Elsevier

Precambrian Research

Volume 252, October 2014, Pages 180-190
Precambrian Research

Magmatic and metamorphic history of Paleoarchean tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) suite from the Singhbhum craton, eastern India

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.07.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Polycyclic evolution of Paleoarchean felsic crust in Singhbhum craton, India.

  • Tonalite–trondhjemite–granites emplaced in two pulses at 3.44 Ga and 3.33 Ga.

  • Amphibolite-facies metamorphism at 3.3 Ga, four low-grade events between 3.2 and 1.1 Ga.

  • Magmatism synchronous with 3.3 Ga metamorphism of older supracrustal sequence.

  • Major crust formation occurred in a narrow time interval between 3.46 and 3.32 Ma.

Abstract

Texturally controlled dating of zircon from Paleoarchean tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorites of the Older Metamorphic Tonalitic Gneisses and the Singhbhum Granite batholith (Phases I, II, and III) from the Singhbhum craton in eastern India reveals a polycyclic evolution of the Archean crust. The granitoid suites were emplaced in two pulses at 3.45–3.44 Ga and 3.35–3.32 Ga. Tonalites and trondhjemites of the Older Metamorphic Tonalitic Gneisses were emplaced at ca. 3.45–3.44 Ga together with Phase III of the Singhbhum Granite pluton while granites belonging to the Older Metamorphic Tonalitic Gneisses were emplaced at ca. 3.35–3.32 together with Phase I and Phase II of the Singhbhum Granite pluton. Both crustal units underwent an early phase of relatively high-grade metamorphism at 3.30–3.28 Ga followed by extensive fluid-induced alteration during low-grade metamorphism at 3.19–3.12 Ga, and 3.02–2.96 Ga. The two units have also been marginally affected at ca. 2.52 Ga and 1.06 Ga by major metamorphic events in the North Singhbhum Mobile Belt and the Singhbhum shear zone at the northern margin of the craton. The zircon grains in granites have inherited cores with ages of ca. 3.61 Ga and 3.46–3.41 Ga and with well-developed oscillatory growth zonation which suggests the granitic magmas were derived by partial melting of an igneous precursor or sedimentary rocks derived from an igneous source. The emplacement of the expansive granitoids belonging to the Older Metamorphic Tonalitic Gneisses and the Singhbhum Granite was synchronous with the amphibolite-facies metamorphism (ca. 3.32 Ga) of older meta-igneous and metasedimentary rocks belonging to the Older Metamorphic Group. Major felsic crust formation in the craton occurred in a narrow time interval between 3.46 and 3.32 Ma with minor contributions of material as old as 3.6 Ga. The complex polycyclic evolution of the Paleoarchean crust in the Singhbhum craton can account for the wide range of often disparate ages obtained using whole rock isochron dating techniques with some of the isochron dates being geologically meaningful while others representing mixing lines or disturbance of the isotopic systems during metamorphism.

Introduction

Archean tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) associations and granitoids represent the oldest archetypical juvenile felsic components of cratons and mark the transition from a dominantly mafic to a more felsic crust (Glikson, 1979, Smithies, 2000, Martin et al., 2005, Moyen and Martin, 2012). The growth, evolution, and stabilization of this silicic crust are thought to have occurred in short-lived episodes involving magmatic accretion, tectonic thickening and high-grade metamorphism (e.g., Wells, 1981, De Wit, 1998, Almeida et al., 2011) over a protracted period. Archean TTG rocks are therefore expected to preserve the geological record of the early continent building-stage of crustal evolution (e.g., Barker, 1979).

