Elsevier

Journal of Pragmatics

Volume 38, Issue 9, September 2006, Pages 1385-1397
Journal of Pragmatics

Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy: Characteristics of some conversational resources

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Empathy is a central notion in psychotherapy and has been the attention of much research, focusing on its importance for the provider–patient alliance and for the success of psychotherapy. Despite its importance, little effort has previously been made in order to study the details of actual sequences through which empathy is achieved. In this study drawing on the method of conversation analysis, actual interactions between therapists and their patients have been video taped and analysed in detail. The present study describes and analyses three types of empathy that can be identified in actual sequences of talk; cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and sharing empathy. These types of empathy are higher level conversational resources that build on the more basic resources, such as questions, assertions, and other types of utterances and non-verbal behaviour. When empathy is expressed, the patient should receive by responding appropriately to the therapist's prior utterance. This receipt may involve answering questions, agreeing with assertions, demonstrating understanding, and appropriate showing of feelings. A lack of proper receipt by the patient is oriented to by the interactants and may result in signs of conversational failure, such as reformulations, pausing, and an abrupt change of topic.

Section snippets

Rolf Wynn (born 1968) received an MA in English linguistics in 1993 (University of Tromsø), and became an MD in 1995 (Tromsø). He earned a PhD in English linguistics in 1998 (University of Bergen) and a PhD in medicine/psychiatry in 2004 (Tromsø). He has published on various topics, including on the analysis of provider–patient interaction and on the use of coercion in psychiatric care. He is a consultant psychiatrist and a researcher at the University of Tromsø, Norway.

References (43)

  • P. Drew et al.

    Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and healthcare professionals

    Health Expectations

    (2001)
  • C. Duan et al.

    The current state of empathy research

    Journal of Counselling Psychology

    (1996)
  • Encylopædia Britannica Online, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.brittanica.com on 5 June,...
  • Richard M. Frankel

    Talking in interviews: a dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician–patient encounters

  • Phillipa Garety et al.

    Cognitive–behavioural therapy for people with psychosis

  • M. Haakana

    Laughter as a patient's resource: dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction

    Text

    (2001)
  • M.A.K. Haliday et al.

    Cohesion in English

    (1976)
  • John Heritage

    Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology

    (1984)
  • John Heritage

    Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic approach

  • A.O. Horvath et al.

    Relationship between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1991)
  • Ian Hutchby et al.

    Conversation analysis

  • Cited by (77)

    • Transitioning out of prognostic talk in discussions with families of hospice patients at the end of life: A conversation analytic study

      2021, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      To reduce the intrusiveness of recordings, audio- rather than video-recording was used, meaning non-verbal practices were missed. For instance, non-verbal practices may be important for demonstrating empathy [57] in response to families’ concerns, before transitioning out of prognostic talk. Future research could therefore video-record consultations, where appropriate, to capture additional non-verbal details.

    • Patients' compliance and resistance to medical authority in Nigerian clinical encounters

      2021, Journal of Pragmatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consequently, patients may assert their expertise (Peräkylä, 1995; Heritage and Robinson, 2006), “co-construct” medical activities (Koenig, 2011; Maynard, 2012) and receive the “institutional license” to pursue their own agenda (Robinson and Heritage, 2006: 279). Although doctors, sometimes, engage in sole decision making on treatment in situations where patients have a mental disorder (Stewart et al., 2010) or are vulnerable (De Haes, 2006), patients' contributions in the treatment recommendations phase is nevertheless advised (see Stevenson et al., 2000; Pilnick and Coleman, 2003; Stivers and Robinson, 2006; Wynn and Wynn, 2006; Watermeyer and Penn, 2009; Penn et al., 2011). These studies on medical authority and patients' compliance provide enriching information across various medical contexts.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Rolf Wynn (born 1968) received an MA in English linguistics in 1993 (University of Tromsø), and became an MD in 1995 (Tromsø). He earned a PhD in English linguistics in 1998 (University of Bergen) and a PhD in medicine/psychiatry in 2004 (Tromsø). He has published on various topics, including on the analysis of provider–patient interaction and on the use of coercion in psychiatric care. He is a consultant psychiatrist and a researcher at the University of Tromsø, Norway.

    Michael Wynn (born 1973) has an MA in English literature from the University of Tromsø. He has published on topics relating to Victorian-age and contemporary culture and literature. He currently works as a research assistant at the University Hospital of Northern Norway.

    View full text