Elsevier

Powder Technology

Volume 262, August 2014, Pages 198-202
Powder Technology

Rheological modeling of strontium ferrite feedstock for magnetic powder injection molding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.073Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We present a rheological model of magnetic feedstock for magnetic PIM.

  • Rheology of magnetic feedstock is investigated experimentally.

  • The model takes the effects of various processing parameters into account.

  • The model can well describe the rheological behavior of the magnetic feedstock.

Abstract

Powder injection molding (PIM) is an important manufacturing technology for the net-shape production of metallic and ceramic components. PIM can also be a promising process for the mass production of magnetic parts. To mass produce magnetic components with complex shape and high performance through PIM, rheological behavior of the magnetic powder mixtures must be understood and characterized for various processing conditions. In the present study, we investigate the rheological behavior of strontium ferrite powder mixture affected by the shear rate, the temperatures, the external magnetic field, and the volume fraction of the powder. Several rheological models are employed to describe the shear viscosity of the mixture, which can be used for the design and optimization of the PIM process.

Introduction

Powder injection molding (PIM) is a productive and widely used technique for the net-shaping of metallic and ceramic components. This technique combines two conventional processes of injection molding process and powder metallurgy, producing high performance and high precision components with complex shape at a low cost [1]. PIM process consists of i) feedstock (powder–binder mixture) preparation; ii) injection molding; iii) debinding; and iv) sintering. Due to many advantages, PIM has been applied to produce various mechanical and biomedical components [2], [3], [4], [5]. For example, mechanical components having three-dimensional complex shapes and/or microstructures such as precision actuator components and microsystem components can be produced by PIM process. Also PIM process has been applied to produce biomedical components such as medical tools for special surgical operations and dental components like orthodontic brackets.

PIM process can also be a promising process for a mass production of magnetic parts [6], [7], [8], [9]. The magnetic PIM process enables a high precision replication of a magnetic part having geometrical complexity or micro-scale structures [7]. This technology can be directly applied to relevant manufacturing industries for production and commercialization of micro magnetic parts.

The magnetic performance of final product from magnetic PIM will be significantly affected by the orientation of the magnetic particles [10]. In this regard, magnetic field is commonly applied in the mold cavity during the injection process in order to align the magnetic particles with a designed direction [8]. The orientation behavior of the magnetic particles is determined by flow-particle interaction, particle–particle interaction and magnetic field–particle interaction. In order to characterize this complex behavior of the magnetic particles during injection process, one needs to understand the rheological behavior of the magnetic powder mixture under various conditions. Also a rheological modeling of the magnetic powder mixture is of particular importance for design and optimization of the process.

There have been several studies regarding the rheology of feedstock and its effect on PIM process. For example, homogeneity effects on feedstock viscosity for PIM were studied by German [11], and it was found that homogeneous mixing of the powder and binder results in the lowest viscosity of the feedstock. Zauner et al. [12] investigated the effect of feedstock viscosity on the dimensional accuracy of the injection molded green part in PIM process. It was noted that the temperature condition of the PIM process affects the dimensional accuracy of the molded part since the feedstock viscosity is significantly affected by the temperature. Wang et al. conducted numerical simulation for filling stage to understand the effects of mold dimensions on rheology of feedstock in micro powder injection molding [13]. He used a power law model and the Arrhenius type viscosity model to relate shear rate and temperature in the FEM simulation and found that PIM process parameters can be affected by the size of mold.

Although there are several studies on the rheology as mentioned above, only few studies have been carried out on the rheology of magnetic powder mixture with particular emphasis on the effects of magnetic field, shear rate, temperature and powder volume fraction with regard to the PIM process. For example, Song [14] studied the rheological behaviors of Neodymium (Nd–Fe–B) powder mixtures for fabrication of bonded magnet, and rheological behavior was characterized by a simple rheological equation of state by nonlinear regression. Kim et al. [6] investigated the rheological behavior of strontium ferrite (Sr–Fe) feedstock for development of magnetic PIM process. In these studies, however, appropriate rheological modeling has not been carried out under magnetic field effect, which limits the application of their results to practical analysis of magnetic PIM process.

In this paper, we present a rheological modeling for Sr–Fe powder mixture based on experimental characterization the shear rheology of the mixture. The effects of magnetic field, shear rate, temperature and powder volume fraction are all investigated comprehensively by using rotational rheometer of plate–plate type. The shear viscosity of the mixture is modeled by employing several rheological models in order to describe the effects of all parameters mentioned above.

Section snippets

Rheological modeling

In general, the shear viscosity of the magnetic powder–binder mixture depends on the shear rate, particle shape and size, temperature, magnetic field flux density and powder volume fraction [6]. In this study of St–Fe feedstock, however, the effect of particle size and shape is found to be almost negligible thus it is not presented. The shear viscosity η can be represented as followsηTγ˙φB=η0TSγ˙VφMBwhere T is the absolute temperature, γ˙ is the shear rate, ϕ is the powder volume fraction and B

Materials

The magnetic feedstock consists of Sr–Fe powder and paraffin wax. There are wet and dry types of Sr–Fe powder depending on the manufacturing method. In this work, the dry type is selected since it is widely used in various applications due to its efficient performance and low cost. Fig. 1 shows microscopic image of the Sr–Fe powder. The magnetic properties are summarized in Table 1. We used coarse-particle wax as binder. It has a density of 0.9 g/cm3. The melting temperature ranges from 42 °C to

Results

First we present the torque rheometer result in Fig. 3. The rotational speed of the screw is fixed at 150 rpm and the temperature is 150 °C. In this experiment, we increase the powder volume fraction from 61% in a step-wise manner in time until the maximum powder volume fraction (ϕm) can be clearly identified. Fig. 3 shows that the increasing slope of the torque changes drastically at ϕ = 70%, which is due to significant friction between particles, indicating that the mixture has reached its

Conclusions

The rheological behavior of strontium ferrite feedstock is investigated for various conditions of external magnetic fields, shear rate, temperatures, and volume fraction of powder. Several rheological models are employed to describe the shear rheology of the feedstock. Three different models by Roscoe, Mooney and Krieger and Dougherty are compared for wide range of powder volume fraction, and it was found that Krieger and Dougherty model could describe the increasing trend of the shear

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2010-0026242/2011-0030075).

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • Investigation of the solvent debinding in the injection molding of ZrO<inf>2</inf> ceramics using LDEP, HDPE and wax binders

    2019, Ceramics International
    Citation Excerpt :

    ZrO2 is an important ceramic due to its high toughness, high thermal stability and other superior properties [3]. The process comprises of several stages: feedstock preparation, injection molding, debinding and sintering [8–11]. Feedstock is mainly essentially composed of ceramic powder and organic binder [12].

  • 3D gel-printing of Sr ferrite parts

    2018, Ceramics International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recently, the application of powder injection molding (PIM) has been reported for fabricating complex-shaped sintered Sr ferrite ceramics [9]. PIM is of interest since it offers the potential for the production of complex-shaped parts [10]. Nevertheless, there are still some drawbacks to PIM, such as specific tooling requirements for injection molding [11].

  • Influence of particle-size distribution and temperature on the rheological properties of highly concentrated Inconel feedstock alloy 718

    2017, Powder Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These investigators showed that the shear rate depends on the shear viscosity, and their model can be used to study the impact of binders on the rheological behaviour of feedstock [25]. It is also accepted that the shear viscosity of a feedstock increases with increasing solids loading [26]. Several models similar to the model presented by Quemada [27] have been used to predict this solids loading dependence.

  • Effect of microcrystalline wax on the solvent debinding of the Sr-ferrite ceramics prepared by powder injection molding

    2017, Journal of the European Ceramic Society
    Citation Excerpt :

    PIM is of interest as it offers the potential for the net-shape production of geometrically complex components [4]. This technique combines two traditional processes of plastic injection molding and powder metallurgy, consisting of mixing, molding, debinding and sintering [5]. Each stage of the processing technology depends on the types of binder systems which are used.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text