The Singhbhum craton in eastern India has extensive occurrences of greenschist- to amphibolite-facies TTGs and granites of Paleoarchean to Neoarchean age (e.g., Sarkar et al., 1979, Basu et al., 1981, Moorbath et al., 1986, Moorbath and Taylor, 1988; Saha et al., 1988, Paul et al., 1991, Saha, 1994, Goswami et al., 1995, Basu et al., 1993, Misra et al., 1999, Acharyya et al., 2010, Prabhakar and Bhattacharya, 2013). Published geochronological data on these rocks mostly comprise whole-rock Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd, or Pb–Pb isochron ages (e.g., Saha and Rao, 1971, Saha, 1972, Sarkar et al., 1979, Basu et al., 1981, Moorbath et al., 1986, Paul et al., 1991, Sharma et al., 1994, Saha, 1994, Ghosh et al., 1996) or K–Ar and Ar–Ar mineral (biotite and hornblende) ages (Sarkar et al., 1979, Iyengar et al., 1981, Vohra et al., 1991). Because the whole rock isotope systems may potentially get disturbed due to open system behavior during metamorphism, the Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd or K–Ar/Ar–Ar ages may have been compromised and often yield contradictory and inconsistent age information (e.g., Basu et al., 1981 vs. Moorbath et al., 1986) which makes them difficult to interpret in geological context. More recent studies using ion probe U–Pb or Pb–Pb isotope dating of zircon from these rocks revealed the presence of several Paleoarchean to Neoarchean age populations (e.g., Moorbath et al., 1988; Goswami et al., 1995, Misra et al., 1999, Acharyya et al., 2010, Tait et al., 2011). However, most of these studies have not documented the internal structures of the dated zircon grains, which quite commonly record episodes of zircon formation/consumption, strain- and fluid-induced recrystallization and reequilibration as well as chemical alteration during magmatic or metamorphic processes affecting the rocks. The textural relations of zircon interiors imaged through Back Scattered Electron (BSE) and Cathodoluminescence (CL) techniques can be used to link the zircon internal structure to particular rock forming and modifying processes (e.g., Corfu et al., 2003). As many of the earlier studies have not utilized this powerful tool, the interpretation of the published U–Pb age data, although spatially resolved, is ambiguous, and robust constraints on the timings of TTG magmatism and the subsequent metamorphic overprints on the rocks is still lacking. This has been a major hindrance to understanding the sequence of crustal evolution in this important Archean craton.

This contribution reports Laser Ablation-Sector Field-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LA-SF-ICPMS) U–Pb ages of zircon grains from the Archean TTG suite of the Singhbhum craton. We have used BSE and CL imaging to document the internal structures of the dated grains. The texturally controlled dating of zircon grains from the TTGs is used to constrain the timing of TTG magmatism and metamorphism of the rocks. This age information has implications for temporal relationships among the TTGs, granites and neighboring crustal units as well as the regional crustal evolution. This study establishes for the first time that the Archean TTGs and granites of the Singhbhum craton form an expansive and correlatable suite of rocks emplaced in two pulses at ∼3.44 Ga and ∼3.33 Ga.

Section snippets

Regional geologic setting

The oval Archean Singhbhum craton is bordered by the North Singhbhum Mobile Belt (NSMB) to the north, the Eastern Ghats Belt to the southeast and the Bastar craton to the southwest (Saha, 1994). The major crustal units making up the craton include greenschist- to amphibolites-facies supracrustals of the Older Metamorphic Group (OMG), TTGs of the Older Metamorphic Tonalite Gneisses (OMTG), granitoids and tonalities of the Singhbhum Granite (SG) batholith and the greenschist facies platformal

Analytical techniques

Zircon grains from TTGs, granitoids and a micaschist sample were dated using LA-SF-ICPMS at the Institut für Mineralogie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster. The grains were separated from the rocks using routine techniques involving crushing/grinding followed by magnetic and heavy liquids separation. Representative grains of all sizes and morphologies were handpicked under a binocular microscope, mounted on epoxy disks, and polished to reveal their interiors. The internal structures

Sample details and petrography

Samples were collected from three major Paleoarchean crustal units of the Singhbhum craton viz., the OMG, the OMTG and the SG. The majority of them are from the TTG suites of the OMTG and the SG. Together with one micaschist from the Paleoarchean OMG metasediments, zircon grains from thirteen samples were separated and analyzed for their U–Pb isotope compositions and ages. The OMTG samples include tonalite–trondhjemite (CHM-10A, CHM-28B) and granite (CHM-3B, CHM-7, CHM-18C). The SG samples

Results and discussion

The U–Pb isotope data and calculated ages for the analyzed zircon grains are listed in Appendix A, and illustrated on concordia diagrams (Fig. 4) and 207Pb/206Pb age (90–110% concordance only) probability density plots (Fig. 5). Representative CL images of the analyzed grains with the corresponding spot ages marked are shown in Fig. 3.

