Elsevier

Pedobiologia

Volume 57, Issues 4–6, November 2014, Pages 277-284
Pedobiologia

Evaluation of an optimal extraction method for measuring d-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) in agricultural soils and its association with soil microbial CO2 assimilation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Assimilating atmospheric carbon (C) into terrestrial ecosystems is recognized as a primary measure to mitigate global warming. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) is the dominant enzyme by which terrestrial autotrophic bacteria and plants fix CO2. To investigate the possibility of using RubisCO activity as an indicator of microbial CO2 fixation potential, a valid and efficient method for extracting soil proteins is needed. We examined three methods commonly used for total soil protein extraction. A simple sonication method for extracting soil protein was more efficient than bead beating or freeze–thaw methods. Total soil protein, RubisCO activity, and microbial fixation of CO2 in different agricultural soils were quantified in an incubation experiment using 14C-CO2 as a tracer. The soil samples showed significant differences in protein content and RubisCO activity, defined as nmol CO2 fixed g−1 soil min−1. RubisCO activities ranged from 10.68 to 68.07 nmol CO2 kg−1 soil min−1, which were closely related to the abundance of cbbL genes (r = 0.900, P = 0.0140) and the rates of microbial CO2 assimilation (r = 0.949, P = 0.0038). This suggests that RubisCO activity can be used as an indicator of soil microbial assimilation of atmospheric CO2.

Introduction

The anthropogenic increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is generally believed to significantly contribute to global warming (Lacis et al., 2010). Transferring carbon (C) from the atmosphere to terrestrial ecosystems is a major C sequestration measure (Midgley et al., 2010). Carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems is a result of the assimilation of CO2 by autotrophic bacteria, algae, and plants (Tabita, 1999) via the Calvin–Benson–Basham (CBB) cycle. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) is the most abundant protein on Earth (Raven, 2013) and an essential enzyme in the CBB cycle. It fixes CO2 through the reductive pentose phosphate pathway by combining with CO2 to form 3-phosphoglycerate (Siegenthaler and Sarmiento, 1993, Sato et al., 2010). RubisCO is a major autotrophic carboxylase in all photosynthetic organisms, and more than 99.5% of the inorganic C assimilated by primary producers (chemolithotrophs as well as photolithotrophs) involves RubisCO (Raven, 2009).

RubisCO enzymes, which exist in a variety of autotrophic organisms including Proteobacteria and Acinobacteria as well as Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes and Chloroflexi (Hügler and Sievert, 2010), have been widely investigated in aquatic ecosystems or laboratory microbial cultivation (Ezaki, 1999, Chakrabarti et al., 2002, Takai et al., 2005, Hügler and Sievert, 2010, Tourova et al., 2010) because of the enzymatic properties of RubisCO that link directly to CO2 fixation rates. However, relative few studies are concerned with the RubisCO of microbes involved in soil CO2 assimilation. Carbon fixation genes (cbbL), which encode the RubisCO enzyme, are numerous and widespread in diverse soil ecosystems (Selesi et al., 2007, Videmšek et al., 2009, Yuan et al., 2012, Wu et al., 2013, Xiao et al., 2014).

In comparison to functional gene studies, the analysis of proteins can provide more information about active metabolic pathways (Singleton et al., 2003, Tyson et al., 2004, Ram et al., 2005, Schulze et al., 2005, Wilmes and Bond, 2006, Benndorf et al., 2007, Renella et al., 2014). This protein-based technique can characterize soil enzymes involved in biogeochemical cycling in both natural and polluted soil ecosystems, such as rhizosphere soil, grassland soil, forest soil and contaminated soil (Renella et al., 2002, Singleton et al., 2003, Schulze et al., 2005, Benndorf et al., 2007, Fornasier and Margon, 2007, Wang et al., 2011, Wu et al., 2011). Enzymes are protein molecules with catalytic activities (Ogunseitan, 1997), therefore, the accuracy of the RubisCO activity measurements of field samples depends on obtaining representative extracts of bioactive protein. In the initial efforts to extract protein from sediments and soils, researchers used either cell extraction (recovery of cells from the soil matrix prior to cell lysis) or direct lysis within the soil matrix (Singleton et al., 2003, Barzaghi et al., 2004, Benndorf et al., 2007). Direct extraction of soil protein provides a less biased sample of the soil microbial communities (Singleton et al., 2003, Ogunseitan, 2006).

