Alexithymia and interpersonal problems: A study of natural language use
Introduction
The concept of alexithymia was introduced in the 70s (Nemiah and Sifneos, 1970, Sifneos, 1973) and refers to difficulties in experiencing, verbalizing and regulating emotions. Nowadays alexithymia is defined as consisting of four dimensions: (1) difficulty identifying feelings and distinguishing between feelings and the bodily sensations of emotional arousal, (2) difficulty describing feelings to other people, (3) constricted imaginal processes, and (4) a stimulus-bound, externally orientated cognitive style (Taylor, Bagby, & Parker, 1997). These characteristics are understood by Taylor and colleagues to reflect “deficits both in the cognitive-experiential domain of emotion response systems and at the level of interpersonal regulation of emotions” (p. 30). In this context, the authors suggest that alexithymic individuals communicate emotional distress to others poorly and as a result fail to enlist others for help or comfort.
Problems with close, affectively invested relationships already became clear in the early clinical observations of alexithymia (Marty and de M’Uzan, 1963, Nemiah and Sifneos, 1970). With the absence of transference and the slow-moving development of the therapeutic relation, Marty and de M’Uzan (1963) use the term “relation blanche” to characterize the interaction with these patients. Furthermore, this interpersonal style was not limited to the therapeutic relation; in terms of object relations these patients were described as lacking libidinal affect. Moreover, they seemed to be uninterested and unemotional towards significant others (Marty et al., 1963, McDougall, 1984). More recent research suggests that their relationships are marked by discomfort, avoidance, and a distance taking attitude (Vanheule, Inslegers, Meganck, Ooms, & Desmet, in press). Indeed, an investigation of the association between alexithymia (20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, TAS-20; Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 1994) and interpersonal problems (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) found that alexithymia is characterized by a cold and socially avoidant interpersonal style (Spitzer et al., 2005, Vanheule et al., 2007). Research with children and adolescents shows that those with a lower level of emotional competence (a characteristic of alexithymia) display less help-seeking behaviour with respect to family, friends, and professionals (Ciarrochi & Deane, 2001). Adult attachment studies indicate that a dismissing attachment style is related to a higher level of alexithymia (Scheidt et al., 1999), while child attachment studies found that an insecure and disorganized attachment style is associated with a developmental delay in the acquisition of mentalizing language (Lemche, Klann-Delius, Koch, & Joraschky, 2004).
To date both clinical observations and theoretical descriptions of alexithymia suggest a link between alexithymia and an interpersonal style that is characterized by a lack of investment in others. However, the studies that provide evidence for this association frequently operationalize both alexithymia and interpersonal styles by means of (self-report) questionnaires. This method can give rise to artificially high correlations due to content overlap and shared method variance (Meyer et al., 2001). In this study, we investigate the link between alexithymia and interpersonal style by means of interview data and lexical content analysis. The rationale behind lexical content analysis is that the lexical choices people make as they speak or write reveal what they have on their mind or are concerned with, irrespective of the intentions they have while communicating (Pennebaker, Mehl, & Niederhoffer, 2003). As we operationalize interpersonal style through language use on social processes, we avoid any correlations with alexithymia being attributable to shared method variance or content overlap. To our knowledge, there is no research on the relation between alexithymia and language use on social processes. However, a pilot study that we carried out prior to this study indicates that the externally oriented thinking (EOT) subscale of the TAS-20 is related to a lower use of social language (Meganck, Vanheule, & Desmet, 2008a). Nowadays, the TAS-20 is the most widely used measure of alexithymia. Nevertheless, while its psychometric properties have been widely investigated and accepted (Meganck et al., 2008b, Taylor et al., 2003), the TAS-20 has been criticized for a number of problems. First, it is not clear whether a person can judge a capacity he or she lacks (Lane et al., 1997, Waller and Scheidt, 2004), since procedural knowledge and cognitive processes are largely unconscious (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977, Vanheule, 2008). Second, the TAS-20 is highly susceptible to negative affectivity (Lumley, 2000) and it does not measure the constricted imaginal process dimension of the alexithymia construct. To tackle the problems attributed to TAS-20, its authors have recently introduced the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia (TSIA; Bagby, Taylor, Parker, & Dickens, 2006) as an alternative measure.
In this study we use both the TAS-20 and the TSIA to measure alexithymia. We primarily investigate the association between alexithymia and interpersonal style through the analysis of natural speech. We expect that alexithymia is related to a lower use of social words because of the lack of investment in relationships with others and that this will be the case for both frequency and complexity (number of different words) of communication word use and references to others. Next to this, we investigate the convergence between the alexithymia measures.
