Revised late Cenozoic foraminifer biostratigraphy of the Eskiköy Formation (Aksu Basin), SW Turkey and its paleoenvironmental conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.110883Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pleistocene bioevent marker planktic and benthic foraminifers were identified.

  • The sedimentation of the Aksu Basin in southwestern Turkey did not end in the Late Pliocene but continued during the Calabrian.

  • The Aksu Basin marks a period of low temperatures and lowered sea-level stands during the Calabrian.

Abstract

The Aksu Basin, near Antalya, is an important area from many aspects of the geology as it hosts the youngest marine deposits of the western Taurides in southwestern Turkey. These marine deposits play an important role in revealing the response of the Eastern Mediterranean coasts to the post-Zanclean transgression following the Messinian Salinity Crisis and provide a chronological record for detailing the late Cenozoic regional tectonic and sedimentary features. Therefore, biostratigraphic reconstruction of this basin is essential to enhance our understanding of the late Cenozoic evolution of the region and the response of the Eastern Mediterranean realm to climatic shifts. Here, we present an updated foraminifer biostratigraphy of the topmost part of the Eskiköy Formation in the Aksu Basin, a member of the Neogene Antalya basins. The studied Kargı section, located in the northern part of the Aksu Basin, contains planktic foraminifer species such as Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, Globigerinoides tenellus, Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, and Globoturborotalita rubescens, and benthic foraminifers Bulimina marginata and Saidovina karreriana. These species are important bioevent markers in the Mediterranean Region. Accordingly, we update the stratigraphic range of the Eskiköy Formation found in southwestern Turkey extending it to the Pleistocene falling in MPle1a Neogloboquadrina spp. sx Interval Subzone, more specifically between 1.54 and 1.36 Ma, which previously was considered to be of Pliocene age. This age interval is also in agreement with the previous studies that reported Calabrian-Chibanian aged marine deposits in the Mut Basin, southern Turkey.

Introduction

Foraminifer biostratigraphy constitutes the basis of comparison and in-depth investigation of marine sedimentary basins as it provides age correlation between the rock units (BouDagher-Fadel, 2013). The Eastern Mediterranean Region, given its particular geodynamic and sedimentary evolution registering important events, such as the Messinian Salinity Crisis (MSC) and the Zanclean flooding, has been intensively investigated by researchers for its sedimentary basins. The Neogene MSC as a major regression and the Zanclean flooding as a major transgression, marking the end of the Miocene and start of the Pliocene, were first reported by Hsü et al., 1973, Hsü et al., 1977, Hsü et al., 1978 based on findings from offshore studies conducted in a vast area ranging from the Western to the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (DSDP Leg 13). In this concept, the Neogene Antalya basins, namely the Aksu, Köprü, and Manavgat basins, have been of interest to researchers since the 1910s because of their rich tectonic complexities and well-exposed structural and sedimentary features (e.g., Penck, 1918; Altınlı, 1944; Chaput and Darkot, 1953; Brunn et al., 1970, Brunn et al., 1971; Poisson, 1977; Gutnic et al., 1979; Şenel, 1997; Robertson and Woodcock, 1982). Its Miocene (bio-)stratigraphy and evolution were extensively studied by several researchers (e.g., Bizon et al., 1974; Varol, 1982; Akay et al., 1985; Poisson, 1977, 1983, 1984; Karabıyıkoğlu et al., 2000, Karabıyıkoğlu et al., 2005; Üner et al., 2011) and Flecker et al., 1995, Flecker et al., 2005 complemented these studies with detailed Miocene facies analysis and Sr isotope stratigraphy (Flecker et al., 1998). Pliocene-Quaternary characteristics of the Antalya basins were investigated by Glover (1995), Glover and Robertson (1998a), and Poisson et al., 2003a, Poisson et al., 2003b, Poisson et al., 2011. Combined Neogene-Quaternary sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Antalya basins were documented by Çiner et al. (2008) and Üner et al., 2015, Üner et al., 2018. The Mut and Adana basins of the same age interval in the neighboring localities in the further east (Mersin and Adana districts, respectively) were studied by Yıldız et al. (2003), Cipollari et al. (2012), Cosentino et al. (2012), Schildgen et al. (2012), Faranda et al. (2013), Radeff et al. (2016), and Öğretmen et al., 2018a, Öğretmen et al., 2018b who revised the late Cenozoic biostratigraphy and geodynamical mechanisms of the region.

