Psychometric evaluation of the Timeline Followback for Exercise among college students

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Two separate studies assessed the psychometric properties of a retrospective behavioral measure adapted for exercise called the Timeline Followback for Exercise (TLFB-E). Study one examined criterion, convergent, and predictive validity. Study two examined test–retest reliability.

Design

Validity data was collected at three time points (baseline, 2 months, and 6 months) as part of a randomized clinical trial on exercise engagement. Test-retest reliability was assessed via two participant interviews scheduled one month apart.

Methods

Study one participants (N = 66) were college students 20.0 ± 1.4 yr. Validity of frequency, intensity, time, and type (FITT) of exercise as assessed on the TLFB-E was examined using Pearson r correlations with accelerometers, weekly exercise contracts between participants and researchers, question four of the College Alumni Questionnaire, and a health-related physical fitness battery. Study two participants were a different sample (N = 40) of college students 18.63 ± 1.0 yr. Pearson r correlations determined reliability of the TLFB-E for exercise frequency, intensity, and time. Kappa statistic determined reliability of the TLFB-E for type of exercise.

Results

The TLFB-E displayed evidence of criterion validity when compared to accelerometers (r = .35 to .39) and evidence of convergent validity when compared to weekly exercise contracts (r = .65 to .80) and question four of the College Alumni Questionnaire (r = .06 to .75). The TLFB-E displayed evidence of modest to adequate test-retest reliability (r = .79 to .97) for exercise frequency, intensity, and time and moderate Kappa (k = .49) for exercise type.

Conclusions

The TLFB-E produces evidence of reliable and valid scores among college students and improves upon other self-report, retrospective questionnaires by enabling daily collection of exercise FITT over a specified time period.

Highlights

► We examine psychometric properties of an exercise behavioral measure. ► Validity is shown through correlations with other measures of physical activity. ► Reliability is shown using a test–retest method. ► The exercise behavioral measure may improve upon current physical activity measures.

Section snippets

Method

Data for this study were derived from the National Institute of Health funded project entitled, Motivational Interventions for Exercise in Hazardous Drinking College Students (R21-AA017717). The study investigated the utility of exercise as an intervention for sedentary hazardous drinking college students.

Participants

Participants (N = 66, n = 37 women, n = 29 men) were English speaking, currently enrolled in college, 20.0 ± 1.4 yr, and normal weight [body mass index = 24.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2]. Participant

Participant characteristics

The overall sample was 20.0 ± 1.4 yr, normal weight, and had optimal BP. All physical fitness tests showed evidence of poor to below average physical fitness for individuals of their age except the push-up test in which participants scored good to very good (See Table 1; Thompson et al., 2009). Men had significantly higher systolic BP (p < .001), BMI (p = .004), and WC (p < .001), and scored significantly higher on the push-up (p = .029), and handgrip (p < .001) fitness tests than women. Men

Participants

A separate sample of participants was recruited from an undergraduate subject pool at the same state university and students received class research credit for completing the reliability study. Prior to participation, all participants signed an informed consent approved by the university Institutional Review Board. Participants (N = 40, n = 28 women, n = 12 men) were English speaking college students 18.6 ± 1.0 yr. Participant breakdown by ethnic category was 72.5% Caucasian, 20.0% Asian, 2.5%

Test–retest reliability, hypotheses five & six

At interview one, participants recorded an average of 22.0 total bouts (SD = 12.1, range = 6.0–50.0), 1379.9 min (SD = 1425.3, range = 140.0–8940.0) of exercise, RPE of 13.7 (SD = 1.9, range = 10.3–18.3), and expended an average of 1211.0 Kcal (SD = 1722.8, range = 192.9–11268.7). At the retest interview, participants recorded an average of 20.0 total bouts (SD = 12.4, range = 4.0–50.0), 1308.6 min (SD = 1445.8, range = 80.0–8880.0), RPE of 13.6 (SD = 1.8, range = 10.2–18.1), and expended an

Discussion

The primary purpose of this study was to test validity (study one) and reliability (study two) of the TLFB-E. We sought to test validity by correlating the FITT components of exercise collected on the TLFB-E with the FITT components of exercise collected using objective and subjective measures of exercise. We sought to test reliability by using a test–retest method between two interviews separated by one month. Results suggest that the TLFB-E produces valid test scores when assessing

References (57)

  • G. Borg

    Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales

    (1998)
  • R.A. Brown et al.

    Reliability and validity of a smoking timeline follow-back interview

    Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

    (1998)
  • Center for Disease Control

    Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2010 national health interview survey

    (2010)
  • P.K. Chung et al.

    Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests in university men in Hong Kong

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (1999)
  • C.L. Craig et al.

    International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

    (2003)
  • M.L. Dennis et al.

    Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) and Timeline Followback (TLFB; Form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment

    Addiction

    (2004)
  • M.K. Dinger et al.

    Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in college students

    American Journal of Health Education

    (2006)
  • R.K. Dishman et al.

    Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-d recall of physical activity in college students

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

    (1988)
  • D.M. Donovan et al.

    Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials

    Addiction

    (2012)
  • R.N. Ehrman et al.

    Reliability and validity of 6-month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1994)
  • W. Fals-Stewart et al.

    The timeline followback spousal violence interview to assess physical aggression between intimate partners: reliability and validity

    Journal of Family Violence

    (2003)
  • K.M. Flegal

    Agreement between two dietary methods in the measurement of alcohol consumption

    Journal of Addiction

    (1990)
  • J.L. Fleiss

    Statistical methods for rates and proportions

    (1981)
  • C.E. Garber et al.

    Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

    (2011)
  • M. Hagstromer et al.

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity

    Public Health Nutrition

    (2006)
  • G.F. Hamilton et al.

    Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer

    The Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy

    (1992)
  • W.L. Haskell et al.

    Physical activity and public health. Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

    (2007)
  • Health and Human Services

    Introducing the 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans

    (2008)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Changes in coping, autonomous motivation, and beliefs about exercise among women in early recovery from alcohol participating in a lifestyle physical activity intervention

      2017, Mental Health and Physical Activity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Physical Activity Duration and Using Physical Activity to Cope. For the purposes of this study, we utilized the Timeline Followback for Exercise (TLFB; Panza, Weinstock, Ash, & Pescatello, 2012) as a self-reported measure of participants' physical activity. This procedure asks participants to indicate the days, of the previous 90, that they engaged in physical activity lasting 10 min or more in duration.

    • Developing a Fitbit-supported lifestyle physical activity intervention for depressed alcohol dependent women

      2017, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Physical activity was measured in several ways: step counts, minutes of physical activity, and episodes of using physical activity to cope. We measured self-reported physical activity using the Timeline Followback for Exercise (Panza, Weinstock, Ash, & Pescatello, 2012). The psychometric properties of the TLFB-E include: criterion validity (r = 0.35 to r = 0.39), convergent validity (r = 0.65 to r = 0.80), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.79 to r = 0.97).

    • A preliminary, randomized trial of aerobic exercise for alcohol dependence

      2014, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, the lack of objective measure of exercise behavior between sessions is an important limitation. In addition, the reliability and validity of the TLFB for assessing levels of daily exercise over extended periods of time, as utilized in this study, has only recently been examined (Panza et al., 2012). Future studies should consider supplementing TLFB assessments using objective monitoring devices, such as pedometers or accelerometers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text