Post-mortem alteration of diet-related enamel surface textures through artificial biostratinomy: A tumbling experiment using mammal teeth
Introduction
Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is a powerful proxy for oral behaviour, reflecting the mechanical properties of ingesta consumed during the last few days or weeks, and for tooth function in general. The tribosystem of occluding teeth is largely controlled by abrasion and attrition as a cause of material loss (Dahlberg and Kinzey, 1962). Patterns of wear features at μm-scales (roughness texture) can be related to feeding traits, enabling quantitative and comparative assessments of diet/ingesta related traits such as soft- or hard-object feeding among extant and fossil vertebrates (Solounias et al., 1988; Scott et al., 2005; Merceron et al., 2007; Semprebon and Rivals, 2007; Schulz et al., 2010; Winkler et al., 2013). Baker et al. (1959) were among the first to link microscopic wear features on teeth with abrasives ingested in the diet. In their study of sheep teeth, they concluded that internal abrasives, such as phytoliths, where hard enough to scratch enamel and thus indicate diet. Since then, many studies of tooth wear analyses at different spatial scales (mesowear, microwear, dental microwear texture analysis) for a large variety of vertebrates (mostly mammals) have been performed, and characteristic wear patterns related to their assumed natural diets have been described (Fortelius and Solounias, 2000; Schulz et al., 2010; Fraser and Theodor, 2011; DeSantis et al., 2013; Purnell et al., 2013; Calandra and Merceron, 2016).
In the fossil record, teeth are often the only preserved parts of animals and are therefore a crucial source of information about the feeding behaviour of extinct taxa. Dietary reconstructions based on the wear features of fossil occlusal tooth surfaces can easily be biased post-mortem due to mechanical and/or chemical modification (King et al., 1999; Dauphin et al., 2018). Therefore, reconstructions should be restricted to areas of a tooth which are relatively unaltered by post-mortem processes. This makes distinguishing between ante- and post-mortem surface alterations a crucial issue for reliable palaeodietary reconstructions based on 3DST (Calandra and Merceron, 2016).
There are two primary sources of post-mortem mechanical surface alteration on teeth (Teaford, 1988):
- 1.
Material loss occurring after death or before/during the burial of an animals remains.
- 2.
Material loss caused by excavation and preparation during/after the collection of a fossil.
Both sources of mechanical surface alteration can have an impact on ante-mortem occlusal wear features and possibly alter or obscure those wear features. Most post-mortem wear features are distinctively different in their size, shape or orientation (Teaford, 1988). In addition to mechanical alteration, chemical alteration may modify ante-mortem wear features, e.g. by acid attack in the stomach of a predator (e.g. Dauphin et al., 2003, Dauphin et al., 2018) or by dissolution processes in the soil/sediment environment. Overall, there is a substantial lack of experimental data on the effect of biostratinomy on mammalian teeth. Gordon, 1983, Gordon, 1984 tumbled extracted human molars and premolars with four different types of sediment, ranging from volcanic ash to “pea” gravel (~4–8 mm), in aqueous and non-aqueous environments for different time intervals (unspecified). Gordon found significant changes to the ante-mortem dental wear after 5 h and determined that alteration of the microwear pattern correlated positively with sediment grain size. However, tumbling seemed to abrade the identifiable microwear rather than add or produce new wear features (Gordon, 1984). Similarly, King et al. (1999) tumbled three human lower molar teeth from the late Neolithic with three different grain size fractions of sediment and water for 2–512 h and found evidence for changes in dental microwear only with the smallest grain size fraction. Coarse sand (500–1000 μm) produced no change in dental microwear and quartz pebbles (2000–11,000 μm) also resulted in little surface damage on the tooth. However, a noticeable abrasive effect was observed for the grain size fraction between 250 and 500 μm, which completely removed the original microwear features. Both studies showed a polishing effect on the dental surface rather than formation of new wear features comparable in morphology with those of the ante-mortem wear (Gordon, 1984; King et al., 1999). Nevertheless, taphonomically altered dental wear patterns could still be easily identified and distinguished from diet-related wear patterns (Teaford, 1988; King et al., 1999). For example, Martínez and Pérez-Pérez (2004) tested whether taphonomic and non-taphonomic wear features were clearly distinguishable on the buccal enamel surfaces of fossil hominin teeth from Olduvai and Laetoli (Martínez and Pérez-Pérez, 2004). In this sample, they found evidence for both chemical and mechanical alteration, as well as for well-preserved dental surface areas with no obvious post-mortem material loss, enabling the identification of taphonomically altered teeth. The combination of mechanical and chemical post-mortem wear has often drastically reduced sample sizes of analyses of fossil material (e.g., Ungar et al., 2008), however, this may not always be necessary.
All experimental studies conducted thus far are qualitative and have only been performed on human teeth. Although there are numerous studies connecting dental wear in other mammalian taxa with ingesta properties (i.e. Mainland, 2003a, Mainland, 2003b), there is as of yet no experimental approach to assess the influence of post-mortem abrasion on non-human teeth. Here we present the first experiment to quantitatively test the effect of biostratinomy on DMTA in three different herbivorous mammalian species.