In this study, we focus on the Aksu Basin among the Neogene Antalya basins. It is situated on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey, bordered by the Beydağları Carbonate Platform to the west and its eastern margin is underlain by the Aksu Thrust (Fig. 1a) (Poisson et al., 2011). The Aksu Basin, being in a complex tectonic setting, plays an important role as it hosts key marine successions to unlock the chronostratigraphy of the tectonic and sedimentary events in the Eastern Mediterranean coastal areas. Many important studies were conducted to unearth the age relationships of the sedimentary formations of the Aksu Basin through foraminiferal (Bizon et al., 1974; Poisson, 1977; Glover, 1995; Glover and Robertson, 1998a) and nannoplankton biostratigraphy (Varol, 1982; Akay et al., 1985; Poisson et al., 2003a, Poisson et al., 2003b, Poisson et al., 2011). These studies are based on the foraminiferal biozonations of Iaccarino (1985) and calcareous nannoplankton biozonations of Martini (1971), Okada and Bukry (1980), and Perch-Nielsen (1985) dating the youngest marine deposits as the Early-Late Pliocene within the foraminiferal Globorotalia puncticulata-G. margaritae Zone and nannoplakton NN15 and NN16 zones. However, biostratigraphic zonations of the Mediterranean Region have been revised through paleomagnetic and astronomical calibrations, and several new foraminiferal and nannoplankton datum events have been recognized which aid in more refined age model reconstructions (Rio et al., 1990; Lourens et al., 1992, Lourens et al., 1996a, Lourens et al., 1996b, Lourens et al., 1998, Lourens et al., 2004; Raffi, 2002; Raffi et al., 2006; Iaccarino et al., 2007; Cita et al., 2008; Anthonissen and Ogg, 2012; Lirer et al., 2019). For example, the biozonations of Iaccarino (1985) did not include the sinistral coiling Neogloboquadrina pachyderma whose first occurrence marks the Pleistocene at 1.79 Ma (i.e., Lourens et al., 1996a, Lourens et al., 1996b, Lourens et al., 1998, Lourens et al., 2004; Iaccarino et al., 2007; Lirer et al., 2019). Similarly, in 1993, Raffi et al. have introduced four new nannoplankton datum events within the Early Pleistocene based on the size groups of Gephyrocapsa. Furthermore, the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary has been redefined from ca. 1.8 to 2.6 Ma (Gibbard et al., 2010) and thus many Late Pliocene deposits today correspond to the Early Pleistocene. Therefore, revising the biostratigraphy of the Antalya basins will contribute to many important recent studies which considered and were built on the older versions of biostratigraphic schemes (e.g., Poisson et al., 2011; Koşun, 2012; Üner et al., 2015, Üner et al., 2018; Koç et al., 2016; Doğan et al., 2019; Şiş et al., 2020; Wasoo et al., 2020; Gürbüz et al., 2021; Wasoo and Koç, 2021 among others).

Here, we present the initial study of high-resolution foraminifer biostratigraphy revisions of the Antalya basins. We aim to contribute to the Quaternary geology and paleoclimate reconstructions of the region providing missing information about the depositional history of the Eastern Mediterranean coastal zones.

Section snippets

Geological setting

The Antalya basins, located within the Isparta Angle, consists of three sub-basins, namely the Aksu, Köprüçay, and Manavgat basins, which are controlled by the N-S striking Kırkkavak Fault and the W-SW-directed Aksu Thrust (Fig. 1a) (Poisson et al., 2011). The Antalya basins have been evolving unconformably over the autochthonous Bey Dağları and Anamas-Akseki platforms, and the allochthonous Antalya Complex (i.e., Antalya Nappes), Lycian Nappes, Beyşehir-Hoyran-Hadım Nappes, and Alanya Massif

Stratigraphic relationships in the studied region

The Miocene Aksu Basin in the east of the study area consists of the Karpuzçay and Aksu formations (Fig. 1b). The basin-fill initiated with the Langhian-Tortonian Karpuzçay Formation which is composed of shallow-marine conglomerates intercalating with sandstone-mudstone successions. It unconformably overlies the basement units, mainly the Antalya Complex, and it is in lateral and vertical transitions with the Aksu Formation (Akay et al., 1985). The Langhian-Messinian Aksu Formation is

Previous micropaleontological studies in the region

The first micropaleontological study in the Aksu Basin was carried out by Bizon et al. (1974) from the blue marls in the western part of Gebiz (Fig. 3) and they dated the unit as Early Pliocene within the Globorotalia puncticulata-G. margaritae Zone (MPl3; see Supplementary Info, SI, Table S1). Poisson (1977) dated a blue marl section south of the Antalya-Manavgat road (Fig. 3) as Early Pliocene, spanning the G. puncticulata-G. margaritae Zone, similar to Bizon et al.'s (1974) findings. Varol