Bead beating, freeze–thaw and sonication are three commonly used methods for breaking aggregated soil particles and for lysing cells to release protein molecules (Singleton et al., 2003, Ogunseitan et al., 2004, Bastida et al., 2009). However, these soil protein extraction methods are inefficient in the various individual step, with problems of incomplete cell lysis, protein sorption on soil surfaces, and loss or degradation of the protein. Therefore, the primary objective of this work was to establish an optimal method for rapid and efficient soil protein extraction. The extraction method we propose here preserves protein function as much as possible and extracts protein from the entire microbial community, representing the contributions from both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Once the method was established, it was used to examine the activity of soil RubisCO in response to changes in soil microbial CO2 assimilation rates in different types of agricultural soils using a 14C-CO2 tracer experiment. We hypothesized that the measurement of soil RubisCO activity following appropriate calibration can provide a reasonable estimate of the microbial CO2 fixation potential in the soil.

Section snippets

Soils

Three separate bulked soil samples from paddy fields P1–P3 and three soils samples from upland crop fields U1–U3, which covered the two typical (Fluvisol, Ultisol) paddy and upland soils in the subtropical region of China, were collected from the Ap horizon (0–20 cm) in different geographical regions of China (28°12′–29°50′ N, 111°13′–113°45′ E) (Table 1). Mean annual temperatures of the sampling sites range from approximately 8.1 °C to 16.8 °C and mean annual rainfall range from approximately 721 

Protein extraction

The amount of total protein extracted by the bead beating-Fastprep method varied significantly between the three lysis protocols B1-B3 used (Fig. 1). The minimum amount of protein was obtained following protocol B1 and the maximum from B3. Total soil protein yield increased with bead beating time. The total protein extracted by the B2 and B3 protocols was significantly higher than by B1. The B2 protocol was the optimal protocol for procuring high yield while being time-efficient. Among the

Soil protein extraction

The criticism of early methods to extract soil protein has focused on increasing the yield of protein extraction (Ogunseitan, 1993, Ogunseitan, 1997). However, an improved extraction method will be necessary to obtain samples with efficient recovery of bioactive representatives in addition to high yield of total protein (Keller and Hettich, 2009, Renella et al., 2014). Therefore, we compared three common methods for soil protein extraction, based on the recovery efficiency and the RubisCO

Conclusion

Overall, this study suggests that the sonication method (ultrasonic disruption) is an efficient way to extract soil protein and provides a promising approach for direct RubisCO activity measurements in field samples. The 14C-CO2 tracing experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of this protein extraction and confirms the role of soil RubisCO activity in soil C sequestration. Therefore, soil RubisCO activity can be potentially used as an indicator of the assimilation of atmospheric CO2 by soil

Acknowledgements

This study was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271279; 41090283), the International Cooperation and Regional Science and Technology Foundation of Hunan Province (2013WK4009), and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams (KZCX2-YW-T07; 20100491005-8).

References (55)

  • G. Renella et al.

    Hydrolase activity during and after the chloroform-fumigation of soils as affected by protease activity

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2002)
  • G. Renella et al.

    Environmental proteomics: a long march in the pedosphere

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2014)
  • D. Selesi et al.

    Quantification of bacterial RubisCO genes in soils by cbbL targeted real–time PCR

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2007)
  • I. Singleton et al.

    The potential of soil protein-based methods to indicate metal contamination

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2003)
  • E.D. Vance et al.

    Microbial biomass measurements in forest soils: determination of kc values and tests of hypotheses to explain the failure of the chloroform fumigation–incubation method in acid soils

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1987)
  • P. Wilmes et al.

    Metaproteomics: studying functional gene expression in microbial ecosystems

    Trends Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • J. Wu et al.

    Procedure for the simultaneous analysis of total and radioactive carbon in soil and plant materials

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1997)
  • J. Wu

    Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction – an automated procedure

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1990)
  • D. Barzaghi et al.

    Use of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight to explore bacterial proteomes

    Proteomics

    (2004)
  • F. Bastida et al.

    Soil metaproteomics: a review of an emerging environmental science. Significance, methodology and perspectives

    Eur. J. Soil Sci.

    (2009)
  • D. Benndorf et al.

    Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater

    ISME J.

    (2007)
  • A.J. Boller

    Stable Carbon Isotope Discrimination by RubisCO Enzymes Relevant to the Global Carbon Cycle

    (2012)
  • G. Fuchs

    Alternative pathways of autotrophic CO2 fixation

  • L.P. Guo et al.

    Carbon sink in cropland soils and the emission of greenhouse gases from paddy soils: a review of work in China

    Chemosphere-Global Change Sci.

    (2001)
  • M. Hügler et al.

    Beyond the Calvin cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean

    Mar. Sci.

    (2010)
  • H. Holo

    Chloroflexus aurantiacus secretes 3-hydroxypropionate, a possible intermediate in the assimilation of CO2 and acetate

    Arch. Microbiol.

    (1989)
  • M. Keller et al.

    Environmental proteomics: a paradigm shift in characterizing microbial activities at the molecular level

    Microbiol. Mol. Boil. R.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text