We employ an experimental setup with three different sediment grain size fractions (fine to middle sand, 63–500 μm) and different tumbling time periods (from 0.5 to 336 h). Dental surface texture measurements of the same areas on wear facets were performed on teeth of three herbivorous (grazer and browser) mammals (Otomys sp., Capreolus capreolus and Equus sp.) before and after each tumbling interval, using a high-resolution disc-scanning confocal 3D-surface measuring system μsurf Custom. To quantify dental wear and detect potential alteration by the selected sediments during the experiments, two DMTA methods were employed: scale-sensitive fractal analysis (SSFA) and, what we refer to as 3D surface texture analysis (3DST). Both approaches employ optical profilometry to obtain 3D representations of the enamel surface at submicron resolution and evaluate the overall distribution and three-dimensional geometry of topographic features. In SSFA, surface features are characterised using length-scale and area-scale fractal analyses, describing complexity and anisotropy of the surface (e.g. Ungar et al., 2003, Ungar et al., 2012; Scott et al., 2006; Scott, 2012). In 3DST, standardised roughness (ISO 25178) and flatness (ISO 12781) parameters plus additional motif, furrow, direction and parameters are employed to characterise wear features (Schulz et al., 2013a, Schulz et al., 2013b; Purnell and Darras, 2016; Kubo et al., 2017; Purnell et al., 2017). A major focus of diet reconstruction via dental wear has been on the browser-grazer dichotomy in the artiodactyla and perissodactyla (e.g. Rensberger, 1973; Fortelius and Solounias, 2000; Damuth and Janis, 2011; Fraser and Theodor, 2011; Schulz et al., 2013a). The browser-grazer dichotomy is well reflected at the different scales of dental wear evaluation (i.e. mesowear, microwear, and dental microwear texture analysis). Browsers are characterised by less abraded tooth wear, which is reflected in a mesowear profile with sharp cusps (Fortelius and Solounias, 2000; Kaiser et al., 2000). The surface is dominated by high complexity and low anisotropy values (SSFA, Scott, 2012; Ungar et al., 2012) and an overall smooth surface with low microscopic peaks (3DST, Schulz et al., 2013a, Schulz et al., 2013b) and pits (microwear, Walker et al., 1978). In contrast, grazers show mesowear dominated by rounded or blunt cusps and scratches (microwear, Walker et al., 1978), with an overall greater surface roughness, higher and more frequent peaks and deeper dales but a generally less variable pattern (3DST, Schulz et al., 2013a, Schulz et al., 2013b) and high anisotropy/low complexity values (SSFA, Scott, 2012; Ungar et al., 2012).
The aim of this study is to test whether diet-related 3DST (i.e. browser-grazer differences) are resistant against mechanical alteration during sediment transport under a post-mortem abrasive regime. If biostratinomical changes on the wear facets of teeth occur, are they recognizable as post-mortem wear or do they show patterns comparable to ante-mortem wear? We therefore tested if the 3DST of teeth from a grazer (Equus sp.) and browser (Capreolus capreolus) could still be assigned to the correct dietary category after tumbling intervals of up to 336 h. In other words, could the surface texture parameters normally found to distinguish between these two dietary categories still distinguish between browsers and grazers despite mechanical abrasion meant to mimic sediment transport? We expect that different surface texture parameters will be affected differently by our experimental setup. We anticipate that parameters which describe extremes of the surface (e.g. maximum height) will more prone to alteration by abrasion compared to parameters describe mean roughness of the surface. Thus, we intend to identify parameters that show the potential to bias dietary interpretations. Our goal is further to not only test the hypothesis that sediment grain size has an impact on dental microwear texture, but that tooth geometry does as well. Additionally, we analysed the altered parameters after the experiment to test whether the extreme outliers in parameter values can be used as indicators of taphonomic alteration.
Section snippets
Material and methods
Cheek teeth from three different extant small and large mammal taxa were used to investigate the physical effects of post-mortem abrasive action on 3DST patterns on chewing facets. Due to the potentially destructive nature of the experiment, dental material with low scientific value (e.g. no precise locality data) was used. This resulted in a variable sample composition including both molars and premolars and, due to unequal preservation, different enamel facets (Fig. 1). Such a sample
Results
Only texture parameters (Table 2) showing distinct trends after the tumbling intervals are further described (Fig. 5) and only parameters with obvious alterations are plotted for the individual species in Fig. 4, Fig. 7, Fig. 8.
Discussion
Generally, we observe two different patterns in parameter values when comparing the original, unaltered surface textures with those after the subsequent tumbling intervals. “Stable” parameters are either not significantly altered by the tumbling process or follow a distinct trend with increasing tumbling time (Fig. 11). “Unstable” parameters show pronounced different values after tumbling and/or follow no distinct trend, alternating between increasing and decreasing parameter values over the
Conclusion
Tumbling experiments of isolated cheek teeth from large and small mammalian herbivores in siliciclastic sediment demonstrate a high degree of resistance of surface textures against physical post-mortem abrasive alteration during simulated fluvial transport in grain size fractions representing a sandy natural river sediment. The surface texture signatures as measured do not generally respond to post-mortem abrasive alteration as imposed by the tumbling procedure. Macroscopically these modified
Acknowledgments
This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 681450) and the Max-Planck Graduate Center. We thank the Center of Natural History (CeNak) and Dr. Irina Ruf (Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt) for the dental material. We thank Ralf Meffert and Dr. Tobias Häger (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz) for the X-ray diffraction-analysis and Prof. Dr. Frank Lehmkuhl (RWTH Aachen
References (50)
- et al.
Teasing apart the contributions of hard dietary items on 3D dental microtextures in primates
J. Hum. Evol.
(2012) Dental microwear in grazing and browsing Gotland sheep (Ovis aries) and its implications for dietary reconstruction
J. Archaeol. Sci.
(2003)- et al.
Palaeoenvironment of Dryopithecus brancoi at Rudabánya, Hungary: evidence from dental meso- and microwear analyses of large herbivorous mammals
J. Hum. Evol.
(2007) - et al.
Feeding ecology and chewing mechanics in hoofed mammals: 3D tribology of enamel wear
Wear
(2013) - et al.
Dental microwear texture analysis: technical considerations
J. Hum. Evol.
(2006) - et al.
Was grass more prevalent in the pronghorn past? An assessment of the dietary adaptations of Miocene to recent Antilocapridae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla)
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.
(2007) - et al.
Early Neogene environments in East Africa: evidence from dental microwear of tragulids
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.
(2012) - et al.
Indications for a dietary change in the extinct Bovid genus Myotragus (Plio-Holocene, Mallorca, Spain)
Geobios
(2013) - et al.
Cause of wear in sheep's teeth
Nature
(1959) - et al.
Dental microwear texture analysis in mammalian ecology
Mammal Rev.
(2016)
Ordinal Methods for Behavioral Data Analysis
Étude microscopique de I'abrasion et de I'attrition sur la surface des dents
Bull. Group Int. Rech. Sci. Stomatol. Odontol.
On the relationship between hypsodonty and feeding ecology in ungulate mammals, and its utility in palaeoecology
Biol. Rev.
Structural and chemical bone modifications in a modern owl pellet assemblage from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania)
J. Taphonom.
Diagenetic alterations of Meriones incisors (Rodentia) of El Harhoura 2 cave, Morocco (late Pleistocene–middle Holocene)
Paläontol. Z.
Direct comparisons of 2D and 3D dental microwear proxies in extant herbivorous and carnivorous mammals
PLoS One
Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
Functional characterization of ungulate molars using the abrasion-attrition wear gradient: a new method for reconstructing paleodiets
Am. Mus. Novit.
Comparing ungulate dietary proxies using discriminant function analysis
J. Morphol.
Taphonomy of dental microwear: can fossil microwear be studied productively?
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Taphonomy of dental microwear, II
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Mammals of Africa Volume III
Teeth
Tooth mesowear analysis on Hippotherium primigenium from the Vallesian Dinotheriensande (Germany)-a blind test study
Carolinea.
Effect of Taphonomic Processes on Dental Microwear
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Cited by (14)
A workflow for quality control in surface texture analysis applied to teeth and tools
2022, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsThe good, the bad and the ugly – A visual guide for common post-mortem wear patterns in vertebrate teeth
2021, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, PalaeoecologyCitation Excerpt :Mechanical and/or chemical agents can cause taphonomic post-mortem alteration of the occlusal surface during transport, burial, and the fossilisation process as well as during excavation and preparation of fossils for conservation or study. Very view studies have assessed diagenetic alteration of dental wear features under either experimental (e.g., Gordon, 1983, 1984; King et al., 1999; Böhm et al., 2019) or natural conditions (Dauphin et al., 2003, 2018; Martínez and Pérez-Pérez, 2004). In general, DMTA relies on surface scans of “good” (i.e., ingesta-related) ante-mortem surfaces, while “bad” (i.e., surfaces with attached debris or other post-mortem alteration) are routinely excluded (i.e., the “bad and ugly”) from publication (Ungar et al., 2008; Schulz et al., 2010; Purnell et al., 2013).
Dental microwear texture analysis on extant and extinct sharks: Ante- or post-mortem tooth wear?
2021, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, PalaeoecologyCitation Excerpt :A third dataset of extant shark species generated by these analyses was then employed as a reference framework to assess dietary differences. Fourth, we performed a taphonomic experiment with siliciclastic sediments of four different sediment grain size fractions (very fine sand, 51–168 μm; fine sand, 112–292 μm; medium sand, 221–513 μm: fine gravel, 2–8 mm) and different tumbling time periods (from 0.5 to 336 h) using the setup of Böhm et al. (2019), in order to simulate the effect of sediment transport on dental wear features of modern sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) teeth. Finally, a set of isolated fossil shark teeth from different species and depositional settings were measured, to infer whether taphonomic transport processes overprinted ante-mortem wear features.
Advances in the study of diagenesis of fossil and subfossil bones and teeth
2020, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, PalaeoecologyWhy should traceology learn from dental microwear, and vice-versa?
2019, Journal of Archaeological Science