Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 126, Issue 8, August 2019, Pages 1181-1188
Ophthalmology

Original Article
Genomic Landscape of Sporadic Retinitis Pigmentosa: Findings from 877 Spanish Cases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.018Get rights and content

Purpose

We aimed to unravel the molecular basis of sporadic retinitis pigmentosa (sRP) in the largest cohort reported to date.

Design

Case series.

Participants

A cohort of 877 unrelated Spanish sporadic cases with a clinical diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and negative family history.

Methods

The cohort was studied by classic genotyping or targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and array-based comparative genomic hybridization were performed to confirm copy number variations detected by NGS. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction was assessed in sRP cases carrying de novo variants to confirm paternity.

Main Outcome Measures

The study of the sRP cohort showed a high proportion of causal autosomal dominant (AD) and X-linked (XL) variants, most of them being de novo.

Results

Causative variants were identified in 38% of the patients studied, segregating recessively in 84.5% of the solved cases. Biallelic variants detected in only 6 different autosomal recessive genes explained 50% of the cases characterized. Causal AD and XL variants were found in 7.6% and 7.9% of cases, respectively. Remarkably, 20 de novo variants were confirmed after trio analysis, explaining 6% of the cases. In addition, 17% of the solved sRP cases were reclassified to a different retinopathy phenotype.

Conclusions

This study highlights the clinical utility of NGS testing for sRP cases, expands the mutational spectrum, and provides accurate prevalence of mutated genes. Our findings evidence the underestimated role of de novo variants in the etiology of RP, emphasizing the importance of segregation analysis as well as comprehensive screening of genes carrying XL and AD variants in sporadic cases. Such in-depth study is essential for accurate family counseling and future enrollment in gene therapy–based treatments.

Section snippets

Cohort Description

A cohort of 877 unrelated Spanish cases (475 female and 402 male participants) with no family history of retinal dystrophy was selected from the database at Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital (FJD, Madrid, Spain). All patients had been referred to our unit for genetic testing because of clinical suspicion of RP. Specific exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) family pedigree compatible with AR, AD, or XL inheritance; (2) visual deficiency with onset before age 1 year and compatible

Mutation Detection Rate and Mutational Spectrum

A cohort of 877 sRP cases underwent comprehensive analysis of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and CNVs, as detailed in the genetic algorithm in Figure 1. Likely disease-causing genotypes were identified in 330 patients, and thus the overall mutation-detection rate was 38%. A total of 304 different variants were found in 56 different genes, including 298 SNVs and 6 structural variants (SVs). Figure 2A shows the overall frequencies of disease-causing genotypes in the mutated genes. Of note, 6

Discussion

Most patients with IRD referred for routine genetic testing in Spain are sporadic cases of RP. The lack of a priori knowledge about the mode of inheritance, along with the intrinsically high clinical and genetic heterogeneity of IRD, hampers efforts to establish an accurate clinical diagnosis in these patients. In addition, doubts remain as to the likelihood that a sporadic case with an initial suspicion of IRD will have positive genetic test results. To shed light on this issue, we performed a

References (36)

  • R.S. Ramrattan et al.

    Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2001)
  • A.I. den Hollander et al.

    Lighting a candle in the dark: advances in genetics and gene therapy of recessive retinal dystrophies

    J Clin Invest

    (2010)
  • C. Hamel

    Retinitis pigmentosa

    Orphanet J Rare Dis

    (2006)
  • C. Ayuso et al.

    Retinitis pigmentosa and allied conditions today: a paradigm of translational research

    Genome Med

    (2010)
  • K.M. Nishiguchi et al.

    Genes associated with retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases are frequently mutated in the general population

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • R. Perez-Carro et al.

    Unravelling the pathogenic role and genotype-phenotype correlation of the USH2A p.(Cys759Phe) variant among Spanish families

    PLoS One

    (2018)
  • R. Riveiro-Alvarez et al.

    Frequency of ABCA4 mutations in 278 Spanish controls: an insight into the prevalence of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2009)
  • K. Neveling et al.