Section snippets
Participants
The sample consisted of 50 patients (62% female) from psychiatric hospitals in Belgium, with a mean age of 41.56 years (SD = 11.41). In terms of education, 6% attended elementary school only, 14% completed a first cycle (3 years) in high school, 62% completed a second cycle (6 years) in high school, 14% obtained a non-academic degree in higher education, and 4% received a university degree. All participants met DSM-IV axis I criteria for the following diagnoses: mood disorders (68%), anxiety
Preliminary analyses
Descriptive statistics for scores on the TAS-20, TSIA, language variables, and NA are presented in Table 1. Mean alexithymia scores were comparable to other studies using clinical samples for the TSIA and slightly higher for the TAS-20. Compared with community samples, mean scores were higher for both instruments (Bagby et al., 2006, Taylor et al., 2003). In terms of socio-demographic variables, independent sample t-tests showed a significant difference between men and women for complexity of
Discussion
This study primarily investigated the relationship between alexithymia and interpersonal style. Two measures of alexithymia were used (the TAS-20 and the TSIA), and interpersonal style was measured through lexical analyses of clinical interviews. Secondarily, the convergent validity between the TAS-20 and the TSIA was investigated.
Our results show that the TAS-20 total score and the DIF and EOT subscales had a negative effect on the complexity of communication words. These results indicate that
References (33)
- et al.
The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale – I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(1994) - et al.
The assessment of alexithymia. A critical review of the literature and a psychometric study of the Toronto alexithymia scale-20
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2002) - et al.
Is alexithymia the emotional equivalent of blindsight?
Biological Psychiatry
(1997) Alexithymia and negative emotional conditions
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2000)- et al.
The 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale. IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2003) - et al.
Somatoform disorders as disorders of affect regulation. A study comparing the TAS-20 with non-self-report measures of alexithymia
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2004) - et al.
Interpersonal problems and personality characteristics: Psychometric studies of the Swedish version of the IIP
Personality and Individual Differences
(1996) - et al.
The development of the Toronto structured interview for alexithymia: Item selection, factor structure, reliability and concurrent validity
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
(2006) - et al.
Emotional competence and willingness to seek help from professional and nonprofessional sources
British Journal of Guidance and Counseling
(2001) - Hogenraad, R. (2003). The Protan software of computer-aided content analysis. Unpublished...
Inventory of interpersonal problems
Mentalizing language development in a longitudinal attachment sample: Implications for alexithymia
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
La pensée opératoire
Revue Française de Psychanalyse
L’investigation psychosomatique
The “dis-affected” patient: Reflections on affect pathology
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly
Cited by (42)
A case for emojis, more or less: An analysis of word and emoji expressivity in text messaging for high and low alexithymia levels
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorAlexithymia and self-harm: A review of nonsuicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts
2020, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :A consistent and well-replicated finding across different samples is that individuals who report elevated levels of alexithymia are less likely to feel supported by other individuals in their social environment (Fukunishi and Rahe, 1995; Karukivi et al., 2011; Kojima et al., 2003; Lumley et al., 1996; Picardi et al., 2003; Posse et al., 2002; Wells et al., 2016). As well, individuals with elevated levels of alexithymia have been found to experience high rates of interpersonal problems (Vanheule et al., 2010a) and that alexithymia is characterized by a cold, socially avoidant, and hostile interpersonal style (Jordan and Smith, 2017; Meganck et al., 2009; Spitzer et al., 2005; Vanheule et al., 2007). A significant relationship between alexithymia and social, family, and romantic loneliness has also been uncovered.
Alexithymia level and response to computer-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy among cocaine-dependent methadone maintained individuals
2015, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Computerized CBT therapy may reduce the complication of lessened emotional awareness in social situations by offering information about how to deal with urges to use, offering other solutions instead of pursuing drugs, and do so without the added difficulty of processing internal experiences in the presence of a clinician. Given the findings in previous work that suggested that those with alexithymia may encounter difficulty relating to therapists (Ogrodniczuk et al., 2005; Rasting et al., 2005) and difficulties those with higher levels of alexithymia may encounter recounting emotions in therapies that require interpersonal communication (Meganck et al., 2009), it is possible that the less interactional nature of computerized CBT was more helpful in the population examined here. This relationship appeared to persist during follow-up, but not at a statistically significant level, possibly due to sample size.
Alexithymia in anorexia nervosa: The mediating role of depression
2015, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :For this reason, complementary measures, especially for the assessment of the DIF and DDF factors, relying less on self-report would have been beneficial. Considering that EOT does not require participants to make judgments about their own deficits with regard to the experience of emotions (Lane et al., 1998; Henry et al., 2006), some authors argue that EOT is the most pure (Meganck et al., 2009), objective (Lane et al., 1998), and accurate (Henry et al., 2006) alexithymia subscale. However, the low internal consistency found in some studies (e.g., Prazeres et al., 2000; Loas et al., 2001), including ours, document the instability of the EOT factor solution (Kooiman et al., 2002) and limits a reliable analysis of this alexithymia dimension.
Measures of Alexithymia
2015, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs