Elsevier

Process Biochemistry

Volume 48, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages 1107-1110
Process Biochemistry

Short communication
Rapid harvesting of freshwater microalgae using chitosan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Chitosan is used as flocculant to harvest freshwater microalgae.

  • The effect of pH, chitosan concentration and settling time on harvesting efficiency is tested.

  • Harvesting efficiency of 99% is achieved at pH 6.0, 120 mg/L chitosan, after only 3 min operation.

  • Harvesting occurred due to charge neutralization.

  • Flocculation is verified by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs and by zeta-potential measurement.

Abstract

In this study, chitosan was used as a flocculant to harvest freshwater microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. The recovery efficiency of C. vulgaris was tested at various chitosan concentrations. 120 mg/L of chitosan showed the highest efficiency (92 ± 0.4%) within 3 min. The maximum concentration factor of 10 was also achieved at this dose of chitosan. The harvesting efficiency was pH dependent. pH 6.0 showed the highest harvesting efficiency (99 ± 0.5%). Measurement of zeta-potential confirmed that the flocculation was induced by charge neutralization. This study showed that a biopolymer, chitosan, can be a promising flocculant due to its high efficacy, low dose requirements, and short settling time.

Introduction

Microalgae biomass has been considered as an alternative source of biofuels since long [1], [2], [3]. Due to dilute nature of microalgae culture, harvesting, i.e. biomass recovery from growth medium, is one necessary step, which accounts 20–30% of total biomass production cost [4]. Cost-effective harvesting is challenging due to small size of microalgae cells (3–30 μm in diameter).

Several techniques are available for microalgae harvesting, such as centrifugation, sonication, filtration, air floatation, coagulation, and flocculation. Among these, flocculation is the most striking option, as it is simple and relatively cheap [5], [6]. Flocculants such as aluminum and ferric salts can form flocs with microbial cells including microalgae. Despite high efficiency of such chemicals, their abundant use can contaminate microalgae biomass, which exhibit adverse effects on its subsequent uses such as feed for human and animals [5]. Natural polymers such as chitosan can be a promising alternative to address these challenges [7], [8]. Chitosan is a linear poly-amino-saccharide, which is produced by alkaline deacetylation of chitin [9]. It is insoluble in water and soluble in acids. Generally, chitosan has a viscosity of 20–300 centipoises, molecular weight of (5–19) × 104, density of 0.15–0.3 g/cm3 (in 1% acid solution), and deacetylation degree of 75–85% [10]. Chitosan has distinct advantages over commonly used flocculants for microalgae harvesting [7]. It is cheap, has high flocculation ability, and require low dose for harvesting [10], [11]. It costs only 2 $US/kg. One kilogram of chitosan can effectively treat 500,0000 L of microalgae culture [12]. Moreover, it is biodegradable and has no toxic effects on some downstream applications such as feed for fish and animals.

Several factors such as flocculant type, flocculant dose, settling time, and culture pH affect the harvesting efficiency of microalgae [13]. pH also plays a vital role in flocculation process [3]. pH affects the flocculant interaction with microalgae, and thus, alters the harvesting efficiency [4].

In this experiment, we have explored the potential of chitosan as a flocculant for microalgae harvesting. The effects of flocculant dose, zeta-potential and pH, on harvesting efficiency are also demonstrated.

Section snippets

Strain and growth conditions

Chlorella vulgaris AG30007 UTEX 0000265 was obtained from the University of Texas at Austin, USA. C. vulgaris was cultivated photo-autotrophically in 250 mL sterilized cell culture flasks in a shaking incubator, at 140 rpm, 25 ± 2 °C, and under the illumination of white (Light Emitting diodes (LEDs)). BG-11 medium was used as a growth medium [14].

The medium pH was adjusted by adding either 1 M H2SO4 or 1 M NaOH. Cell suspension was stirred for 10 min at 100 rpm on an orbital shaker. The mass cultivation

Effect of chitosan dose

The effect of chitosan dose on harvesting efficiency of C. vulgaris was investigated. Various concentrations (30, 60, 90 and 120 mg/L) of chitosan were tested. The corresponding percentage ratios of chitosan dosages to microalgae biomass were 3%, 6%, 9% and 12%. A control experiment (without chitosan) was also performed as a reference. A dramatic decrease in optical density was found just after 3 min settling time. The optical density decreased with increase in chitosan dose. We have presented

Discussion

Flocculation is a widely used process for microalgae harvesting. Flocculation is induced by inorganic or polymeric flocculants. Despite versatile applications of such flocculants, there are some limitations with their use. Inorganic flocculants (e.g. alum and ferric chloride) are toxic and produce large amount of sludge, while polymeric flocculants are expensive to use. Biopolymers, on the other hand are cheap, efficient, and environmentally friendly [22]. Chitosan is one promising choice due

Conclusions

Chitosan holds tremendous potential for high biomass recovery from microalgae culture. Low dose requirement and short settling time are the distinct advantages of chitosan over commonly used flocculants. Microalgal culture can be concentrated up to 10 times at optimal pH (6.0) and flocculant dose (120 mg/L chitosan). Further studies should be carried out to explore the possible ways to reduce the chitosan dose for cost-effective microalgae harvesting.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (NRF-2012M1A2A2026587).

References (33)

Cited by (122)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text