The important results of the study are described and discussed in the following section in the context of the existing subdivisions of the major Archean crustal

Conclusions

The zircon age data shows that major crust formation in the Singhbhum craton occurred in a narrow time interval between 3.46 and 3.32 Ma with minor contributions of material as old as 3.6 Ga. The Singhbhum TTGs therefore represent quite pristine Paleo-to-Mesoarchean material with possibly little recycled material, an inference supported by their low initial 87Sr/86Sr (0.701; Moorbath et al., 1988) and chondritic to positive initial ɛNd (Moorbath et al., 1988; Sharma et al., 1994). This is in

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz Award) to KM. DU acknowledges financial support from IIT Kharagpur (ISIRD research grant). We thank Udo Zimmermann and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments that helped to improve the paper significantly. Editorial handling by R.R. Parish is gratefully acknowledged.

References (62)

  • K. Mezger et al.

    U–Pb ages of metamorphic rutiles: application to the cooling history of high grade terranes

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1989)
  • S. Misra et al.

    Geochronological constraints on evolution of Singhbhum mobile belt and associated basic volcanics of eastern Indian shield

    Gondwana Res.

    (2005)
  • S. Misra et al.

    Archaean granitoids at the contact of Eastern Ghats Granulite Belt and Singhbhum-Orissa Craton in Bhuban-Rengali sector, Orissa, India

    Gondwana Res.

    (2000)
  • S. Moorbath et al.

    Dating oldest terrestrial rocks – facts and fiction

    Chem. Geol.

    (1986)
  • J.-F. Moyen et al.

    Forty years of TTG research

    Lithos

    (2012)
  • D. Mukhopadhyay

    The Archean nucleus of Singhbhum: the present state of knowledge

    Gondwana Res.

    (2001)
  • N. Prabhakar et al.

    Paleoarchean partial convective overturn in the Singhbhum Craton, Eastern India

    Precambrian Res.

    (2013)
  • S. Rekha et al.

    Lithostructural and chronological constrains for tectonic restoration of Proterozoic accretion in the eastern Indian Precambrian shield

    Precambrian Res.

    (2011)
  • M.S. Sambridge et al.

    Mixture modeling of multicomponent data sets with application to ion-probe zircon ages

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1994)
  • S. Sengupta et al.

    Mid-Archaean evolution of the eastern Indian craton: geochemical and isotopic evidence from the Bonai pluton

    Precambrian Res.

    (1991)
  • R.H. Smithies

    The Archaean tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) series is not an analogue of Cenozoic adakite

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2000)
  • S.K. Acharyya

    Greenstones from Singhbhum Craton, their Archaean character, oceanic crustal affinity and tectonics

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India

    (1993)
  • S.K. Acharyya et al.

    New U–Pb zircon ages from Paleo-Mesoarchean TTG gneisses of the Singhbhum Craton, eastern India

    Geochem. J.

    (2010)
  • J.A.C. Almeida et al.

    Zircon geochronology, geochemistry and origin of the TTG suites of the Rio Maria granite-greenstone terrane: implications for the growth of the Archean crust of the Carajás province, Brazil

    Precambrian Res.

    (2011)
  • A.K. Baksi et al.

    40Ar–39Ar incremental heating study of mineral separates from the early Archaean east Indian craton: implications for the thermal history of a section of the Singhbhum granite batholithic complex

    Can. J. Earth Sci.

    (1987)
  • A.R. Basu et al.

    U–Pb age of an older metamorphic group micaschist: earliest terrain of the eastern Indian craton

  • A.R. Basu et al.

    Late 3.4 Ga Algoma-type BIF in the Eastern Indian Craton

    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

    (2008)
  • A.R. Basu et al.

    Eastern Indian 3800-million-year-old crust and early mantle differentiation

    Science

    (1981)
  • M.K. Bose

    Precambrian mafic magmatism in the Singhbhum Craton, Eastern India

    J. Geol. Soc. India

    (2009)
  • D.J. Cherniak

    Pb diffusion in rutile

    Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.

    (2000)
  • F. Corfu et al.

    Atlas of zircon textures

    Rev. Mineral. Geochem.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text