Elsevier

Practical Radiation Oncology

Volume 7, Issue 3, May–June 2017, Pages 173-182
Practical Radiation Oncology

Basic Original Report
Assessment of hepatic function decline after stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.10.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to determine how the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score compares with the Child-Pugh (CP) score for assessing liver function following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods and materials

In total, 60 patients, 40 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 20 with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), were treated with SBRT. Liver function panels were obtained before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after SBRT. Laboratory values were censored after locoregional recurrence, further liver-directed therapies, or liver transplant.

Results

A significant decline in hepatic function occurred after SBRT for HCC patients only (P = .001 by ALBI score; P < .0001 by CP score). By converting radiation doses to biologically equivalent doses by using a standard linear quadratic model using α/β of 10, the strongest dosimetric predictor of liver function decline for HCC was the volume of normal liver irradiated by a dose of 40 Gy when assessing liver function by the ALBI score (P = .07), and the volume of normal liver irradiated by a dose of 20 Gy by using the CP score (P= .0009). For CCA patients, the volume of normal liver irradiated by a dose of 40 Gy remained the strongest dosimetric predictor when using the ALBI score (P = .002), but no dosimetric predictor was significant using the CP score. Hepatic function decline correlated with worse overall survival for HCC (by ALBI, P = .0005; by CP, P < .0001) and for CCA (by ALBI, P = NS; by CP, P = .008).

Conclusions

ALBI score was similarly able to predict hepatic function decline compared with CP score, and both systems correlated with survival.

Introduction

Over the past decade, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an option for the treatment of primary liver cancer (PLC), especially for those tumors whose location, size, or distance from major vessels preclude the use of other local modalities.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] The applicability of SBRT is not limited by these characteristics, and it may even be combined with other local therapies.[17], [18], [19]

Despite these advantages, the use of SBRT for treatment of PLC is still limited by the concern of liver tolerance to radiation. The association of PLC with underlying cirrhosis leads to compromised hepatic function at diagnosis,[20], [21], [22] which, added to the intrinsic liver radiosensitivity, likely increases the risk of radiation injury.[23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]

The Child-Pugh (CP) score is one of the most widely used scoring systems to grade liver function29 and stratify patients for a number of different therapies and treatment algorithms, including SBRT.[30], [31], [32] CP class has been shown to correlate with survival and toxicity in patients treated with SBRT.[2], [3], [4] As a result, current guidelines and prospective trials limit the use of SBRT to patients with Child class A cirrhosis[33], [34], [35]; however, the CP scoring system has a number of limitations, the most notable being the inclusion of subjective clinical criteria that requires an evaluation of the presence of ascites and encephalopathy with no consensus on how to distinguish the severity of these measures. CP score shows also a relative lack of granularity for assessing liver function because most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are CP A at diagnosis.36 With these limitations in mind, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was developed as a novel and simple tool for assessing liver function that uses only the criteria of serum albumin and total bilirubin, eliminating the need for subjective clinical variables.[36], [37]

The purpose of this study was to compare the ALBI and CP grading systems in predicting prognosis and toxicity in patients treated for PLC with SBRT and to determine factors associated with liver function decline following therapy.

Section snippets

Data collection and study population

In this study, the records of patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic HCC or cholangiocarcinoma treated with SBRT at our center between July 2004 and November 2015 were reviewed after being approved by the institutional review board. Patients were excluded if they had a history of chemotherapy within 3 months from the date of SBRT, liver radiation within 1 year from SBRT, or if follow-up was unavailable or inadequately documented.

SBRT treatments

Treatment simulation was performed by a 4-dimensional computed

Patient characteristics

Of a total of 72 patients who met inclusion criteria, 12 were excluded from analysis because of incomplete follow-up records. Demographic and treatment-related characteristics are shown in Table 1. Baseline hepatic function assessed by CP score showed similar class distributions between cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and HCC. However, by ALBI score, more CCA patients were located in the poorer ALBI grade (A3) compared with HCC patients. SBRT treatment characteristics were comparable between the 2

Discussion

Although CP score is commonly used to determine liver function for a variety of liver-directed therapies including SBRT, its more complicated inclusion criteria leads to the potential for significant bias and variability. The ALBI grading system was developed to provide a simpler alternative to CP score and was validated in a large international cohort.36 In this study, we sought to determine how liver function declines after liver SBRT and to compare the ALBI scoring system with the CP scoring

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that SBRT for PLC leads to a measurable decline in liver function, primarily in patients with HCC, and that this effect can be similarly assessed by CP or by ALBI score. Decline in hepatic function correlated with OS and HB toxicity using either system. Future studies on SBRT for PLC should consider including ALBI score to further compare its clinical utility with CP score.

References (42)

  • LA Dawson et al.

    Analysis of radiation-induced liver disease using the Lyman NTCP model

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2002)
  • CC Pan et al.

    Radiation-associated liver injury

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2010)
  • SH Son et al.

    Stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma: Dose-volumetric parameters predicting the hepatic complication

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2010)
  • C Verslype et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    Ann Oncol

    (2012)
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver et al.

    EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Hepatol

    (2012)
  • D Schuppan et al.

    Liver cirrhosis

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • A Mendez-Romero et al.

    Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors: A single institution phase I-II study

    Acta Oncol

    (2006)
  • HR Cardenes et al.

    Phase I feasibility trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clin Transl Oncol

    (2010)
  • BO Choi et al.

    Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma

    Jpn J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • K Goyal et al.

    Cyberknife stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonresectable tumors of the liver: Preliminary results

    HPB Surg

    (2010)
  • YS Seo et al.

    Preliminary result of stereotactic body radiotherapy as a local salvage treatment for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Surg Oncol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supplementary material for this article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.10.003) can be found at www.practicalradonc.org.

    Conflicts of interest: None.

    View full text