Lithology, material and methods

The Kargı section (37° 43′ 28.17” N, 30° 47′ 54.46″ E) in the Aksu Basin is located on a road cut at the south of the Kargı Tunnel on the eastern side of the Aksu River and found approximately 100 m above sea level (Figs. 1b and 4). It is an eight-meter-thick outcrop consisting of unstratified, unconsolidated/semi-consolidated green-gray colored, silty marl deposits containing foraminifers, ostracods, and mollusk fragments. The section is exposed in the northern part of the Aksu Basin (Fig. 1a,

Results

Micropaleontological analyses on planktic and benthic foraminifers were performed throughout the section. Foraminifer identifications were carried out to species level when possible aiming to update the age model of the sedimentary succession and to improve understanding of the paleoenvironmental conditions of the basin (Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9). We were able to recover foraminifers from all of the sampled levels. The specimens show mainly moderate to well preservation and

Through an updated age model

The Kargı section starts with the occurrence of N. pachyderma at S1 and its presence does not show any significant interruption throughout the section (Fig. 5, Fig. 10). Neogloboquadrina pachyderma is an important species in the Pleistocene stage with a first occurrence (FO) marking at 1.79 Ma (Fig. 10, Fig. 11) (Lourens et al., 1996a, Lourens et al., 1996b; Cita et al., 2008; Lirer et al., 2019) constraining the maximum age for the bottom of the section to 1.79 Ma. Sample S1 contains also a

Conclusions

We conducted a study to review the planktic and benthic foraminifer content of the youngest marine deposits of the Aksu Basin (Antalya) located in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, G. tenellus, and Globoconella inflata as planktic foraminifers, and Saidovina karreriana and B. marginata as benthic foraminifers are marker species that strictly point the age of the Kargı section in the Aksu Basin to the Calabrian stage (MPle1a

Author Contribution

SK designed and conceptualized this research. SK performed the fieldwork and collected the samples with assistance of Y. Üstündağ. SK and NÖ achieved the data collection. SK and NÖ visualized the results. SK and NÖ wrote the original manuscript, contributed to the discussion, reviewing, and editing of the paper.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Y. Üstündağ for his help during the sampling campaign. We would like to thank the technician S. Akyürekli who assisted during the SEM photography of the samples. NÖ received support from the Max Planck Society and benefitted from the TÜBITAK-2221 Fellowship Program for Visiting Scientists and Scientists on Sabbatical Leave. We are grateful to A. H. F. Robertson, N. Hudáčková, and T. Algeo whose comments helped us improve the manuscript. We thank A. Dickson for the editorial handling.

References (110)

  • M. Karabıyıkoğlu et al.

    Facies and environmental setting of the Miocene coral reefs in the Late-Orogenic fill of the Antalya Basin, western Taurides, Turkey: implications for tectonic control and sea level changes

    Sediment. Geol.

    (2005)
  • A. Koç et al.

    Late Neogene oroclinal bending in the central Taurides: a record of terminal eastward subduction in southern Turkey?

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2016)
  • M. Kučera

    Chapter Six Planktonic Foraminifera as Tracers of Past Oceanic Environments

    Develop. Mar. Geol.

    (2007)
  • F. Lirer et al.

    Mediterranean Neogene planktonic foraminifer biozonation and biochronology

    Earth-Science Rev.

    (2019)
  • L.J. Lourens et al.

    Late Pliocene to early Pleistocene astronomically forced sea surface productivity and temperature variations in the Mediterranean

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (1992)
  • P.J. McPhee et al.

    Preparing the ground for plateau growth: late Neogene Central Anatolian uplift in the context of orogenic and geodynamic evolution since the cretaceous

    Tectonophysics

    (2022)
  • H. Okada et al.

    Supplementary modification and introduction of code numbers to the low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation of Bukry

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (1980)
  • F. Quillévéré et al.

    An onshore bathyal record of tectonics and climate cycles at the onset of the Early-Middle Pleistocene transition in the eastern Mediterranean

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (2019)
  • I. Raffi

    Revision of the early-middle pleistocene calcareous nannofossil biochronology (1.75-0.85 Ma)

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (2002)
  • I. Raffi et al.

    A review of calcareous nannofossil astrobiochronology encompassing the past 25 million years

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (2006)
  • I. Raffi et al.

    The Neogene Period

  • T.F. Schildgen et al.

    Multi-phased uplift of the southern margin of the Central Anatolian plateau, Turkey: a record of tectonic and upper mantle processes

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2012)
  • T.F. Schildgen et al.

