Hydrograph separation using hydrochemical tracers in the Makanya catchment, Tanzania
Introduction
In many parts of the world catchments are not or poorly gauged. In particular in developing countries, catchments are predominantly ungauged, as a result of lack of adequate resources (Mazvimavi, 2003). There are two main factors in sub-Saharan Africa that affect the predictability of hydrological responses. First, the climatic variability is both spatially and temporally very high. Additionally, increasing population densities and the resulting dynamic land use changes affect hydrological responses.
Chemical hydrograph separation is a method to define the origin and composition of the runoff during floods (Uhlenbrook et al., 2002). This method is based on the mixing of two or more water types with known and distinct hydrochemical characteristics, where the ratio of mixing determines the concentrations in the stream. Chemical hydrograph separation is predominantly done to separate sub-surface and surface runoff. Pre-event (“old”) and event (“new”) water can be separated using environmental isotopes (Hooper and Shoemaker, 1986). Uhlenbrook et al. (2002) also used a chemical method for a separation between event water, shallow groundwater, and deep groundwater, using isotopes and dissolved silica (3-component separation). Hydrochemical tracers, such as Ca+, Mg2+, and Cl− are relatively inexpensive to analyse and easy to use for hydrograph separation (Ribolzi et al., 2000, Soulsby et al., 2004, Tardy et al., 2004, Wels et al., 1991). The main challenge with using these tracers is that the original concentrations can change along the specific flow path (non-conservative behaviour). With a limited amount of time between rainfall and runoff, this can be neglected. Although more expensive, hydrograph separation can also be done using isotopes, or a combination of isotope and chemical tracers (Sklash and Farvolden, 1979, Buttle, 1994, Ladouche et al., 2001, Marc et al., 2001).
Chemical hydrograph separation has been mostly applied in humid temperate climates. This paper describes the application of this method using hydrochemical tracers in a semi-arid meso-scale catchment. The Makanya catchment is located in the South Pare Mountains, northern Tanzania. It is part of the Pangani river basin, one of the nine river basins in Tanzania (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). It is a poorly gauged catchment with two rainfall stations with a record of more than 10 years, and without any long records of discharge measurements. Rainfall in the catchment ranges from 550 mm yr−1 in the lowlands (∼700 m) to 800 mm yr−1 in the highlands (up to 2000 m) and is distributed over two rainy seasons. The short rainy season, locally known as “Vuli” runs from October to December, whereas the long rainy season, locally known as “Masika” runs from March to May. In 2004, the SSI Programme (Rockström et al., 2004) installed a hydrological monitoring network in the catchment, and has since been researching the hydrological implications of changing farmer management practices. The objectives of this study are to investigate the applicability of using hydrochemical tracers for hydrograph separation in a meso-scale semi-arid catchment in Tanzania.
Section snippets
Methodology
In this paper, chemical hydrograph separation for one relatively small flood event is described, using hydrochemical tracers including electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved silica (SiO2), and major anions and cations. The flood event occurred on 9 November 2005, during the short rainy season in a sub-catchment of the Makanya catchment. The Vudee sub-catchment is monitored after the confluence of two rivers, upper-Vudee and Ndolwa (Fig. 2). At this location, discharge was recorded and samples
Results
During the event, the raingauges in upper-Vudee and Ndolwa observed 13.5 mm day−1 and 7.9 mm day−1, respectively. At the outlet in the valley, hardly any rainfall was recorded: 3.2 mm day−1. Hourly rainfall records for this event were observed at this station, where a light drizzle started around 7 pm, continuing until 11 pm on 8 November. Rainfall in the upper part of the catchment was observed late afternoon. The runoff generated by this rainfall, started after midnight, reaching its peak at 2:30 am
Discussion
Hydrochemical tracers may be readily used for hydrograph separation, however hydrochemical tracers are a result of the processes that occur within the catchment, and therefore the assumption that the water quality of the fast runoff is equal to that of rainfall could be wrong and may introduce some uncertainty. This may also be the reason for the increase of some of the hydrochemical parameters at the beginning of the hydrograph. The effect on the water quality of surface runoff processes will
Conclusions
During the event of 9 November 2005, dominance of groundwater for flood formation was demonstrated by chemical hydrograph separations; over 95% was contributed by sub-surface runoff. This was confirmed by the complete lack of suspended sediments in the samples showing no erosion through surface runoff. Dissolved silica is a good tracer to distinguish between sub-surface and surface runoff, which was also found by Wels et al. (1991). Changes in selected chemical parameters can be used for the
Acknowledgements
The work reported here was undertaken as part of the Smallholder System Innovations in Integrated Watershed Management (SSI) Programme funded by the Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (WOTRO), the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the Netherlands Directorate-General of Development Cooperation (DGIS), the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education. Thanks to the WaterMill (DGIS, The
References (13)
- et al.
Hydrograph separation using isotopic chemical and hydrological approaches (Strengbach catchment, France)
Journal of Hydrology
(2001) - et al.
Investigation of the hydrological processes using chemical and isotopic tracers in a small Mediterranean forested catchment during autumn recharge
Journal of Hydrology
(2001) - et al.
Hydrograph separation and flow analysis by specific electrical conductance of water
Journal of Hydrology
(1993) - et al.
Contribution of groundwater and overland flows to storm flow generation in a cultivated Mediterranean catchment. Quantification by natural chemical tracing
Journal of Hydrology
(2000) - et al.
A watershed approach to upgrade rainfed agriculture in water scarce regions through water system innovations: an integrated research initiative on water for food and rural livelihoods in balance with ecosystem functions
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
(2004) - et al.
The role of groundwater in storm runoff
Journal of Hydrology
(1979)
Cited by (47)
Particularity of hydrological processes under heavy ablation based on environmental isotopes in transition zones between endorheic and exorheic basins
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementHydrochemistry of waters in snowpacks, lakes and streams of Mt. Dagu, eastern of Tibet Plateau
2018, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Besides, the isotopic composition of lake and stream waters behaved highly similar to snowpack samples, suggesting that lake waters at high altitude and stream waters at low altitude may originate from earlier meltwater of glacier. Hydrograph separation employing stable isotopes has been widely applied to identify the contributions of numerous water sources to runoff and evaluate streamflow generation mechanisms in a small spatial scale (Fritz et al., 1976; Mul et al., 2008). Based on Eqs. (3) and (4), the contribution proportion of meltwater and precipitation was calculated with the δ18O (similar result with δD).
Evaluating relative merits of four baseflow separation methods in Eastern Australia
2017, Journal of HydrologyBase flow separation: A comparison of analytical and mass balance methods
2016, Journal of HydrologyTracing water flow from sloping farmland to streams using oxygen-18 isotope to study a small agricultural catchment in southwest China
2013, Soil and Tillage ResearchCitation Excerpt :Genereux and Hooper (1998) concluded that the total stormflow runoff from rainstorm events is dominated by pre-event (“old”) water in a majority of small hillslope catchments. In addition, Saito (2000) and Mul et al. (2008) assumed that the isotopic concentration of subsurface runoff was identical to the value of pre-event water for use in hydrograph separation. In contrast, a few researchers have found that stormflow is dominated by event water (Bonell et al., 1998; Schellekens et al., 2004).