    Identification and analysis of inherited retinal disease genes

    Methods Mol Biol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Genetic characteristics of suspected retinitis pigmentosa in a cohort of Chinese patients

      2023, Gene
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the later stage, the visual field is tubular and completely blind at middle or old age. RP is inherited in a complicated mode, encompassing autosomal dominant patterns (AD, about 20 %), autosomal recessive manners (AR, about 30 %) and X-linked inheritance (XL, about 10 %), occasionally digenic modes and mitochondrial inheritance also have been reported (Kajiwara et al., 1994; Beales et al., 2003; Hartong et al., 2006; Martin-Merida et al., 2019), which further indicates the typical genetic heterogeneity of RP. Meanwhile, those without a family history were referred to as sporadic cases, and the proportion of sporadic RP is approaching 40 % (Martin-Merida et al., 2019).

    • Inherited retinal diseases: Linking genes, disease-causing variants, and relevant therapeutic modalities

      2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Aiming to tabulate a list of the most common reported IRD-related disease-causing variants and genes worldwide, we performed a literature search using google scholar for relevant key words (retina, genes, cohort, mutation, disease, pathogenic, variants, identified, IRD, inherited retinal disease) and obtained a list of 748 hits. We subsequently excluded 515 irrelevant papers from the list (e.g. focused on topics other than IRDs, described IRD variants in a small cohort of patients, etc.) and the remaining 233 papers were screened for those detailing specific sequence variant information for relatively large cohorts of over 35 cases (a total of 31 papers-the “IRD cohort papers”; Table 2) (Abu-safieh et al., 2013; Birtel et al., 2018; Carss et al., 2017; Colombo et al., 2021; Ellingford et al., 2016; Ezquerra-Inchausti et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2021; Haer-Wigman et al., 2017; Holtan et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2015; Hull et al., 2020; Jespersgaard et al., 2019; Koyanagi et al., 2019; Lenassi et al., 2020; Martin-Merida et al., 2019; Nassisi et al., 2018; Perea-Romero et al., 2021; Rodríguez-muñoz et al., 2020; Sallum et al., 2020; Sharon et al., 2020; Stone et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2013, 2015, 2018, 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Weisschuh et al., 2020a; Xu et al., 2014; Zampaglione et al., 2020; Zeitz et al., 2019; Zernant et al., 2011, 2017). We then extracted genetic information from tables that were provided in the IRD cohort papers to obtain the total number of solved cases and their reported disease-causing variants.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplemental material available at www.aaojournal.org.

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

    I.M.M. and O.Z..: Sponsored by the CIBERER.

    M.dP.: Supported by a PhD fellowship from the Conchita Rábago Foundation.

    M.C.: Supported by the Miguel Servet Program (CPII17_00006) from ISCIII.

    Supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) of the Spanish Ministry of Health, including the Center for Biomedical Research Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER 06/07/0036), FIS (PI16/00425), and IIS-FJD Biobank PT13/0010/0012; and from Regional Government of Madrid (CAM, B2017/BMD37), all partially supported by FEDER (European Regional Development Fund). The Spanish National Organization for the Blind (ONCE), the Spanish Fighting Blindness Foundation (FUNDALUCE), University Chair UAM-IIS-FJD of Genomic Medicine, and the Ramon Areces Foundation supported our work.

    HUMAN SUBJECTS: Human subjects were included in this study. The human ethics committees at the IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital approved the study. All research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent.

    No animal subjects were used in this study.

    Author Contributions:

    Conception and design: Martin-Merida, Corton, Ayuso

    Analysis and interpretation: Martin-Merida, Avila-Fernandez, del Pozo-Valero, Zurita, Perez-Carro, Aguilera-Garcia, Riveiro-Alvarez, Ana Arteche, Trujillo-Tiebas, Lorda-Sanchez, Garcia-Sandoval, Corton, Ayuso

    Data collection: Martin-Merida, Avila-Fernandez, Blanco-Kelly, Zurita, Perez-Carro, Aguilera-Garcia, Riveiro-Alvarez, Ana Arteche, Trujillo-Tiebas, Tahsin-Swafiri, Rodriguez-Pinilla, Lorda-Sanchez, Garcia-Sandoval, Corton, Ayuso

    Obtained funding: Ayuso

    Overall responsibility: Martin-Merida, Avila-Fernandez, Del Pozo-Valero, Blanco-Kelly, Zurita, Perez-Carro, Aguilera-Garcia, Riveiro-Alvarez, Arteche, Trujillo-Tiebas, Tahsin-Swafiri, Rodriguez-Pinilla, Lorda-Sanchez, Garcia-Sandoval, Corton, Ayuso

    M.C. and C.A. have contributed equally.

    View full text