    Linking slab break-off, Hellenic trench retreat, and uplift of the Central and Eastern Anatolian plateaus

    Earth-Science Rev

    (2014)
  • F. Sgarrella et al.

    Benthic foraminiferal assemblage turnover during intensification of the Northern Hemisphere glaciation in the Piacenzian Punta Piccola section (Southern Italy)

    Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

    (2012)
  • AGIP

    Foraminiferi Padani (Terziario e Quaternario)

    (1982)
  • E. Akay et al.

    Antalya Neojen Havzasının Stratigrafisi

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Turk.

    (1985)
  • E. Altınlı

    Etude stratigraphique de la region d’Antalya

    Revue de la Faculte des Sciences Universite d’İstanbul

    (1944)
  • E.M. Balmer et al.

    Pliocene-Pleistocene sedimentary development of the syntectonic Polis graben, NW Cyprus: evidence from facies analysis, nannofossil biochronology and strontium isotope dating

    Geol. Mag.

    (2019)
  • G. Bizon et al.

    Nouvelles précisions stratigraphiques concernat les bassins tertiaires du Sud de la Turquie (Antalya, Mut, Adana)

    Rev. Inst. Fr. Pét.

    (1974)
  • M.K. BouDagher-Fadel

    Biostratigraphic and Geological Significance of Planktonic Foraminifera, Second

    (2013)
  • J.H. Brunn et al.

    Structures majeures et correlations stratigraphiques dans les Taurides occidentales

    Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr.

    (1970)
  • J.H. Brunn et al.

    Outline of the geology of the western Taurids

  • G. Chaput et al.

    Sur le Pliocene des environs d’Antalya

    Comptes Rendus de I’Academie des Sciences Paris

    (1953)
  • A. Çiner et al.

    Late Cenozoic sedimentary evolution of the Antalya Basin, southern Turkey

    Turk. J. Earth Sci.

    (2008)
  • P. Cipollari et al.

    Easternmost Mediterranean evidence of the Zanclean flooding event and subsequent surface uplift : Adana Basin, southern Turkey

  • M.B. Cita et al.

    Sedimentation rates in Neogene Deep-Sea Sediments from the Mediterranean and Geodynamic Implications of their changes

    Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj.

    (1978)
  • B. Cita et al.

    The Calabrian stage redefined

    Episodes

    (2008)
  • D. Cosentino et al.

    Late Miocene surface uplift of the southern margin of the Central Anatolian Plateau, Central Taurides

    Turkey. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (2012)
  • X. de Planhol

    Contribution à l’étude géomorphologique du Taurus occidental et de ses plaines bordières

    Rev. géographie Alp.

    (1956)
  • G. Depape et al.

    Contribution à l’étude des Flores fossils d’Asie mineure

    Bull. Museum Nat. Hist. Naturelle

    (1953)
  • L. Di Bella

    Plio-Pleistocene foraminiferal assemblages of the Monte Mario site (Rome, Italy)

    Boll. Della Soc. Paleontol. Ital.

    (2010)
  • K. Emeis et al.

    The sapropel theme of Leg 160

  • R. Flecker et al.

    Facies and tectonic significance of two contrasting Miocene basins in south coastal Turkey

    Terra Nova

    (1995)
  • C. Faranda et al.

    Messinian paleoenvironmental changes in the easternmost Mediterranean Basin: Adana Basin, southern Turkey

    Turkish J. Earth Sci.

    (2013)
  • D. Frizon de Lamotte et al.

    Chevauchements post-tortoniens vers l’ouest puis vers le Sud au coeur de l’angle d’Isparta (Taurus, Turquie). Conséquences géodynamiques

    Bull. Soc. géol. Fr.

    (1995)
  • P.L. Gibbard et al.

    Formal ratification of the Quaternary System/period and the Pleistocene Series/Epoch witha base at 2.58 Ma

    J. Quat. Sci.

    (2010)
  • C.P. Glover

    Plio-Quaternary Sediments and Neotectonics of the Isparta

    (1995)
  • C.P. Glover et al.

    Role of regional extension and uplift in the Plio-Pleistocene evolution of the Aksu Basin, SW Turkey

    J. Geol. Soc. Lond.

    (1998)
  • A. Gürbüz et al.

    Geological evolution of a tectonic and climatic transition zone: the Beyşehir-Suğla basin, lake district of Turkey

    Int. J. Earth Sci.

    (2021)
  • M. Gutnic et al.

    Géologie des Taurides occidentales (Turquie)

  • View full text