Original Article
Role of topoisomerase I and thymidylate synthase expression in sporadic colorectal cancer: Associations with clinicopathological and molecular features

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2013.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Topoisomerase I (Topo I) and thymidylate synthase (TS) are essential enzymes for the replication, transcription and repair of DNA, and are potential biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study was to correlate the tissue expression of Topo I and TS in sporadic CRCs with relevant pathological and molecular features and patients’ outcome.

Topo I and TS expression was assessed by immunostaining in 112 consecutive primary CRCs. Increased expression of Topo I was found in 36% of tumors, preferentially rectal (50%) and with not otherwise specified (NOS) histology (44%). Topo I expression was associated with 18q allelic loss (LOH), (p = 0.013), microsatellite stable phenotype (p = 0.002) and normal expression of mismatch proteins hMLH1 and hMSH2 (p = 0.0012 and p = 0.02, respectively). High TS expression was found in 60% of tumors, more frequently in distal sites (62%) and with NOS histology (66%); no association with microsatellite instability was observed.

Topo I seems to be involved in the chromosomal instability pathway of sporadic CRCs. Conversely, high TS expression is unlikely to affect the clinical behavior of microsatellite unstable CRCs.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women worldwide. According to WHO, there were 1.2 million new diagnoses of CRC in 2008, and more than 608,000 deaths [1], [2]. CRC development follows two major pathways of genetic instability: chromosomal instability (CIN), observed in 85% of sporadic CRCs, and microsatellite instability (MSI), accounting for approximately 15% of cases [3]. CIN-related CRCs are characterized by gross chromosomal rearrangements, aneuploidy, defects in checkpoints for G1/S entry, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in particular at chromosomal arm 18q [3], [4], [5]. Conversely, MSI-related CRCs have diploid or nearly diploid karyotypes and show defects of the DNA mismatch repair system (MMR) genes [3]. CRCs referred to CIN or MSI pathway display relevant clinic-pathological differences as to tumor site, histology and response to adjuvant therapy [6]. Several studies have also demonstrated that the molecular phenotype may affect CRC outcome [7], [8], [9], [10]. In particular, CRCs with MSI have been associated with improved survival [11], whereas 18qLOH is a molecular marker of adverse prognosis [7], [8], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21].

Several biological markers have been investigated for a prognostic role in CRC [22], among which are topoisomerase I (Topo I) and thymidylate synthase (TS), whose expression levels correlate with survival although this evidence is controversial among different studies [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].

Topo I is an essential enzyme in regulating the topology of supercoiled DNA by transiently cleaving of one of the two strands [29]. Antineoplastic drugs targeting Topo I, such as irinotecan and camptothecins, form stable Topo I-DNA cleavage complexes and inhibit Topo I activity, thus preventing DNA religation [30], [31]. Topo I is expressed in primary CRCs and metastases, but it is debated whether its expression can predict the response to anti-Topo I treatments [32], [33], [34], [35].

TS catalyzes the conversion of dUMP to dTMP and is essential for ‘de novo’ DNA synthesis [36], [37]. The expression of TS may affect tumor sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [38]. 5-FU-based treatment is the standard of care for adjuvant therapy of CRC in combination with oxaliplatin [39] and for the treatment of metastatic disease in association with oxaliplatin or irinotecan [40], [41], [42], [43].

The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of Topo I and TS in tumor tissue by immunostaining and to correlate it with pathological and clinical variables, patients’ outcomes and molecular characteristics, such as MSI status, LOH at different loci and other markers implicated in CRC carcinogenesis.

Section snippets

Patients

The study is a retrospective evaluation of 112 unselected, consecutive, primary CRCs that underwent curative resection between January 1997 and April 1999 at our institution (Table 1). There were 58 males (age range 27–94 yr, mean 69) and 54 females (age range 45–91 yr, mean 69). Tumors were located in the proximal colon in 42 patients (37%), in the distal colon in 50 patients (45%), in the rectum in 20 patients (18%), and they were predominantly poorly differentiated (G3) adenocarcinomas (62%)

Topo I and TS staining according to clinical and pathological variables

High expression of Topo I was found in 34 (36%) of 94 CRC cases. The remaining 18 cases were considered inadequate due to poor immunostaining likely caused by defect in fixation that impaired the interpretation of the results.

No statistically significant differences in Topo I staining were found according to the clinicopathological variables analyzed (Table 2). However, increased Topo I expression occurred more frequently in tumors with rectal location (50%), AJCC stage I and III (45% and 41%,

Discussion

We analyzed the tissue expression of Topo I and TS in a well-characterized series of primary CRCs and investigated their correlation with standard clinicopathological variables, MSI status and other molecular markers implicated in colorectal carcinogenetic process.

Topo I plays a pivotal role in key cellular processes, and it is the target of antineoplastic drugs used in clinical practice [29], [56]. It has been suggested that higher levels of Topo I expression may predict the response to

References (71)

  • E. Odin et al.

    Colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability display increased thymidylate synthase gene expression levels

    Clin. Colorectal Cancer

    (2007)
  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2010)
  • C. Lengauer et al.

    Genetic instability in colorectal cancers

    Nature

    (1997)
  • B. Vogelstein et al.

    Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1988)
  • C.C. Pritchard et al.

    Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice

    Gut

    (2011)
  • T. Watanabe et al.

    Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2001)
  • C.B. Diep et al.

    Genetic tumor markers with prognostic impact in Dukes’ stages B and C colorectal cancer patients

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2003)
  • C.M. Ribic et al.

    Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2003)
  • A. de la Chapelle et al.

    Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2010)
  • S. Popat et al.

    Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2005)
  • J. Jen et al.

    Allelic loss of chromosome 18q and prognosis in colorectal cancer

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1994)
  • O.A. Ogunbiyi et al.

    Confirmation that chromosome 18q allelic loss in colon cancer is a prognostic indicator

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1998)
  • P. Jernvall et al.

    Loss of heterozygosity at 18q21 is indicative of recurrence and therefore poor prognosis in a subset of colorectal cancers

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1999)
  • G. Lanza et al.

    Chromosome 18q allelic loss and prognosis in stage II and III colon cancer

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1998)
  • S.W. Choi et al.

    Genetic classification of colorectal cancer based on chromosomal loss and microsatellite instability predicts survival

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2002)
  • H. Alazzouzi et al.

    SMAD4 as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2005)
  • S.E. Kern et al.

    Clinical and pathological associations with allelic loss in colorectal carcinoma

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • A. Font et al.

    Prognostic value of K-ras mutations and allelic imbalance on chromosome 18q in patients with resected colorectal cancer

    Dis. Colon Rectum

    (2001)
  • L. Sarli et al.

    Association between recurrence of sporadic colorectal cancer, high level of microsatellite instability, and loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18q

    Dis. Colon Rectum

    (2004)
  • A. Walther et al.

    Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2009)
  • M.P. Costi et al.

    Thymidylate synthase structure, function and implication in drug discovery

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2005)
  • D. Edler et al.

    Thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer: a prognostic and predictive marker of benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2002)
  • J.R. Bertino et al.

    Is the measurement of thymidylate synthase to determine suitability for treatment with 5-fluoropyrimidines ready for prime time

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2003)
  • T. Inoue et al.

    Expression level of thymidylate synthase is a good predictor of chemosensitivity to5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer

    J. Gastroenterol.

    (2005)
  • S.A. Jensen et al.

    The prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase and ihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal cancer of 303 patients adjuvantly treated with 5-fluorouracil

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2007)
  • Cited by (8)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text