011)
  • T.F. Carneiro et al.

    Chapter 17 – biomass pretreatment with carbon dioxide

  • N. Beukes et al.

    Effect of alkaline pre-treatment on enzyme synergy for efficient hemicellulose hydrolysis in sugarcane bagasse

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • A.K. Kumar et al.

    Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review

    Bioresour. Bioprocess

    (2017)
  • K. Karimi et al.

    A critical review on analysis in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: degree of polymerization, adsorption/desorption, and accessibility

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • C. Akobi et al.

    The impact of furfural concentrations and substrate-to-biomass ratios on biological hydrogen production from synthetic lignocellulosic hydrolysate using mesophilic anaerobic digester sludge Furfural:sugars exerted a greater effect on H 2 inhibition than f

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • E. Palmqvist et al.

    Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2000)
  • D.B. Levin et al.

    Hydrogen production by Clostridium thermocellum 27405 from cellulosic biomass substrates

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2006)
  • D. Evvyernie et al.

    Identification and characterization of Clostridium paraputrificum M-21, a chitinolytic, mesophilic and hydrogen-producing bacterium

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2000)
  • S. Tanisho et al.

    Continuous hydrogen production from molasses by the bacterium Enterobacter aerogenes

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (1994)
  • H. Yokoi et al.

    Microbial hydrogen production from sweet potato starch residue

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2001)
  • E.W.J. Van Niel et al.

    Distinctive properties of high hydrogen producing extreme thermophiles, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga elfii

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2002)
  • T. Klimiuk et al.

    Biofuels. Technologies for Sustainable Development

    (2012)
  • J. X et al.

    Microwave irradiation–A green and efficient way to pretreat biomass

    Biresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • C.M. Zhang et al.

    Effective ethanol production by reutilizing waste distillage anaerobic digestion effluent in an integrated fermentation process coupled with both ethanol and methane fermentations

    Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng.

    (2010)
  • M. Sharma et al.

    Biohydrogen production: sustainability of current technology and future perspective

  • K. Randolph et al.

    DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Hydrogen Production Cost from Fermentation

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text